So this video sort of plummeted my hopes in this game.
The guy answering questions had no fucking clue how to respond to most of the questions(im only ten minutes in). FUcking laughed my ass off when he said interstellar wasnt based on any real science and the interview responded that a Theoretical Physicist consulted the entire thing. Criiiiiiinge.
The game looks great, but it sort of sounds like things arent all as they first revealed. idk if its worth the full price.
>>333232620
And my dumbass forgot to post the link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhuATJFqNis
>comments and ratings disabled
I wonder why.
>>333232620
> believing hype for anything
c'mon anon
IT'S 2016
All that texture loading hold shit its noticable and annoying me why.
>>333232683
Almost none of this shit looks like gameplay or even game
>>333232620
>expecting the makers behind Joe Danger and Joe Danger 2: The Movie to make anything grand
...
The problem with any game that gets stupid big is there is a whole lot of nothing to do. And in this game you're dealing with planets and galaxies; not even user generated. I mean you'd need to hire like all of Mexico to have each planet be unique. I guarantee when the game comes out theres going to be like 4 different types of planets and about 20 palette swaps repeated hundreds of times. Oh and nothing to do.
>>333235108
this, 3d starbound.
does he ever say "no thats actually not in the game" at any point? i bet none of the actual interesting concepts are in this
lol at the LOD. the planet literally changes to a completely different planet once you get close enough to see the terrain
