Ran like shit on the PS3.

How well does it run on PC?

>>332948172
it's 2016, you're allowed to have shit taste, OP. You do you.

As someone actually likes ff13
This shit wasnt remotely good, who in the blue hell thought a timed game was a good idea?

>>332948172


was waiting wor a PS4 port.

because like >>332948247 said, it was chugging on PS3, but the game was fun.

>>332948334


liking any game means you have shit taste nowadays.

File: 20160310195007_1.jpg (354 KB, 2560x1440) Image search: [Google]

354 KB, 2560x1440

>>332948247
>How well does it run on PC?
Fine for the most part. Still slowsdown in few places in towns, not a big deal.

>>332948247
Ran fine on PC but I have a relatively high end setup

I'd probably be playing it now if I could play FFXIII-2 on my PC. Probably the worst port I've ever seen, crashes every half hour and framerate is obscenely inconsistent with stutter every few seconds.

The first game didn't perform very well either, but at least it was consistent. This is unplayable, which is unfortunate since the combat is better with more options than the first game and there are actually things happening in the plot (characters are worse though unfortunately)

is this game lightening dressup simulator?

and >>332948247

>how well does it run on PC?

>>332948414
the time limit is mostly irrelevant unless you're really bad

>>332948414
I was disappointed how little that time limit actually mattered. It does nothing, I'm done with main quest and still two days left, not much that I want to do left.

>>332948664
Interesting, don't remember it crashing on me. On the other hand even Arkham Knight worked absolutely fine on my system.

File: 36_large[1].jpg (39 KB, 600x855) Image search: [Google]

39 KB, 600x855

>>332948664
Oh, in case it wasn't clear I was talking about FFXIII-2 in this post, not LR.