>So the game has been received relatively poorly overseas.
Tanabe: By those who can't accept any kind of change. *Laughs* But among our real customers, no, of course not.
>Can you elaborate?
Tanabe: The people who have been vocally opposed to the new kind of Paper Mario, from the beginning, have been very adamant about two points: Make the game easier by bringing back experience points, partners, and easily exploitable combat, and make the game story driven, so they don't have to actually play it. This isn't the kind of audience we really want to appeal to, so we're disregarding all comments of that nature towards the title.
>So you consider all criticism towards the title to be unfounded?
Tanabe: Of course not. However, we are taking in complaints from the group of people who have actually played and completed Sticker Star. The amount of people who say they 'hated' Sticker Star because they couldn't get past the first few areas, in my mind, aren't the people to listen to. Our main priority, for this game, is to improve on the Sticker Star formula. For example, hints on what you need to do are less vague, and you no longer have to worry about a finite number of attacks.
>
Source, please.
>>332940681
>you no longer have to worry about a finite number of attacks
Well that is an improvement, and was my main concern. I can't say I like his attitude though.
>>332940681
First off, Source?
Second off
> Make the game easier by bringing back experience points, partners, and easily exploitable combat, and make the game story driven, so they don't have to actually play it
>Easily
>Exploitable
>Combat
Has this guy ever played his own games?
>>332940890
Googling what he wrote brings up only an interview that has the same layout, but nothing that OP said.
Also
>>332941087
A game designed wouldn't call his combat "easily exploitable" even if it was
>>332940890
Clearly his father works for nintendo
>>332941087
Yeah, he's talking about how easy it is to stack badges in ways that lead to players breaking the game.
Both of the traditional PM games have them.
>>332941943
No he's not, since the interview is fake
>>332940681
>real customers
>>332940681
>make the game story driven, so they don't have to actually play it
Fucking what?
How the hell does that work? Since when did the story from paper mario remove us from playing the game.
Am i just interpreting this wrong here?
>19 KB
>same screenshot
>same title
So how much do they pay you to shitpost?
>>332942240
Has it ever occurred to you that you might not be their target audience? Stop being so entitled.
>>332940681
>Tanabe: By those who can't accept any kind of change
Doesn't sound like a Nintendo rep at all. stopped reading.
>>332940681
Sorry Japan but everyone in America just want the same thing over and over again. They just want to get an nostalgia hard on. Please disregard us.
>>332942370
>you might not be their target audience
I purchase their games so yes I am, retard.
Can we at least agree the OST for the game sounds nice?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3irbsRozEk
>>332942447
The people who enjoy the games are. YOU are not the target audience, they do not give two fucks about you and any kind of opinion you have is immediately thrown into the trash.
>>332942553
Nintendo has never, EVER implied any of that.
>>332942553
>>332942447
>>332942370
>>332942240
>>332942317
>>332942441
>>332942717
>>332942518
That's cool and all but the interview is fake
>mfw I honestly can't tell if the people falling for this are real or not
>>332942717
All Nintendo developers laugh at losers like you who think they know how to make a game.
>>332942904
>random, unsourced meme pic that anon probably edited himself
>even if that pic is real it literally has nothing to do with the argument at hand
Nice job proving your point, retard.
>>332942904
They would if the interview were real
Nobody could fall for such obvious bait, right?
>>332942904
why would anyone just want 1st gen pokemon only? I just want a game that has all the regions with their respectful pokemon in them. I know it wouldn't be a bad game.
>>332940681
Nice source senpai
>>332942904
I really hope this quote is true
>>332943119
Its not like that doesn't sound exactly like shit devs, usually western devs, have said before.
>>332940681
Nice bait
>>332943085
>not recognising that incredibly old bait picture
How underage are you?
April Fools day was yesterday.
>>332942904
Oh, please don't copout like that. They don't make games for indie developers or some shit they sell their games to an AUDIENCE and they do not have to know how to learn Python or some shit.
Nothing is more cuck than continuing to support a dev that treats it's fanbase like this.
>>332940681
YEAH THIS LOOKS REAL TO ME
>>332940681
>This isn't the kind of audience we really want to appeal to
Fuck off Nintendo I hope you rot in hell.
>>332943824
I know right? Fucking Bioware can go fuck themselves
>>332940681
>The people who have been vocally opposed to the new kind of Paper Mario, from the beginning, have been very adamant about two points: Make the game easier by bringing back experience points, partners, and easily exploitable combat
>we are taking in complaints from the group of people who have actually played and completed Sticker Star. The amount of people who say they 'hated' Sticker Star because they couldn't get past the first few areas, in my mind, aren't the people to listen to.
Damn this man holds no punches, /v/ confirmed for casuals who want movie like story experiences and game systems that can be invalidated by EXP grind.
>>332943647
>Nintendo and most other major developers
>Python
You really are clueless, aren't you? Enjoying a video game is one thing, but knowing what makes a good video game is a completely different thing.
>>332944162
You mean you're telling me Nintendo is catering to developers and not the target audience?
>>332940681
You missed April Fools, it seems?
Unless someone can provide a valid source.
>>332944214
I'm saying that Nintendo know how to make games for their target audience, the target audience doesn't know what they want.
this is fake but i laughed anyway
Tommorow OP will repost this and legitimately ask for answers while the source will be a screenshot of this thread. I know because my wife's son's dad work at shitposting.
>>332944872
>>332944872
>>332942904
a game with all of the regions would be fun
re work the starting towns of gen two and above to have train stations or something
you beat the elite four of one region you can go to the next region
you can't bring any of your pokemon from the regions you already beat into a new one until you beat the elite four in that region or some other end region criteria
>So, you're a faggot.
OP: Yes, I enjoy cocks and usually have one in my anus
>Can you elaborate?
OP: Right now about fifty men have their dicks inside me somewhere, with another fifty on the way. My doctor says the amount of AIDS I have is too high to count, but I won't let that stop me.
>So you consider all men to be sexually desirable?
OP: Yes.
>>332942904
This is such a funny image, because it's so true.
>>332940681
That source.
>>332942904
I think they should just make one big Pokemon MMO with all the best features included in each explorable region, with all new Pokemon and stuff added
just keep updating it with DLC and people will never fucking leave, look at WoW, people STILL play that trash after over a decade
>Do you have any final words for those Paper Mario fans worried about the direction the series is going in?
>Tanabe: [laughs]
>people still eating this shit up even without a source
this board is so gullible
>>332947501
did you see this place yesterday? jesus christ /v/ is the worst it has ever been
yesterday was even worse than GG shitters at their fucking PEAK
>/v/ falling for such obvious bait
>>332947742
/v/ has been shit tier for a long ass while, long before GG
Yesterday is what happens when the moderation encourages shitposting instead of trying to stop itit's the future of this website
>ITT: What if eastern devs behaved like western devs
>>332947779
>Implying modern Nintendo doesn't deserve every bit of criticism, justified or not.
>>332948006
>long before GG
I have to disagree, sorry. /v/ was totally tolerable pre-GG.
not a single funny meme has come from this board since then.
>Write some bullshit
>Cite no source
>Retards will jump on the thread like roaches
every time
>>332948110
>nintendo deserves criticism for a fake interview made up specifically to stir the emotions of newfag autists
i like to pretend posts like these are just bait but i know this retard genuinely believes the shit he's spewing
>>332943119
There's 2 anons asking for source in the first three replies and then a guy who obviously googled for one in the next.
I think you underestimate how fucking stupid people are.
>That image and file name
This is the same exact fucker that's been spamming threads with the same
>So now we can all admit this looks pretty good
OP. He subsists on Color Splash bait.
>>332948110
Bait
You're basically saying misinformation and propaganda are good, that full retardation.
>>332949495
It's from a Japanese interview that isn't in English yet.
You can't link something that the majority of people can't read. I still remember how SuperMetalDave tried to 'prove' Niji was Sun and Moon by linking to a Japanese website and claiming that the symbol for Niji was hidden in the source code or some bullshit.
>>332949764
Not that guy but anything is good if it bring down the censorship-house.
>>332940681
Yeah, sure.
>>332950436
Where the fuck is the shell??
>falling for this poorly written trash
/v/ is fucking retarded
This never happened but /v/ will believe it anyway
>>332950372
Oh yes so let's plug click-bait articles so that we sway the opinions of uneducated people.
Surely these people care about censorship too and that's why they request it so much.
Really it's as simple as tell the big N you don't want it and don't buy it, not make a witch hunt out of it.
This is videogames anon, not politics.
Money is their primary goal at the end of the day not presenting themselves as upstanding companies.
So again, that's retarded.
>>332950436
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P27ZsrQ_wFE
>>332940681
>But among our real customers, no, of course not.
Nintendo has customers?
Fake interviews should be a bannable offense
>>332954680
is there ANYTHING that's still a bannable offense on this piece of shit board?
i've never seen a single fucking (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) in YEARS.
every person that participated in yesterday's shameful display should be banned for fucking life.
