[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>Graphics power is more than doubled >2.2 times more powerful
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 73
Thread images: 7
File: ps.jpg (41 KB, 620x349) Image search: [Google]
ps.jpg
41 KB, 620x349
>Graphics power is more than doubled
>2.2 times more powerful GPU
>1.3 times more powerful CPU
>1.1 times faster RAM
>RAM size may be upgraded to 8.5GB for 4K rendering
>Through update It can run 30fps games at 60fps
>$399

Are you ready for bloodborne in 60fps? FFXV? Kingdom Hearts? VR at 120fps?

If you're not getting PS4K you're pretty much giving up gaming as a hobby, because this where it's at. How does Sony do it ever single generation?
>>
60 fps confirmed? I would sell xbone for this if true.
>>
So do I need to buy a 4K tv for it?
>>
>>332677305
BULLSHIT
Double gpu power would be a R9 290x equivalent GPU and that alone cost $350.
>>
My only problem with buying a PS4 was that it was only 10% better than the PS3. If this is really true, I would definitely buy a PS4, but it might need more exclusives first.
>>
>>332677798
No. 1080p TVs benefit from downsampling aswell.
>>
File: image.jpg (135 KB, 782x809) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
135 KB, 782x809
>>332677305
>/v/ actually believes there will be a console that can run games at 4k in 2016, while ps4 can barely keep 30 fps at 1080p
>>
>>332677892
>PS4 was that it was only 10% better than the PS3
Are you fucking serious?
The PS4 gpu is 20x times more powerfull than a PS3. Compare the nVidia 7800Gtx vs Amd Radeon HD7870.
>>
>>332677305
Where are you getting this information from, your ass? Or worse, neogaf?
>>
>>332677305
Listen up mate, you can't just Bloodborne at 60fps with more graphical power if the game, as a lot of Jap games are, was hardcoded and locked at 30fps.
>>
>>332678094
Nobody said that. 1440p is likely target for 30 fps though.
>>
>>332678284
so much for yelling "doubled graphic power".
>>
>>332678107
Yet, it still played games at 30FPS and SOMETIMES 1080p, something that the PS3 already did. Doesn't matter if it isn't being used at all.
>>
Even a 2.2 times faster GPU will not guarentee existing games can run at 60fps because the slow ass CPU is struggling enough as is, so a potentially doubled amount of draw calls and increased resolution will strain it even more.
>>
>>332678094
let them dream
>>
When you examine cost for cost, there's zero reason to stay in the "Playstation Ecosystem". Sony has delusional aspirations for the console gaming industry, not understanding that it's a value industry first and foremost. Good entry price and long life cycles are what people look for in a console.

No real reason to pay higher prices for games, be locked into proprietary peripherals, and pay money a second time to use my own internet connection if there is no lengthy fixed hardware cycle.

Consoles have become a strictly "end of life" cheapo purchase at this point.
>>
>>332678094
that cat has such a punchable face
>>
>>332678484
>Being this tech illiterate
In that case N64 games also ran at 30FPS, does that mean the PS3 is as powerful as the N64?
>>
File: 1430594184915.jpg (73 KB, 372x500) Image search: [Google]
1430594184915.jpg
73 KB, 372x500
>consolefags
>not even once
>>
>>332677305
I don't care about fps or 4k shit and will buy it anyway.
>>
>>332678094
Bloodborne is literally the only game that dips below 30, delusional pcuck
>>
>in 2000 sony created the best video-game console of all time, the PS2

what the fuck happened to them that made them so shitty now
>>
>>332677305

Watching console plebs getting excited about the latest shitbox is like watching some pleb ass ricers in their pimped out miatas while you cruise past them in your m3.
Always worth a chuckle.
>>
>>332678856
Normies
>>
>>332678831
Have you played the FFXV demo? The frame rate is garbage.
>>
File: 1432152025525.gif (4 MB, 275x206) Image search: [Google]
1432152025525.gif
4 MB, 275x206
>own pc
>been playing games at 60fps since 1995
>>
>>332678284
1440p is a monitor resolution, making it the standard makes no fucking sense. 1080p 60fps is more likely, or just keep 1080p 30fps because devs are lazy anyway.
>>
>>332678831
so does witcher 3
>>
>>332677305
>GPU as powerful as two 7850s
>still weaker than a GTX680
>a 5 year old high end card
>meant for VR
>>
So basically console manufacturers have realized that new consoles aren't making the technological leaps they used to and have decided to start treating them like iPhones instead.
>>
Bullshit, games already take up 20 gig some even more, how the fuck are they going to fit on the Blu Ray disc when the resolution is quadrupled?
>>
>>332679367
this. it was predicted that this gen consoles will have the shortest life span
>>
>>332677305
If any of that were actually true, you be looking at a $1000+ console.
>>
>>332679492
Screen resolution doesn't have anything to do with file size.
Now if they decide to use more detailed textures and models in response to this that's a different story.
>>
>>332677881
I imagine the new card would probably be based on polaris. Otherwise the console would generate too much heat.
>>
File: 1426199095438.jpg (39 KB, 375x375) Image search: [Google]
1426199095438.jpg
39 KB, 375x375
>>332677305
What the fuck am I reading? That's not nearly strong enough to run games in 4k or VR.

It's like I'm in 2012
>>
It's all bullshit. they're only differentiating this POS because the original and current PS4 is literally incapable of 4K output. It does not have the right decoder.

All the 'PS4K' will be will be a PS4 with a modest overclock and RAM upgrade, plus the decoder. This only point of it will be to watch 4K bluray movies, which they'll be announcing alongside it. They'll try to say it will improve VR experience and other BS but it's truly just a modest upgrade to make the system a better bluray player.
>>
>>332680705
this. they might as well have snuck it in silently like other upgrades that was done to the 360 and ps3.
>>
>>332678959
>>332678959
Im not too worried abut that tho, considering every update post release is optimization and frame rate improvements anyway, a demo before the release figures to be pretty poorly optimized anyway
>>
>>332680267
That's because it's not gonna natively display games at 4K. It's Sony's masterplan to upscale them to 4K.
>>
>>332678094
4k is the price
>>
>>332680705
yeah this is most likely. I guarantee it will improve framerate stability though.
>>
>>332678959
it's also 900p
>>
File: silky smooth 14fps.jpg (42 KB, 639x347) Image search: [Google]
silky smooth 14fps.jpg
42 KB, 639x347
>>332678831
>>
>implying devs can just simply update games to 60fps

It's far more complicated than that
the devs might not have multi-threaded it properly, PS4's new GPU might not have extra compute, the CPU might be the bottleneck, etc etc

Bloodbornes heavy alpha effects will stop it from getting 60fps unless PS4K is way more powerful
>>
Literally a PC at this point.
>>
Is there going to be a trade in option? If there is ill be all over this shit
>>
>>332682412
This, its on the Devs to make use of the upgraded hardware.

Recently, the PS4 allowed game devs to make use of its 7th of 8 processors, normally reserving the last two processors to perform system functions, and really only future games can benefit from that.
>>
I'm only excited for the PS4K because it will tank the secondhand PS4 market and I can get one for dirt cheap without giving any money to Sony to play the three or four games on the system I'm interested in.
>>
ALSO, important point here, if the ps4k is that much better, devs would make games specifically for the ps4k, not the ps4, since only the 4k would have the power to run it. imagine the riots. it figures to be more powerful but 60 fps power is highly doubted.


The Nintendo NX tho, gonna be bitchin
>>
>>332677305
>8.5 GB of RAM
>>
>>332677305
Is it going to be as expensive as the PS3 when it first came out?
>>
>>332677305
Good goy
>>
>>332677305
If this thing can do 1080p60fps with no drops, I will buy it.
>>
I think that all this is just retards blowing a new model out of proportion
>>
This is so fake that it's crazy /v/ is believing it.
>>
>>332683087
Fucking this.
>>
>>332677305
this is really getting me mad serously faggots , think about it we own a ps4 yet pc faggots have far more good looking graphics , me myself i just bought a brand new pc with perfect specs playing 1440p gaming BUT STILL i'm going to play dark souls 3 on ps4.. i ask myself why? so i will part of a stupid community where we are suckers for those sony bastards?? fuck this shit. the only reason i bought a ps4 is because i'm waiting for it to jailbreak..

btw my spec:

Quad Core i7 6700K Skylake 4.0Ghz S1151
MSI Z170A KRAIT GAMING S1151
Gigabyte GTX980Ti EXTREME 1216Mhz 6G DDR5
Fractal Design Define R5 Titanium with window
Corsair 750W 80+ Gold RM750
Corsair Hydro H110i GTX Extreme
>>
>>332678856
at the time, the PS2 was actually the equivalent of a high end PC, as in when it was released in 2000 The PS2 could run Ubuntu, and it was thought to be a replacement for the computer.

PC got faster according to "Moore's Law" where (i might be wrong) transistor density doubles every two years, meaning more processes, more speed, more game.

When the Ps3 came out, ps3 was a middling PC, and with PCs coming out every year with better processors, graphics cards etc, its impossible for consoles to catch up while maintaining a lower price that everyone can go for.

Consoles are sold at a loss (most of the time) when they first come out with the price of the parts dropping as time goes on, and this is because manufacturers sell it cheap and when the person buys games they get to grab that dough too. They cant get sick hardware and sell for a super-loss to where it takes quite a few games to make up for that loss. E
>>
>>332678831
https://youtu.be/1VEKCCe3JAs?t=34s
>>
This is the biggest anti consumer shit Sony has ever pulled
>>
Fuck off poorfags. If you can't afford a super computer PS4 that is your own problem. A few hundred dollars is nothing to cry about.
>>
>>332683657
It's neo-/v/ anon. Full of children who believe anything without needing sauce. Neogaf always took rumors seriously while 4chan was the opposite, but with Neo-/v/, the children will butcher their own brains for desire to believe in anything.

I've been noticing it every passing year on here.
>>
>>332679624
It didn't help that the 7th gen dragged on for nearly a decade. When the 8th gen consoles launched they were already years behind PC.
>>
>>332682412
>>332682960
>>332678281

wrong. Bloodborne engine supports 60fps, just look at DS3 on PC. It would be simple to add 60fps support for it.

stay mad though. enjoy dota and league of legends!
>>
>>332688840
Capped.
>>
>1 ram stick and a new GPU
>Some minor stuff on cpu/ram which you could get overclocking with a new cooler
>$400
Consoles as usual
>>
>>332678094
Sony can actually do it you know that right? They have hardware engineers far more capable than manchildren building lego's from PC parts in their basement. They are in the business of creating cheap consumer electronics, although they have a premium line of products, the price tag really is fucking premium.

They can and should make a high end console, just so that the option exists but they know full well it'll be redundant because games are actually made with PS4's and XB1's in mind. It's pointless for them to make a 4K console.
>>
if you have the money just buy a PC at this point

It pretty clear that sony is milking the cow
>>
>>332677305
>CPU is still a huge bottleneck
welp
>>
>>332678831

kek
>>
>>332689561
>They can and should make a high end console
This is always, always, always Sony's problem. They make low to mid-end products and slap a high-end price on them.

If Sony wanted to be in the high-end graphics business, they should have designed their own GPU, not enter the console market.
>>
File: 17.jpg (42 KB, 700x525) Image search: [Google]
17.jpg
42 KB, 700x525
>>332684623
>at the time, the PS2 was actually the equivalent of a high end PC
THIS IS WHAT SONYGGERS BELIEVE

ahahahahahahha
AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Thread replies: 73
Thread images: 7

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.