>/v/ keeps going on and on about the Nvidia 970 3.5 VRAM issue
>it was never proven to affect performance in any game, unless you're playing at 4k, which the card wasn't designed for
When will this meme end?
i wonder who could be behind this post
>not owning a R9 390
i sure am enjoying 4k gaming
Skyrim with a bunch of texture mods
Lords of the Fallen with Ultra settings
Shadow of Mordor maxed out
>>332419609
keep saying that to yourself
>>332420362
>Lords of the Fallen with Ultra settings
That's not actually true.
Played the game in January on max settings and while it gobbles up all 4 gigs of VRAM it doesn't stutter. There is one area in the game where I dropped to 50's and that had nothing to do with memory utilization.
Can't speak for the other two games though.
>>332419609
It's true though.
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/198214-198214
>>332420816
They released a patch to optimize the VRAM usage because the game came bundled with GTX 970s for a time when it came out and they were choking with ultra textures once you exceed 3.5GB.
>>332420362
>Shadow of Mordor maxed out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sT_HQOJ0I4
>>332421656
Hush, AMDfriends need their two minute hate.
>get cucked by nvidia
>cheaper AMD cards get the same or better performance and don't have gimped vram
>still in denial and trying so hard to justify your mediocre purchase
>>332419609
>When will this meme end?
I'm going to post about it twice as much to piss you off.
