Post trilogies that had 3 objectively good games
Pic related, Arkham games
But there's 4 Arkham games
>City was good
Asylum > city > knight > origins
>>332408712
>Knight was good
>>332408968
I didn't say that
> People shitting on Origins still
I understand being salty about the twist, but it was a great game.
Origins wasn't made by Rocksteady and City/Knight are objectively good games.
Asylum > Knight > City
>Anything but Asylum was great
>>332409341
I fucked up tthe wording on that, The only good game was Asyulm. All the other games were too big.
>>332408292
Demon's Souls
Dark Souls
Bloodborne
>>332408292
Asylum was amazing, the others were fucking shit.
>>332408292I'm going to regret posting this, aren't I?
Asylum = City >>>> Origins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Knight
>>332410149
Origins is just a better version of City, less original though
>>332409481
Dark Souls 2 was made by FROM.
>>332410149
>>332410321
Knight was a better version than both games
Arkham Asylum is the best because you can pick up baddies over your head and fuckin' CHUCK EM'! This move is absent in later installments.
Rogue Squadron
Sure 3 was not as good as the first two but they're all good games
>>332408292
>>332409989
i agree with you man
>>332408292
mother
Why all these Arkham threads lately?, because of BvS?. I'm not complaining, don't get me wrong, i love these games (i bought a PS4 just for Arkham Knight), so, it's a pleasure to discuss them.
If you are WB shills making some market test, i say yes, make another game already. Just don't screw the PC port and the collector's editions this time.
>>332409108
It was mediocre.
Try playing City and then going straight to Origins.
The city design is horrible, half the buildings can't be scaled for no reason, the combat feels sluggish, the """""new""""" gadgets are lazy ripoffs of the City gadgets and the side missions are awful.
The only thing that makes that game worthwhile is the writing.
>>332408292
The mgs trilogy was pretty good. Shame they didn't make any more games.
