Whats /v/ verdict?
Is it a scam or not.
here's a video of chris roberts trying to play the game that y'all gave :him a hundred million dollars to make: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWq8ynUq7wM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUrpNvimhPc
Here's gameplay of an actual person playing a recent build, I've been having a lot of fun with it.
>>332370467
original release date was november 2014, fambly
>>332370780
And the game was greatly expanded on and it takes longer to develop technology to support that, not to mention the actual content's development
So yeah, completely justified delays considering they've doubled the length of Squadron 42, added planetary content, added a ton of sandbox political systems and shit in addition to technology that allows you to have different gravity settings in different sectors of a ship/station (scene in the engine).
>>332370780
Even before the original campaign ended they extended the date to 2017
>>332371123
and uh, when do you expect that they'll deliver on all of that, exactly
>>332369989
It is a legitimate videogame for distinguished gentlemen such as myself.
Source: I am Blaine.
>>332371667
Certainly not a year after their initially targeted date
Let's say late 2017 and give them until Summer 2018 until we shitpost about their progress
Feature Creep: The Game.
>>332371667
2018 just to nice and delay Derek Smart's suicide by a year.
>>332371802
when you can watch any "10 for the chairman" video and see enough red flags to bring a tear to lenin's eye, i'd say it's more than safe to shitpost about star citizen
if you paid for it yes
if you didn't, no
>>332372040
Well then at least admit it's speculation until the game is done.
>>332370258
christ that was painful
doesn't help he looks like a mong
I'm sure I've paid more for worse fully developed games that this.
>>332372603
no, sorry
you're asking me to look at this jenga tower of lies as it all falls down and say that "well it might not collapse *entirely*", and i just can't. not even to spare your feelings. so sorry