>look up game review on steam
>greentext stories
>x/y would z again
>0.5 hrs played
Why is this shit allowed?
>>331882295
Steam comedians. It's because everyone wants to be a comedian and get upboats. Blame reddit and twitter.
>>331882295
Everyone on Steam wants approval, how shocking. Everyone on /v/ is the same, fishing for replies with bait image and circlejerk thread like Stardew Valley. NEWS NEWS. Acccept it.
>>331882815
Wait. Are you mad that someone put time and effort into their reviews?
>>331882815
At least it's helpful.
>>331882295
>monkey see legitimate funny and original greentext screencap
>omigod im gonna be like one of those 4chaners and be super funny and look like I'm ahead of the memes
>except like 30 other guys got the same idea
>unfunny autism ensures
>>331883041
Even more important. SHMUPS are all about replayability, it's important to know whether it uses conventional systems or not.
>>331882815
>>331883041
>being insight and in depth in a game review is a bad thing
You know, you would probably make it pretty big in game journalism.
>>331882491
It's not really reddit or twitter, it's just how retards have always acted. Look for reviews of anything from any point of time during the internet's lifespan and you'll find an infinite number of this same shit going on across every medium and for decades.
>implying vidya greentext stories work outside of STALKER and /k/
>>331883570
tl;dr
>>331883745
tl:tr
learn to read
>>331883570
tldr
>>331883570
tl;dr
>blatant spoiler for the end of Firewatch in a Steam review
Firewatch is shit but what if it had been for a good game? Steam reviews are garbage if they can just be posted like that with zero moderation. I made sure the guy who posted the review got a nice good ban, though.
>>331883570
tl;dr
>>331884375
Everyone better watch the fuck out, Hall Monitor over here doesn't take no shit.
>>331884375
I know. Someone spoiled CS:GO for me in a steam review, and now I don't want to even touch the game.
![1345919316126s[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/v2BcA88.jpg "1345919316126s[1].jpg")
>>331882295
>230 hours played
>i don't recommend this game
gee
>>331882295
>greentext story reviews
literal the worst type of faggot
>>331884725
He must know what he's talking about.
>>331884725
>game was good enough to put 230 hours
>then they destroy the balance and completely ruin the game or the devs just act like cunts
i don't see a problem
>>331884725
>game starts out good
>turns into crap
Some people feel this way about TF2 and Payday. I don't personally, but I can understand.
>>331882295
What i hate:
>4000 hours
>I think the game is good ;)
HUEHUEHUE
>>331884631
thats understandable, i wouldnt go through that again either.
>>331884725
>Warning you off destroying your life with something as potently addictive
Sounds like a bro to me
>>331884938
This place has made me despise smileys so much, even worse when my family and friends keep fucking using them when writing to me.
>>331884725
>Game is shit because X/Y
>You've hardly even played it, shitposter!
>Game is shit because X/Y
>You wouldn't have played it that much if you hated it, shitposter!
>>331882295
>someone thinks that people want to read his 10 page thesis on why x is good/bad game
I hate steam comedians as much as the next guy, but I'm also not gonna read an essay from someone I don't know and possibly has completely different tastes to me, just bullet point pros and cons and then maybe, MAYBE a couple sentences as a summary.
>>331885308
xD Me too anon lol!
>steam "review"
>it's someone's incredibly long personal vendetta against the devs
>someone's passionate defense of the ground they walk on that decries anyone who hates it as a hater
>someone who can't handle the difficulty but says they could handle harder games anyways
>someone standing on a soapbox preaching how this game is "not your average CoD game"
I hate all of these, every time someone gets into a rant about the game itself it inevitably tangents off into almost complete irrelvancy because the person writing it gets preachy
I just want to read about what makes the game good or bad, at least the "funny" guys only give me a sentence of garbage
>>331885445
>READING IS HARD :(
That's why they give more than one review. People who don't have ADHD can get one that actually has reasons and opinions, and you can get your bullet points.
>>331885308
Jesus fucking christ, how new are you?
That's one of the saddest things I've read all day.
>>331885308
>hate smileyfags
>get called out if I don't use them because I seem like a fucking square
:(
>>331885308
hahaha ikr!?!? smileys should be censored too! xP
>>331885615
>he writes novels for reviews
it's not that reading is hard, it's that it's a waste of my fucking time, why should I put the same amount of time reading the review of a nobody, rather than an established reviewer? Basically NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR SHIT OPINIONS.
>>331886247
OK.
