>>331721758
$35

>>331721758
yes, best AAA game since GTA4

Online is Pay 2 Fun.

>>331721758
yes

>>331721758
eh. i guess. as long as you don't care about multiplayer and want a decent singleplayer game then go for it.

>>331722859
>>331723067

Honestly couldn't give less of a shit about MP.

How is the gameplay compared to RDR? I know it's an odd comparison but I thought RDR's gunplay and movement felt fantastic. Just wondering if GTAV took anything from it.

>>331723416
i don't know man. there's very little similarites between the two other than having a distinct rockstart game feeling. rdr is like 10 or 15 years old now right? probablt the best horseback riding in any game, the cars in gta5 do not have the best feeling in any driving game.

>>331723628
He's talking about Redemption, not Revolver.

OP i can get it for you for 30 bucks on mexican steam if you want

>>331723416
they replaced all the horses with cars

>>331721758

not particularly.

the series got pretty stale after SA.

>>331723628

I just mean in terms of overall movement. RDR had this great, weighty feel to character movement and the way firefights played out.

And yeah, the horses were the best in any game, period.

>>331723942

Nah, I appreciate it though.

>>331724168

I haven't played a GTA since VC.

>>331724049

So it's like RDR with cars?

>>331724324
>I haven't played a GTA since VC.
then what are you doing nigger. play nigga simulator gta sa.

>So it's like RDR with cars?
not him but i wouldn't say that. rdr was like a hub world with large open plains whereas gta5 actually had a city plus a rural area in the desert. gta5 map design was honestly pretty shitty.

>>331724537

How's SA on Steam?

>>331724807
well i heard there was issues with music licensing running out so the in game radio got butchered. back in the day i ripped all my songs to the ps2 and played them through the game anyway but people seemed upset. other than that i really don't know. i would say be cautious and that it could be a mobile port ported to pc.

>>331721758
where are you getting this for $40?

>>331721758
Yeah, great game you'll sink at least 30 hours in it

>>331725207
More like 15

File: Untitled.png (504 KB, 980x794) Image search: [Google]

504 KB, 980x794

>>331725115

>>331725501
oh
hmmmm

does this game run okay wit a 750ti?
I don't expect high settings, but does it run well enough on medium textures and stuff?

>>331725708
i don't know faggot why don't you try typing in gta 5 minimum spec requirements into google. or why not gta 5 benchmarks. maybe you can figure it out.

>>331725708
>>331725872

Alternatively, buy it, play it for 1.75 hours and return it if it isn't up to your standards.

My guess is that it'll probably be pretty rough, even at medium or lower.

>>331725708
Getting 30-60FPS in 720p on mostly minimum, using 5850

>>331722859
Get gud then. I have not paid a cent, and have ~110mil, a yacht, and all the cars and houses I can own. If you play the game you will make money or be a faggot and pay money for fake money that you will lose because you are a scrub

>>331726086
thanks, i think i can get it to run at 45-60 if i do some config tweaks