I'll just leave this here
>>331245367
This hasn't been confirmed as anything yet, or? So it's safe to assume that it's just another elaborate troll.
Welp
Huh. Never noticed the guy in the hoodie smoking.
>>331245780
I think that's a statue anon
What am I looking at?
I don't know what I'm supposed to be looking at.
>>331245559
0:06
https://youtu.be/LMcscM_Hogc
>>331245559
Nah it's real. Guy claimed it's part of the dev kit in another thread. It's a ubisoft game on the screen.
Since OP was too lazy to give context, this is from a 2 year old Unreal Engine 4 demo
http://www.technobuffalo.com/2016/03/18/nintendo-nx-controller-leak-fake/
This either means the NX can run UE4, or someone photoshopped this shit
>>331245559
It's not even that elaborate.
This shit happens every time something is about to be announced.
>>331246019
Of course its fucking photoshopped. Are you stupid?
>>331245965
>Epic Games
>Nintendo
That shit's fake alright
>>331245367
Here. I fixed the fingers covering the screen problem.
>>331245367
Please pick it up, littering's not cool
>>331246406
Man, that thing was such a damn disappointment
>>331245367
More proof of legit devkit leak.
>>331245367
This wasn't posted on /v/ already?
>>331250085
Everyone was too busy shitposting.
>>331249920
(You)
>>331246019
>This either means the NX can run UE4
Is that incredible or something? It seems like a UE4 tech demo is exactly the sort of thing that would be running on an NX just lying around in the office.
>>331250368
Well considering EA and others said Wii U couldn't run it at least that proves they didn't fuck up and make the NX an underpowered piece of shit
But who knows
>implying they'd make it look exactly like the patent.
They purposely make it not look like the final product so they don't give it away.
>people seriously don't want this
>>331250890
>people seriously want this
>>331250890
You cannot use that map.
>>331251742
why
just move your thumb off the buttons for like two seconds and put them back on
you seriously don't need to see the map all the time in MH
>>331250890
Put the map down there on one side and a customizable hot bar for items or simple actions like pinging and I'll be happy.
But take the action the hell off that screen.
>>331245971
That doesn't mean it's real you dumb sack of shit I hope you die.
>>331250890
>people seriously want their games to be in a format that literally nobody uses or have it be in a normal rectangle format with the image cut off
>>331250890
No I don't that's fucking awful
>>331246145
>Of course its fucking photoshopped. Are you stupid?
http://www.destructoid.com/are-these-leaked-images-of-the-nintendo-nx-controller--349431.phtml?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
> The first thing I did when we saw this image was run it through a program often used to tell if an image has been Photoshopped, based on highlighting aspects of an image that will be inconsistent in Photoshops.
> While the image shows evidence of multiple times being saved over, this could be explained by the presence of the large black rectangle and date stamp on the image. It looks otherwise consistent, leading us to suspect that the image has not been Photoshopped significantly.
In other words, calling it fake via Photoshop is not an option.
>>331245971
>It's a ubisoft game on the screen.
But it's not, it's a screenshot of a UE4 demo reel.
Cuck off.
I'm guessing it's a prototype. I'm hoping beyond hope that it is not real.
I'd imagine it's haptic-based if it's real. If that's what it is, I'd expect it to not do very well and then the same technology to pop up somewhere else [in actual tablets/surface books] and be successful.
>>331250745
Look at Wii U patents. Exact same design as patent. Stop rejecting the proof
>>331253484
The screen can be used for fucking any format, man. You just don't draw anything on the parts of the screen you're not using. You want a shitty square display constrained between the two control sticks, you can have that.
But literally every game which took advantage of the free-form screen would have double the resolution and would look twice as good.
>>331245367
Looks like leddit face.
>>331255443
>double the resolution
No it wouldn't. Not unless the actual resolution of the oval is double the resolution of whatever you are comparing it to. Which is unlikely because it's a fucking oval not a rectangle. How are they going to double it perfectly?
>>331246916
And now it's completely unusable unless you mod it.
Alright, alright, I will provide you a brief elucidation. What the embodiment in the image is representative of I do not know, it may or may not be a prototype related to the project of interest, it may or may not be a final design to the consumer. What I do know is what I originally said, and that x distinguished excellencies/individuals have expressed indignation about this situation (and earlier events this year). I have full trust in my source. These leaks are unfortunate.
I have no intention to troll anyone or cause a commotion. My original post was primarily a way for me to express my thoughts about this. While it is of course nice to have something to discuss in termsof NX, I am hoping that future stories of this calibre house less harmful properties. I have faith in this clarification providing sufficient eligibility.
>>331255443
>double the resolution
You are an idiot
>>331255784
>>331256608
I was speaking figuratively, retards.
The actual value ends up being like 1.3x as many pixels on screen, up to like 1.5x depending on the exact shape of the ellipse and placement of the analog sticks. It's still a big deal, since most of that is widescreen real-estate.
>>331246275
>implying the Unreal engine is used solely by Epic
