[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
You hype for dem epic epic Samurai battles?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 30
Thread images: 7
File: For-Honor-E3-2015-news.jpg (56 KB, 750x400) Image search: [Google]
For-Honor-E3-2015-news.jpg
56 KB, 750x400
You hype for dem epic epic Samurai battles?
>>
The idea is good but I don't get hyped for concepts anymore, especially coming from Ubisoft
>>
>Ubisoft

Go to bed, Yves.
>>
I give my life
Not For Honor
>>
>>330430494
Last year I was hyped for this and the division.
After what happened to one I've already tuck&rolled off the hype train for the other.

It's sad because the concept looked fun to me.
>>
File: Getting hype for a bad game.png (869 KB, 753x706) Image search: [Google]
Getting hype for a bad game.png
869 KB, 753x706
If it's anything like Chivalry then nope
>>330430945
But for (You)
>>
>>330431208
What's a buttfor?
>>
>Inb4 complete derail over the fact there's women knights in active combat
>>
File: 1456920656965.png (76 KB, 233x208) Image search: [Google]
1456920656965.png
76 KB, 233x208
>>330430494
>Ubishit game
>>
>>330430494
>playing as anything but knight
>>
>>330431559

I don't think there's anything vaguely realistic about this game, so I don't see why /v/ would get upset over that.
>>
>>330431441
For pooping, silly.
>>
>>330431813
You see your major error here is that you think /v/ needs a reason to be upset.
>>
>>330431441
For fucking, silly.
>>
It's literally Ubisoft's Evolve
>>
>>330430494
I already play Dynasty Warriors. Why do we need some edgy deadliest warrior copycat?
>>
>>330432082
Because Dynasty Warriors is shallow as fuck and the PvP is weak. For Honor has a really interesting guard system along with dodging and attacks that make a difference when and where they're being used.
>>
>>330430494
>rock paper scissor mechanic
>epic
>>
>>330432082
DW is bad, Anon.
>>
>>330432287
But you can see which they're using, and have to try countering it before they counter it, and they can feint. It's like a really slow mind game.
>>
>>330432235
>DW
>shallow
I get that musou games aren't for everyone but which one did you play tha t you felt was shallow?
>>
File: 1456159521091.gif (1 MB, 500x281) Image search: [Google]
1456159521091.gif
1 MB, 500x281
>>330432379
Dynasty Warriors 3 and 4.
Played the first Dynasty Warriors Gundam on PS3 as well.


They're utterly and completely shallow.
>>
>>330432368
Which is not an epic battles.
Its qtefest game when dueling, mindless button mashing when mauling the mobs.

Also
>opening gates and charging out of fort when you're under siege
>>
File: msfrusrs.jpg (400 KB, 1920x1040) Image search: [Google]
msfrusrs.jpg
400 KB, 1920x1040
>Ubishit

Also, For Honor is going to blow. It's literally dumbed down Mount and Blade with shitty MOBA mechanics. The lock on requirement for fighting other players will make 1vN engagements next to impossible.
>>
File: 267187_front.jpg (123 KB, 640x903) Image search: [Google]
267187_front.jpg
123 KB, 640x903
>>330430494
I have my epic samurai battles right here.
>>
>>330432447
>can guard, guard break throw, dodge, flank, or out prioritize an attack with either speed or range


What's the QTE?
>>
>>330432447
I'm not defending it entirely, because to me it seems boring as fuck, but there's definitely potential in the combat. More focus on positioning and being able to change swing direction during a swing, if done right, would help. Especially if it let you target other people during a swing.
>>
>>330430890
Nahh this game should be in the clear, since the game play was fleshed out in the demo from ages ago. Wasn't this a joint studio development thing?
>>
>>330432441
>Dynasty Warriors 3 and 4
There's your problem.
>>
>>330432441
>They're utterly and completely shallow.
YOU FLAMING IDIOTS
Thread replies: 30
Thread images: 7

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.