Should rereleases of older video games (on GOG, Steam etc.) have silimar disclaimers?
>Disclaimer: This product was released when games were good.
>Dear parents: EDUCATE YOUR FUCKING KIDS
>Sincerely, the Creator
Content ratings already don't work, what makes you think this would?
>>330300763
kek
really? books? like any fucking normies read books nowadays anyways
>>330300494
Was 2008 that long ago?
>>330300921
Nigga its from the 1700s
>>330300880
What kid is reading Kant?
Parents: Expose the true nature of the hniverse to your children and allow them to trancend humanity and cross the dimensional planes in order to recieve ultimate understanding and wisdom. The journey is treacherous, but those who seek truth will forfeit anything to find it.
>>330301109
College kids.
I should start reading books. Is that one any good?
>>330301373
Film is a superior medium. Use your limited lifespan wisely.
>>330300921
retard alert
>>330301373
It's probably good if you're at all interested in ethics or philosophy. Kant was the guy who basically started secular deontological ethics
>>330300893
Too bad you can even manage to read a fucking post.
>really? books?
No. He was obviously talking about video games.
>>330300494
Yes, as it's preferable to changing them. See the Pokemon VC release.
>>330301617
I dont think the second part of his post was referring to mine.
>>330301721
What was changed in Pokemon VC release?
>>330301449
>Film
enjoy your pleb shit
>>330302025
Enjoy innate intellectual shallowness.
>>330300494
>have silimar disclaimers?
> for videogames
Yeah:
"If you bought this from anyone besides the original creators, you're a fucking idiot for reinforcing shitty copyright and public-domain-never laws."
>>330300494
I don't think it'd make a difference. The kind of people who intend to bitch aren't going to be deterred by a disclaimer.
>>330300494
>This book is a product of its time
What a stupid fucking disclaimer. Every work in human history is a product of its time. Are people really so sensitive and/or stupid they don't realize that it's implicit?
>>330302289
You mean films?
>>330302916
yeah
>>330302942
Nah, kino and films are good. It's movies and flicks you should avoid.
>>330301373
No. If you wanna read philosophy, read something more refined. Kant is basically glorified new age mumbo jumbo.
>buy old game on Steam like Max Payne or Thief
>run into a bunch of issues and problems
Is there no QA for this type of shit? Sure, you could fix it, but why should you?
>>330304229
Kant on consciousness is probably the best philosophy you'll read from a German, but the writing is practically impenetrable even if you already know what he is trying to say.
>>330304259
http://pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Category:Windows
Both Max Payne and Thief have fanfixes.
>>330304867
I know, but that's fucking ridiculous. They can't put working versions of the games on the store?
>>330305037
Sometimes they do. Many GOG games have patches already preapplied.
But you're still better off checking if fans didn't release a newer version and updating if necessary.
>>330304493
>philosophy from a German
>the writing is practically impenetrable
Why did you repeat yourself?
>>330300494
Is there something offensive about Kant? I don't remember what I learned about him in my philosophy class
>>330305220
This, Steam has zero quality control with older games, GoG implements any available fixes with the game.
>>330305323
All the special tumblerinas taking a few philosophy courses to pad their BA with get triggered AF when they read a book filled with references to "man", "men", and "mankind"
>>330305323
I want to say he was sexist and thought that it was the duty of women to serve men or something. I forget
