it wasn't that bad.
>>322983639
Next you're going to say Assault was good
ass salty?
EDO SOO TAVOOK GENERAL SCALES
>Peppy and Slippy looking like they do something relevant in the game from that cover
show me the stair fax!
>>322983639
Wasn't that good either.
>atrocious voice acting
>enemies are all meat walls that take ages to beat down, but they only come at you one at a time, making it a tedious beat down
>backtracking
On the flip side
>fantastic dungeons, solid puzzles
>excellent music
>haggling
>good grafics
It's a mixed bag. 8/10 because the positives outweigh the negatives significantly in my opinion.
YOOU PAY THIIIIIS MUCH
I liked Assault more
64 was a game 2
>>322983929
it was good
>>322984773
"Wasn't that good."
8/10
C'mon IGN.
graphics were suck. 9/10.
>>322985739
That's my personnel subjective opinion. I like it because I have nostalgia for it and am willing to overlook it's flaws when playing it.
Objectively it's probably around a 6.5
>>322985739
MMMMMMMM NO THATS TOO HIGH
NOBODY BRINGS ME GAMES ANYMORE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOPx4s0sxfU
is Jon still friends with new york?
