/v/ is put in charge of writing da rules for video games. These are universal rules that apply to any new video game being made. Each /v/ user can add 1 rule.
What rule do you put down?
NO LITTLE GIRLS DOING LEWD THINGS
No regenerating health
NO "NO LITTLE GIRLS DOING LEWD THINGS" RULE
Games must come with a physical or digital instruction booklet
All player characters must be blank slates for the player to self insert into, characters with their own motivations and personalities are no longer allowed.
Troy Baker is not allowed to voice more than 2 characters per year.
All games MUST support every possible mode of input for the system they run on.
>>322594830
All games must be finished at launch and have no microtransactions. Expansions are fine.
Every rule has to be approved by me to stop shitty rules like>>322594906
>>322595102
what games have this?
No FPS elements.
All games must run at 60FPS minimum, no matter what.
>>322595656
Expansions are basically micro transactions.
You're paying for more content
>>322596390
Expansions are not 'micro' in any way.
No killing unnamed unimportant people/mercenaries/soldiers or whatever.
Any game can be as lewd as the developers wanted to and no silly sjw nonsense to get in the way
>>322595327
Troy Baker must voice all male characters and at least 25% of the females.
No ablebodied, cis white men as MC
all rules above this rule are moot
>>322594992
>>322596146
Kill yourself
>>322596659
Mad "serious gamer" shooter cuck.
All games should be multiplatforms, and be released on all supported platforms at the same time.
>>322596587
No ablebodied, cis white men
>>322596462
You still paying either in call of duty for extra guns or for two new classes with a few more levels.
Just cut the bullshit, its all the same shit
>>322597097
No men
>>322597136
No humankin
>>322597215
No FtM chatacters, nothing that looks like a phallus (missiles, bullets, swords, actual penises, vertically oriented buildings, etc)
>>322597109
so how new are you exactly
>>322597561
>who cares if I'm paying 5 or 20 dollars for, your still paying
>>322597793
>horse armor and Shivering Isles are the same thing because they cost money
>>322597793
Your perspective is apparently skewed because you've only played games from this decade. In the better years of gaming expansion packs were whole new campaigns, complete reworks, things like that. What you're describing is DLC.
fuck undermeme
1.For every ARPG JRPG you make you musT make 1 turn based one
2.Games that feature fanservice parts are fine but games that are purely fanservice like Neptunia and Senran are not
3.MAKE SOME 90'S STYLE JRPGS IN HD YOU DUMB FUCKS JUST DO IT AHHHHHHH
>>322597932
Yeap. You still paying money for extra content.
>>322594830
No Quick Time Events
No escort Missions.
FUCK escort missions
I want the endgame to be extremely grindfest but without RNG loot
Day 1 DLC is forbidden, if content was available on the first day of playing, then it should be in the game and shouldn't cost extra money.
>>322598060
You guys got arguing differentiating microtranactions and DLC. Microtranactions both can and can not be DLC depending on, you know, you're downloading it. Everyone agrees buying say expendable items, tiny bits of content at a time to milk a game, or essentially locking content of a full game is bullshit but that all has different terminology.
Yes, expansions can be DLC and they can be bullshit. Most of the time you will feel dirty having to give more money but there are exceptions.
>>322594830
Game must WORK on release, a.k.a they are not allowed to be published by Electronic Arts.
None of this fucking "sim city is always online oh whoops sorry it doesn't work on release day xD" shit
>ITT: Shit taste and bad opinions
No fanservice, ever
>>322598305
I argue that whether it be fan service or just any kind of flashiness that makes up a game it's okay as long as certain standards are being met in keeping it interactive. A game doesn't have to be demanding to be fun, plain and simple.
All video games must have an approval rating of at least 70% from at least 10 review sites AND at least 55% of its internet reception through well-secured polls/ratings before the game can be released to any market.
The character creator must allow you to customize at minimum all the simple aspects of anything you can use to customize your character.
>>322599754
>Game must be reviewed by the internet before being released to the public
all antagonists voiced by Jim Cummings
>>322594830
ALL THE FEMALES SHOULD HAVE PHAT ASSES
>>322599754
wow that's retarded
every video game must go through 3 years minimum pre-production before actually starting working on the project.
Every male child character must be voiced by either Antony del Rio or Yuri Lowenthal
>>322594830
every MC has to be elsa
All 3D camera-based (pretty much all) games must have an FOV of 108 degrees, as this is the focal length of a 1 mm thick lens required to see every nook and cranny from the entrance of my asshole, like just imagine you're looking into my asshole like a sniper scope and you want to see all around, you would need a 108 degree view from a 1 mm thick lens, which probably has a focal length one tenth of my penis.
>>322594906
(subnote: Little brown girls are ok)
No visuals allowed, games must be text only.
>>322600157
>>322600470
>Implying SEGA knows how to not shoot themselves in the foot
>Implying Nintendo knows what their fanbases want
>Implying Big Red Button cares about their fans over cinematic experiences
>Implying implications
I guess it's true that the internet'd make some games viral like what happened with Gone Home, Undertale and all that shit so there's that, but are you sure that a company like Nintendo thinks they're making a good game or at least a marketable game when making that Amiibo Festival or Big Red Button completely abandoning older franchises? SOME external source needs to tell these companies why they're wrong, even if it isn't the internet. Really I'm just pissed at all these low quality games being made and continuing to take inspiration from each other but these devs just don't seem to do what most people want like releasing x game or, like Sega, have made some great games but completely stray away from them for no reason to make some horseshit again.
>>322594906
We have to reconstitute what this means:
>No,
as in no and no exceptions, boolean right and wrong, okay, and then there's
>Little,
as things that suffer from dwarfism, you-you get the idea.
Once you buy a game it is yours.
No more of this license purchasing BS
>>322595085
Why? Fuck that. Reading manuals was never fun, and it never will be.
>>322594830
Every video game must have sexy furry girls in it.
>>322601071
them rubber dams
like putting a glove over your gums
shit feels oddly comfy when they put it on
