I want a multi million budget 1939-45 FPS with single player AND multi player. It's been 8 long years since the last one. Imagine the possibilities with todays technology regarding graphics! Activision, you hear me?!
Vote here: http://strawpoll.me/6364779
>>321793210
kill yourself
>>321793756
You don't like killing Nazis, you Nazi?
remember when all we got were fucking WWII games? it was like a joke and lots of people were tired of it. Now all we have is this tacticool near-future bullshit. I miss storming normandy in Medal of Honor
>>321793210
>wants a game made by Activision
you might as well just jump of the bridge fucking faggot
sage
>>321793210
reddit: the thread
>>321793865
I don't like playing as the bad guys
plenty of WWII games in the world
sorry if you can only handle FPS
>>321793210
>people wanting future shit or contemporary garbage against sandniggers
what the fuck is wrong with you people
>>321793210
That's not how it works. Call of Duty dictates the time period 99% of shooters take place in.
>>321793210
How's your first day on 4chan friend?
>>321793895
>normandy in Medal of Honor
those fucking 24/7 omaha beach servers in DoD:S
NO one wanted to be on the american side.
>vietnam
>1969-1973
I vote that this thread was made by a millennial.
The reason I named Activision is because they are at the moment THE ONLY company who said it was plausible with a new WW2 game.
In all honesty senpai, there's never been a more relevant time to churn out "vs. terrorist" games with ISIS on the rise.
t. knower
>>321793210
>No option for Korean War
End yourself, fampai
id like dice to do a ww2
>>321794346
What? I'm sorry but 1969-73 is the only important era of the Vietnam War. As all are taughtin school.
>>321794234
I played it and it was geat. But it aint 1939-45 and does not have a multiplayer.
>>321794179
no, not at all. but I ain't a dickhead.
>Not wanting to kill Chinese with your M1
