>OS: Windows 7 SP1 64bit, >Windows 8.1 64bit Windows 10 64bit
>Processor: AMD® FX 8150 3.6 GHz or Intel® Core™ i7 2600 3.4 GHz
>Memory: 8 GB RAM
>Graphics: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 750, ATI Radeon™ HD 7850
>DirectX: Version 11
>Network: Broadband Internet connection
>Storage: 50 GB available space
>Sound Card: DirectX 11 sound device
http://www.pcgamer.com/dark-souls-3-system-requirements-revealed/
Who /hype/ here?
This can't be right, can it?
Those are low as shit. My 980 will destroy this game.
>>320430115
>>Storage: 50 GB available space
>>320430115
>"You Died" spec
>50GB
I shouldn't be surprised
>>320430115
Cool, I can run it just fine
day 0 pirate
won't finish
unintalled
changed my mind, I won't even bother
>>320430115
>ps4 spec
>blu-ray space requirement
another fucking console port. When will the industry get their shit together?
Whatever, just be better than DSII plz
>pcgamer
Nice hoax there kiddo. 0/10 didn't even try
>>320430596
>20gb of game
>30gb of cutscenes
its over
from turned ds3 into a cinematic shitpile
why does his keep happening
>>320430798
When has Souls or even Kings Field ever not been a console game?
>2012 laptop w. Radeon HD 8730M
What are my chances, bros?
>>320430798
I don't care as long it's 60fps.
>>320431002
>20 Gb of game
>1 gig of graphics
>0.1 gig of hitboxes
>0.00001 gig of gameplay
>18.89999 gigs of midi music
Gaming is dead
>>320430341
>Not storing it on your extra 10 TB Hard drive.
>>320431123
stick to dragon's dogma maybe
>>320430798
bloodborne is 28 gb though, i expected the same size
shit visuals no shadows low res textures 30fps cap confirmed
day one pirate every single day
I'm really mad right now
My PC doesn't even support DX11.
>>320430115
IT'S THE EXACT SAME REQUIREMENTS AS SOTFShttp://store.steampowered.com/app/335300/
>>320430341
how small is your hard drive that you need to actually manage 50gb
>>320430115
My $300 budget pc that /v/ said could compete with the ps4 can't play this. Thanks a lot.
>>320430115
what will the system requirements for the ps4 be, I hope I can run it without haVing to upgrade my graphics cards and download more ram
>>320431979
My fucking sides
>>320432157
Yes it can.
>>320431979
I think it's minimum
>Network: Broadband Internet connection
>implying
I'll just solo through this like I did for every other Fromsoft game.
>>320430341
>50 GB available space
im sick of the new games being huge on PC meme
What is there that requires so much space? Souls games don't exactly have a ton of video or audio, so I'm kinda surprised.
>>320432148
50 GB is a significant portion of a 1 TB drive. Some people also like to install their currently played games on a smaller SSD.
Not that I'm complaining, just surprised.
>>320431979
That's minimum you fuck wit.
>>320432323
Nope.
>>320431610
>>320432148
>live somewhere with shit internet, not even third world country
>50gb would take me AT LEAST 2 days of downloading
These filesizes are not ok
>>320432571
>>320432404
Buy the disc
>muh steam playtime
>>320432114
What Ben Garrison has to do with it though?
>>320432686
>implying the disc won't only have a steam installer on it
>>320430115
Those are my exact specs hory sheeit
>>320432435
Wasn't there a mention of 60 minutes worth of cutscenes in the The Know leak? But even then, they're probably just in-game rendered as every cutscene in DaS except the opening.
>>320432686
will there be a physical release?
>>320430341
Fuck me familia
How much is a 500gig SSD these days?
Can I maybe run it on lowest settings?
>>320430115
Playing Souls games, while technically superior, is a just a waste of time. The amount of cheaters is fucking terrible.
PS4 version is where everyone will be playing.
>8 gigowatts when 4's more than enough
every fucking time
>>320432870
Yes, whether or not in your region I cant say for sure.
i have the specs, but no directx11. how fucked am i?
nice, that means my 840m will run it without problems
>>320431979
It's weird, my GTX 460 managed near-60 FPS at max settings even with GeDoSaTo.
Makes me think these requirements are complete bs.
>i7
This is proof of lazy benchmarking.
>>320432571
It's not their fault you have shit internet. Good internet is a privilege.
>>320430115
>50gb
Fromsoft! You of all peole! WHAT THE HELLL!
>>320433002
I'm surprised you can run 4chan, Anon.
>>320433154
It's their fault for not even attempting to optimize the game.
Oh I thought this wasn't coming to PC. Guess I haven't kept up with the news
Well, I'm fucked.
>>320433261
They had a pre-load 1 day before launch. If you can't download it before launch you should stick with single player.
>>320432898
The fuck you need an SSD for?
More B-Team offal, it'll be 2017 until an actual From game comes out again.
>>320433370
'twas announce on the first day.
Welp, I hope it runs on my 5770 on minimum
>>320433408
you are over the minimin reqs, you probably will play it w/o problems, not max out 60+ fps, but you will run it at mid settings 30+ fps easy
>>320433632
to run games obviously
>>320433642
fuck off sonypony, DaS 3 is going to be way better than BloodBorne
>>320433642
>only plays BB for memes and doesnt enjoy all From games equally
Fuck off faggot.
>>320433657
what the hell how am i not legally retarded yet
>>320433642
But anon, From Software is going to make Cyber Souls-like
>>320432898
500gb is like 200 dollars.
I would recommend getting a seperate 1-3 TB HDD for installing on your games, movies, music. Then store your apps on your SSD. I got a 120gb ssd, but I would recommend something larger.
>>320432290
No, it cant.
>>320430115
>dork souls 3
>from software
wow its fucking nothing. i bet you it will be just as shit as the previous games.
>>320433759
you better start fucking praying that it's not a repeat of dark souls 2
>>320431002
Souls games only use in engine cutscenes outside of the intro so that can't be right.
>>320434021
it most definitely is, it even has the same weapons/armor for fucks sake
>>320431979
This has to be fake
>>320433750
I ran SotFS on max at 60 FPS.
>>320431979
Wondering if recommended is for 1080p/30at console equivalent settings or 1080p/60.
Knowing From it might just be another Souls game that you cap at 30 so the durability and ladders don't spaz out.
2 was optimized really well, I got an easy 60 even below min specs. I wouldn't be surprised if 3 was the same.
>>320434330
well given that is has almost the same reqs, you probably will get the same performance
>the recommended requirements for the old are game are the minimum for the next game
This is how every game series should work
>>320434398
>miyazaki stated a long time ago that he's going for 30fps with DaSIII
will we just be lied to like last time?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7Lp-5WdtD0
this was worse than even mgs5 trailer lies
literally a whole different game
>>320434747
sorry didn't mean to > it's just the shitposting reflex
>>320430115
>i7
>750
Fucking nips
DAILY REMINDER THAT DARK SOULS III IS LOCKED TO 30 FPS
NO MATTER WHAT. MODS WILL BREAK THE GAME
>8gb ram
Kill me senpai
>>320434902
How do you not have 8GB?
>Storage: 50 GB available space
>this just means more uncompressed audio and video
blu ray allowing devs to be more lazy than ever
>>320434567
New gen is a free license for them to dump all support for toasterbros.
>>320434902
>MMXV
>playing video games on a computer
>not having 8 gigs of ram
do yourself a favor and order another stick of 4 GB memory to complete that 8
I dunno if DS3 is gonna actually use more than 2-3 GB (the PS4 version needs to fit in 5 GB including VRAM) but you are missing out
>>320435001
Mobo only supports ddr2 and I'm a poorfag.
>>320434650
actually...
>>320434870
This wouldn't be surprising. Jap devs are literally fucking retarded and still tie game mechanics to the frame rate.
>>320435151
If you have at least 6 you will be fine.
>>320430323
You're surprised that a series that looks like garbage from 2005 has low requirements? Are you new?
>>320435149
>>320435231
I have4.
DDR2 is fucking expensive and my shit old mobo only has 2 slots.
>>320430115
>Intel® Core™ i7
Why do they always suggest this? Games never ever fucking use hyperthreading, yet they say "GET AN i7 FOR GAMING"
The literal main fucking difference is the hyper-threading feature which does jack shit for games.
>>320435572
B-but Civ 5 turns process 2 seconds faster guys! That's worth buying an i7 for, r-right?
>>320435572
intel pays devs to recommend an i7
>>320435856
I still have an i5 at 4.3 GHz. I've yet to see much of any bottleneck on my gaming due to CPU.
>>320432571
>tfw live in the US and still only get 500kb/s
>>320433021
>The amount of cheaters is fucking terrible.
Sounds like someone has never played on PC. I've seen 4 hackers in my entire 500 hours and I do a lot of PvP.
Any PC footage lads?
>>320435572
this is an i7 from several generations ago (sandy bridge), and there are lots of i5s since then that are better, but yes you're right.
>>320431731
Why does making shit up make you mad?
Can't believe From fell for the 50gb meme
>>320433956
noob question but how would I run steam games on an SSD if they are installed on an HDD?
I don't understand, can someone explain?
>>320439281
>Copy game
>paste game on SSD
FUCKING GG
>>320439281
Install them to the SSD.
>>320433816
>cyberpunk souls game
how would that even work?
and don't give me any of that futuristic sword bullshit
>>320440498
I dunno, but the Lords of the Fallen guys are doing it too.
>>320440498
Metal Gear Revengeance SOULS
Looking forward to this glorious adventure.
Not letting myself get too hype though, still 7 months away without any delays.
>>320440498
Nanoswords
>>320441096
No it's 4 months away, not seven. Dumb ass.
>>320432348
Pussy
>Not playing on a sony platform
Souls community always lasts longest and is of the highest quality on Sony platforms. Demon's Souls is STILL alive and kicking
>>320441558
>not preordering collectors on console and special on PC
shigs and digs
>>320439281
I have the files installed on to the HDD. I have Steam on my SSD I think.
>>320430115
Wait, i have a GTX660, can i even run this on low??
>>320430323
It's going to be on consoles too, shit not going to take another leap in requirements for a looooong time, the new gen just started.
>>320441880
well, I'm gessing if you can run SotFS you can run DaS3 as well
>>320431979
On one hand i'm happy because if this is true, it means i can run it 100%.
On the other hand i'm a bit weirded out, the videos look much better than DS2.
Oh well.
>>320441558
People want 60 fps.
They actually included AMD processors in that, you don't see that too often. That's nice of them.
>>320441880
requirements are never accurate
>>320441558
Demon's is only on PS3 dipshit
>RAM stick dies
>only 4 GB left
>no idea whether the RAM I have even exists anymore
Should I get a completely new MB or just a new set of RAM?
>>320441558
I like have 2 second load times and 60fps
>>320441880
anon if we can play gta 5 and dying light with 660s I don't see how we couldn't play this. They always overestimate the recommended reqs because they want room for error
>>320441880
yea it says 750
your 660 is better than that
>>320439281
You can set the path where you want to install your games in settings. You need Steam on your Operating System though.
>>320430115
Why is my 860m , 2.4 i7 laptop not good enough for this game?!?!?
REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>320443143
Can I even run this piece of shit game on my laptop??
860m, 2.5ghz HQ i7.
>>320443143
it is
the 750 has the same cores as the 860m
>>320443620
Coolio, thx fåm
>>320431979
>think i will have to upgrade for this game
>see this
>i got fucking 100fps average running this game on my i-5 and 7850
feels wünder
>>320430115
>those recommended specs
Confirmed 30fps 1:1 direct port of the PS4 version
as I expected honestly
Hope unlocking the framerate doesn't break anything major
>>320444601
those specs aren't very high and I doubt the game uses more than 3 cores
>playing a souls game for graphics
>expecting anything other that shitty FPS
/reddit9k/ has officially killed /v/
>>320445023
DS2 ran great on a toaster and you could max it out with a 750ti
>>320431979
Most likely they have not tested the PC version at all on different hardware and are basing the specs off a build as close to a PS4 as possible
You can pretty much ignore the reqs in this case, and I doubt we'll even see how the PC version runs until it unlocks on Steam
>>320445112
Unsurprisingly the worst in the series, too.
>>320430115
>Intel® Core™ i7 2600 3.4 GHz
Why did I listen to /v/ when they said "i5 is good enough"?
>>320430798
maybe it doesn't really matter cause it on pc.
>>320445292
Best performance, but worst of the series.
I put 1000 hours into the game, but I had fun.
>>320445413
>just because some dev says you need an i7 means you need it
you don't
>>320445465
Definitely still had fun
>>320445112
DS2 (even SOTFS) looks mediocre to bad 99% of the time. The only areas it looks good are where the skybox takes up the most of the screen space. (aka Majula, Dragon Shrine)
>>320445465
>it was bad
>I put only 1000 hours into it
What's the word on dual-shields?
>Requires SP1
Thank god. Now I can put off upgrading my 7870 for another year. Fuck this card is great. Lasted way longer than I anticipated.
>>320430323
I have a 290x so I know that whatever console performance is I can roughly 4x that
so 1080p 30fps means 1440p 60fps
60fps console games mean 4k 60fps
>>320445638
He said it was the worst in the series, he never said it was bad you plen
>>320445784
are you dumb?
>>320430115
>i7
>50 gbs
Fuck sake from software.
>>320446010
you probably don't need an i7 at all and it will work fine with an i5
>>320445585
>looked bad
it looked fine for what it was, DS2 was done in Dx10 and SOTFS was in Dx11 and had a great lighting effect included because of Dx11
>GTX 750 for recommended
kek
Something should be wrong. Unless they will downgrade the fuck out of it there's no way it will run on a 750 at 60 FPS.
>>320446568
DS2 did
>>320446084
I know. My rig will have zero issues running thiswhen I pirate itIt's just a stupid "requirement" to list.
I don't even trust system requirements anymore.
My specs exceeded Just Cause 3's and that game ran like shit for me. I just use benchmarks now.
>>320446678
they've always been inaccurate as fuck
GTAV had its requirements that were horribly thought up
>>320433997
well maybe you were retarded and mismanaged your $300
>People complaining about a measly 50gbs
That's not even a fraction of my media collection. So much for "master race" you fucking plebs.
>>320430323
>8 gig ram
That seem high to anyone else?
Is it finally time to move from 8 gig to 16 gig?
>>320430323
Every single souls game is a corridor family, of course it's low.
>>320433021
Haven't even see one hacker? You sure you aren't playing with that one sonycuck who intentionally hacks with his toaster and records it?
>>320436780
Cmon man that's a lie unless you're just incredibly lucky. You really mean to say you've never been invaded by someone who curses you in one hit or doesn't have a health bar? Hell, I've had a guy spawn 50 crystal golems in the forest before
>>320433759
SSD's aren't really meant for games that require constant rewriting and such
>>320447007
I moved over when Witcher 3 + a couple browser windows was creeping into the 7GB range.
It's time bro.
>>320447160
what?
>>320446982
I actually wanted to download this on my PS4 because of the slow loading times from Bloodborne.
so, with an i7 4790 + 8gb of ram + a gtx 950 I should be ok?
>>320447527
yea but thats a retarded set up, dinky wasted GPU, overpowered CPU
>>320447527
Of course you will be okay.
It's locked at 30 fps for fuck sakes.
>>320446629
Yes, and it looked like shit compared to what was presented on videos. DaS3 is supposed to work on next gen consoles, so surely it will have a graphical upgrade to accommodate for those.
When will the 60 fps meme die?
50 gb jesus
that's half my bandwidth
>>320435572
it is probably because the ps4 and bone have 8 core cpus in them, so people think that pcs must also need 8 cores to run the games.
>>320447654
>It's locked at 30 fps for fuck sakes.
pls no
>>320447527
Why would you have those specs?
>>320447826
>60fps meme
fuck off meme loving faggot
>>320447698
a lot of shitty devs do that today, expect it even if its not ok
>>320447975
Unfortunate as it is, it is indeed locked at 30 fps. I am also going to assume that if it is modded to be 60 fps, it is going to be broke as fuck
>>320447975
weird reasons about imports and taxes (not american)
>>320448223
source?
>>320448223
bullshit
>>320447356
SSD's are faster but degrade more quickly from writing. If you're reading far more than writing they're the way to go, but if you're constantly writing (like Souls does) an HD is better.
>>320430341
>tfw 300gb monthly data cap
>>320448530
his ass
>>320430115
That's a hefty requirement for roll roll attack and shitty hitboxes along with terrible frame rate
>>320439348
This doesn't work
>>320441880
im on a 650 ti boost. i run Scholar on 60 fps
>>320449571
It does work, provided you already created the steam library folder in the ssd
>>320449718
Not him, but it does work if the game doesn't rely on any specific .dll's or makes any registry changes
most games will run fine however others, things like ARMA or what ever rely and reference certain locations within c:\ so changing the locations might fuck things up depending on where its written to originally
