Star Wars Battlefront + 4K + 60 FPS + Sweet FX Mod = Real life graphics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGyaR2sSBkA
>>319726291
2 bad dat game still suck
Still not a Battlefront game
>Origin
>>319726291
This really is an exceedingly pretty game.
If only it was a single player title, I would buy the shit out of it.
>>319726291
If Battlefront 2 was somehow as pretty as EA's Battlefail, would there be any point in spending money on it?
>>319726291
And arma 3 still looks better lmao
>>319727775
show me a video of better graphics
>>319728003
You must have eye cancer
>Over saturation = real life
I've never really thought about this before but, what the fuck is the point of a crossbow lazer gun?
>>319728041
At no point in his post did he challenge the graphic quality, retard.
>>319728246
Style points
It's a fucking brilliant looking game and runs really fucking well for how good it looks just shame they missed out on the whole game part.
>>319728080
Nah, you have since you preffer over saturated bloom filled trash over clean graphics.
>>319726291
Huh? Did they ever use any type of grenade/grenade-like device in the movies? I don't recall ever having seen stuff like that before...
>>319728483
You're a fucking idiot.
>>319728150
>real life isn't saturated as FUCK
have you ever been outside?
>>319728246
>Through the use of magnetic acceleration, bowcasters were more powerful and accurate than the average blaster. Designs differed through the materials used and the creator's artistic approach, although the end result was visually similar to a crossbow-like weapon.[2]
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Bowcaster
>>319726291
Is this the best-looking mediocrity in vidya?
>>319728483
>>319728041
what
didn't he just say he likes single player games?
>>319726291
This is it. Crysis' reign is finally over.
>>319726291
Looks better without it t b h
>>319728848
Leia threatens Jabba with a Thermal detonator in Return of the Jedi.
That's the only one in the movies though, and she doesn't even use it really.
>>319728848
Leia has a thermal detenator in jabbas palace.
>>319728848
Yeah, they messed up with a lot of stuff like that, such as having RotJ Luke on Hoth. The game is beautiful, but it's only fun for a handful of hours until it gets stale imo.
>>319726291
Post your face when this is what the current standard of graphics in PC gaming would be if consoles hadn't held it back for the last decade.
ironic shitposting etc
>>319728848
>Did they ever use any type of grenade/grenade-like device in the movies?
Thermal detonators.
It's kind of big scene in Jedi.
>>319729114
Consoles run some pretty nice stuff now
>>319726291
>SweetFX
>>319726291
Looks great.
Game sucks though.
>>319728979
All the time and money spent on shiny graphics, none of the gameplay.
See this PC gamers, THIS is your legacy and your endless consumer treadmill of buying PC parts for the one extra pixel to look better.
We all like a nice game but this is going too far. This is how games die.Star Wars Battlefront 2 already in preproduction
>>319729114
This is funny because despite running at gimped resolutions and framerates, the console versions of Battlefront are almost as pretty as the PC release.
>>319729114
How did the existence of consoles have an effect of the development of PC graphics?
Could you imagine how many more gross, fat, smelly autistic people we would have if consoles were never around? I don't want to live in that universe.
>>319728903
>lurk /v/
>see outside
pick one
>>319729224
not really.
what are the best looking current gen games?
Far Cry 4 and MGSV are probably the best looking on PS4 without compromising themselves into blurry messes.
>>319729329
>despite running at gimped resolutions and framerates
Gee, well I guess it's okay then
>>319729397
Star Wars Battlefront, m8
You're posting in a thread about it right now.
>>319729313
>still posting the "graphics cost gameplay" meme
>all that effort put nto modding and the game is still shit
whats the point?
>>319729472
PS4 version runs at pretty consistent 60fps. It's hardly gimped. The resolution is a little iffy at 1660x900 though.
>>319729397
Not even close, The best looking games are on PS4, Killzone Shadowfall , The order 1886 and Batman Arkham Knight.
Even ST Battlefront runs at 900p at 60fps, the xbone does 720 at 45-60
>>319729539
>Battlefront 1 on the fucking PS2 had more maps and modes than the new one
Get fucked faggot, Battlefront is shit now
>>319729114
KEK. And who would pay for development of games? PC gamers only? KEK
>also implying without consoles everyone would magically switch to PC gaming
>implying you wouldn't be "held back" by those guys who play on shitty PC's and laptops (look at steam stats)
>>319729313
There is literally nothing wrong with the gameplay in Beatlefront.
>>319729539
What meme? The proof is the game itself.
>>319726291
>jackfrags
Witcher 3 already won. It's too late
>>319729114
Witcher devs said the 3rd game literally wouldn't exist without the income from console players. You're living in a non-existent fantasy world - you wouldn't have *anything* to play without consoles aside from shovelware indies.
>>319729827
>>319729671
It's very well known that modern games are more expensive to make these days due to them requiring a better graphics and detail than old games.
If DICE was making Battlefront for the Wii U with shit graphics then they would have easily made a lot more maps in the same time-span. But this is not acceptable for a PS4 game.
>>319729861
Shhhh, don't shatter his delusions
>>319729916
Here's your reply
>>319726291
>Sweet FX
kill yourself, only underage use this shit besides improving colors of shit console ports or say crappy filters (piss filter in Deus Ex HR, red filter in Bioshock Infinite) that need to be minimalized
>>319729827
>those hideous trees
Slavs cannot into good graphics, only true Aryans can actually make a game with state of the art graphics.
>>319729983
>clipping
>blurry wall textures
>horrible lightining
>>319730087
It's time for you to stop posting
One thing that always baffles me about this game is that the game sounds and looks amazing, but the voice acting is so fucking bad. BF2 had better VA work.
>polishing a turd
having amazing graphics doesn't make the game any better.
it's still a horrible game
i would be happy if they gave me the PS3/360 version FreeRadical was working on back then.
>>319730212
Post an open world game which looks better
>>319730151
>>319729861
Actually, they specifically said they couldn't make a game the size of the Witcher 3 without the income from consoles, not that they couldn't make a game that looks like it.
It is quite obvious that they could have. Look at the Witcher 2's graphics, it still looks better than most games that come out today, including most PS4 games. Witcher 3 was an extremely bloated game and never should have been as huge as it was in the first place. They just thought they had to make the world the biggest ever because of skyrim and that sort of nonsense. It was a great game but it would have been even better if they had actually avoided making it so needlessly oversized and full of nothing but pointless treasure drops and bandit camps.
For decades, PC gaming was ahead of console gaming in graphics, because games that were made for PC were usually made just for PC. They all get dumbed down now because they have to have console versions. Witcher 3 could have been a smaller but more interesting and better looking game. We know it could have because it looked better when it was first unveiled and CDPR has literally admitted that they dumbed down the graphics since then so that it could run on consoles.
>>319728908
Can we all just take a moment to appreciate that Chewbacca is a drug smuggling space sasquatch mechanic/space pilot with a plasma crossbow, and whose best friend is a space cowboy?
Star Wars is crazy and I love it.
>>319729642
yeah, because if they only released this game with PS2 graphics the gameplay would have magically been better than the first one.
You're a fucking idiot if you think there's a theoretical slider that turns down gameplay as graphics are improved.
>>319729671
How is a game with good graphics having bad gameplay proof that it has bad gameplay because of it's good graphics?
Games always used to try and push graphics in the past, why would you expect for the first time in history developers should arbitrarily limit themselves in a vain hope it might somehow make it better?
There are hardly any maps in this game because they plan to sell them as DLC, not because they didn't have the budget left over from all the graphics.
Budgets just don't work that way anyway, it's not like scaling your source textures down lower somehow saves you cash.
There is an associated cost in testing, optimization and implementing shaders but it doesn't just take money out of a content budget.
too bad the game sucks
![1284082608297[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/s2GnqsV.jpg "1284082608297[1].jpg")
>>319729114
Consoles have always come first, Even since the atari 2600. PC games made for PC were some sims and RTS games. Consoles did everything better and sold more than anything. Even handhelds do better.
Plus PC gaming is expensive as fuck now. You need to upgrade every 6-8 months and even a year is a bit much. You could spend that money on games and not parts you spend hours looking for on site after site for the cheapest discount possible.
Buy a gaming laptop, one year, it's a paperweight. Build your own, murphy's law makes it break in someway or your OCD makes you fix something that isn't broken. Console, buy, play, sit on comfy couch and play with some peeps, playing games everyone can play.
The sad part if you the consumer blames consoles, most devs blame PCs.
>>319729964
Dunno man splatoon is more fun than battlefront.
>>319730242
I'd like to see a picture of this with the original with
>Before Republic Commando
>After Republic Commando
Or Battlefront whichever.
>>319730432
This.
>>319730327
ArmA III to be honest.
>>319730327
Sucks how the PS4 struggles with TW3 even when they lower the draw distance massively.
>>319726291
Could they not reuse sound clips of Vader?
>>319730381
Even the snacks in the break room come out of the game's budget, the chairs they use, the desk the vending machines. And now like big motion pictures 50-60% of the budget is used on adds.
>>319730432
You definitely sound like someone who doesn't actually have a good gaming PC.
>>319729916
Do people actually think these look similar? Because the Witcher is clearly better looking, even in this cherrypicked example on min graphics.
>>319730327
Modded Skyrim looks way better.
>>319730364
>It is quite obvious that they could have
You're seriously second-guessing the people that made the game?
>They all get dumbed down now because they have to have console versions.
Because that's where the sales and money is. PC gamers either buy on sale or pirate. They're vastly less profitable than console gamers. See EA's earnings for their most recent reported quarter. Console sales dwarf PC sales.
http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ERTS/1150977715x0x857525/97870E68-0A23-4D1F-A10F-932661982AF5/Q2_FY16_Earnings_Release.pdf
Fucking gorgeous.
But that shit music, wtf
>inb4 muh favorite song
cool, nigga, but what's it doing accompanying my star wars? Fucking shit up that's what.
>>319731135
Your reading comprehension needs some work.
>>319730221
>rubber ears
>facial hair just works like that
>>319730432
>> Build your own, murphy's law makes it break in someway or your OCD makes you fix something that isn't broken
not everyone has autism, you know
>>319731090
>Modded
>>319730523
I am curious about Splatoon but I am not buying a console for one game that has a bullshit 2 map rotation.
>>319731135
no.
>>319731243
You have to expand on a comment like that otherwise it's basically pointless stone throwing.
>>319728848
>not having a now defunct encyclopedic knowledge of everything Star Wars
Get keked
>>319730852
All i see is better textures and some anti aliasing. Witcher 3 has some nice textures and good looking girls with porn star level of makeup on but it doesn't look better than some PS3 and 360 games i've played.
Most high end footage and screencaps of the games are made by people who have better PCs than anyone. I can't compete with that, can you? They either have sponsors or are already rich or get revenue from like youtube videos or some other source.
>>319731246
>Still shitposting
>>319731090
>modded
>>319731485
There is no need to be upset my fellow shill, it's unanimously agreed on here that the game looks like shit since the downgrade.
>>319731352
It's pretty good, and like nearly all nintendo games there's little to no issues or bugs with it.
>>319731264
I have yet to meet someone who builds their own PC who doesn't have it in some form.
>>319731574
>hamsterposting
>>319731628
And it's still 350 dollars for the console and the game. Call me when it's ported to PC and it costs 30 bucks or less.
>>319726291
>ATAT
>Going through heavy woods on a slope edge
Wat
>>319726291
>using the skyrim defence
LOOK HOW SHINY MY SHIT IS!
It pains me that they made the game so gorgeous but so shallow.
>>319731886
>getting triggered this easily
>>319732204
The game is meant to be played by children and old people. What do you expected?
>>319729667
There is literally not̶h̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶w̶r̶o̶n̶g̶ ̶w̶i̶t̶h̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ gameplay in Beatlefront.
>>319730432
>You need to upgrade every 6-8 months and even a year is a bit much
Please stop.
>>319731594
HOW THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSED TO HELP THAT? CDPR GAVE IN TO GREED AND MADE THE GAME FOR CONSOLES AS WELL
>>319732520
Well it's based on movie.
>>319728996
Graphics>Everything
Its why PS1 and N64 and Saturn games suck. Welcome to the future bitch. Games of today are going to suck 20 years from now.
>>319732631
Stop buying consolized shit. That's what I told you years ago, you didn't listened, now it's too late.
This is the future you choose.
>>319732631
downgraded witcher 3 is still better shit wars oogaboogafroth
>>319726291
when will there be a mod that makes the gameplay good and adds some content to the game?
>>319732768
But every single game being released is consolized shit now
>>319726291
>better game is a mod
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGwEuBkBBso
>>319732723
playing SO SS right now and it's 1000 times better than your master's shit game, shill. PS1 4 Life
>>319730432
>You need to upgrade every 6-8 months and even a year is a bit much.
Try 6-8 years you fucking idiot
>>319732631
>>319733010
>dat faggy queer homo Geralt hair
DELETE THISAlso delete all save games and start over. This time try to play as a man jesus.
>>319733393
He's right you jackass. PCs become outdated every several months. Doesn't mean you have to replace them though.
>>319733012
Looks 5 years more out of date than COD4 that it's based on.
>>319730693
everything comes out of the budget but that doesn't mean it's all negotiable and can be redistributed.
Taking money out of the snacks won't give you x:snacks worth of gameplay.
The development staff are limited by their numbers, the hours they work within the production timeline and the devtools they use.
Just giving them more money or telling them to make the graphics less impressive isn't going to make it a good game, especially when you're already planning to ruin the game with DLC and casualization.
Didn't someone at EA literally say that the game is intended to be played by kids?
https://www.vg247.com/2015/12/07/ea-admits-star-wars-battlefront-may-not-have-the-depth-fans-wanted
when developers are told to design the game like that, graphics aren't the deciding facotr.
>>319726291
>Implying that the graphics alone justify the price tag of that game
You're the reason why EA gets away with it you fucking cancer.
>>319731135
>They're vastly less profitable than console gamers.
Consoles make more total money, but PCs rule when it comes to profit.
To sell a game on console, you need to dumb down all the mechanics, chuck a huge marketing budget on it with some live action trailers and pay Sony or Microsoft licenses.
Most AAA games only just make their money back, or in many cases, outright don't.
However, if you make a game specifically for PC, budget costs are like a quarter of that of a multiplat. All you need is engaging gameplay and replayability, and the game will sell like hotcakes. The marketing budget can be a tenth of a AAA multiplat and it will sell on gameplay and word of mouth alone.
Look at City Skylines, Besiege, Witcher 2, Stalker, Metro. All these games were made on a peasant's income and still sold well for a reasonable profit.
CDPR said they needed the income from consoles sale to make Witcher 3 happen, but I think the only thing they need the income for was to release on consoles. They really went all out on their marketing; I mean they first showed the game at E3 2 years in advance, and they visited every single expo in between, with so many trailers along the way. It's a problem to it's own solution. They could have easily made a PC exclusive with just as much content, that looked better, and it would have profited.
I really think AAA devs like EA and Ubi could really benefit from creating small, AA or A sizes PC exclusives. Get rid of the invasive DRM, the dumbed-down gameplay, and the marketing budget, and just create an engaging, fun, experimental and unique title. It'll make it's money back because it was made with a pittance and small, on-the-side dev team.
I honestly look at huge devs like EA and Ubi and just wonder if they're getting sick of releasing the same old AAA garbage over and over again. I think it would be nice for them to experiment once in a while.
</blog>
>>319733729
Good thing he was implying replacing.
>>319729861
>>319729971
Moron...
without barebone PC's for illiterates the vidya would be miles ahead of where it is now. And the market wouldn't be so insanely anti consumer nor would this board be such a casual infested console wars shithole that it grew to be since 06. There wouldn't even be such a thing as DLC it would'Ve never been invented in the first place. CoD would've been honorably laid to rest, EA wouldn't have been given the power to rise where they are now nor would have Activision been able to fucking buy Blizzard to mutate into a supershitlord to conquer the world.
It's all thanks to you super Aids drones this planet has too much of. Let me be the first today to thank you thoroughly for all your efforts into making this place and this species such shit.
Thank you kindly.
>>319733012
It definitely plays tons better thats for sure
>>319729861
kind of how like crysis was more successful than all the sequels despite being PC exclusive at launch and costing less? it also subjectively looks better in many ways.
>>319737481
Just how deluded are you? Your head must be a very angry place.
>>319738890
You call Me deluded? Kill yourself son.
I've seen it all happening I'm with the vidya since it's baby steps. And I've seen it go down the shitter, slowly but painfully steadily. But it helps if you were already an adult around 06.
>>319734318
If I give u a place we can meet up can u come and just end my life?
>>319730432
>need to upgrade every 6-8 months
Nigga I upgrade my PC every 3 years at the earliest. Even then its because I am a quality whore and gotta max out those settings. Otherwise you could probably go 5 years without upgrading.
>>319737481
It's funny because it's probably spot on.
Have you thanked your console bros yet?
>>319728041
Character models look like shit compared AssCreed
>>319726291
I might pick it up after Christmas, all depends if there is still people playing and if there is more content and if DL-44 have been nerfed by then.
>>319740919
Battlefront has near as much players as BF4 on pc.
>>319726291
Too bad the game itself is still shit.
>>319741164
Too bad its still better than any Zelda game except the SNES one.
>>319726291
>Sweet FX
>>319741245
I'm loving this cringe.
>>319741245
Is your game so ded you have to come shitposting here?
Jerking off to graphics in single player is the only thing you can do on PC since online is dead as fuck.
t. pc player
>>319741416
Cant be more dead than shitt Zelda game which wont even show player statistics because it was known to be dead from the start. ;^)
Plus my post obviously proves how easily are children triggered.
>>319726291
If only it wasn't made by EA
It looks good but my suspension of disbelief/immersion is shattered by the comparison between those dank graphics and the fact that they still use fucking viemodel/worldmodel separation.
>>319742016
It isnt.
Its made hy DICE.
>>319742190
It's published by EA, is what I meant.
>>319741549
not true. you can jerk off to the sound design too.
>>319729827
slavshill pls
>>319726291
This is what happens with a game is focused entirely on graphics. FPS mediocre generica #964.
>>319726291
Game is really a technical masterpiece. I feel like DICE wants to make good games but EA rushes it out of the door every time.
>mp44withanacogscopeandCO2canister.jpg
>>319726291
You know, on purely technical level, this game looks like shit, they used photogrammetry(old news in game industry=they could make this look 10 times better and playable even on toasters) .
They had luck to have access to set where SW 7 is filmed, they took shitload of pictures of models,rocks and PC did the rest.
Im happy because finally we will have actual "real life" graphics as an norm,
assets are now so easy ,cheap and fast to produce even indie devs will have(already do have=all you need is 50$ drone and slightly better consumer level camera) access to this.
Vanishing of Ethan Carter was done in UE3, game is in top 10 best looking games ever made.
My point is, every game can look like "RL", since forever and best part is, technology is actually really cheap.
What Im pissed about is, this was available 5 years ago...
Also , take a note, next thing that will be needed to have this level of graphical fidelity is SSDs, really fast RAM, lots of VRAM. It will change hierarchy of what is most important part of hardware in gaming PC, since some assets are up to 200mb big(some valley or tree, rock, vehicle etc) and it will be on-screen for maybe an half a second. So, its basically streaming data.
Check this if you want to see what one guy did in his spare time, alone.. with equipment of no more than 1000$...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CG11F0RX8WE
Most benefit from this technology will have PS4(even Xbone), they will release some games you will think its impossible, considering hardware specs and then you will remember you had better hardware back in 2009...
And PC, PC croud is already interested in making VR games with this technology, so save your shekels, you will need to upgrade soon.
Anyway, old hierarchy of PC gaming hardware was GPU>speed of GPU>speed of VRAM>amount of VRAM>CPU>speed of single core of CPU>number of cores>>>>amount of system ram>>>speed of system ram>>>>>>>>HDD>>>speed of hdd>>size of hdd and now it will look like this..
>>319744024
The fuck is wrong with you?
>>319744024
Anon, your autism is showing.
>>319730589
now post the money that PC rig is worth. You might just notice it won't be only 350$
>>319744024
Just when you think people of /v/ couldn't get anymore retarded.
>>319744631
I run TW3 on my 2 year old 770. I think you could buy that GPU for 20 dollars now.
>>319744024
How and why do you know all this information?
>>319744024
Part 2..
New order hierarchy
speed of GPU>speed of VRAM=amount of VRAM>System RAM (DDR4 at least)>speed of system ram>amount of system ram=speed and amount of SSD>CPU>number of cores>speed of single core.
Thats it .. I could easily futureproof even now in this uncertain age PC build.
Basically...
8/12/16 cores CPU , clock not that important, it will stagnate when they reach 5ghz as a mainstream(as ~3 is now)
huge and really fast SSD(Intel PCI-E SSD)
a lot of fastest system RAM(G.SKILL DDR4 4266MHz) 64 gb, maybe even128 gb for RAMHDD...
GPU with 12 gb of HBM RAM
>>319726291
My HD 5870 cant deal with 4k :<
>>319726291
Looks good, but not "real life"
>>319728770
Wow ArmA 3 looks really good
>>319731976
why would you even buy a console to play only one game?
>>319729539
>great game comes out, subpar graphics with good substance
>pc fags laugh at "shit gfx"
>get of the best looking FPS of all time
>gameplay is average at best, little or no depth
>LOL GFX JUST A MEME GUYS
>>319744870
>GTX 770
>20
still 300 bro.
>>319744136
>>319744361
>>319744837
Oh, I forgot, this is /v/, not /g/... A place for lowest specimens in IT industry.
How fast are you to insult something you dont understand.
I even suggested you all maybe 4 years ago that amount of VRAM will take more important role in making GPUs(I even mentioned 4 or even 8 gb of VRAM, you all said similar things), it looks like you are retards..
>>319745071
Because I work in AAA gaming industry(people who work on games actually come here a lot(more on /g/), you wouldn't believe, but usually they lurk and laugh) and part of my job is to know those things.
There are literally no games with "realistic" graphics that look good. Tell me you could look at that footage and confuse it for real life, there's no way you could. They might be the best graphics you've ever seen (if you've never seen another game in your life), but they by no means look anything like reality. When the N64 came out people thought "wow graphics can't look any more realistic than this, we've hit the peak", you can actually find archived posts from the 90s saying this. You're going to look back and laugh at how fucking shit this video looks in a few year's time.
>>319746396
Both Battlefront and modded Crysis 1 can be mistaken for real life.
You are just mad that your potato PC or WiiU can handle these graphics.
>>319746396
nah, mate, photogrammetry will revolutionize graphics, purely because it is really cheap to produce high quality assets(even cheaper than classic 3d modeling).
It is really first big step in a long time of stagnation.
I cant prove you how I know this, but have some faith.
You wont believe how Mass Effect Andromeda will look(it will be a shitty third person shooter with elements of RPG(it will actually be very similar to Withcer 3 in space, only with shitty dialogs )
>>319746946
There's more to visuals than just textures.
apparently cranking the sharpening up to 11 makes everything look "lifelike"
Please stop posting this mod. It has a significant framerate hit for a fucking post process effect. It looks like trash and the creator is an attention whore. This is worse than the worst Skyrim ENB presets
>>319726291
Beautiful as fuck. Been playing the game for hours, still worth every cent, would pay more. GOTY. Don't listen to these fucktarded bitter virgins on /v/, you won't get a better shooter in decades.
>>319745513
Also, people forgot majority of Real Life ENB,SweetFX and ReShade presets look really cool when you watch them , but they are unplayable.
Composition devs tampered with for over 2 years is not without reason.
Usually they are good for taking screenshots, making bullshots,videoclips, running around and marvel at how far has science gone, but they would ruin the game so usually at the end everyone just turn them off or tone them down to minimum.
>>319746396
but the n64 had unimpressive graphics for the time
>>319744631
>>319746297
>being a poorfag
>>319726291
Where's the constant 60fps?
>>319729313
>blaming PC gamers for a dev and publisher that abandoned them in 2009 for console shit
K
>>319728003
its more technically impressive considering the scale and depth but you're dumb as shit if you think ARMA 3 on the highest settings looks anywhere near as good as that, not even with blastcore effects on
>All this ARMA3 praise
Look, ARMA3 is a pretty game. But not in the sense of every screenshot is jampacked with detail and atmosphere. It's pretty because with a good rig you can have a good equal amount of detail in a further viewable area than you will ever see on consoles. But human models are still stiff as shit. Effects from explosions (I.e. walls being destroyed, grass/trees flattening etc.) are low quality, and overall animation is janky as hell. It's got a massive problem with how doll like it all seems.
But I digress, ARMA is practically Bohemias side business. And the military simulators that are actually used by the military in room sized simulators are some freakishly impressive shit.
>>319726291
>SweetFX
>>319729114
Photoganametry or whatever it's called is relatively new and is being used in games just now. It's mostly for rocks and shit, since it's easier and faster to models props than to clean up the scans, but if you've got the tech, you can do clean scans and just slap game-ready topology on them and bake all the information on it, just to save time.
It has nothing to do with consoles.
>>319730212
>clipping will never ever be fixed in games
>"Cinematic" DoF
>Not every scene should have muh cinematic epic 3point lignting
>>319730432
>6-8 months
I've playing on ultra everything for close to two years now and it'll stay that way for about 3 years too.
Some hardware will fail faster than i need to upgrade, really.
>>319748706
So it's shit then? lol
>>319746396
Those graphics are not really realistic, they're Star Wars movie-like, and they nailed that
>>319748934
Great argument there buddy. Keep on shitposting!
>>319749052
What else do I have to say when the points you mentioned all points towards it being shit visually?hahahhaha
>>319729660
If console's didn't exist the technology to create them would be perfected by uber nerds instead of companies intending to sell to as many people as possible. You wouldn't have the hand holding, or dlc. Just a community of nerds trying to out do eachother for the throne to ultimate pc power. Think of what croatia team is except multiplied 10x fold
>>319726291
now if only it were a good game
>>319729397
Bloodborne is really quite good looking
Incredibly amount of detail and design going on without any sort of visible repetition.
>>319729114
How do you explain PC exclusive titles looking like dogshit then?
The future of graphics is what 4k is all about, HDR.
I want them to add in conquest mode. MODDERS. DO IT.
>>319726291
Yeah maybe if your eyes are broken or something
>>319748583
Its really not that new, at least in IT years.
Around 5 years or more..
Whats new is it is available to consumer who does not have a lot of money.
Photogrammetry is absolutely great for everything that is static, or in static movement(it will make photo realistic car if car is still, but you will never make tree that bends under heavy wind or river), but that is not actually a problem. Later on you add movement to the face, but for now , there is no cheaper way to produce ,lets say photorealisitc clutter(chairs,books,furniture,even airplanes etc.. but it is actually really great for making huge terrains that are static, lets say area of 500x500 meters, or even more) or face etc...
You need 2 programs, semidecent PC , good camera and time, better PC, less time you need, more pics you make, less time .If you have drone, you can actually photograph whole area, process it, add a little makeup in Maya,add more clutter, buildings, cars etc FP camera ,
and voila photo-realistic FPS express.
>>319749690
Because most of them are made by small game studios instead of triple A companies that cater to peasants like you ;)
>>319749760
>Conquest mode
>Each faction starts with a planet
>There's only 2 planets to fight over
DIIIIIIICE!
>>319744870
It's called a 960 now, and it's 250$ at best.
>>319728848
Thermal detonators
Those Dorling Kindersley books that went into detail of Star Wars stuff were pretty awesome
>>319730852
>Do people actually think these look similar?
Yeah
AFAIK Arma 3 would look better if people stopped using A2 assets and modeled new things for the new engine.
>>319752115
Every object in the game is from scratch dum dum.
>>319752419
What in this screenshot was modeled in the past 5 years?
>mod to make game look more real
>just turns contrast and saturation up until you're blinded by color and brightness and everything in shadows is pitch black
>mod to make gameplay more real
>instead of having to eat and drink like a normal person, you have to constantly eat or drink all day nonstop or you die of dehydration
Modders are fucking retarded
>>319729329
>>319729573
If it werent for consoles, it could look like that and actually be a decent game and not just have tiny maps
>>319730432
>You need to upgrade every 6-8 months and even a year is a bit much.
What the fuck is wrong with you people? Why the fuck do you lie through your teeth just to hold the industry back? This is the only way you can feel better about being a shortsighted poorfag?
>/v/ still hasn't posted a video of better looking graphics
kek
>>319733729
>PCs become outdated every several months.
What in the absolute fuck are you retards going on about
Fuck this im out you guys are braindead
>>319753034
No one's disputing how good it looks. What are you keking about?
>>319753034
Maybe because graphics arent impressive when there is no expansive game world behind the scene you're looking at and thats all there is
Crysis 1 is probably harder to run than this shit, and for good reason
Its a whole damn island. And the trees all have fucking physics in their leaves and trunks, causing them to sway and blow in the wind and from explosions
Everyone who bought SWB should be deeply ashamed of themselves after the initial maximum of 2 hours of having fun with the game
>>319733635
It wasn't fag hair back then, bro ;^)
>>319731403
The textures are much better, as is the model. And that's ignoring that there's no way to compare hair.
I do agree with what you're saying though, that on low to mid graphics, it only looks good, not super exceptional, but I feel it makes up for that by having a fair amount going on. The towns feel pretty alive, even on console, and that wasn't really achievable in last gen.
Graphics alone though, yeah, it's only a bit above some of the later games unless you've got a high end rig.
>>319753112
if u want to play the latest games on the highest settings u have to upgrade every 6 months. on console you can play the latest games on highest settings without upgrading for 66 YEARS
>>319749657
>shit textures
>30fps
>chromatic aberration
naw nigga
Frostbite engine has REALLY good lighting (maybe the best currently) and materials system, even fucking DA3 looked pretty realistic in places.
>>319752587
that's a mod you autist.
>>319755841
nobody plays vanilla
>>319755869
nice strawman feg ;)
>>319726291
That looks absolutely amazing graphics-wise, but I will never forgive EA for shitting all over Battlefront gameplay-wise.
What a waste of good graphics. And not even modding can can save this game. Almost tragic.
>>319726291
dice finally allow community to mod frostbite now?
>>319757170
No. SweetFX usually works on anything. Frostbite is still the bane of modding.
>>319728003
>>319726291
This video is a big fuck you to all Nvidia users and to all the devs that doesn't support AZDO ("Almost zero driver overhead") specially the people who owns the 970 3.5 meme card. FUCK YOU for supporting proprietary bullshit like gameworks that rapes the frame rate on every game that partnered with Nvidia.
>>319757397
What are you even on about? The 970 is still a good card, although it's shitty that it hasn't dropped in price at all for a year now.
>>319726291
real life doesn't run at 60fps
>>319750646
The 960 is like $180 m8.
>>319757696
if you're going to support deceitful marketing practices you might as well mingle or consider yourself a console plebs.
>>319758067
well of course not, the human eye can't see past 24 frames per second. that's why movies are 24 frames per second.
>>319759172
AMD isn't perfect either.
