http://www.pcgamer.com/eve-valkyrie-to-come-with-every-oculus-rift/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amtBUkmHS0w
Are you hype /v/?
>>319677106
Fucking dank
More of an eve guy myself but valkyrie looks like a neat addition to the universe
>vive delayed till April
>OR costs less and comes out sooner
GG Valve no re.
Never played EVE so not really. I like that it's arcadey and not faux-physics shit like ED and Scam Shitizen though. More excited for AC7 VR
>>319677965
what
Ready for this to flop like that FPS did? Yeah, I guess.
>>319677981
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZ4gpjwJa08
I guess its really really big and they want to integrate it with the EVE online universe instead of a stand alone
>>319678101
Looks pretty cool. I don't want to pay a monthly fee for an MMO though. Don't think my 770 is good enough for VR too
>>319678174
well you don't need to play EVE online to play EVE valkyrie
>>319678174
You can always play it with PSVR if your PC can't run VR.
How does it affect EVE? The same shit as Dust 514?
>>319677739
They also added a FPS too right?
>>319678301
I played Eve Valkryie on PSVR. It looks like complete shit compared to the Oculus version.
>>319678432
Really? What were the main differences between versions?
>>319678354
yeah Dust, it's kinda dead because it was a PS3 exclusive. Maybe they'll port it to PS4, I dunno.
>>319677106
ah damn thought for a moment you can fly all the carrier fighters and bombers
looks p nice though
>>319677106
What a fucking seizure inducing mess.
CCP's designers complete shit as per usual. Why you'd decide to stick the guns there right next to the pilot I don't know but why the fuck are they flashing so much in the vacuum of space?
ALL of their visual effects are way overblown and ridiculous, not to mention the fucking SPACE behind everything is glowing and annoying to concentrate with.
As far as arcadey shooters go, you have to go fast or it's not worth it. If you want arcade space games try something like Strike Vector where you go crazy. Or basically do Ace Combat but with crazy inertia.
>>319678101
what's up with the sound design on this, radio effects are really generic and the voice acting is shit
SYSTEMS ONLOIN ugh why
the only good voice acting there is the scottish guy, that sounded natural and real
whoever that american woman with all that dialog is can't act for shit, her inflections are all wrong
>>319678660
probably because its in prealpha and sound isnt a high priority for early development.
>>319678248
I know, just meant I would play EVE but I dont want that monthly fee.
>>319678660
The explosions and synththetic SFX are pretty good though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixFmWj_eSys
Might as well play a real game instead.
>>319678603
Making that a PS3 exclusive was such a dumb move.
Can't wait. Buying a 980ti for it. Hope it doesn't die like Dust514
>>319678603
>PS4
Erm no, it's supposed to be coming to PC now. These projects are what killed WoD MMO.
>>319678762
Wondered how long it would take for the obnoxious DCS fag to show up
>>319678585
Not him, but I've done the same. OR version looks better because AA coverage and higher fidelity graphics. PS4 loses a ton of image quality to get it running and makes it look like a mobile game while on PC it looks like an actual AAA videogame
>mfw even ccp have got their game out of the door before star citizen even has a decent flight model
Lol
>>319678828
Not going to happen, it's owned by sony
>>319679054
Good to know, I'll factor that in when choosing which headset to buy.
PSVR is 1080p? Isn't that a lot of screen door effect?
>>319679116
The star citizen cultists all claim their shitty, floaty flight model is a feature not a bug.
>>319679358
The PSVR version was running at a lower resolution as well and the scaling was really obvious (Holy shit the lack of AA is criminal). If you want VR games that look console quality or better. Get OR or Vive. If you don't mind indie titles that are mobile quality or really downgraded console games (Whoever at Sony said PS3 fidelity was high, it's more PS2) get a PSVR.
>>319679543
Only slightly reduced by being full RGB custom display but it's still there and very noticeable as is the interpolation.
>>319678762
>DCS SU-27
>Not even DCS A-10 at the very least
>Not the vastly superior Falcon 4 BMS
>>319679543
the number of pixels doesn't really affect the 'screendoor effect'. it's the space between the pixels that's the problem. unless you want a 4k tv strapped to your head with a big tunnel to block out your peripherals the screen door is going nowhere until tech advances
>>319679543
Supposedly it's counteracted with high quality lenses and more subpixels, but you'd have to ask someone's who's actually used it about the visuals. SDE isn't really a big deal in VR though, if the content is good enough you stop giving a shit about pixels.
which VR device do I buy if my primary concern is porn?
>>319679543
Screen door is actually well managed. The newest one is actually better than the Vive Devkits as far as screen door goes. However,it uses a diffuser so it's slightly blurrier and aliasing is really, really noticable.
>>319679880
Oculus, they already have a solid porn community for both 2D and 3D.
>>319679752
Hm, I hope it's not too bad in Cockpit mode in AC7. Certainly not buying a headset when it comes out, but I want to play Ace Combat in VR someday.
>>319679617
reminds me of the shit physics in SWG:JTL
which were actually good in beta
>>319679772
BMS has no rift support yet.
>>319679772
>Su27 is the superior G2A fighter craft
>and modeled just as accurately as any paid module
>lol
>>319678754
Sure, but bad voice acting is one of this things that really sticks out to me. The system voice design is pretty good but I think someone didn't realise that there's something very informal about that accent that doesn't really work, at least for me. It would be like having a hillbilly voice.
If one suffers from myopia a.k.a. near-sightedness, are glasses required for vr headsets?
>>319680256
What about astigmatism and VR?
>>319680256
i think the oculus has space for glasses. carmack wears glasses so it would probably be a priority
>implying they can out freespace 2, freespace 2
>>319677106
I'd probably try and get into EVE again if they made it support the Rift.
>>319680256
Depends on how bad it is. I do ok without my glasses, but some people need them. You can use glasses in the headsets, but if you can avoid it, you should, because you lose FOV with glasses.
![673f4641f6337f5a33555bc3d444354272ba6e19.jpg__940x420_q85_crop-smart_subject_location-312,153_upscale[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/seJ1SLu.jpg "673f4641f6337f5a33555bc3d444354272ba6e19.jpg__940x420_q85_crop-smart_subject_location-312,153_upscale[1].jpg")
So long real world
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gB9jCEXVQDk
http://hantzgruber.tumblr.com/post/103515367865/updated-new-link-and-new-animation-also-youre
https://vine.co/v/euxJ11pveMW
https://vine.co/v/eZegVJJrhZV
https://vine.co/v/O3lwwJThAa1
>>319680563
I feel it in my bones
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnzCzV9Dnvs
>4chan temporarily offline
wtf is that stupid gook doing
>>319680563
>New Retro Arcade
Looks neat as fuck, can't wait to try it.
