[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
/v/ when did video game journalism die?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 4
/v/ when did video game journalism die?
>>
It was stillborn
>>
File: 1366377239054.png (720 KB, 2540x2874) Image search: [Google]
1366377239054.png
720 KB, 2540x2874
>>319271972
I don't really know. But E3 died around 2008.
>>
When print media died. Then the ME3 debacle was the final nail in the coffin.
>>
File: amiga.jpg (592 KB, 1999x1499) Image search: [Google]
amiga.jpg
592 KB, 1999x1499
>>319272152
Shit it was dead long before that. back in the Amiga days.
>>
>>319271972

There is no such thing as gaming journalism.

What we call gaming journalism is just another form of advertising.

So in that sense, it never died since it never existed.
>>
>>319271972
GG. When one person decided to be a slut. One tried to save face. And /v/ went full /a/.

Because of this event, gaming as a whole is ruined.
>>
It was never alive.
>>
File: 1429407343578.jpg (95 KB, 500x667) Image search: [Google]
1429407343578.jpg
95 KB, 500x667
>>319272330

finally someone fucking gets it
>>
Before internet gaming magazines were ok.
Now since people arent paying to buy 5-10 euro magazine in exchange for good product they get shit clickbait bloggerism for free.
>>
>>319274701
Just because you throw money at a product does not mean that product will have any kind of quality standard.

It made it easier for consumers to ''promote'' good shit but it didn't weed out all of the shitty products by default.
>>
it was never alive in the first place
>>
It was always bad but the things that are wrong with it have changed over time.
>>
>>319274993
If you pay for something theres an expectation of quality. Also the journalists had to keep up the standards if they wanted to get their work printed.
>>
mmm 2007
>>
>>319271972
Go read reviews from IGN in 1997-8. It was always shit.

Print media was a little better, but the fact of the matter is that it was always shit.
Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 4

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.