AMD wins again!
"I thought I would do my best to be a faget." -OP
Not bad considering that Just Cause 3 has Nvidia Goyimworks.
>>318748192
>AMD wins again!
>Fan locked at 20%
>Computer melts
>>318751406
>Locked at 20%
Literally what nigger.
>750 Ti
>27.1fps
>>318751480
Crimson update accidentally locked GPU fans at 20%, so a lot of people had their cards die on them.
>>318751526
It's a budget card, no one is expecting any wonders at maximum settings.
>tfw 760
feels bad desu
>tfw 750Ti
Upgrade to a memecard?
>>318751526
Upgraded recently from a 750ti to a 970.
>mfw i witness fps above 30
>>318751231
>AMD delivers shit performance as always
>m-muh Goyimworks!
>>318751526
>dumb frog cancer can't play it on decent fps
Well deserved
>>318751817
No, just stay with your super underground hipster card if you start talking about "meme cards" already, sperg
>>318751817
I'll sell you mine if you wait till Pascal.
>>318748192
780 still strong. I wonder how long my 780 still hold up, I can still max most games.
>>318748192
well damn, looks like I gotta play this at 1280x720 just to get 60.
>>318751406
>Fixed in a patch not even one day later
>Nvidia had three driver releases in the past 5 years that did it
Seems like it is ok when Nvidia is doing it.
It checks out.
>>318752474
You know, benefits of not being perpetually a week from bankruptcy and all.
>>318752474
Might i refer you to this
>>318752539
Stay mad AMDfags
>>318752474
>day later
You fucking wish. It took like 4 days over the black friday deliveries.
>>318748192
fury x has 5fps more than 970
how is that possible?
>>318752814
It's actually 6.5.
You have to wait two months for new housefire drivers before it will barely beat the 980.
>>318752897
>housefire drivers
cracked me up
>>318748192
why not 290x?
fucking cunts.
>>318753305
the reg 290 is over 60 so 290x should be the same or butter
>>318753305
Read the article, it burned down when they were testing Crimson.
>>318751565
Just in time for mommy to buy me a new AMD card for christmas FUUUUUUG :D
>>318748192
Its worrying that cards like the 290/390 and the 970 can barely stay above 60fps at 1080p.
Surely they cant be that close to being completely outdated.
I've done extensive scientific research which have concluded that /v/ is the only board still arguing about nvidia/AMD
Grow up
>>318753671
>no fun allowed
>>318754024
> it's fun to shit post about video cards
>>318754212
Yep.
There are always so fags who take it as a personal insult.
>>318753665
>28 nm process is close to 5 years old
Ya think it's getting a little long in the tooth?
![e8591b426b[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/emDBTYR.jpg "e8591b426b[1].jpg")
>>318751526
>670 isn't even on this list
>don't buy 970 guys muh 3.5
>instead get this more expensive amd card that performs worse
Why can't all AMDfags just die.
>>318755641
Remember, never trust an AMDJew.
>>318748192
DELETE THIS
>>318751565
sweet jesus my sides
just imagine whoever was reponsible for this in AMD
>you just fried quater of our fanbase by turning off their coolers
>lol whoops
>>318748192
>nvidia has 3 card options for 60+ fps
>two of them OVERPRICES AS FUCK
>AMD has 4 card options for 60+ fps
>starting at a reasonable price
nvidia shills are the macfags of graphics cards, prove me wrong
>>318757518
>4 options
An EOL 290.
A 390 that costs about the same as a 970 and performs slightly worse.
A 390x that costs more and performs within 1%.
A Fury that costs more than a 390x and should perform about 5% better.
A FURY X TITAN X KILLER that costs as much as a 980Ti and loses to a 980.
Keep in mind you only get that performance for about two hours before your card cooks itself.
Amazing value right there.
>>318757518
>overpriced
Marginal performance costs more. If you want the best you have to pay. And 970 is the objectively best graphics cards you can purchase. Cheaper or same price as the AMD equivalents, runs everything and doesn't have all the problems AMDfags always have.
>>318757518
AMD, like Volkswagen, only wins benchmarks. Real world performance of AMD cards, like Volkswagens, has been shit for decades.
>>318757807
390 is a better card. faster and won't have a year or more shaved off its lifespan because of deceptive corner-cutting. it's a damn shame it runs gameworks game that runs like absolute dog shit and other gameworks game that ran so poorly it stopped being sold marginally worse.
>>318758326
It's a lot more expensive for what, half a frame? And that's in a non-Gameworks game.
>b-but my memes and 3.5
>>318758326
>AMDfag is confronted with the fact that his hardware isn't running on fairy dust
>muh Gameworks!
Errytiem
>>318758326
>m-muh gameworks
>>318748192
But this game is optimized like shit, so does it even count?
>>318759435
>it doesn't count if it's not favorable!
>only DICE titles shall be used!
>>318758483
>>318759186
>product specifically designed to cripple old cards and competitor's cards performance does what it says on the tin
>>318748192
>got an R9 290 over two years ago
>haven't had a single reason to upgrade
anyone else know that feel?
>>318759634
Other junkies?
>>318759524
>what do you mean AMD Ruby isn't a legitimate benchmark
>>318759763
>it clearly shows AMD is superior!
>Nvidia BTFO!
>>318760229
heres your reply
>AMD
Literally poverty: the GPU - Now Featuring NO DRIVERS LOL
hey,
why are AMD users so excited for driverless cars?because they are used to driverless cards
>tfw GTX 680
>tfw your card beats midrange 960s
It's like Nvidia doesn't want me to get rid of this old-ass card.
I play everything 1080p 60fps with med/high settings.
I bought this card when it came out. Never had a crash, driver issue or overheating. It's at stock clocks, never felt the need to overclock.
>>318751565
Only is you also use a third party fan controller
>>318760514
So when will AMD collaborate with Volvo and bring to market the very first self-immolating driverless car?
>>318760539
>you can't use anything but our consecrated overdrive we update twice in a decade
>>318760229
this bait again
>>318760651
what's the problem?
I'm sorta poor. Should I go for a 380X?
>>318748192
>FagWorks
Checks out.
>>318760534
In the same boat as you, wishing Pascal is worth upgrading to.
>>318757461
>We'll call it an "accident" and offer discounts on new cards as a reward
[Hand Rubbing Intensifies]
>gtx960
i bought this card without the intention to max out games, i bought it cause i didnt want to use a gtx560 in 2015, c'mon people, dont you know which year it is?!
>>318751480
>>318751406
>>318751565
Cards didn't die, they overheated and turned off. after cooling they were fully functional.
Why is it a news for people? People even post happy merchant. nVidia did this several times and Fermi owners have some gripes with the latest driver.
Both sides fuck up, at least no house burned down.
>>318748192
>>318751869
>>>/v/rules/3
>>318757779
>A FURY X TITAN X KILLER that costs as much as a 980Ti and loses to a 980.
On this game, for whatever reason. In most others it always beats the 980 and competes with the 980ti.
>>318765253
Anon that is way too reasonable and totally not in line with my jimmy rustling intent.
>>318751729
>buy budget card 2 years ago
>it still plays the newest games on ultra with console FPS or medium settings with 60 FPS
I for one am not complaining
Why is Steam discussion boards filled with people with saying they have a 970 and the game drops the frames to below 20?
Something seems off.
>>318766712
>Steam discussion boards
Half of them will have something like a FX 6300 or i3's or even older CPU's.
i dont have an AMD heatsink
I dont want nvidia 3.5
what is man to do
>>318767161
Intel is the only choice.
>>318751565
but any GPU will automatically shut off once it goes over it's TDP, which means sudden black screen and you'll have to hold the restart button on your PC, which is bullshit, but the cards don't actually die, do they as in permanently break?
>>318757958
No sorry, VW is a reliable car, always has for many years.
Golf voted best car ever
AMD yep theyre fucking toasters
>>318748192
>37fps on Ultra with 760
Honestly about what I'd expect if not a bit better
