Make a card and contribute it to this thread, serious cards only, if the thread communally dislikes your card leave /v/ forever
http://www.hearthcards.net/
![a3a8f78c[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/oPBca1p.png "a3a8f78c[1].png")
>>318705482
Fucking learn the lingo.
Discard a card
shit thread
>>318709361
I wouldn't even play this if it was 3 mana.
>>318709361
Good idea, poor stat distribution
>>318709573
Good idea, but you won't have >2 overload at any time so it's really just a situational arcane shot
>>318709701
>Succubus
>Male
YOU FUCKING IDIOT
I tried.
>>318709701
That's an incubus then, you slob.
>>318709929
10/10
>>318709852
Overloaded crystals are both the current locked crystals and the crystals that will be locked in the following turn. I think it's possible to get 3 or 4 damage out of it. And if you're running Elemental Destruction it's also quite good.Atleast that's the idea.
![8c767a36[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/0YzpldN.png "8c767a36[1].png")
>>318709361
make it red and blizzard will put in.
>>318709929
Blood Knight is way, WAY better.
>>318709189
Also needs to specify if its from the hand or the deck. If hand: shitty card, if deck: also pretty shitty but possibly playable.
>>318710026
Thats actually pretty interesting.
>>318710145
fuck me, i forgot energy cost and other bullshit
>>318710026
Give it taunt.
It fits and it will make the card viable.
>>318704875
>unidentified
What does that even mean?
>>318710279
I've never played Hearthstone.
death knight when
ey b0ss :P
>>318704875
>>318710448
I assumed it'd make them unplayable.
>>318709929
add "gain taunt and +4+4" for a good card that still works as an alternative to blood knight.
>>318709980
>>318709864
It's a meme you dips
>>318709361
The sad reality is that board is in 9/10 cases completely removed of anything that could be useful, such as taunts, by the enemy.
7/2 isn't useful for shit.
>>318709852
You get Overload for current turn and next turn.
Thats up to 20 locked mana crystals, even if it realistically is 3-6.
>>318711018
>I was just pretending to be Reddit!
>>318710729
Go fuck yourself, you autistic fag.
>>318709573
this card is actually crazy the way it's worded right now if you stack overload and spell damage it could easily do an insane amount of damage
>>318710548
if it had +4 autism it would be playable but in its current state i wouldn't see this ever seeing competitive play
>>318711258
Redditer detected
>>318711094
You being a retarded newfag doesn't make me Reddit.
>>318711446
use a starcraft photo and you got it
>can't make secrets
Shit card maker you got there
>>318711627
I don't understand.
>>318709852
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-7PGOAb5SA
The card would be insane in malygos shaman
>>318711689
warriors don't have secrets you fucking inbred
it's also a shit card
Not sure if the text is the proper language.
>>318711891
>>318711665
upvoted
r8 dont h8
>>318711939
Draw 3 then discard 2 might be more correct, either way its a better tracking
>>318711986
You can't be serious
>>318711986
You would only be overloaded once, as overload is actually part of the cost to play it.
>>318712084
When the fuck did /v/ like MtG: Jizzard edition?
>>31871198
You worded it wrong, also it should've been a 3/5 Totem. Otherwise you'd spawn 2 ragers.
Also the card already exists
How's mine?
>>318712084
I just realized that shit on his eyelids is supposed to be eyes
>>318711986
Reverse the order of those keywords, it doesn't make sense right now.
I tried.
>>318712470
The deathrattle effect isn't reasonable.
>>318712242
?
>>318712251
>>318712645
I guess overload isn't the right term then, but I was aiming for a functionally similar effect as a cost.
3/3 for 4
or a 6/6 over two bodies for 2 mana now, 2 mana next turn
If the threat isn't removed, they can start exponentially multiplying ala patron, except your opponent can react to it and there is no warsong commander
>>318712687
this is pretty terrible.
>>318712441
Worse swamp ooze?
>>318712470
Why would you give it a deathrattle? I like the concept of proliferating Divine shields. But for 8 mana as a 7/8 with that effect it'd be balanced, just not played because
>BGH
>shit stats
and its probably a win more card
>>318712687
What do you mean reflects damage? Does it deal damage to the enemy? Does your hero attack the minion as well? Does reflect nullify damage as well?
Also it looks insanely strong, 4/3 for 3. Even if you can't attack agaist aggro decks this would destroy them
>>318712441
>A worse swamp ooze
>>318712687
Lower the attack value, probably raise the cost, and make it epic.
>>318705482
Lose a card from where? Your collection? Needs a stat buff if that's the case, but either way it's almost literally pay to win.
>>318712835
er, 6/6 for 6 with overload(2).
Each activation with some on the battlefield incurs more and more overload cost.
>>318712835
You know Kodo Rider is literally the same exact card you designed minus the shaman/tribal.
3/5 for 6 mana summons a 3/5 on inspire.
>>318711891
Kind of interesting honestly.
>>318712969
There are tons of minions that summon more minions anon. Kodo rider comes out 2 turns later (or 4 turns later if you want to pop inspire as you summon it)
>>318712897
DUDE
>>318710026
That's one infuriating card.
>>318709980
>>318711018
Litteraly always bait the newfags
>>318712735
>>318712847
I actually meant to make him a 5 mana crystal summon, I forgot to remove the 8. Here's another one.
>>318713378
Already exists anon
>>318713362
insanely Op. Crazy statline, even a toshley is only 5/7
AND you get another body with taunt. much better than toshly and hogger, would basically be the next Dr boom.
>>318713378
Objectively worse than Aspirant.
>>318713759
doesn't have a class though and it doesn't specify empty, so it may actually be a full mana crystal like coin
broken desu
First time be gentle.
It's legendary but the dragon doesn't show up for spells.
>>318711891
Tfw mine's not as interesting as this.
![2f1acb85[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/9ySiDZ6.png "2f1acb85[1].png")
>>318713613
>would basically be the next Dr boom.
I hate Dr.boom
>>318713904
this would be beyond broken.
would basically solidify fatigue priest against ANY deck.
basically, you'd get the kill condition of a fatigue priest. +30 cards.
AND you get the kill condition of your opponents deck starting at 10 mana AND you draw 3 cards.
absurdly OP.
>>318713919
Would have to be worded more carefully: would attacking a minion <=6 hp just not work or would it reduce them to 1?
How about this fellas?
>>318714184
Pretty good.
>>318714127
Summoning extra bodies is a really big bonus I think you're undervaluing how much of a difference 2 taunts make, especially with Bran existing.
If anything this should be like 5 mana at least.
>>318714184
>>318714238
Jesus christ this site...
>>318713904
Why didn't you even make this 10 mana?
Also, just no. Add 30 cards to your deck? Draw 3 cards?
Compare this to Pyroblast, which is just 10 damage. Mind control, which is basically add one of their minions to your deck and cast it for free.
>>318714096
My bad, it would reduce them to 1 health. Tried to make it so there wasn't way too much text on the card.
WHAT'S THE BEST CARDS GAME?
>>318714315
so basically a 6 mana 2/6 that draws 2 cards.
That's pretty OP actually.
When balancing inspire you have to remember that
>effects can be repeated more than once
>all minions with inspire benefit from inspires activation
nice try though.
![bc0f0d3e[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/a190cPU.png "bc0f0d3e[1].png")
Our lord and savior arrives.
>>318714467
So basically a worse grim patron?
>>318714431
I'll try better senpai
>>318714467
Better wording: "Enrage: Gain Deathrattle: Summon Endless Assaulters."
>>318714603
I just started playing yesterday, didn't know.
>tfw thought it was a little OP
>a better version exists
r8 or h8
>>318714780
Hmmm, I like it. I just don't think it should be rogue focused. Rogues have very few hard removals on purpose (assassinate/sabotage) they mainly focus on damage clears that add up (shiv, blade flurry, backstab, si7, undercity valiant)
I would give this to another class, warlock maybe.
>>318714859
Needs to be a 5 cost for what it does.
>>318713919
Just make it so he captures instead of killing then.
False swipe them to 1 HP then bring them over to your side Goyo style.
![fb8ba448[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/OU71xcT.png "fb8ba448[1].png")
Someone with more experience can probably word this better
>>318704875
>>318714859
Aw fuck, I liked that commercial
>>318714928
Which safe contains this card?
>>318714317
because to me mc took the 10 spot for priest and a 10 mana draw card seems really boring to me especially when you could draw pretty much anything including your own cards.
If priest had something like prep I'd make it 10 but idk.
But mind control isn't that because you don't gain the battlecry
>>318714073
made it a legendary for that reason but too strong? idk
>>318715070
>using venge ulti
![a4d4f1c1[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/QB83M8U.png "a4d4f1c1[1].png")
I finally made a card.Don't judge me too hard
>>318715175
>made it a legendary for that reason but too strong? idk
even if it were a 1-of in a deck, it's fatigue priest. the point of fatigue priest is to go through every card.
>>318715242
I like it, I just think you should do
>Frost Bolt
>Arcane Missiles
>Flame Cannon
Also I'd get rid of the enrage. Spells costing 2 less is a really big bonus when you look at sorcs apprentice or antonidas, and don't forget sorcs is a 3/2 body and this is a 2/4 easily because you can ping yourself.
>>318715398
I like this. Obviously a tech card but it has its place in high-level play.
>>318710026
I was thinking about this earlier today, an enrage card with less attack, but didn't know how it would make any sense. You nailed the flavor with it and everything bretty gud/10
>>318715228
Yeah man.
>>318715562
Card exists in the form of a curse card.
LET THE DUMP COMMENCE
>>318715634
>>318711891
>this
>interesting
What?
It fits Sans but it's literally "take a nap" the card
>>318715652
>Not giving it a coinflip
It's like you don't know warhammer
>>318715725
>>318715759
True, but I hate stupid meta rules like that.
>>318704875
i get the feeling nobody in this thread plays hearthstone
if your card is a proper noun i.e todd howard, it has to be a legendary. otherwise it's one of the other rarities. OP shouldn't be legendary because it's not a proper noun.
>>318714595
Valve online ccg when?
>>318715820
Why not just do
>battle cry
>deal 4 damage to 2 random enemy minions?
it doesn't make sense
>>318715725
>lose -1/-1
So, gain 1/1?
>>318715820
>>318715896
Battlecries only activate if played from your hand. The card effect is fucking weird though.
>>318715942
Should be 5 mana that that summons 3 1/1s that give you a coin whenever they attack.
![8aec93ff[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/xK6CUZ5.png "8aec93ff[1].png")
>>318715942
>4 mana: If your opponent doesn't have AoE or a board, win the game.
Slug
>>318716009
So better than Ball of Spiders?
>>318715976
Cards already a batlecry.
Just make N'Doul do the battlecry and get rid of the concept of Geb since it accomplishes the same thing?
It says "minions around Geb"
well, which minions. you don't choose where it's summoned, might as well be random. and if it's destroyed, whats the point of a 1/1 body
>>318715942
>>318715384
I thought of it like Reno where
>okay I win IF he doesn't have this card
where it's a huge game changer for certain games IF it's in the other players hand which fits the legendary title most imo.
I also like the archetype of priest just flatout stealing cards all the time.
I am very proud of this one.
>>318710543
>mech romancer
suddenly that pic makes a lot more sense ;^)
>>318713406
>infinite health
>infinite attack power
>for 1 mana
>>318716059
Different class cards different effects.
See frostbolt + dark bomb + quickshot.
Same rules apply in MtG. You could have a blue deck with burn cards that could cost the same amount of land, but deal less damage because that's not what blue's made for, but you still get the damage/burn of a red deck at a consequence
>>318716134
This is actually a very interesting cards, but I'd place it at least 2 mana higher.
>>318716134
>>318707253
Isn't that just blessing of might?
>>318716197
I like it, very similar to dark cultist.
>>318716134
Very cool card. I agree with the other anon, should have to be a higher mana cost as it's basically a pseudo-removal
>>318714684
Don't get your hopes up kid, Patron decks are shit now.
Hearthstone or Magic? Or other card game?
>>318716279
>>318716330
Its a reroll, It could turn some good stuff for you, or something real good for them, or the otherway around.
>>318716279
So, basically Venomous Cobra?
Also, if this can't be damaged by any minions wouldn't this just be stupid OP? If anything just give it divine shield.
>>318716321
It's swap, not give +3
>>318707253
I think you should remove the can't attack. I like how it's at the 4 attack point so Shadow words don't work.
![28040839[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/u1lwHza.png "28040839[1].png")
>>318714315
Making it draw one card would be much better.
>>318716464
It has less hp, easily killed by most heropowers or spells/aoe. I do agree it could be powerful if buffed, but then an owl ruins it.
>>318716417
>>318716563
Confuse already exists, anon
>>318716220
>>318716615
I made a mistake making them full mana crystals.
>>318716414
Magic, you gotta pay money just like hearthstone (f2p will never ever catch up to the meta because of how long it takes to get all the legendaries and epics) but there is an actual player market so you can buy singles and build a deck easily, hearthstone does not allow trading and you can only get cards by being lucky when you open a pack, or dusting to craft one (which takes forever for epics and legendaries, if 1 pack of 5 cards is all duplicates that's going to be a whopping 40 dust each time, a single legendary card is 1600 dust, an epic is 400, and you can get a pack a day if you grind enough)
if you meant magic the gathering origins, its shit, wait till it has a bigger card pool. mtg has over 40,000 unique cards, origins isnt even 1% of that number.
>>318716685
Ironically the only balanced card posted so far.
I actually spent some time thinking about this one.
>>318716417
Isn't this just a REALLY REALLY weak Foe reaper?
I'd rather it be
>any minion damaged by this one will damage minions on it's side of the board equal to its attack
or something.
>>318716615
Owl as an argument isn't really fair, owl ruins everything.
>>318716818
Mana cost should be lower
also it can't be "Draw" it has to be placed, otherwise you could specifically search your deck for Dr. Boom.
>>318716751
>>318715242
Keep in mind that if you ping it yourself immediately it's a 2/4 for 6 that makes all of your spells cost 2 less, and gives you a random frost/fire/lightningbolt immediately, as well as any time you use your hero power later.
It's pretty absurd.
>>318716919
>otherwise you could specifically search your deck for Dr. Boom.
why doesnt hearthstone have deck searching abilities yet? MTG has tons of cards that let you do that.
>>318716818
indirect doctor doom nerf
Here's another.
>I feel like theres a card like this, but I don't know.
>>318716925
>beside itself
>not
>ALL OTHER minions
>>318716983
Because Hearthstone has much smaller decks and RNG is the only factor that stops people from getting perfect curves. MTG has to deck search for lands, Hearthstone doesn't.
>>318716925
>>318716919
Some of these are not designed to be perfect, They are meant to match the character they are based on
>people actually post and discuss card balance
>in a fucking meme thread
Go away you fucking shitters and take your meme shit garbage game elsewhere
>>318717065
so hearthstone will never be as good as MTG then is what i'm gathering from that
what a shame
>>318716919
> otherwise you could specifically search your deck for Dr. Boom
You realize that's the point, right? IT can tutor for Boom (or any other 7 cost you have), but if you tempo play it on 5 your opponent has two turns to kill it and force the discard. If you play it on 6 you have to play it with a 1-cost minion or spell or you've wasted mana. The only way to actually PLAY the 7-cost you draw is to keep it protected or discount its price by two somehow and play it as a big turn-10 tempo push.
>>318716818
I actually really like this.
>>318717023
You mean twisting Nether but much better?
>>318717069
I feel like Star Platinum would be the equivalent of Al'Akir
>>318717151
>wasted mana
there are dudes in the world tournament who ended turn with a bunch of unspent mana
having unspent mana is not a guaranteed bad thing
>>318717069
>>318717147
>implying deck searching cards are good
muh 30 card slots
muh combos
>>318716919
>Mana cost should be lower
So it would be a 4 Mana 3/5? It would give the opponent atleast a extra turn to shut it down but that would also make it alot less practical.
>>318717151
Thanks anon. Now post yours.
>>318717141
dumb frogposter
>>318713378
>Deathrattle isn't 'Lose 3 Mana Crystals'
oi vey
>>318711891
hah it's basically a free win
>>318717262
>deck searching is bad
>meanwhile nobody cares about discover which lets you break the 2 card limit for important shit like polymorphs
i've lost ranked games because of faggot discover mages with fucking six polymorphs
>>318717261
Strictly better Fireball?
>>318717280
>So it would be a 4 Mana 3/5? It would give the opponent atleast a extra turn to shut it down but that would also make it alot less practical.
well you're basically drawing a card
so that's 1 strong effect
then you have drawing a specific card
which is absurdly strong
although I will admit discarding a specific card is strong as well.
I feel like it should be a 2/8
Not a big threat, but a large body that can stick.
>>318713904
>>318714073
>>318714317
>>318715175
>>318715384
Fixing this shit, I dont know proper wording for this game.
"Random opponents cards replace cards remaining in deck"
Make it so your deck count never changes, and program wise, could be a 50/50 chance that the next card you draw is yours or opponents.
>>318717460
>a large body that can stick
flame lance
>>318717426
Discover isn't deck searching though? Discover as a mechanic is pretty interesting, players have to make choices now. The difference between Mortal Coil, Power Overwhelming or even Corruption could be gamechanging.
>>318716760
>>318716414
Thank you so much for your answer!
>>318717460
Fireball can target face. This is only for minions.
>>318717261
>>318704875
basically all of these cards have improper wording on them.
Not literally all of them, but it's too difficult to sift through.
>>318717508
A card that doesn't see play at all. If you're talking about removal for 4/5 mana nothing deals 8 damage except flame lance. The hardest of removals (hex and polymorph) wouldn'teven trigger the deathratttle, which really just proves my point.
Also, because it's prepping for a 7-drop, it's 2 attack is basically an anti-aggro measure. So I think 4 mana for a 2/8 is fair.
How OP is this?
>>318717587
>basically all of these cards have improper wording on them.
We're not getting paid to do this shit. Just enjoy the ideas being brainstormed then question the balance.
>>318717537
no it's not deck searching, it creates a card out of thin air, you get to pick from 3 so there's an absurdly high chance you get a core card like poly to deal with anything the opponent plays, it's a complete no brainer every time if you have a hard control spell available which is basically every time in my experience.
>>318717712
its pretty op.
I mean, even feugen and stallagg require 2 deathrattle effects to summon a 11/11. which means its much harder to summong because you could just silence either ofthem
>>318717562
>>318717809
>3 so there's an absurdly high chance you get a core card like poly to deal with anything the opponent plays
not it doesn't. You have the exact same change as any other class card. Just because someone needs a specific removal doesn't mean they have a high chance. RNG is RNG. If I was playing Tomb Spider and I needed a Boar to deal 1 damage I'd still have the same chance with every other beast. Which, in that case would also be a no-brainer if the boar did pop up.
It only seems like a high chance because that's what they picked. If they were retarded and didn't pick poly in your example, then you wouldn't feel this way.
>>318710292
>2 mana 5 4
>from the hand it's questionably shitty
>from deck it's fucking amazing
What is it with idiots and not understanding that discarding from the deck is not only completely negligible, it's actually advantageous most of the time.
It would be a great card if it was from the deck. Would probably still be decent if it was from the hand. Succubus isn't shit because it discards a card, it's shit because it has 3 health and dies to fucking everything.
If she was a 2 mana 3 4 she would be borderline auto include in every zoo and demon deck.
I'm not so sure about this.
I mostly wanted to do the Battlecry and Deathrattle.
>>318717932
strictly better wolfrider.
and wolfrider already sees play.
>>318717882
![dbafa88d[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/Te3w5Dl.png "dbafa88d[1].png")
Basically a stronger Annoy-o-tron
>>318717993
>all none
>>318710729
>>>/b/
Until you stop trying to fit in so hard
>>318716783
It's worse than wisp, the only free card.
>>318718042
card is really uhhh, untelling.
Like, does his Deathrattle activate the remotes DRs? Does the remotes have a DR or effect or what
alsolegendaries use Nouns, not pronouns.
>>318718104
Nope. It's just a stronger sunwalker which is a div shield, taunt 4/5 for 6 mana.
>>318718042
Remotes don't have an effect right now.
I was mostly curious how a Battlecry/Deathrattle combination that can add/remove minions would work.
Whatever I cant think of a dank meme
>>318718127
Sorry
Haven't played the game but i tried.
>>318718385
whoops meant for
>>318718256
>>318716197
make it a 5 mana cost and it's balanced.
>>318704875
idk why i even wated my time with this desu baka senpai
http://www.hearthcards.net/cards/1a3e0f5a.png
>>318717957
tomb spider discovers a minion, i mean discover a spell, there's a lot less spells than minions, so the chance of getting a control spell is so much higher
mill
>all these people calling cards Reddit
Gee who would've guessed a Hearthstone OC thread would be full of assburgers...
>>318718409
Has there been any FUCKING UPDATE yet jesus FUCK. there aren't even threads on /h/ about it anymore
I've no idea how to play this card game, so I doubt I can make any good fake ones. Here's some DaS-YGO cards I made one day while I was bored, though
Something like this has to exist already right?
>>318718771
> strictly better magma rager
SHIT BALANCE BLIZZARD
>>318715725
Too MtG for hearthstone.
>>318718863
It's a class card you fucking SCRUB
>>318718234
Training Dummy
