do you think new vegas would have gotten more praise if it came out before fallout 3?
>>318298921
Yes. Remember, older is always better no matter what.
>>318298921
By the average guy/reviewer? No, they love bethesda to the death while thinking obisidan is just okay.
They would heavily criticise going 3D shooter with the Fallout franchise and it would probably be ignored by most people.
But people love them bethesda games/hyping them, so its all ok, mods will fix it.
>>318299405
>Remember, older is always better no matter what
>Older
>Always better
So by that logic Fallout 3 is better than New Vegas... Because FO3 is older than NV.
Nice logic bruh
>>318298921
It would of got more praise if you started in a vault and the strip was actually big and impressive. That's all it needed to be a good game.
>>318300062
He's joking, making fun of people who think that way you doofus
>>318298921
Obviously. Any game that mostly reuses another game's assets that was developed by a different team is going to be a hard sell both critically and comercially.
>>318298921
No, I don't think Bethesda would have spent that much promoting the game as they did with Fallout 3. Probably would have just used the game as promotion for their next Fallout game.
No, because then New Vegas would have been the first game to ruin the franchise by using the Gamebryo engine. New Vegas seems better because Fallout 3 was so shit.
>>318300327
samefagging this hard so you don't looklike a retard.
>>318300589
sorry anon but you're mistaken
>>318300062
>Being this new
