Why can't we shoot kids in games? isn't that a form of censorship?
why didn't he just shoot urkel?
>>318191843
>Why can't we shoot kids in games?
That's like asking "Why can't we jerk off tigers in games?". It's not that we can't, it's just that no one has actually done it yet.
>isn't that a form of censorship?
No.
Because Americans keep shooting them in real life.
>>318191843
>mfw shooting the kids that steal your shit in Fallout 2
pretty good desu
>>318191843
>Why can't we shoot kids in games?
Play fallout 1 or 2 if you want to shoot kids. The real question is why you include kids that you can kill these days unless you want to court controversy to sell your game.
>>318192263
CPS would take your child if you were involved in making or playing a game where you could shoot children, in the US anyways.
>>318192181
You could in the old fallout games
>>318192181
>Nobodies ever done it
DEUS EX you god damn newfag
>>318191976
>>318191976
>deleted
>>318192181
I'm DEUS Ex you can brain the first kid you see and then throw him into a river.
>>318192181
>It's not that we can't, it's just that no one has actually done it yet.
something something neo-/v/ something something REEEEEEEEEE
>>318192181
No, no its not. There's no real demand for jerking off tigers and unless the game was centered around that what reason would there be to implement that?
If you're in a game that has children, and mostnof the game is you killing other people, you'd have to go out of your way to not implement killing children.
Obama
>>318191843
Because the ESRB would fuck up the ratings on it
>muh censorship
fucking shut up already
Besides being an edgy 14 year old, why would you ever want to kill children?
>>318191843
Because the people in charge have a difficult time separating fantasy and reality
which is pretty ironic since that's exactly why they insist on censoring, because they think kids will play GTA and then go on killing sprees
>>318191843
>isn't that a form of censorship?
Arguably, yes. Ratings themselves can be counted as a form of censorship, especially if the distributor refuses to stock, or puts further restrictions on games/movies/albums of a certain rating.
sure is edgy in here
>>318191843
the morality police will not permit this action
Your transgression has been logged
>>318191843
I don't actually know why. It doesn't make sense. You can kill adults in games, but suddenly when there's a child NPC they're bulletproof.
There's no logic behind it.
>>318194167
Realism, it's fucking weird when you get an open world filled with adults without a kid ever in sight or one where adults are dying all around immortal kids
>>318192181
>"Why can't we jerk off tigers in games?"
What about that one kinect game?
>>318191843
Why do you want to shoot kids in games?
That' s the better question.
>censorship
I don't think you know what that word means.
>>318191843
Same reason women and animals in media aren't subject to the same cruel deaths men are. And if you really had some artistic agenda with depicting the death of children surely there are more effective mediums than vidya gaems
>>318191843
>isn't that a form of censorship?
Yes it is.
Self censoring is still censorship.
You would have to be a complete naive retard to think that devs wouldn't put more kid killing in games if there would be so much backlash from soccer moms (which btw don't even play the games).
>>318192363
[citation needed]
>>318194481
Lets say there's no backlash from blowing up digital kids, why would more devs put it in game unless they want to pander to edgelords?
>>318191843
I sure as hell want to kill the kids in Skyrimjob.
I hope hatred has kids in it
>>318194553
WTF
>>318194553
Welp, time to reinstall.where do you find those? Doesn't Loverslab ban any loli stuff?
>>318194314
>Playing video games that lets you kill adults in game doesn't actually make you go kill adults IRL, everyone knows this that isn't a retard
>Playing video games that lets you kill children in game DOES mean that you will go kill children IRL
PERFECTLY logical, what the fuck is wrong with your mind.
>>318194663
It makes scenes in Africa more believable.
>>318191843
>isn't that a form of censorship?
You fucks are taking this too far!
>M-MUH CENSORSHIP
Did the GG fags just move to this thread instead?
>>318191843
>isn't that a form of censorship?
Why do you fucking children keep asking this stupid ass question?
>>318194553
excuse me???
Why are there so many games where dead bodies don't react to being shot?
I think Crysis had that because of Germany or something, but what about the rest?
>>318191843
It would be censor ship if a developer made a game, and then the publisher made them remove content to fit their views.
The real issue is that developers clearly don't take their own games seriously. If a movie director has a vision, hes going to stick to it, even if hes showing something controversial. Sex scenes, people dying and being mutilated, torture, all manner of shocking and horrific shit is shown on film and no one bats an eye. Video games only have these subjects as taboo because people have collectively started to shy away from them. If those boundaries were to be pushed then the taboo would disappear.
>>318192382
Yeah and you'd receive the title of Childkiller which would set all your relations to zero and everyone would hate you
>>318194553
>Mmmm Salami my favorite
Mfw
>>318194406
Why do you want to shoot adults?
What if the game only allowed you to kill children, could I ask why you want to kill adults?
>>318191843
It doesn't make fucking sense anyway. Any reason you could give (it's all sjw shit anyway) can easily be flipped over with the question, "Why can you kill minorities or women, then?"
>>318194663
>loads his question with edgelord meme
Let me give you the benefit of the doubt and ask you this: Is there something morally wrong with being an edgelord?
Protip: if your answer is yes, then you are retarded
if your answer is no, then you are still retarded because your post is pointless
You are trying too hard newwfag kid, go to /b/ and lurk for awhile to learn how to shitpost in a way that can't be shot down in half a second.
>>318194910
>triggered normies don't exist on /v/
>muh SJW boogieman
>>318191843
You can make what you want, but most games try to be marketable.
>>318195639
>Is there something morally wrong with being an edgelord?
No, there's nothing wrong with having the mentality of a 13 year old, if you're 13.
>You are trying too hard
Pot, kettle, ect.
>>318194553
>>318195091
>anyone anti-censorship is AUTOMATICALLY a goobergate faggot
When did pretending to be a SJW faggot become a meme on /v/? That is a better question.
>>318195482
You won't get replies to people you out as being retarded for having double standards, hypocrisy, and the inability for logical thinking.
I can tell them you're a spy and they will kill you.
>>318195639
What does morals have anything to do with what he posted?
People don't care about tits in videogames anymore. But the only reason a game dev puts it in is specifically to appeal to people who get off on videogame tits. If people stopped caring about kids being blown up in videogames the exact same principle would apply.
>>318195895
>No
Retard confirmed
>>318194253
Welcome, Rebbit
>>318195753
Well, i only said "WTF", i don't know any other reaction that could be taken out of that situation.
>>318196446
>What does morals have anything to do with what he posted?
If you can't see why then you are too retarded to understand why obviously. No amount of explaining is going to help your condition.
>>318191843
Just because we don't do something, doesn't mean we should.
>>318196746
>i don't know any other reaction that could be taken out of that situation.
I think you do know
>>318196746
Oh, maybe a natural normal reaction like. Holy fuck that is hot! Or like this poster: >>318195976
Or if you are gay, I guess you wouldn't have those reactions either...
>>318196964
Okay moral authority, why shouldn't we?
>>318194553
What mod?
Simple. USA and UK have laws over killing kids in video games. I shit you not. In the West, USA is No.1 buyer of video games, then UK is No.2
Since they're so big, making a game where you can kill children pushes the rating up to adult automatically. So most companies don't because they don't want to lose potential sales due to the new rating.
That's why.
>>318196854
Let me know when you'd like to address the points being brought up rather than just dodge everything.
>>318197261
>USA and UK have laws over killing kids in video games
I wouldn't doubt in the current year 1984 UK has laws against this, but USA does not, stop spreading bullshit like a little faggot.
>>318195416
But you still have the option to do it, dingus
>>318196997
Oh, i'm sorry that i'm not attracted to 3D kids that suck dick, i'm so very sorry.
Is the fact that you can't kill monsterkid in Undertale censorship?
Die Hard should be censored. It's 2015.
>>318197261
Really? You can technically kill children in MGSV, but it isn't AO
>>318197261
It's not a law, just that the ESRB will almost instantly give a game an AO rating if it has kid killing and since most stores don't stock AO games, that's financial suicide to include.
>>318197594
>you are too retarded to understand why obviously. No amount of explaining is going to help your condition.
Let me know when you increase your mental capacity, reading comprehension, and education to the level required to address points being brought up rather than having me just repeat myself.
>>318197731
They do with age ratings, I didn't mean laws, neither has 'laws', but ESRB auto raises it to AO if you can kill children.
Feel free to look this up yourself.
>ad hom
Nice, insults are the last refuge of somebody who has no argument.
Typical American.
>>318197984
Done already
ESRB rates games, and console companies use these ratings to judge whether or not they should be on consoles. As it stands, no AO games are allowed on consoles, and by modern standards, killing children makes a game AO.
>>318197896
So gay then?
>>318198010
That's what I meant. See >>318198137
>>318197986
Shrug. Unlikely they got that far, or it isn't consider a "major part" of the game. Or something. Fuck knows. But that's the reason. Hatred Devs said that same thing when asked bout children.
>>318197984
The do censor it for some audiences. The board is edited to say "I hate people".
>>318198250
If that's going to make you happy, who am i to judge.
>>318198275
>>318198178
>>318198178
jesus
>>318198137
So you admit that you were being a retard for using the term laws, but then still CRY like a little bitch about internet cyber-bullying >AD HOM >AD HOM LEL U HAVE NO ARGUMENT!11ones
Look, kid, it wasn't my fault you made a dumbass comment in the first place. Not to mention it isn't ad hom if it is true. :^)
Depends on the games you're playing.
>>318198454
So gay, then?
I know this /v/ and all, but why you being such a timid little beta faggot? Why are you even on the internet, let alone this website?
>>318198178
>ION TV
Nothing to see here.
>>318198936
Stop crying, Anon.
>>318198465
In my country it gets censored for prime time TV because you can't show certain ratings before 9:30pm so they cut it down so they can play it in the 8:30 slot. They cut a lot of movies to make the rating lower so they can put them in better time slots. Sometimes it's just a matter of discretion cuts when there's violence so Murphys torture scene in Robocop is heavy cut and is mostly implied violence, or removing the word "fuck" from movies and either leaving a bit of silence or using a soundbite of a less vulgar word. It's pretty jarring to watch when you know what is being cut.
>>318198936
>stop hating what I like
Because people don't want their morals questioned. They don't want to deal with the consequences of an imaginary choice in an imaginary world.
Killing children is obviously seen as very bad, so few games have that to make the player not feel terrible. Not that I agree with this. It's the same with sexual content, especially when it involves minors. That shit happens all the time, but people like to ignore that it happens to not have their views challenged. Even though virtual murder is just as "bad" as virtual rape and whatnot.
>>318198073
hey bro your trying-too-hard is showing
>>318195639
>You are trying too hard newwfag kid, go to /b/ and lurk for awhile
Oh the irony
>>318194167
"Another wanderer here to lick my father's boots."
>>318197261
>USA and UK have laws over killing kids in video games
No they don't, retard.
>>318194167
Because one day you might encounter a shitty kid that somehow managed to press the right buttons,who is just way to smart for his own good.
And then you suddenly realize you hate children,and you just feel like blowing off some steam or some shit.
>>318192282
>be Britbong
>playing EU Fallout 2
>They just deleted the sprites
>Kid entities are still there
>Get your shit stolen by invisible ghost kids
>Can never get them back
>>318197261
No they don't
It's just that the ESRB will rate child killing AO unless you can trick your way around it, like making them children of a fantasy race.
>>318200207
I kidnapped that little shit and his sister after his Daedra quest, did his father a favor.
I left that other son, he's a good kid he just wants to be strong warrior man.
yes
any time something happens that you don't like it's censorship
>>318201037
>ESRB
Can someone remind me why ESRB gets to have the final say and full control in rating
>>318199098
So, gay, then?
>>318197897
Not really, because you can try. the fact you can't kill is well explained in the story.
>>318201131
How kidnap? Eh?
>>318201450
Because they were set up specifically for that purpose?
>>318196434
Killing him, and his death scream, gave me equal feelings of satisfaction and regret
>>318201450
>Can someone remind me why ESRB gets to have the final say and full control in rating
Because of Hilary Clinton. No joke.
>>318201549
The only legitimacy attached to the ESRB is that most stores refuse to carry AO games. If not for that, nobody would give a shit.
>>318201450
Many retailers refuse to stock games that don't have a rating. They have the power for the same reason the FCC owns the air waves. One day, they just decided they have the power and no one felt like saying otherwise.
>>318201548
Oh you know, mods.
They were still essential so I dumped them both cuffed at the bottom of a cave. They are still there to this day.
>>318201504
Why are you still crying, Anon?
Stop being a beta bitch.
>>318199625
I wish there were more games that dealt with this shit, I feel like the world is waiting for another powerful piece to come around and embrace the current zeitgeist, for all its good and bad, but I don't really know of any on the horizon.
>>318201747
Isn't that a monoply?
That should make it illegal under US law.
>>318201875
>Isn't that a monoply?
No.
>>318201875
monopolies only become an issue when someone else stands to gain enough money/power to give a shit, and then usually doesn't exist for regulatory boards.
It's more like 'there's no explicit monopoly, it's just no one tries to compete'. A monopoly through apathy, if you will.
>>318201450
>I would like to comment about the ESRB even though I don't know SHIT about the topic
Hi, retard, if you are going to be all anti-censorship, which is good, but present yourself as an ignorant retard, please don't, it make fighting censorship harder.
The ESRB, if anything is a good thing simply because the alternative would have been far, far worse.
The ESRB is actually a game industry created organization. It is NOT governmental. It was created in the hopes of the USA government NOT stepping in and regulating video games with governmental eye, which congress was about to ready to do due to a lot of controversy going on at the time.
Rating systems in themselves are not censorship. Censorship rises with standard censorship through publishing companies or self censorship from the devs, even if self censoring due to fear of for example AO rating. It is not the rating system in it self at fault, but the mentality and thought process of the devs/pubs and their perceived view of what society will think of their work.
>>318191843
Abusing the word censorship is gonna have the same buzzword affect as SJW
stop it you fucking idiots
>>318201787
So, gay, then?
You know it is unnatural to be gay, right? You know this, right?
>>318198759
what is this
that anti-feminist crap started the trend of victimising yourselves
you cannot kill children because it is over the line. children are innocent, meaning they are not responsible for wars, criminal and killings
>WE HAVE EROTIC GAMES BUT NOT PEDO GAMES
>MUH CENSORSHIP
>FUCKING SJWS I KNEW IT
>>318197807
>you have the option of jumping off a building and killing yourself in game
>>318202740
>So, gay, then?
No. I'm not even the guy you first lobbed that at.
Stop crying, beta bitch.
>>318202828
Sorry but trying to make an appeal to upholding our justice system in fictional worlds is just retarded. Who are you to say a virtual child is innocent, what if the child kills other kids? You're saying a kid is always absolutely 100% innocent, you're wrong bucko.
>>318202443
I was asking for people to make me less ignorant, you nigger
>>318202739
>I'm going to post the buzzword meme meme that will show that I'm a true 4channer!
I have a challenge for you to prove the above quote isn't your intent:
1) Explain how OP was "abusing" the word censorship in his post
2) Answer the OP's question. Is his example censorship?
>>318203072
>Not him but... meme
Sure you aren't gaylord faggot.
Let's look at Fallout 4, in the core game you couldn't kill kids, because Bethesda didn't want you killing kids, it's their game, they do what they want, but then there's mods, that lets you do these things.
But if a game comes out in Japan, and in that game you could kill kids, and when is ported over here, you can't kill them anymore, then yes, it's censorship.
What gets me is the fact they have to go out of their way to make sure the kids are invincible. Why bother even putting them in at all?
>>318203148
making loose comparisons in order to extend a word's meaning robs the term of its meaning
Most markets don't allow child murder to sell and the ones that do, publishers prefer to stay on the safe side
>>318203241
Then go ahead and quote the posts you think are me and him, beta bitch.
Don't chicken out.
And try not to cry too much when you get btfo.
>>318202828
kid who kills other kid is still unresponsible for his actions in analogy of adult justice norm. but its pointless saying this here because it is /v/ where 80% of visitors are rebelious children
its not upholding justice system from reality. you can implement killing children in your videogame, no one will stop you. but it is degutant, so developers dont think of doing it
>>318203784
wrong quote
meant quoting this >>318203132
I feel like any RPG that includes children should give you the option to kill them, but not without real consequences.
>>318191843
Seriously? You're asking this now? Now?! When there's school shootings happening every other month?
>>318203132
This is a good point.
For instance, in HellMOO, you start out as a 10 year old (13 if you don't count the tutorial), and you can do all the horrible things everyone else can do, including killing, raping, and brutally maiming other children.
>>318203758
Not him, but you really are trying too hard kid.
The fact that you are using the same insults on him that he used on you is proof how retarded you are.
>>318191843
Its not censorship, they aren't interested in doing it or it doesn't fit the tone they want with the game.
Like Nico talking about his child soldier days in GTA. It felt uncomfortable.
This censorship boogeyman is so funny to me.
>>318204348
>Not him
Fuck off, then.
>>318203605
>Self-censorship is not a real, defined term
Okay, retard.
>>318192181
>"hey guys i spent thousands of man-hours writing this game engine that includes ragdoll-physics in order to create a realistic gaming experience. And also I made all the half-sized ragdolls immortal for no fucking reason."
>implying that asking for all instead of 95% of the ragdolls in the game to be killable is akin to wanting a gamemechanic where you fuck animals
Are you literally retarded?
>>318193824
Now I want a videogame where you jerk off tigers!
>>318191843
You can kill kids in sm4sh
>inb4 assmad tourneyspergs, wavefurries, and meleefags
>inb4 HURR DURR THEY DUNT DIE THEY FLY OFF TEH SCREEN
>>318203725
Nice *teleports behind you* dodge, bro, but can you actually answer the 2 questions, then I will also address what you said in this post.
>>318205150
can you pay attention without memeing or should I not bother trying to have a conversation with you
>>318203758
>>318204458
How does it feel being proven retarded once again?
This is fun and why I love 4chan so easy to make fool out of people.
>>318192596
Holy fuck can I please have your autograph!
>>318204394
>I don't know what the term censorship means
You have 2 choices at this point kid:
1) Go look it up in a dictionary/wiki and learn and stop being a retard, quietly and humbly
2) Come at me bro in an attempt to try to defend your post and make yourself look like a retard when *I* teach you what the definition is
>>318204454
>I think the pretend to be pro-censorship meme is FANNY XD
>>318191843
You can, it's just that developers want to sell games so they intentionally do not allow you to do that out of fear of it being seen as in poor taste by the general public.
>>318205240
>says the faggot that started this with buzzword meme meme
Look kid, it is obvious you don't know what censorship is from your last post yet you come into this thread and say the thread is shit because no one what the word means.
Such pathetic irony.
>>318205392
You think getting told to fuck off is some sort of victory?
Way to go, retard.
>>318197261
>Someone's job is to shoot every kids head in to decide the esrb rating
>>318206238
#whowatchesthewatchers
>Guy makes a game where you can shoot kids in the head
>ESRB says that's okay, but your game will have a rating attached to it that says it's for adults only
WOW CENSORSHIP
>>318198178
>I hate everybody
>a pack of wild niggers appears, they mad because they can't stand the fact John McLane be so mean to ppl.
That makes sense.
>>318207082
>Dev team is making a game
>You can kill just about everyone in it, except for kids
>The devs think killing kids is in poor taste and make it so you can't kill children
WOW CENSORSHIP
Learn the difference retards:
This post is NOT censorship:
>>318207082
This post IS censorship:
>>318207485
If you can't see why, then there is a good chance you are really retarded, especially if you can't see why after actually reading the definition.
>>318206785
Why are you quoting my posts?
There's no one else talking to you and I never pretended to be anyone else.
>go ahead and quote the posts you think are me and him
If you weren't such a retard you would realize I was talking about quoting the posts we made before that point.
Way to go, retard, you completely missed the point.
>>318207819
The latter really isn't censorship, broheim.
I made the post because people like you are actually retarded. If the artists themselves decide they don't want to do something, that doesn't make it censorship.
>>318207485
>>318207082
>Dev team is making a game
>You can kill everyone
>Kids aren't in the game
WOW CENSORSHIP
>>318208131
He's going to just fire back that it's self-censorship.
It's just censorshipfags being obnoxious.
>>318207953
I don't know who the fuck you are trying to talk to kid, but you really need to give it a rest and stop trying so hard, your assblasted status is so fucking obvious and your tears are going to make global warming a joke.
>>318207819
Except that's not censorship though.
The developers thinking that killing kids is in poor taste/unneccessary does not mean they censored it out of the game. It means it wasn't there to begin with.
>>318209081
I'm sorry I made you mad.
Calm down, retard.
>>318192441
I want to impregnate Tomoko
>>318208131
As even your pro-censorship faggot butt buddy points out >>318208552
it is self-censorship.
Now besides using your butt buddy's words against you. Let me use your own retarded words against you to prove what kinda absolute retard you are >>318207485
>The devs think killing kids is in poor taste and make it so you can't kill children
Censorship:
>information which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient
If you want to go for lesson 2 when you want to try to argue that "in poor taste" isn't synonymous with the above definition we can go there.
I am an English teacher. I do this for a living, teaching kids what words mean. :^)
>>318204870
call it super tiger jerker 2000 3 @ Ex Gold
>>318209178
>>318204646
Serious question? Are there REALLY this many people in this world that don't even know how to use the language they speak???????
>>318192181
>it's just that no one has actually done it yet.
This is some fucking Orwellian shit right here. Stop it.
>>318210230
>pro-censorship faggot butt buddy
Man, censorshipfags sure are stupid and obnoxious.
>>318192181
>That's like asking "Why can't we jerk off tigers in games?"
>>318191843
Because they are a bunch of moralfags that can't differentiate between reality and fantasy.
Yes, it's censorship. But, as long as censorship is not an ilegal thing, no problem will arise with that.
You guys get important events broadcasted with a 5 minutes delay so they can cut out everything they don't want you to see, so why would they not do this with games?
Also, i have a big problem with this censorchip bullshit, but i have an even bigger problem with them NOT LETTING ME CRAFT AN ARMOR MADE OF LIVING CHILDREN, IF THEY ARE UNVULNERABLE WHY CAN'T I USE THEM AS ARMOR MATERIAL WHY BETHESDA?
you could shoot kids in FNV but they would just run away in the speed of pixels
>>318209816
How many individual people in this thread is it going to take to make you realize that it isn't everyone else, just you being the retard.
>>318210769
I'm sorry I made you mad, retard.
Calm down.
![hqdefault[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/AcwRGyU.jpg "hqdefault[1].jpg")
In Pathologic, the first quest you get as one character (from one kid) is to kill some other kid. In the original non-Russian versions of the game, though, the kid was replaced with this weird midget guy. The more recent release restores the kid.
>>318210527
kek
>>318191843
You can't fuck them either.Actually, you can but it's very niche Japan-only stuff..
>>318210490
Heheh, yeah, bro. Like that Stephan Hawkings guy?! He knows all that math and physics shit and astronomy star SPACE STUFF shit, which I don't have any clue about, but damn, he is obnoxious. I am glad I'm not obnoxious!
>>318210912
And now that I look at him, the midget guy seems to have a better modeled face than most other characters in the game.
>>318211130
I apologize for making you mad, retard.
Goodbye.
>>318195993
It's funny that they claim GG is only about hating women, but when any of their real causes are brought up they still scream GG. The amount of doublethink to make this work is impressive.
>>318210872
Not him, but I would actually like to thank you anon, for giving me some good laughs in this thread. Watching stupid people act retarded is always funny.
Thanks
>>318210667
And why should it be illegal you retard? If they own the game, they can do whatver they want with it.
>not allowed
Mods do it all the time.
Child killing, rape, etc are heavily frowned upon by normalfags and gaming is a normalfag activity. Why do you think gaming had so much more "edgy" stuff before gaming got popular?
>>318211942
Censorship should be ilegal, always.
It's literally "i don't want you to do / see this because fuck you".
>>318213094
So private companies shouldn't be in charge of the creations they made and paid for and fully own? Fuck off commie.
>>318212072
>Why do you think gaming had so much more "edgy" stuff before gaming got popular?
This is definitely true, but it doesn't really account for the extremism of the "non normie stuff NOT allowed" movement of current society with this recent hyper politically correct/SJW retardation that has popped up.
In the pass you could account for it in the American christfag puritans influence and religious fervor. But most SJWs are actually anti-religion since they support stuff like gays and being c'ucked in poly relationships.
I would like to know how this hypocritical moral high horse movement came from without religious basis.
>inb4 the jews are behind it
Actually about the only thing I can think of...
>>318213320
Explain to me why I can't make a private company, a restaurant that I worked for and paid for myself, but then have a rule that it is only for white people or that black people can come, but can only use one side of the place?
>>318213879
Do it, I'd eat there.
mfw you can play as a child and be killed but can't kill children
>>318213336
Actually I remember /pol/ actually proved once that one of those topless/naked women feminists screaming and disrupting public functions events was funded by a Jew once. They had literally paid the females to do it.
>Warcraft 3
>children units
>rifleman units
>>318214763
>literally 4 years old
>a bunch get killed as part of the story
Fuckin miracles.warcraft 4 when
>>318192181
in skyrim you can kill everything except the kids.
Yes, I bet it's NoA's fault too.
>>318214763
Huh, forgot about that.
>>318192181
BUT THERE ARE GAMES YOU CAN JACK OFF TIGERS
JESUS CHRIST DID YOU NEVER PLAY HIGH TAIL HALL
>>318192282
>put all my stuff away
>carry just one thing
>tnt, timer, 5 mins
>mfw it "disappears" from my inventory
>wander around for another 4 minutes
>>318191843
Yes, but you can't really complain about it without being singled out as a creep that wants to hurt real children.
>>318216443
>>318217357
like god. who creates an entire nation of people to be slaughtered as practice, instead of like, beasts.
because, you know, god, who can do anything decided to make sure his people were strong and ready instead of make sure there was nothing that could hurt them.
>can't eat kids anymore
https://youtu.be/3ltjmjSa2GE
>>318217773
Don't start, Anon.
>>318207082
ESRB has never rated a game AO because you can kill kids to my knowledge.
The ESRB also doesn't tell companies they have to censor a game, or what they have to do specifically in order to lower the rating. Hell a company could send the game to them 3 times unchanged and get M, M then T depending on who exactly was rating it.
All they do is rate what they are given, 99% of companies that make changes to games do so before they even attempt to send the game to the ESRB the first time just as an effort to save time and money by only having to send it once. i can't even think of a game where companies said they sent it in multiple times aiming for a lower rating than what they got like you see with a lot of movies aiming for PG13 instead of R or something
>>318218216
come in. have some hot coffee.
>playing fallout 3
>decide to be a murderous dickhead
>go to megaton and slaughter everyone
>except those two kids
>they're invincible
>corpses of the rest of the townspeople strewn about while they continue through their scripted pathing sequences
Fuck this shit. Also fuck bethesda for making the biggest dickhead, Mayor McReady, a kid and therefore invincible while also making it so that you need to suck his dick to continue the main quest. Had it been an adult, you could've just blown his head off and entered little lamplight without going through his bullshit. But no, gotta do what the little faggot wants.
>>318218624
what no you dont you just run to the cave and take the fungus
you didnt actually do everything he told you
right
right
>>318218557
The "hot coffee" retardation was a long time after SA even came out anon.
>>318218817
You can't enter lamplight without his permission. You either pass a speech check (which is probably the hardest in the game, with >50% success even if you have max speech) or you give in to the little shits demands and go save the kiddies from paradise falls.
>>318210230
>information which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient
>I am an English teacher
God, I hope not. Can you point me to the dictionary where the word "censorship" is defined as "information which may be politically incorrect"?
Because as far as I'm aware, censorship is the SUPPRESSION of that material in an official capacity by groups such as governments, media outlets, and other official authorities.
I don't know why I'm surprised retards like you are the mouthpieces for all these obnoxious CENSORSHIP threads on /v/.
>>318218856
It was discovered shortly after the PC version released
>>318218856
...and? the ersb changed its rating, making it illegal to sell or so-on, so fourth. rockstar literally re-released the entire game in a new case and cover
>>318191843
You can shoot kids in TPP can't you? It gives you a game over afterwards but you can still do it you sick fuck.
>>318219127
>Because as far as I'm aware, censorship is the SUPPRESSION of that material in an official capacity by groups such as governments, media outlets, and other official authorities.
>as far as I'm aware
You aren't aware of very much then I guess:
>>318204646
>>318219437
Which was like a year after PS2
>>318219605
It was never illegal to sell. AO games are not illegal. Huge chain stores just don't want to sell them, the same as they don't sell porn. The ESRB only went back and did that rating because of the media coverage of the mod on PC, since it was otherwise dummied out in all versions.
It's like if the ESRB went back and rated each fallout/elderscrolls for it's mods. Also sex in a game does not automatically equal AO considering the number of games with sex in them. Like Witcher, god of war and leisure suit larry. The ESRB was just reacting to soccer moms and trying to deflect anger shooting at them at the time by complying with what the screaming tards wanted.
>kids are invincible
>the kids can attack and kill you because you can't do anything to defend yourself
>>318219871
Not him, but wouldn't that imply that the developers really wanted to let people kill kids in their game, but decided against it? As opposed maybe to just not wanting people to kill kids. Or are you saying there's no difference between those two?
>>318219731
>you sick fuck
>Killing virtual pixel kids is the SAME as killing REAL CHILDREN IRL
I learned this from my SJW blogger that I follow on twitter, which I learn so much interesting facts from. I am so progressive and empowered AND SMART now! Tehehe XD
>>318220074
Well even though your question order further proves your lack of understanding the English language (oh, sorry you AREN'T the same anon).
Anyways, I will work with you but only if you promise to behave.
So, first let us establish that you are talking about a hypothetical situation, correct?
In this hypothetical situation, can you explain why the "devs" are "just not wanting people to kill kids"?
>>318219871
So, to clarify, your stance is that censorship is:
>information which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient
And not
>the suppression of information which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient
Correct? Plus, you still haven't sourced your definition. I can source my definition.
Merriam-Webster
1
a : the institution, system, or practice of censoring
b : the actions or practices of censors; especially : censorial control exercised repressively
Definition of censor, according to Merriam-Webster:
1
: a person who supervises conduct and morals: as
a : an official who examines materials (as publications or films) for objectionable matter
b : an official (as in time of war) who reads communications (as letters) and deletes material considered sensitive or harmful
2
: one of two magistrates of early Rome acting as census takers, assessors, and inspectors of morals and conduct
3
: a hypothetical psychic agency that represses unacceptable notions before they reach consciousness
I don't really have a horse in this race since I know for a fact that you're wrong and most of this censorship hubbub on /v/ is sensationalist garbage, but it's really fun watching you squirm under trying to rationalize your retardation; regardless of whether or not that retardation is intentional or not. I'm banking on a long quote chain with "all me :^)" or "fell for the bait."
>>318220226
>mfw pictures of people who dont exist have more rights then you
>if a 10 year old arrangement of pixels flashes me, i can go to jail for child pornography
>if i flash a 10 year old arragment of pixels, ill go to jail for sex offenses
>the 10 year old arrangement of pixels could stab another 10 year old arrangement of pixels, and it just becomes a popular 10 year old arrangement of pixels
>mfw i willl never be a 10 year old arrangement of pixels, doing things only 10 year old arrangements of pixels can do to each other, like plowing eachothers sweet, tight, arrangement of pixelshes still 10 right
>>318220659
Maybe in this hypothetical situation the devs (as in developers) don't want to let people kill kids because they find it morally wrong? On a level separate to killing adults. Not to make a judgement on their morals in this hypothetical (I personally don't mind the concept if we're talking about an open world game where you can murder mostly anyone).
If that were the case, would it be self-censorship? Or if we used another hypothetical situation, if someone producing a dating sim opted not to add the ability to date someone of the opposite sex because they didn't want it in their game, would that be self-censorship?
>>318220696
>Plus, you still haven't sourced your definition. I can source my definition.
You can source your definition (which btw you only just minutes ago looked up for the first time), but you can't figure out the source of my quote.
Just how retarded are you trying to prove yourself to be son?
Tell you what. Being a teacher, I going to give you a pop quiz. If you can pass it then, I will deem you competent enough to re-address the issue.
Protip: It picked a source that is virtually retard proof that explains things in details without the assumption that you can understand all the big words from the source you cited that I KNOW you don't understand either, as you have proven already. :^)
>>318220757
A man can dream.
>>318221456
>devs (as in developers) don't want to let people kill kids because they find it morally wrong? On a level separate to killing adults.
Do the devs feel that any number of members in society (in their perception) also feels this way?
>Make the kids the most obnoxious NPCs in the game
>You can't murder them
>>318222015
fuckin shoursh
>>318220696
Hey nigger kid, can you hurry up and reply to >>318221713
it has been fun and all making you look like a retard, but even that eventually gets boring, and I want to actually go play some vidya gaemz.
>>318192441
>>318192583
>Moe archive is gone
>I'll never know what that post was
>>318200997
Just download the restoration patch
>hurr restoration patch
Whatever faggot
>>318221713
>Protip: It picked a source that is virtually retard proof that explains things in details without the assumption that you can understand all the big words from the source you cited that I KNOW you don't understand either, as you have proven already. :^)
...あれ?
