[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Just Cause 3 specs
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 59
File: CUgtpLBXIAAto-G.png large.png (650 KB, 1024x512) Image search: [Google]
CUgtpLBXIAAto-G.png large.png
650 KB, 1024x512
Will your pc survive
>>
No.
I need to upgrade, but I still hesitate between a 380X and 290.
>>
File: speccy.png (24 KB, 491x463) Image search: [Google]
speccy.png
24 KB, 491x463
Probably going to be fine.
>>
>>317622925
Daym dude
>>
>>317622560
They are currently livestream on twitch: originpc
>>
>tfw i5 2500k is becoming a bottleneck

Will I be able to max the game out if I have a GTX 970? Or will the CPU hold me back?
>>
File: Untitled.png (20 KB, 548x416) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
20 KB, 548x416
worried laughter

I've already pre-ordered and I'm not gonna be able to upgrade until I get my christmas bonus.

I have a few questions btw

Can I go from an i5 2300 to an i5 4690 without any issues involving compatibility?

I've currently got two GTS 450s, and I'm planning on upgrading to a GTX 970. I'm currently using a dual monitor setup and both monitors are connected using DVI-I ports. The GTX 970 has one DVI-I port and one DVI-D port, if I buy a DVI-D m -> DVI-I f adapter will I still be able to use my current monitors?

Also how do I figure out what wattage my PSU is? The cards I'm currently using only require 400w minimum, but the 970 requires 500w.
>>
>>317622560
>Implying those aren't bloated as fuck
Look at Mad Max's bullshit and it runs 60 on everything.
>>
my cpu (i5 760 at 2.8ghz quadcore) might be a bit too slow, but it has survived both GTAV and witcher 3
>>
File: 1448078890271.gif (1 MB, 500x347) Image search: [Google]
1448078890271.gif
1 MB, 500x347
>tfw the 8350 is still recommended
>>
>>317623402

I believe the CPU, check out the dev diary. A lot of computational power seems to have gone into how objects break and how the AI reroutes to intercept.
>>
File: sysreq.png (38 KB, 658x471) Image search: [Google]
sysreq.png
38 KB, 658x471
Nope, witcher 3 barely passed, and looks like im gonna have to upgrade soon.

Should i skip on JC3 and wait for the new cards to come out, or splurge now and get a new card?
>>
>>317622776
you still cant decide?

http://www.anandtech.com/show/9784/the-amd-radeon-r9-380x-review

it's not the 290 but it's close enough (280x)
>>
File: speccy.png (20 KB, 535x354) Image search: [Google]
speccy.png
20 KB, 535x354
Maybe not at max settings. Is Just Cause good?
>>
>FX-6300
>R9 280X
Maybe like mid or some shit
>>
>>317623585
The thing is, the 380x is at 260 bucks in my country and right now there's an offer of a 290 Dual X for 240 coins.

So I'm on the edge.
>>
>>317623643

Good in my opinion. You really need to play JC1 or 2 in order to see what JC3 will be like.
>>
>>317623297
These are usually exaggerated estimations so they have margin so people doesn't whine and moan.
>>
>>317622925

>not buying a intel K cpu

top kek
>>
>>317623457
hello nehalembro, I'm at 750
>>
>>317622925
how much did you spend on all those SSDs anon?
>>
File: cotton.webm (2 MB, 480x288) Image search: [Google]
cotton.webm
2 MB, 480x288
>>317623383
pls respond
>>
File: 1430274161693.jpg (28 KB, 247x248) Image search: [Google]
1430274161693.jpg
28 KB, 247x248
>>317623507
>>
File: pecs.jpg (217 KB, 654x444) Image search: [Google]
pecs.jpg
217 KB, 654x444
I hope it will run fine at medium settings on my toaster.
>>
Yup, gonna have to upgrade my radeon HD 5770 for a GTX 670
>>
>>317622560
>tfw i5 2500K / HD7850
hmm, maybe it's getting time to upgrade now that I don't even meet minimum specs anymore.
>>
>>317624080
>ups_shipping_ur_mums_dildo.gif
>>
File: speccy.png (21 KB, 605x452) Image search: [Google]
speccy.png
21 KB, 605x452
>>317623507
Buy an i5 For gaming they said
i5 is for gaming they said
>>
>>317623973
i heard that my 760 has a pretty good overclocking potential, should i plan for that + a new cpu cooler instead of a new motherboard+cpu+cooler upgrade?
my gpu is solid for a while
>>
>i5 minimum

GOD
FUCKING
DAMNIT

at least I'm upgrading come christmas
>>
>i7 for recommended
This is full of shit
Not a single game use a i7 to the best of its capacities
>>
IM HYPED
>>
File: 1447518098057.jpg (241 KB, 1357x766) Image search: [Google]
1447518098057.jpg
241 KB, 1357x766
>TFW Recommended CPU but minimum GPU

Saw footage of the PS4 version and it ran like shit. One explosion and the framerate dived into the sub-20's so console version is fucked.
>>
File: 1435975268126.png (175 KB, 480x368) Image search: [Google]
1435975268126.png
175 KB, 480x368
>just built $700 tower last month
>barely surpasses minimum specs for new games
>tfw I'm already feeling pressure to upgrade
>>
File: 1423514690879.gif (3 MB, 200x175) Image search: [Google]
1423514690879.gif
3 MB, 200x175
Yes, because Denuvo.
>>
>About to upgrade my GPU only
>See this
FUCK

I have the money but I really don't want to spend another 1000bucks on this.
>>
File: StealingAPlane.webm (3 MB, 640x360) Image search: [Google]
StealingAPlane.webm
3 MB, 640x360
>>317624518
SO FUCKING HYPED
>>
>>317623383
>Can I go from an i5 2300 to an i5 4690 without any issues involving compatibility?
not without buying a new motherboard because of different sockets
>>
>>317624614
'budget gaming pc' is a meme, you will pay $1500+ or face the consequences
>>
>You now realize that amd cpu was always the way to go
Feels good.
>>
>>317624769
Not at all.
I spend around 800 for my rig 5 years ago and it still holds up.
>>
File: Iknowyouwantit.webm (3 MB, 896x504) Image search: [Google]
Iknowyouwantit.webm
3 MB, 896x504
>>317624643
>>
File: MichaelBay.webm (3 MB, 1024x576) Image search: [Google]
MichaelBay.webm
3 MB, 1024x576
>>
>>317622560
Yes i just grabbed a 980 from gigabyte
>>
>>317624957
>that watch tower

they better fix that
>>
>>317623776
grab the 290 senpai
Though look around for a 290x before you bite the bullet
>>
>>317622560
>no multiplayer

but why? sandbox games get boring after an hour if you're alone
>>
>>317624674
thanks
>>
>>317624769

In what universe is a $700+ tower "budget"

If anything that's mid-tier
>>
File: 3lyJr3x.webm (1 MB, 720x404) Image search: [Google]
3lyJr3x.webm
1 MB, 720x404
>>317625068
>>
No because garbage games don't touch my PC.
>>
File: Speccy 10-13.png (47 KB, 784x558) Image search: [Google]
Speccy 10-13.png
47 KB, 784x558
Ran Fallout 4 and everything else that came out this year more or less perfectly, so it should run JC3 just fine.
>>
Same engine right?
That shit was very well optimized
>>
>>317625089
>I can have a 290x for 40 bucks more
THE RIDE NEVER ENDS
>>
File: 1686096226.jpg (45 KB, 500x281) Image search: [Google]
1686096226.jpg
45 KB, 500x281
>BUY A $400 PC:^)
>It will play all games maxed at 1080p 60fps:^)
>You only need to upgrade every 10 years:^)
>>
>>317622560
I remember JC2 being very well optimized. It ran exceedingly well even on my dated hardware at the time.
Wondering if this one will be as optimized or not.
>>
>>317625121
Too much extra work for something that was never in JC games. They are releasing an SDK though.
>>
>>317624789

Has xbone co-marketing but also Nvidia gameworks

50/50 on it either being well optimized or running like shit on AMD. Avalanche said the pre-release footage was mostly xbone (Anything 30FPS was xbone. 60FPS was PC obviously) but footage of the PS4 version came out and it runs like shit there so god knows at this point.
>>
File: 562.jpg (67 KB, 600x600) Image search: [Google]
562.jpg
67 KB, 600x600
>just copy and paste 3
>>
>6GB ram
>minimum
wat
>>
File: 4chanhacker.jpg (59 KB, 483x430) Image search: [Google]
4chanhacker.jpg
59 KB, 483x430
Fuck the specs

does it use denuvo?
>>
well that's a real shame

jc2 was so toaster friendly
>>
File: gaki1.jpg (8 KB, 300x168) Image search: [Google]
gaki1.jpg
8 KB, 300x168
>I have a i3 4170 and GTX 950
>>
>>317624865
Because all you play is Assfaggots and Counter Strike, maybe some Undermeme tier games. Even 2 years old $700 budget builds start to get crushed by modern releases.
>>
File: fuck clubs.jpg (67 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
fuck clubs.jpg
67 KB, 1280x720
>>317625310
>tfw no season 3
>>
>>317625608
You don't have to play everything at ultra settings anon.
>>
File: 1426785632582.jpg (36 KB, 601x583) Image search: [Google]
1426785632582.jpg
36 KB, 601x583
>>317625219

>that gpu bottleneck
>>
>>317625694
So 720p 30fps is fine after all? Oh the hypocrisy.
>>
File: CUcFZxTWwAAcDWb.jpg (94 KB, 600x800) Image search: [Google]
CUcFZxTWwAAcDWb.jpg
94 KB, 600x800
>>317625497
Welcome to 2015

This wasn't rare even in 2014

>>317625539
I'm pretty sure no since you can buy this game for $25 in some places. The prices would be higher if it had secure DRM (Fun fact, the Army you need to to defeat called D.R.M)

Also box-art doesnt show Internet Connection Required
>>
>>317625850
Dunno, crank some useless parameters down?
If you really need that tesselation at x16 and x8MSAA be prepared to upgrade every year, but that's your problem.
>>
>>317625920
Mad max use denuvo and you can buy keys for 13$ since day one.
>>
>>317623643
>>317623802
you can skip the first and go straight to the second
>>
>>317625850

>turn textures from ultra to high
>turn down balls-out filtering and other PP
>instant and substantial gain in FPS

Babby's never played on a toaster before, how cute!
>>
Seriously what?
Why did requirements blow out of proportion so much lately?
In the last year it's been a shitshow
2013 BF4 says minimum gt8800 recommended gtx660
2014 dragon age inquisition requiring a gt8800 minimum and gtx660 recommended on the same engine
And now sw battlefront says gtx660 is minimum and gtx970 recommended
Come on it's still fucking frostbite 3 why?
And JC3 requiring a gtx 670? Battlefront looks way more impressive and it's stupidly blown out of proportion requirements are still inferior
>>
File: specs.png (20 KB, 589x414) Image search: [Google]
specs.png
20 KB, 589x414
>>317622560

I might be okay. I upgraded to Skylake from a Bloomfield i7 920. I only spend 300 for it, and seeing that the 6700k is now 419 makes me glad I did it sooner rather than later.

Only problem is, I don't know if these recommended are for Ultra @ 60 or console setting @ 30 or what. It never really says.
>>
File: speccy.png (31 KB, 654x447) Image search: [Google]
speccy.png
31 KB, 654x447
>>317622560
Yes
>>
>>317626029
Show me that GTA V 1080p 60fps that still looks better than the console version, because if it's to play the PS3 version on PC you've been better just getting the game 3 years ago.

You don't need x16 tesselation and x8 MSAA but having decent looking shadows and and some proper anti-aliasing is the bare minimum if you're going to be an elitist cunt about your prefered vidya platform.
>>
>>317625497

2 years ago I would have agreed with you, but its fucking 2015 man if you expect to game on a non-64 bit machine then you're fucking crazy
>>
File: giphy.gif (433 KB, 442x259) Image search: [Google]
giphy.gif
433 KB, 442x259
>>317626068
Oh shit, didn't know that. Didn't Steam usually showed this shit on their store page?

Also is Denuvo that big of a problem? The game never crashed for me and bought it for $20 on release date. I'm pretty sure it got cracked to in 1 or 2 week
>>
Fuck, I have a 2500k.
I though I would be set for a few years still.
>>
>>317626674
Just OC it too 3.5-3.8 Ghz and you should be fine
>>
>>317624438
this
the only reason for setting an I7 for recommended is because it looks like "more" to people who dont know shit
>>
Isn't this another Sony advertised, #4theplayers multi? If so, I'm expecting the reqs to not be exaggerated, the game WILL be poorly optimized. Curiously enough, just in the same way Arkham Knight and Blops 3 are.
>>
>>317622560
surley games like this can be optimised better.\
I'd better start saving up for an 4770K and gtx980ti for Deus Ex
>>
>>317626853
its made by avalanche
they dont do bad optimization
>>
>>317626379
not to disagree with you but gta 5 is the one example that undercuts your point
>>
>>317626745
Yeah but my PSU is already barely at maximum.
I will try it It should be okay
>>
File: pink.gif (1 MB, 346x261) Image search: [Google]
pink.gif
1 MB, 346x261
>>317626929
>Blops 3 is made by Treyarch
>they don't do bad optimization
>>
>>317626765
You might be onto something. I visited an electronics store today and took a tour in the prebuild gaming PC section, almost all the builds had an i7 despite being coupled with shitty gtx 750 cards. Only $1099:^)
>>
File: MY SANDWICH.jpg (21 KB, 274x361) Image search: [Google]
MY SANDWICH.jpg
21 KB, 274x361
>have 6300 and a decent mobo
>try a modest OC
>games suddenly stop working, windows stutters intermittently, and I get frequent bluescreens until I shut it off

I'm gonna have to figure out how to get this shit working if I want my junker to keep playing games.
>>
>>317627047
but they do
blops 2 had shit optimization
>>
>>317627047
what does that have to do with anything?
treyarch didnt make Just cause
>>
>>317627047

JC2 and Mad Max ran like a dream
>>
>>317626853

Nope. xbone advertised. There's a chance it might be a good optimized version but it has Nvidia jewworks as well.

PS4 version reportedly runs like shit though so prepare for assmad.
>>
>>317622560
>290 recommended

Well shit. I've got a 280X.
>>
>>317627185
Didn't JC2 had Nvidia effects too like the water?
>>
File: file.png (74 KB, 250x187) Image search: [Google]
file.png
74 KB, 250x187
>>317627185
>MS were the good guys all along
>>
>>317627480
dont think so
its old as fuck now
>>
>>317622560
I'm surprised developers bother dealing with Vista.

I don't believe people running Vista have capable hardware anyway.

The only reason to run Vista in 2015 is if you have a laptop without proper Windows 7 and up drivers.
>>
>>317622560
will my 970m survive?
>>
>>317622560
That's below mid tier. It should run fine on most gaming PCs.
>>
File: chilidog.jpg (77 KB, 754x544) Image search: [Google]
chilidog.jpg
77 KB, 754x544
>>317627675

>m
>>
>>317627480
>>317627535

It just had CUDA water effects but it ran well on everything so no one gave a shit. Since Gameworks fucks everything up the last three years. People are worried about that.
>>
File: Specs.png (46 KB, 874x703) Image search: [Google]
Specs.png
46 KB, 874x703
Should I get a whole new rig or upgrade just my GPU?
I'm on the fence.
>>
File: MadMax_2015_09_22_17_05_30_124.png (2 MB, 2048x1152) Image search: [Google]
MadMax_2015_09_22_17_05_30_124.png
2 MB, 2048x1152
Roughly the same recommended specs as Mad Max.
I'm not worried.
>>
File: spex.png (40 KB, 675x535) Image search: [Google]
spex.png
40 KB, 675x535
Will probably be fine.
>>
File: speccy.png (27 KB, 604x458) Image search: [Google]
speccy.png
27 KB, 604x458
hey I have the exact recommended CPU
>>
>>317627540
Isn't 7 just a heavily modified Vista? If a game works for 7, it probably will for Vista.
>>
File: 1307822565289.jpg (112 KB, 768x576) Image search: [Google]
1307822565289.jpg
112 KB, 768x576
>>317627675
>970
>>
>>317623383
i5 4690 use an 1150 socket type.
>>
>290X
More than fine
>>
maybe just 760 ti oem not sure if my computer is good or not
>>
>>317625394
what does that even mean you autist
>>317625310
console retard, do some research
>>
>>317627540
It's probably not so much that they're "bothering" with Vista so much as they're "not bothering" with XP.
>>
File: TOASTER.png (30 KB, 656x473) Image search: [Google]
TOASTER.png
30 KB, 656x473
Not even the title screen.
>>
>>317627843

The 2500k is pretty great. Just OC it if you haven't already.
>>
i5 4790
970
16 GB of RAM

I'll be fine.
>>
>980ti
>i7 4790
>16GB RAM

I'm good
>>
>>317622925
i don't understand why anyone would keep windows 8 its layout is so fucking shit and finding stuff is such a chore as much as i disliked the windows 10 privacy shit it had a damn fine layout and i don't have cp on my computer so i didn't give a shit about the privacy issues
>>
>>317626929
>>317627175
This isn't the team that made JC2 and Mad Max, this is a new team that hasn't made a game before. Approach with caution.
>>
>>317628290
i7*
>>
>>317628324
Well if only MS would send my fucking copy notification.
>>
>>317628290
>970

Two explosions MAX before that .5gb is used up and the game goes into slideshow mode.
>>
File: CGUZYhnWwAAUFCJ.png (123 KB, 600x300) Image search: [Google]
CGUZYhnWwAAUFCJ.png
123 KB, 600x300
>>317628324
>i don't have cp on my computer so i didn't give a shit about the privacy issues
>>
>GTX 980
>i5 4690k at 4.8GHz
Should be fine.
>>
I bought a gaming PC for $1000 but every game runs like shit

The guy at BestBuy said it was a good PC

How can I fix it?
I'm not good at computers
>>
>>317628491
everyone has something to say so that argument is invalid
>>
File: 8kMjvii.jpg (61 KB, 500x544) Image search: [Google]
8kMjvii.jpg
61 KB, 500x544
>>317628491
Was Snowden a pedophile who was angry that he couldn't store CP on his laptop to jerk off to?
>>
>>317628579
Nice b8.
>>
>>317628605
Everyone has something to hide. Way to miss the point.
>>
>>317628579
You can fix it by not posting obvious bait on 4chan. That takes up premium CPU memory RAM.
>>
>>317625597
You'll still be able to run slightly-above-PS4 graphics and FPS, unless they gimp the port like Arkham Knight
>>
>>317627795
whats wrong with the m
>>
>>317622560
>more and more games are more putting the 2500k as their minimum spec cpu
I don't know why I'm surprised. I might finally have to upgrade. It was a good run.
>>
>>317628706
i don't so youre still invalid
>>
>>317628579
great pasta
>>
Is an OC 2500k still good enough or should I be looking at upgrading soon?
>>
Tfw been coasting with a super ocd 8320 for years now and its still recommended
>>
>>317628779
Post your full name, address, telephone # and social security/passport number right now.
>>
>>317622560
>laptop
of course it won't! But I could play MGSV competently on lowest settings so I can probably play this too.
>>
>>317628768

It means you're using the mobile version, which underperforms the desktop version.
>>
File: Capture.jpg (47 KB, 543x441) Image search: [Google]
Capture.jpg
47 KB, 543x441
>>317622560
>tfw don't meet the min
I knew this day would come, I just didn't expect it so soon
>>
>>317628908
go find it i'm not hiding it i'm just not holding your hand for it google would give you all that all you need to do is go dig up my ip
>>
>>317628980
Rip anon
>>
>>317628992
>you can just google my IP posting while anonmyous
>i'm not hiding it I just won't tell you :^)
Yeah nah your argument is invalid.
>>
>>317628992

>i'm not hiding it

The only reason it's hidden is that people you have never met work behind your back to protect your privacy.

You are incredibly stupid. Your argument has no head nor tail, and you have no idea what you're talking about.
>>
>Intel Core i7-5960X
>GeForce GTX TITAN X (x3 Sli)
should be fine
>>
>>317629136
quality argument you brought forth anon the i can't counter it so i'll just attack him
>>
>>317629212
Keeping your virginity?
>>
>>317628850
Mate I'm on a 4.2ghz i5 760 from fucking 2010 with a 970 and have yet to see any game perform under expected framerates when comparing to benchmarks

I wouldn't worry
>>
>>317629352
Except he literally countered your shit argument.
>>
>>317629352
anti-privacy fags, everybody

take a good look
>>
Fuck I have a 650 Ti, and an i5 at 3.10 GHz, how am I gonna do?
>>
>>317629442
my argument was i'm not hiding anything if someone has my info and does it for me good for them but good try anon come back when you acquire common sense
>>
>>317625608
>this guy
Still using a GTX 680 and i play MGS V, Fallout 4, KF2 and all those terrible new releases on ultra.
>>
>>317629486
*Ti Boost, my bad.
>>
>>317628209
does ZBWAE stand for Zimbabwe?
>>
>>317624080
Oh man that's like the worlds biggest cannoli
>>
What's the best 980 Ti brand?
>>
>>317624871
glad they improved the grapple animations while wingsuiting. I love seeing early footage and then seeing obvious improvements later on. Unlike some devs where they show something and the game looks far worse later on
ugh
>>
>>317627185
>PS4 version reportedly runs like shit though
pls no
i need a game to make this stupid machine worth it
>>
>>317630275

Why would you plan on playing Just Cause on consoles?

Enjoy your mods and customization
>>
>>317624871
this game looks fucking pretty
how does avalanche do it
>>
>>317630275
bloodborne
kingdom hearts 3
FFXIV
project diva X


it's all you're getting anon
>>
For how long I am set with a 290 OC?
>>
>980 Ti is $800-$900 CAD
Fuck this country.
>>
File: Mad Max.jpg (43 KB, 626x279) Image search: [Google]
Mad Max.jpg
43 KB, 626x279
Almost the same as Mad Max so i might be alright
>>
>>317622560
If I preorder off of cdkeys.com and I get a steam key, does that key come with the pre-order bonuses?
>>
>>317631940
what are the pre-order bonuses?
>>
File: ss (2015-11-23 at 05.26.16).jpg (41 KB, 757x233) Image search: [Google]
ss (2015-11-23 at 05.26.16).jpg
41 KB, 757x233
Easily max it out with probably extra downsampling
>>
>>317632194

>windows 10

lol
>>
>>317632431
>Running a outdated OS
>>
>>317631986
on steam they are three weaponized vehicles and an explosive sniper.
>>
>>317632194
Did you seriously name your pc after a Caine/Brosnan flick?

Props.
>>
File: WORRY.jpg (11 KB, 192x245) Image search: [Google]
WORRY.jpg
11 KB, 192x245
>Tfw i5 2500K and GTX 560Ti-448
>>
File: homer.jpg (22 KB, 500x376) Image search: [Google]
homer.jpg
22 KB, 500x376
>>317632726
>>
>>317632726
>running a botnet
>>
File: spicy.png (157 KB, 991x788) Image search: [Google]
spicy.png
157 KB, 991x788
>>317622560
:^)
>>
File: Capture1.png (21 KB, 483x418) Image search: [Google]
Capture1.png
21 KB, 483x418
I will be ok.
>>
>>317633087
Is there really a noticable difference when you play on an SSD?
>>
My 780 should do fine, then
>>
3570k+2GB 7850

I might upgrade to a used R9 280x(7970 rebrand
) soon.
>>
>>317633380

>is there really a noticeable difference between a bicycle and a motorcycle?
>>
>>317633081
>Using your gaming PC for anything other than gaming.

I dont give a shit if MS or the NSA knows what im playing. I can see how this would be a problem if I was a poorfag and only have 1 PC.
>>
>>317633529
not when you can't go above 5mph
>>
>>317633380
Not him, but it depends on the game. I've noticed a very considerable difference in load times in games like Skyrim/Fallout where there are a lot of loaded instances. Whereas with say, GTA, not so much (tohugh admittedly I've only played online where the loading screens are fucking awful regardless, might be good for sp)
>>
My 760 will chug, but almost max the game out. Fine with me.
>>
>tfw HD 7850
I really need to upgrade, but I don't want to until the new gen cards release next year. Here's hoping that I'm fine with medium-low settings.
>>
>tfw 2x 3gb 7950

the 7950 is a badass card, i won't have to upgrade for a long time
>>
>>317622560
This specs makes no sence at all...

>Nvidia you need 3GB
>AMD you need 4GB

k.
>>
>>317633839
>taking min/rec specs even remotely serious.

This was just a thinly veiled speccy thread.
>>
>>317633087

>980ti is 2gb

Wut?!
>>
>>317633919
tnx m8, I dn't gt t.
>>
>>317633937
Its 6. Speccy is retarded
>>
>that feel I have a 780gtx and barely hit the mark for recommended in all other categories

I wouldn't even hit it if I didn't overclock the shit out of my cpu.
Getting close to upgrade time boys.
>>
>>317622560
>i5 4590 master race

fuck
>>
Yes. Will this come out this year? It has been really disappointing for me. I played Fallout 4, Witcher 3 and GTA V but that's it for PC gaming this year.
>>
>>317634089
see>>317633919
>>
>>317625219
>4.7GHz
Holy fucking shit, how do you even cool that?
>>
>>317625291
This, JC2 ran amazingly well on an old laptop I have with a 525m

Gonna guess they are going way overboard with the recommended as well.
>>
>>317623643

Dude you'll max it, what are you high?
>>
>>317634242
It's out next week m8
>>
>>317627228
>280X is better than a 290
I guess there's the 1gb of VRAM but the nvidia recommendation only has 3.
>>
>>317634252
AIO water cooling or a decent HSF. Its not a intensive as you think it is if you invest in cooling components
>>
File: corybaxter.jpg (47 KB, 900x900) Image search: [Google]
corybaxter.jpg
47 KB, 900x900
>>317633380
guy who posted the og pic here. not really a noticeable difference. in games with lots of loading screens like elder scrolls or fallout there might be like a 5 second difference.
>>
>>317625068
there are multiple pieces to the floor & roof of the tower, and one piece of each remains. the pieces that fall clips through them.

not as bad as the tower duplicating before it falls but it does still look fucked.
>>
Game looks pretty fun but I'm afraid I've already seen everything just watching beta footage on youtube. Every video I've seen has been the same "wing suit acrobatics, new grappling hook mechanics, destroy bridge and laugh at cars driving off the edge, slingshot guy between church towers, rocket propelled explosives on random objects" showcase. I hope there's more crazy things to discover.
>>
>570 gtx
>mfw remember paying $270 for it
>>
File: help.png (21 KB, 657x436) Image search: [Google]
help.png
21 KB, 657x436
Maybe.
>>
>>317634840

>A 630
>He bought a 630 and put it in this shit box

Fucking stop. Just stop. You need to build a new PC. You are not getting anywhere near the performance from that card as you should be with that setup.

DDR2 RAM? You need a new everything.
>>
>>317622560
yes

I have a 4770k and a 390

I am set
>>
>>317635148
A 630 isnt even a gaming card. Its a media card.
>>
File: specs.png (36 KB, 615x525) Image search: [Google]
specs.png
36 KB, 615x525
Barely, but I guess I could lock the game to 30 fps if I have too many issues. Although if this game is anything like mad max for optimization I'll be fine.
>>
>>317633380
>>317634573

SSD's are not all created equal.

The new samsung 950 has read write speeds like 4x faster then those crucials.

You get what you pay for really.
>>
>>317635354
You are a retard
>>
>>317634252
I got a Corsair H105 closed loop water cooler. Works great.
>>
>>317635148
I don't have money man, I just gotta make up with what other people give me.
>>
Avalanche have a pretty much perfect track record when it comes to optimization so I'm not worried yet. I'm just below MinReq right now but when Just Cause 2 came out I was just above MinReq and I was getting 60fps with all settings on Medium/High
>>
File: samsung950.png (11 KB, 599x148) Image search: [Google]
samsung950.png
11 KB, 599x148
>>317635387
i am drooling
>>
>>317635460
why?
>>
>>317635740

You don't have $50? You could could get bargain bin MOBO/RAM/CPU second hand for $50.
>>
>>317629583
>>317629352
>>317628992
>>317628779
>>317628605
Woman or idiot?
You decide.
Best part is, if it's a woman, you know they'd be upset if someone plastered their sexual history, any STDs they have, and their sex lives all over the internet.
>>
how do I figure out the relative computing power of two lower tier cards vs one higher tier card?
>>
>>317635868
>970
>i5

You either have no clue what you have or you are bullshitting
>>
>>317636681
Just because I have that cpu and gpu doesn't mean its capable of running everything. The destruction and physics in this game will bring either my card or cpu to its knee's no doubt.
>>
>>317636847
You are idiot. Leave the thread
>>
>>317636163
benchmarks.
>>
File: Specs.png (31 KB, 696x395) Image search: [Google]
Specs.png
31 KB, 696x395
Going to be glorious
>>
>>317637753
i hope you're not expecting to get the full 144fps on that
>>
File: JC2_Fly_By.webm (3 MB, 960x540) Image search: [Google]
JC2_Fly_By.webm
3 MB, 960x540
>>317637959
Why not? Avalanche are the best PC devs since Crytek. I average about 150 fps in JC2 and 120 in Mad Max so I'm expecting something similar
>>
>>317622560
holy shit my cpu is BARELY gonna make it.

got all my shit 5 years ago for $1200 ($1,995.87) and I'm pretty happy.

Probably going to go for an Intel product next, most like i5 when they go on sale, and a nice mobo.

SSD after that, considering I only have one drive with less than 1TB.

Also, all my friends called me crazy for buying another stick of ram to get 8 gigs. WHO'S LAUGHING NOW DEREK YOU PIECE OF SHIT.
>>
>>317626142
nah, fuck that, you can play both if you don't want to be a 12 year old fuckboy like this nigga

lets you know where how the gameplay is changing
>>
>>317639934
This is basically my rig. Still playing all new games like a champ.
>>
>>317622925
Are you happy with your asus rog monitor?
Should i buy it?
Thx for reply :)
>>
Is this game going to be good? Like, how do you think it will stack up against GTA V?

I just want to be able to drive/run/fly around and fuck people/shit up.
>>
>>317634805
thats not crazy enough? they also have nitrous boosts and rocket jumps in the cars so people wil actually drive them now
>>
Only feel like buying one game

This or Fallout 4???????????????
>>
>>317640767
>I can't make a decision for myself
fuck off
>>
>>317640674
I guess, I just want it to be more than modded JC2
>>
>>317640854
This is a fucking video game board

fuck yourself with a sword
>>
>>317623776
why on the fence? the 290 is better. see if you can get a 290x. I got one with a custom cooler and its a fucking powerhouse
>>
>>317640942
>hurr better ask the Just Cause thread if fallout is any good
>>
>>317640767
This. Fallout 4 is shit.
>>
>implying I'll play it
Just Cause 2 had one of the emptiest and most boring open worlds of all time. Add to that the worst 3rd person action and shooter controls I've ever even tried to use.
>>
>>317640767
>should i buy a sandbox destruction game or a shitty RPG
i wonder anon
i fucking wonder
>>
>>317641134
Seriously fuck off and get a life you fucking neckbeard faggot
>>
>>317641296
good comeback
you sure got me.
>>
>>317623643
if it's anything like Just Cause 2 you'll be bored of it after a few hours.
>>
>>317640656
If you're looking for GTA V quality, I think you'll probably be disappointed.
>>
>>317641394
I know I did you annoying, chronic masturbating low-life loser bitch
>>
>>317640509
yeah man I dunno how I lucked out. I disnt know the first thing about computers when I bought it and this guy named dan at tiger direct helped me pick shit out and build it. he was so nice.

now all I gotta do is get some good upgrades whenever necessary.

plays everything at 60 on at least medium settings, mostly high or max.
>>
File: 1424790291259[1].jpg (73 KB, 490x333) Image search: [Google]
1424790291259[1].jpg
73 KB, 490x333
>>317641509
try forming your own opinions 8)
>>
>>317626532
>>317625920

Allegedly, Denuvo was made by former scene crackers who turned to the industry for work. I hear it certainly upped the ante for more effort, but it's still easily crackable and the advertised "time to crack" is greatly exaggerated by them
>>
>>317622560
Yea still on a 760 only witcher 3 brought it between 30-40 on ultra

Waiting on amd sea islands since I want a true dx12 card
>>
>>317641509
you got somefin against masturbating there m8?
>>
>>317641617
Who the fuck cares if I asked which game is better? I don't sit around all day playing the fucking things like you... I just want to know which would be a better game to pick up, you fat fucking virgin loser
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 59

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.