What went wrong, /tv/?
it set up one of the most powerful moral dilemmas in recent memory and then wasted it.
the dancing scene with oscar isaac should have been the start of this descent into madness but instead feels odd and out of place.
Your mum cancelled the abortion.
>>72091821
Nothing, actually.
In the story, or box office? Be more specific you lazy fuck.
>>72091915
If you don't think the story is stilted then you really suck at life.
>>72092060
Exactly how dense, or incapable of comprehension are you?
The story was fine. Was inquiring as to what specifically stating the story as in the intending conflicts within the story.
Don't you feel dense now? THINK before not posting.
the music was pretty neat
The whole setting seemed convoluted to tell the story they wanted to.
> one of the wealthiest manlets on earth lives alone in a remote location with security or even a Doctor more than 6 hours away even though he's a health nut by day and a fall-down drunk at night because HE'S A QUIRKY RICH GUY!
> entire mansion sealed like a panic room to make up for (see first point)
> builds robots on his own in absolute secrecy because (see first point)
> invites a total stranger he has never met before in his life into his Fortress R&D&Solitude as a lab partner because (see first point)
> the best way to test sentience in a robot is to have it learn to lie and manipulate because drug addicts are the only people who write scripts for (((Hollywood)))
>>72092060
>In the story
>In the story
>In the story
>>72092060
>you suck at life if you aren't a contrarian faggot that hates things others like
>>72092311
It was a budget movie that had amazing effects.
Her looking like a robot was not needed at all. It was put in there simple because it's an AMAZING EFFECT.
Turing test is suppose to be done with a double blind.
One guy was not testing her at all.
The movie was about an alpha, a beta, and a literally objectified women, and a virgin.
It's not really an interesting story. There's nothing interesting to think about other then the massively stupid decisions made by one of the most intellgent people.
It's like thinking about why Einstein didn't flush after taking a massive dump: The Movie
>>72092305
If you don't think in the story is stilted then you really suck at life.
Better???
>>72092305
It did well in the box office, the visuals are obviously well done, the acting was good, the set and pacing wasn't bad, it's just the narrative lacked.
It's like Blade Runner, but frankly it's still one of the best in it's field. It's more upsetting that there's not better sci-fi.
>>72092636
>>72092696
OP whomever that was (you or not) wasn't specific enough in asking:"What went wrong?", so instead of admitting the obvious confusion of such a broad question, you'd rather resort to insults with no real basis.
If you're here to discuss the movie let's do that, but if you're here to insult, we're done.
>>72092955
>whomever
You mean whoever
>>72092696
Blade Runner, as brilliant as it was dwelt with a different kind of artificial android. Blade Runner seemed to lean more towards sci-fi type androids based mostly on the science of the time.
Ex Machina was based on current knowledge of androids, or artificial intelligence.
Comparing the two can only be done in a broad sense as artificial androids, avoiding the specifics of what each type was constructive of.
Blade Runner androids are almost human, being engineered down to an almost genetic level, where as Ex Machina is based in more hardware, and fictional based predictions pf technology.
Both are different kinds of androids, within a different set of rules with a different kind of story.
>>72093178
Thank you for the correction. That is so sweet of you.
nothing went wrong, it went perfect. best film of the year
>>72091873
this film wasnt about his descent into madness, nor was he mad just because hes a bit socially awkward because hes spent alot of time only around robots
>>72093318
It was my privilege, Anon.
I thought it was really great. Can't wait for Alex Garland's Annihilation.
>>72093496
Certainly, thank you again.
>>72092569
>literally objectified women
robots anon, they are robots
It's directed by an amateur director. (Also shitty casting)
i think shes actually a robot irl because this is the only thing shes been good in
The Asian was a top-tier qt
>>72093712
She was decent in Danish Girl, but she's such a dull actress in most everything. I can't believe people were giving her performance praise in this.
>>72091821
We're mostly incapable of thinking of a bright and happy future. TBQH what will happen in reality is the intelligence of Ava would have been nuked to fuck. She'd then be a mass produced little fuckbot for all men everywhere. Complete with adaptable fetish settings based on your porn history... But the second we start thinking about the technological breakthroughs just over the horizon we get all sweaty and nervous and can only see doom and gloom. This fear is probably a good thing though. It's evidence we're going to have about fifty billion failsafes in place before we ever turn a real AI on.
>>72091821
Gingers
>>72093852
>fifty billion failsafes in place before we ever turn a real AI on.
>create something with the power Ava has
news report will read something like "first times nukes tested in over a hundred years in distant canadian wilderness"
>>72093816
another oscar winner who is shiite im shocked
>>72093852
>we're going to have about fifty billion failsafes in place before we ever turn a real AI on.
Are you aware that the stock-markets are run by artificial bots that determine when to pull money in or out of trading based on set parameters?
It had the second worst ending possible which was monster killing the creator meme.
Worst ending would have been if Caleb got out with his waifu and lived happily ever after.
>>72095356
>monster killing
She wanted to be free. Caleb held Eva captive. Caleb can be seen as a monster too depending on how you choose to view it..
>>72092569
her looking like a robot was important for the movie, it adds on to her being "literally objectified".
That's why she puts on the skin at the end
>>72093656
That's what he meant. They're robots so they're LITERALLY objects. I cringe everytime I see the phrase "objectified woman" though.
