>>72061783
>27%
The thought of watching this crap really makes me tremble.
>>72061783
tbqhwy i dont understand rotten tomatoes
i watched BvS, marvel's X-men apocalypse, x-men days of future past, and marvel's captain america civil war in a row, all four one after the other, and they were all about the same: passable, flawed but watchable if you like escapist fantasy (i do)
i really dont know how the critics decided that days of future past and civil war deserved 90% and BvS and apocalypse deserved 40%
>>72061783
>...Plebs cower in fear
What did he mean by this?
>>72061946
Do you bleed?
>>72061874
same
>>72061874
They look at more then just enjoyment but also the technical aspects of a film.
BvS was poorly edited, it is the highest criticism. Frankly it seems like a new strat that they're doing to boost DVD sales.
The movie was edited for theater to sell DVDs.
As for X-Men no one expected anything more.
>>72061874
BvS was trash, Apoc was underrated for sure though.
>>72061969
Only when watching BvS theatrical version.
>>72061783
Cool poster.
First time seeing it.
Pic related is still my favorite.
>>72062018
>yfw you realize that Snyder allowed the theatrical cut to be released only to unleash the true Detective Kimics though the ultimate edition so only those who are patient get the sweet taste of Batno
>>72062177
shame about the movie though
>>72062002
i read this like a couple weeks ago and it inspired me to watch BvS
im glad i read this beforehand so i could be pleasantly surprised by how passable BvS was
>>72061832
You're embarrassingly close-minded if you use movie reviews to determine whether or not you see a picture.
>>72062396
The reviews were right in this case. It should have been a bit lower than 27% though.
Maybe 15%.
It wasn't a movie, it was a 3hour advertisement for a cinematic universe.
Based Snyder
"L'invasion" -Zack Snyder 2013
