Which was better? The 60's Lolita or The 90's Lolita.
![Russkaya.Lolita.2007.DVDRip.DivX-xFILM-PtBr by Beghini.avi_snapshot_00.43.13_[2014.12.29_23.13.40].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/z5lWz5U.jpg "Russkaya.Lolita.2007.DVDRip.DivX-xFILM-PtBr by Beghini.avi_snapshot_00.43.13_[2014.12.29_23.13.40].jpg")
Russian lolita
>>72036310
the book desu
>>72036377
Which one is the lolita in this?
>>72036310
As a movie, the original.
As fap material, the remake.
Haven't read the book. This is /tv/.
>>72036470
Agreed. Truer to the story.
>>72036437
Even worst, that shit is in Slavo.
>>72036377
nice pick haha
>>72036310
Which one's hotter? That one.
>>72036310
I'd say both are equally good, but the 60's one is overrated and the 90's one is underrated.
>>72038752
this 60's one is not overrated. it's barely ever mentioned-- but better than Dr. Strangelove which faggots always take to.
60s one is pretty good if you're not autistic about the source material
As far as Kubrick goes it's one of his lesser works but still not bad
They made Lolita a conniving bitch in it though
>>72038792
>Lolita is better than Strangelove
( y o u )
Why are Jeremy Irons and James Woods so damn awesome?
>>72036513
No it's not you, lying sack of shit. Kubrick's is true to the book, which is a black comedy. 90's version is shit.
>>72039333
Nice trips. Anyways, the Kubrick one isn't true to the book. The censorship made it impossible to accurately portray the Lolita and Humberts relationship. The 90's version did that perfectly.
>>72036377
pfffsshhhh HAHAHA. this. so much.
>>72036386
worth the read?
>>72036377
I fapped so hard to that one.
For OP, the original was too heavily censored to be good.
>>72036310
Lolita (2017)
Starring with Lexee
WHEN? WHEN?
>>72040083
does this lexee have nice feet?
if they are going to do a reboot
the girl has to be an acclaimed footslut to pull of those scenes where she teases
>>72040306
Of course, she is, faggit.
>>72040306
>Feetfag
Nigga, please leave
>>72036470
sue lyon was cuter tho
>>72041592
>he hasn't read the book or seen the movies
your opinion is invalid, fag
>>72042904
those feet are too lewd
>>72036310
Hated Kubrick. Watched Lyne's just yesterday for the first time. Really amazing. Kubrick's actress was a fucking roastie not a nymphet.
The one in my basement
>>72044505
This was cast by a real pedo
>>72042904
>>72036310
1962 Lolita was hampered by Hays code and one of the few instances where Kubrick meddling with the script didn't do the movie a lot of favors.
1997 Lolita was closer to the source but ultimately lacked finesse.
Read the book, watch the 60s version for curiosities sake. No adaptation does the source justice.
>>72036310
anything is better than a kubflick
>>72042904
Didn't look like Lolita though. Looks-wise, Swain was a really good choice, even though she looked a tad too old (albeit being only 15 during the time of filming)
>>72044505
I get they couldn't cast someone much younger than 16 or 17, but surely they could have found a 17 year old girl who looked more childish. much closer to the 12-y.o. in the book?
>>72044829
>ultimately lacked finesse.
And humour! At least in the regard Kubrick's version fared better.
>>72036435
The one in the middle.
>>72044885
You could find an adult that looks 12
>>72036310
90s version has Frank Langela's cock swinging left and right on camera when he's running away from Humbert while his robe was untied.
the first one has 30 minutes of peter sellers doing maybe the worst comedy characters capture on film
>>72045105
While the overall portrayal of Quilty isn't THAT bad, Sellers was actually ill-suited to the role.
Also Kubrick's version is too much "in yer face" at some points while leaving out the "NO FUCKIN WAY" when it'd be necessary.
https://youtu.be/pYbNpamv5Dg
Superior telling
>>72036437
>As fap material, the remake.
Except if you're a footfag. Kubrick's adaptation panders to footfags like not even a Tarantino movie would.
Guess it's all due to the Hays code.
https://youtu.be/zlUF_hJbUE4
>>72044964
Im so glad that Monroe hardcore scene was finally released
>>72045262
>>72036310
The problem with the 90s version is that it isn't funny.
The book is serious but it's also really funny.
Haven't seen the 60s version so I can't comment
>>72044964
who or what is that?
>>72045319
Damn, you my sister from another mister
>>72045361
see:
>>72044902
>>72045105
>>72045196
The humour is THERE but often in a somewhat heavy-handed manner.
>>72045319
>>72045262
>>72038800
>They made Lolita a conniving bitch in it though
But that's what she is... if you "BELIEVE" Humbert's account, that is.
>>72045384
sellers was kubrick's personal god, and that's why those scenes go on forever for no other reason. when they were filming strangelove, kubrick was literally rolling on the floor, laughing
>>72040083
Why would you cast a porn starlet as Lolita? That's just stupid.
>Lolita starring Siberian Mouse or Cat Goddess.
make it happen.
>>72045366
Katerina Kozlova AKA Monroe
You have fapping to do
>>72045520
>Katerina Kozlova
The tennis player?
Doesn't look at all like her. I think you're pulling my leg here, good sir.
>>72045315
>Im so glad that Monroe hardcore scene was finally released
You wot mate ! Give me some sauce.
>>72036377
i-is this legal?
>>72045470
>>72045262
Good movie??
>>72036310
The Irons version doesn't quite capture the duplicitous nature of Humbert and makes him a bit too much a straight tragical figure who is likable and easy to fool. In the book it's more ambiguous and uncertain how much of the story is true and what is just Humbert attempting to deceive you.
>>72045648
Irons is more or less portraying HH as characterised by HH.
>>72045593
Of course. You know that everything coming out of Russia needs to be officially sanctioned by Vlad himself.
>>72045520
looks illegal. No fap on my side.
>>72045623
good for 90s nostalgia if you were born in the 80s and had your first fap on Aerosmith's "Crazy" video.
All these normies that don't realize dd/lg relationships with actual teenage girls and middled aged men are a real thing and more common than they think.
I couldn't watch the 60's version, it just seemed like some asinine movie that had the same character names as the book. 90's Dolly at least pretended to not be too old.
I'd love a version with a real nymphet but it will never happen.
>>72036377
WEW LAD THE FILM
>>72045893
We need to bring back the seventies, I guess.
I think the issue with filming Lolita is that the book, because of the way it's written and how selective it is in its descriptions, is not pornographic. A film inevitably has to be, because you can't "hide" things on camera like you can in text.
>>72046187
>A film inevitably has to be, because you can't "hide" things on camera like you can in text.
Are you fucking kidding, there are many ways to 'imply' something within scenes with actors, that's called acting ffs
>>72045741
she's in her 30's.
seriously.
I don't understand why normalfags like to say that Lolita isn't a book for pedophiles. I couldn't stop laughing during Humbert's ranting in chapter 5 because it was just so relatable.
>>72046307
Is she, like, the Russian Emily Kinney or something?
Anime adaptation when?
>>72046440
those same normies say leon is a pedo flick
i don't get it
Why are people saying Kubrick's isn't faithful enough to the book? The biggest biggest difference I can think of is the way Quilty was handled throughout the story
>>72046440
Wait, why did you laugh if it was relatable?
>>72047398
Doesn't feel the same
>>72047497
I disagree then I guess, I've read the book a while after seeing the movie and I had no such feeling
>>72045586
On empornium. If you don't have an account, how are you even on /tv/.
>>72036310
Peter Sellers ruined the first one
>>72046821
That's some bullshit male fantasy. Most virgins can insert a tampon with an applicator without trouble
>>72047990
>Kodomo no Jikan
>bullshit male fantasy
You don't say?
>>72046440
How does Nabokov even portray those feelings so accurately without being one himself ? Its a fucking amazing book.
>>72047461
It's funny to hear someone articulate things you've always bought but never said. It's like Seinfeld.
>>72048026
written by a woman
I've always have considered 90's version far better
>>72036377
link ?
>>72049434
Look at the fucking filename, you can't find it with all that there?
>>72048398
Literally everyone has wanted to fuck a 12-17 year old at some point in their life, it's human nature
>>72049460
>Russkaya
>Lolita
i don't want the cop at my door
seriously there is no available link, torent are dead, pls make a mega link if you have it
>>72050119
TOR that shit, you fuckhead.
>>72048875
yeah sure. I call bullshit.
>>72050162
russian lolita is just called a 'romantic movie' also dominic swain has aged like milk
>>72050776
Fuck off. Dominic Swain is a cool guy.
Dominique Swain has aged like milk though.
>>72050162
>TOR that shit
Why? Is a porno you dumb fucker is legal all over the world.
>>72044505
What the fuck is she even doing?
>>72051119
Reading a magazine
>>72047649
bullshit bro, post a screen from it
>>72046440
I know, while reading the book I could feel exactly the emotions that H.H. was feeling, in the last part with the chase thing I was literally sweating and reading a page per minute like a madmen, I could feel the same rage and desperation as he shot the guy at the end.
The one with Schwarzenegger.
>>72050987
Don't tell ME that. I'm not the guy pissing my pants over nothing.
>>72042904
Wrong
>>72036386
This. I understand why Kubrick considers it one of his weakest films, because it is. i haven't seen the 90s version.
i liked 90's best. it had a more lush, intense atmosphere. liked the characters and performances better.
>>72050190
Whatever you do, don't go to this address, it will shatter your fucking peabrain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaworu_Watashiya
>>72036310
Remake when ?
>>72053635
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaworu_Watashiya
Yeah, she's a MANGA author. Animes usually don't follow the manga they're based on by the letter.
So fuck off and get some fuckin education on how tampons work, you fuckshit.
>>72053741
That scene is literally exactly the same in the manga shitlord
>>72053741
The manga was more lewd than the anime
>>72052759
Very wrong.
