wtf I love Star Trek Beyond © Presented in IMAX 3D now
>average rating 6.8/10
>>72022804
>reviews counted: 10
give it some time OP
>>72022762
why not? did you not see the ratings for the other two?
Reminder
>>72022822
Those were directed by JJ Abrams though.
>>72022762
>6.8/10
Isn't that exactly what you'd expect from the sequel to a 7/10 movie?
>>72022762
>>72022804
Why are you still listening to RT after you saw what happened to Ghostbusters Current Year Edition?
>>72022833
And it was really good.
>>72022853
>Ghostbusters
wew
Reminder justin lin is remaking lone wolf and cub
>>72022762
>I was not expecting this
I WAS COUNTING ON IT
>>72022833
i loved the movie what was wrong with it?
>>72022762
Star Trek Beyond was a great film, where the USS Enterprise crew explores the furthest reaches of uncharted space, where they encounter a new ruthless enemy who puts them and everything the Federation stands for to the test.
With an all star cast of Chris Pine as the bold, dashing Captain James T. Kirk, Zachary Quinto as the brilliant and vexing Commander Spock, and the beautiful, commanding Zoe Saldana as Lieutenant Uhura to show the diverse (but mostly male) cast that women are just as important (if not more) as men.
>>72022762
>Script written by Simon Pegg and some other guy
>Script NOT written by "Magic Blood" Kurtzman & Orci
it makes sense
>>72022822
but the trailers looked like shit for this. But nearly all the reviews are saying it feels like classic Trek. Was not expecting that from the director of Fast and Furious.
Sequel where Khan wakes up and is wrathful towards Kirk fucking when?
>>72022853
Because current year edition was good
Why weren't you expecting marketing?
>>72023023
please don't derail this thread
>>72022881
God damn man...
Women fucking suck.
Do men go around claiming to like things just because men are involved?
NEXT MOVIE BETTER HAVE V'GER AND THE BORG TEAMING UP AGAINST THE ENTERPRISE
GIVE ME MY NOSTALGIA CUM
>>72022762
Fuck the new Trek movies in the ass.
The latest especially, that fucking motorcycle shit is insurrection tier.
>>72023103
Grown up women hate the movie too apparently. I mean, 5.8/10 is pretty bad.
>>72022833
WTF
>>72022947
Have you heard of a TV show called Star Trek? Maybe your grandfather told you about it.
Every time I've refreshed the past 5 minutes it has gotten higher
Looking good, bros
>>72022947
contrarians
same people also thought Skyfall was bad.
ignore them.
>>72022853
yeah all they do is post shill bloggers. should go back to posting only legit reviewers who actually get paid to do it.
>>72023143
Me and a few friends were wondering what it is with shitty Trek films and EXTREEEEME SPORTS.
Although Nemesis' dune buggy chase was because 1) No one gave a fuck and 2) Patrick Stewart loves off-roading.
>Star Trek 2.4 is about them taking the USS Enterprise-A back to Earth but they have to go back to San Francisco to stop the alien whale probes from killing Earth
>>72022833
I liked Into Darkness but, lol.
>>72023290
Oh right it was nemesis, regardless it is a shit scene and it is embarrassing to all of trek.
>>72023313
What was there to like?
Actually hold that thought, I suppose If I were 16 years old or something I would have liked it more.
It was all just so uninspired and cliche.
I guess when you are young you don't notice it.
>>72022847
Was going to say this.
It still astounds me that as much as this board talks about RT they still don't understand the score.
>>72023317
>it is embarrassing to all of trek
How so? Judging by the new movies, this is the shit "broader audiences" want. If anything, it was ahead of its time!
>>72022762
I wasn't expecting this either but I'm really glad. It's been an absolutely abysmal summer, by far the worst I can remember and I really need a fun flick to watch.
>>72023352
It's almost as if this isn't Reddit and people have different opinions.
Lin is a fine by-the-numbers filmmaker.
Like Fast and Furious, ST is a big wide appeal action film that they'll pump out every year except it's space flavored instead of car flavored.
Good for one watch in the theatres and a couple more times on FX or TNT.
Why do old and bitter star trek fans refuse to enjoy anything new?
Are they autistic?
Reminder
>>72022975
>Kurtzman & Orci
Can someone please kill these faggots? Literally every single movie they've written has been terrible but yet they keep getting work.
>>72022762
It looks like most of the positive reviews are 6/10 and 7/10.
Basically they're saying it's a decent flick and not a horrible one.
>>72023272
I liked Skyfall and HATED Into Darkness.
Abrams is a fucking hack.
>>72023352
I liked the acting and the music, mostly.
>>72023381
LOL good point,.
>>72023432
>Basically they're saying it's a decent flick and not a horrible one
Which in this climate might as well be amazing after nothing but pure shit for two months
For some reason, there's a good chunk of people that genuinely believe that the reboot Trek movies were panned.
>>72022762
RT is dead. Fucking retard bloggers without movie knowledge push their agendas
>>72023411
Generic space action isn't new.
>>72023411
most Star Trek fans enjoy the Abrams movies and will enjoy this one.
A few autistic /tv/ contrarians don't represent the entire fan base.
Without these films, ST would be dead anyway, I don't see why they care.
Does Leonard Nimoy come back?
>>72022833
PAID REVIEWS
It's so fucking obvious these days
>>72023481
>push their agendas
What agenda is Star Trek 13 pushing exactly?
>>72023509
I'd rather see it dead than hooking for crack.
>>72023513
From the grave?
>>72022762
The Star Trek reboot was good and Into Darkness was a decent so I can't say I am surprised.
>>72023411
The first one beat my expectations so I raised the bar for the second movie.
>>72023591
It's not like it didn't happen before.
>>72022762
>WOW IT GOT A GOOD RT SCORE
>WOW A MOVIE WRITTEN BY SIMON "SJW" PEGG IS GETTING GOOD REVIEWS FROM "SJW FILM CRITICISM: THE WEBSITE"
I thought Ghostbusters rendered RT obsolete once and for all.
>>72023521
but this isn't Disney, and why wouldn't BvS have paid reviews? BvS was an extremely important cornerstone in the DCEU and it got panned to hell and back. The DCEU basically lost all hype. It had the most expensive budget a blockbuster has had in a very long time, why wouldn't they pay for a 60% or something?
>>72022762
you realize most have an agenda and or paid off?
>>72023698
>Top Critics
>>72023053
>>72023274
>>72023521
>>72023698
>if other people liked something I expected to suck without even seeing it, they must've all been bribed by <studio>
Even as bait this is getting stale.
>>72023828
You are living in denial if you think there are no paid for reviews.
You think that edgelord Spock is gonna have an epic chase scene again?
>>72023857
but I thought Disney paid reviews??
I fucking hate Rotten Tomatoes!
That little smug paragraph! Thats all there is to it!
They call themselves a review agggregate! They have no FUCKING RIGHT to add their own little blurb to "summarize" all the reviews. As if the giant flashing number and biased Pos/Neg system versus Metacritics pure averaging werent enough to instantly brainwash someones opinion, they feel the arrogant ARROGANT urge to offer their own perspective, their own review to further assuage visitors away from actually examining the contents of reviews. I wish Hollywood would get together and destroy this trash site!
The first new Star Trek was fun.
The second one was watchable.
I'm sure this one will be more towards being a summer type movie.
Whatever, should be alright.
>>72023918
everyone does.
wtf i love star trek now
>>72024024
explain Batman v Superman and Tarzan and Mike and Dave and The Purge and Indenpendence Day and Now You See Me 2 and Warcraft and X-Men.
>>72022947
Uh, everything?
>>72023434
I liked Skyfall, hated Into Darkness and loved The Force Awakens
Fight me
>>72024302
fuck off
>>72022762
Into Darkness got good reviews and /tv/ thought it was bad. I'm sure it will be the same for this.
>>72022762
CAN'T WRECK THE TREK
Never doubted it tbfh
>>72024763
Surre a/s/l
>>72024793
37/m/ok
i way 430 lbs
>>72022881
>dat 5.8 from MILFs
>>72022833
Into Darkness is honestly baffling to me because literally everything but the script is quite good.
It's like the scriptwriters were intentionally sabotaging the movie or something.
>>72023434
Abrams had nothing to do with Into Darkness being bad. There's only so much you can accomplish with an Alex Kurtzman script.
>>72024763
>can barely see the butt in the mirror
why even have it there, fuck
>>72022947
My major complaint is that they went out of their way in the 2009 movie to explain to the audience that this is an alternate timeline. That means they have the entirety of the Star Trek universe they can use as their sandbox. Do anything, go anywhere. And they chose to do a remake. That's about the laziest shit you can do and it reeked of "just get the goddamned thing out as fast as possible" even though they had four years between projects.
Aside from that, it's mostly nitpicking stuff that ends up collapsing the film under it's own weight. I'll admit, it has a style and a flash that caters to mainstream audiences which is exactly what Paramount was going for. I can totally see why most people enjoyed it but I can't count myself among them.
>>72024731
This.
First two films were fun while they lasted. That's about all I expect from this franchise.
>>72022918
I think it was sarcastic. There's no one anyone thinks it would be less
Is C+ really a negative review? If you look there's a 3/5 fresh review. 3/5 is 60%, technically a D. This is why RT is shit and I'm sick of hearing about it.
>>72025866
You know critics get to choose if their review is considered fresh or rotten right? Maybe learn how the site works
>>72025906
Then the grading system is shit because it's subjective. Which means film criticism is shit, which is all RT has to offer. Therefor RT is shit.
>>72022762
NEW STAR TREK CONFIRMED FOR KINO
HATERS BTFO
>>72023768
I would expect NOTHING less
>>72025866
>>72025964
>I'm sick of hearing about it
keep crying you baby, no one cares about what you do and don't want to hear about.
>>72023683
no need to pay shit when """""critcs""""" are the voice of the plebs. see >>72022833
>>72026041
I care
>>72026057
Into Darkness is better than 90% of most blockbusters and is a damn fine movie.
>>72026057
Into Darkness is better than 90% of most blockbusters and is a damn fine movie.
Cry more.
>>72026110
It's so full of plotholes even a pleb like me noticed them.
The entire final action scene was completely unnecessary.
>>72023481
It's critics the top 100 most popular movie sites.
You're pushing your agenda more than they are theirs.
why do we do this lads
endlessly read and post?
it means nothing
less than nothing
look at what this fucking world has made us
time to walk away from it all
it's a childish division
this trash
>>72026199
>he's a plotfag
>>72023272
>Skyfall
>good
HAHAHAHA
DEAR ANTON
...
FOR YOU
>>72024936
Well, yeah, they were actually around to watch and enjoy the original one.
>>72025242
>the director had nothing to do with his movie being bad
come on now.
>>72026629
The direction is fantastic, the only problem was the script.
>>72023532
Gays.
>>72023949
I agree.
SPACEKINO
Nostalgia fags btfo
>>72026700
Will never understand the love for this movie, seriously why did it break bank so much harder than the other bonds? Was it that fat fuck's song?
>Average rating: 6.8/10
Another mediocre film.
>>72026916
>new poster is just Chris Pine
Why? It's not exactly like he's that bankable a star. I mean his boat movie flopped and his Jack Ryan movie was really underwhelming - even though I enjoyed it.
>>72023532
The gay space asian agenda
>>72024169
with BvS WB opted to, instead of trying to buy off critics, blocked critics from access until the simultaneous international holiday weekend premier.
The rest were pretty low budget but still started off with goodish reviews from the earliest batch of critics.
What did he mean by this?
From what I read, it seems much more like a TNG episode than a typical Star Trek movies.
>>72022762
Considering there is 0 correlation between the rotten tomato rating and how good a movie actually is, this doesnt say shit.
>>72024489
I won't because I agree with you.
>>72028510
which movie caused you to lose faith in RT?
>>72028604
All of them. Rottentomato proofed critics only let Disney get away with mediocrity.
Get rid of the fucking internet bloggers already and add their scores to the user score.
>>72028662
So BvS?
>>72023949
This
>>72028713
Look up supergirl on RT
>>72028841
>supergirl
>movie
>>72027879
>citation needed
>>72028841
That's not a movie.
>people on /tv/ were dead certain this movie was going to only get a 50% or lower on RT
fucking lol, you guys are retarded. I bet you guys think Jason Bourne won't get good reviews either.
>>72029352
>I bet you guys think Jason Bourne won't get good reviews either
No one is that dumb
