Are you ready for childrensbook-kino?
>>71990555
Why? Seriously why? Its been done. It wasnt even that massive a book to begin with. It was popular but not earth shattering.
Who in their right mind thinks it needs a second film, and a fucking reboot of all things?
Is cinema fucking dead? Between this and the BFG Im getting sick of this shit.
>>71991098
The first movie was a shameless attempt to make it into another big "Harry Potter" franchise. It was shit. Now that we're all past that they actually have a chance to make something good. These books would work great as films if they put a little effort into them.
Oh they are making this one again? Nice. Loved the old movie as a preteen. Emily Browning was like my first movie crush.
>>71991098
Its actually anetflix show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xer4VCa5-tg
>>71991205
read the comments retard, netflix says its fake
>>71991281
The teaser is, the series is not.
Learn 2 Unfortunate Events.
The only reason I even think its real is because Netflix said it was fake.
Also, even if the trailer is fake, the show itself is still real. Its currently filming
http://deadline.com/2016/03/neil-patrick-harris-star-a-series-of-unfortunate-events-series-count-olaf-netflix-1201719838/
>>71991360
meant for
>>71991281
>>71991170
It had nothing to do with Harry Potter, it was a twist on Mary Poppins. You fucking retard.
>>71991428
Are you an idiot? he was trying to say that the only reason the FILM was made was to cash in the recent Harry Potter adaptation hype. They wanted a film franchise that could be as successful.
>>71991360
>>71991338
you kids are retarded, netflix right there says it is fake. read the obvious clues morans
>>71991522
Stop pretending to be retarded. You think I don't see through that shit?
>>71991098
sorry, this is a relatively good series that's worth putting on screen
it's one of the very few original children's series that doesn't rely on the formula of:
>dystopian future
>being selected/divided into factions or associations
>fantasy magic/powers
>pseudo-science fiction
>power fantasy
>self-insert wish fulfillment fantasy
>teen romance drama
it also has the advantage of being designed to appeal largely to an audience of 21+ people (who were in grade school when the series was relevant) as opposed to being primarily for 8-14 year old people like hunger games/maze runner/divergent/host/whatever
>>71991281
it's also probably better than whatever their trailer and theme sequence will look like
>>71991490
Also not true, that type of neo-Goth has been a thing since mid-80s.
>>71991522
>>71991522
>morans
it's a mid-era meme but it checks out
>>71991620
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck how thick is your skull. He's not talking about things tonally or genre. Harry potter had just seen a massive adaption from a children's book series and somebody thought they could do the same for Lemony Snickett. Stupid FUCK
>>71991729
Lemony Snickets was not ever designed to be a franchise.
Was that movie the peak of Emily Browning hotness
Yes
^ Yes
>>71991772
correct, which is why hollywood studios failed to turn it into a successful film franchise when they attempted to
I can tell you know you were wrong but you're still trying to hang just over the edge of admitting it by crafting some kind of clever counter-point to try to trick us into thinking our princess was in another castle all along
it's really okay that you're not a master baiter or ruseman, most people aren't
>>71991281
>That is a fanmade trailer
>Channel only has 1 vid and is named after one of the characters
>Lemony Snicket
It's obviously a ruse, the trailer is real.
>>71991945
This
Have to read the same book like 10 times just to get answers in the last few.
Fuck those books
