[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>The Purge: Election Year getting good reviews because it
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 36
Thread images: 14
File: purge election year.jpg (503 KB, 1250x1979) Image search: [Google]
purge election year.jpg
503 KB, 1250x1979
>The Purge: Election Year getting good reviews because it agrees with liberal reviewers politics

Can somebody explain this?
>>
>Hopson
>"hey nigger"
>Takes out whip
>"I'm gonna make you hop, son"
>>
>>71923549
Did you think this was clever, or something?
>>
>>71923612
No, that's where the name hopson comes from, nigger
>>
A review today is most likely just some twenty something millenial's feelings. No objectivity and nothing more than skin deep critique, just "how this lines up with my feelings."
>>
Election Year was shit compared to Purge 2


The fucking characters they advertise on the cover in the OP are in the movie for like 10 seconds
>>
>a day where all crime is legal
>not that far-fetched under Trump

I don't even like Trump but I thought radical liberals' whole thing was that he was a racist, not an insane cartoon villain caricature. Why are people so stupid?
>>
>>71923485
Yes, reviewers are shit if they're reviewing the message instead of the actual film.

They can show all the titties or shoot all the brown people they want but if the movie is photographed like The Bourne Ultimatum then it's not a good movie.
>>
File: tabletop simulator.gif (4 MB, 500x281) Image search: [Google]
tabletop simulator.gif
4 MB, 500x281
>>71923485
why is this movie franchise so retarded. give me the rights and I guarantee you I'd make the best purge movie possible.
>>
File: 1468240908159.png (123 KB, 785x757) Image search: [Google]
1468240908159.png
123 KB, 785x757
>>71923485
Yeah because /tv/ has never hated a movie or tv show or person because of its politics
>>
>at trump rallies, people readily rip of that mask of civilization

well shes actually right, but its not the trump supporter or the things he says that does it, but more the protester who think physical violence and intimidation tactics are fine as long as they are used against the "bad" candidate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0t7PnrelFdY
>>
File: gc.jpg (1 KB, 48x43) Image search: [Google]
gc.jpg
1 KB, 48x43
>>71923719
we're not film makers or film reviewers
>>
>>71923719
Or loved one.
Or completely misinterpreted something and claimed it was "redpilled" instead of a parody and loved it despite the liberal politics.
>>
File: 1374191987549.png (363 KB, 305x750) Image search: [Google]
1374191987549.png
363 KB, 305x750
Reviewers- whether for films, games, music or books, have become intensely politicized and subjective over the last few years. It's shockingly hard to find actual, politically unbiased reviews at this point.

But then again, everything's become intensely political. Everybody with half a brain knows that liberals and conservatives (or more accurately, globalists and nationalists) are getting very close to the point where they can no longer coexist. Widespread armed civil conflict WILL happen soon, regardless of whoever wins the presidency (possibly before the election)
>>
>>71923485
Reviewing shit is a political game now. Movie doesn't matter so long as they can or can't find racist/sexist/homophobic themes in there.
>>
File: jew 2.png (14 KB, 333x293) Image search: [Google]
jew 2.png
14 KB, 333x293
>>71923929

This

"""""critics""""" lost their journalistic integrity along time ago. Today it's about conforming to a specific, liberalist/leftist narrative which must be appeased and adhered to, making sure your diversity quotas are on check, your movies not misogynistic or oversaturated with privileged white males and it doesn't air any rhetoric demonising or vilifying Islam or negro crime culture
>>
>The Purge: Election Year getting good reviews because it agrees with liberal reviewers politics

I fail to see how. Yes the good guy liberal person wins the election, but it pretty much turn america into purge 24/7
>>
File: 13528795.jpg (48 KB, 480x480) Image search: [Google]
13528795.jpg
48 KB, 480x480
>>71923817

This
>>
>>71923485
>Say Trumps the bad one because he says mean words
>People turn up to protest his rallies and pepper spray 9 year old kids and no one cares
>>
>Everything I don't like is quotas and shills
>Only I am intelligent enough to see through the facade of democratic socialists
>>
>>71923485
I think they feel vindicated or like something in pop culture is "finally" talking to them and making them feel safe or something. Also they get to add another movie to their social media like "this is my jam, i am so this thing". I don't why they don't see 80% of it all is targeted at them.

Now it's gotten tiring, it's like if every reviewer was ok with a movie because it send a good christian message.

>>71923719
not really, when i was a leftist i could recognize the neoconservative themes in dark knight and still liked the movie. Nowadays i think it's pretty weak as a film (bad pacing, terrible functional expository dialogues with bad cuts like most of Nolan's movies, uninteresting main character, Harvey's fall not being the main foccus, messy story, themes being above plot etc)
>>
File: jester.jpg (35 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]
jester.jpg
35 KB, 640x480
>>71924532
>>
Is /pol/ ever not butthurt about something?
>>
It' s almost like RT is a shit way to judge the quality of a movie and some reviewers aren't worth paying attention to

Hmmm
>>
>>71924554
Not sure what people like you even want out of life.
>>
>>71924598
Does /tv/ ever get tired of deflecting to other boards and websites in every thread
>>
File: goblin.png (327 KB, 472x346) Image search: [Google]
goblin.png
327 KB, 472x346
>>71924598

>muh... muh /pol/!

You don't even have the self awareness to realise people like you allow /pol/ to live in your head 24/7, rent free.

At the end of the day you're the one eternally ass blasted with Nazis constantly living in your head like a paranoid schizophrenic. Typical from the person in the thread who randomly, and irrelevantly, brings up /pol/ for no reason at all
>>
File: conspiracy.png (880 KB, 1421x682) Image search: [Google]
conspiracy.png
880 KB, 1421x682
>>71924610
To make fun of autists who think they've discovered the secret jew conspiracy.

Its guaranteed replies every time because you're always so butthurt
>>
>>71923696
>being racist
>being an insane cartoon villain caricature

I think it's possible to be one or the other, or both.

Trump is both.
>>
>>71923703
How hard would it be to just have a mayhem battle royale scene where everyone is just going ham on each other?

Instead its always some stupid bullshit subplot
>>
>>71923485
this is a pet peeve
>a much more involved discussion of politics, socioeconomics, sexism, racism
these emptied overused cultural class cliches that could all be accompanied with "and stuff"
>discussion (i think it agrees with me)
>of POLITICS and shit
>socioeconomics like poor people and rich you know?
>etc
you always see these ready-made words to imply a lot thought behind them when it's usually just "you can write a lot about this in your blog because the subvillain has a southern accent and ultimately the conclusion is whites are bad no matter what argument is used to get there"
>>
File: communist faggot.jpg (123 KB, 500x638) Image search: [Google]
communist faggot.jpg
123 KB, 500x638
>>71924677

Pic related: (you)
>>
>>71923485
that's just how movies work now
>>
File: baitne.jpg (41 KB, 680x683) Image search: [Google]
baitne.jpg
41 KB, 680x683
>>71924786
Look its working
>>
File: 1462123292881.png (148 KB, 2500x1645) Image search: [Google]
1462123292881.png
148 KB, 2500x1645
>>71924822

Thanks for the (you)
>>
File: durnitup.jpg (20 KB, 405x497) Image search: [Google]
durnitup.jpg
20 KB, 405x497
>>71924879
We'll all go together
Thread replies: 36
Thread images: 14

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.