[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
If stockings are supposed to be erotic clothes, why does women
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 45
Thread images: 5
File: living-room-6-511x288.jpg (42 KB, 511x288) Image search: [Google]
living-room-6-511x288.jpg
42 KB, 511x288
If stockings are supposed to be erotic clothes, why does women wear them at the funerals?
>>
>>71899487
>asking men, and virgins at that.

I don't fucking know.
>>
it's like you didn't even watch wedding crashers
>>
why did u make this thread on /tv/?
>>
I find them pretty hot, I think its because they just match with the black funeral clothing
>>
>>71899561
Because i've seen it in the movies. I dont actually know if it's the real thing.
>>
>>71899607
have you never been to a funeral?
>>
>>71899628
As far as i remember: no.
>>
>>71899487
>Helps hide cellulite
>Is actually more modest than having bare legs
>High heels are erotic too, but in a lot of contexts they are just formal, like stockings
>>
>>71899487
because they wish to be fucked over a coffin. a proper lady goes in a back dress but a widow that killed her husband goes in stockings.+ there are erotic stockings and there are stockings for dailye use
>>
>>71899553
this

funerals make chicks super horny. it's not even fair.
>>
>stockings
>supposed to be erotic

I'm not denying that they're hot as fuck but they do exist for a reason other than to get your dick to rise
>>
>>71899700
>Is actually more modest than having bare legs
What the fuck are you talking about?
>>
>>71899791
>but they do exist for a reason other than to get your dick to rise
And what the reason is?
>>
So they can honour the diseased with a final erotic send-off
>>
Because it's fucking worse when they don't have panty hose/stockings on.
>going to a formal event with bruises or shaving nicks visible
>>
>>71899831
>what's the point of wearing lightweight socks that cover your entire leg and come in a multitude of patterns and colors
>>
>>71899795
Look at OPs pic, faggot. It does look more modest than bare legs.
>>
>>71900007
>covers your legs
Why would you want to do that with stockings? They dont protect you from the cold, they a practically useless. The only purpose of stockings is to get men lewd.
>>
>>71900002
This, I feel like people who don't grow up with a lot of women around them never realize how often girls wear stockings or pantyhose just because they haven't shaved in a week or they have ugly marks on their skin from whatever but still want to wear a skirt.
>>
>>71900069
No it doesn't. How can legs in sexual lingerie be more modest than the bare legs?
>>
>>71900085
>They dont protect you from the cold
There's a reason you see girls wearing stockings more in the winter. It's not a huge protection but it'll still make you a little warmer. Also it cuts back on thigh chaffing which is apparently a huge annoyance when you're wearing a skirt, even if you're not full thicc.
>>
>>71900146
>lingerie
Negro not every woman in stockings is wearing them on a garter belt with matching frilly panties or something. Believe it or not, the sexualization of stockings was an effect of men finding them appealing, they weren't created to be worn in the bedroom.
>>
>>71900249
>they weren't created to be worn in the bedroom.
What for then? I can't see any functionality in this kind of clothes.
>>
>>71900397
warmth and modesty you fucking retard
>>
>>71900497
>warmth
Wear the fucking pants if it's cold. If it's not, dont wear anything.
>modesty
Nope, already told ya, bare legs is perfectly fine and much more modest than in stockings.
>>
>>71900397
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stocking

>Before the 1920s, stockings, if worn, were worn for warmth. In the 1920s, as hemlines of dresses rose, women began to wear stockings to cover their exposed legs.

Christ almighty.
>>
>>71900397
They evolved from pantyhose which women (aside from being a necessary component to Edwardian modesty) were apparently a staple in theatre costumes to avoid lewd wardrobe malfunctions ironically enough.

But they're basically lightweight socks that cover your leg up to the skirt that allow you to have some color below your skirt line and hide any imperfections without having to go all the way up to your waistline, since different styles have different waistlines. Also apparently they don't breathe well so you sweat like a bitch in full hose, and so stockings don't totally suffocate your lower body.
>>
>>71900584
IT TURNS OUT

WOMEN WEREN'T SOCIALLY ALLOWED TO WEAR PANTS OR HAVE BARE LEGS
>>
>>71900584
>>71900397
Holy shit, you are one thick retarded faggot.
>>
>>71900584
>Wear the fucking pants if it's cold.
But anon. Some girls like to wear skirts year round. In fact, some skirts are designed with winter months in mind. Stockings and pantyhose make them more comfortable and add some warmth.

How is this hard for you to understand.
>>
File: experts.png (196 KB, 640x360) Image search: [Google]
experts.png
196 KB, 640x360
>>71900397
>>
File: surejan.gif (841 KB, 450x254) Image search: [Google]
surejan.gif
841 KB, 450x254
>>71900584
>being more covered up is less modest
>what is women's fashion?
>>
>>71900663
I fucking hate the internet
>>
>>71900626
I hope he is just pretending to bait you.
>>
File: 1446014145408.jpg (159 KB, 850x478) Image search: [Google]
1446014145408.jpg
159 KB, 850x478
>>
>>71900694
I hope so too.
>>
>>71900584
>bare legs is perfectly fine and much more modest than in stockings.
No and no. This isnt even up for debate.
>>
post essential stockingcore
>>
>>71900146
Fucking stupid. why don't you understand anything?
>>
>>71900584
The utilities of stockings doesn't even matter as much as the style aspect. Girls wear them because they look good. They can bring an entire outfit together. No, that does not necessarily mean they want you to see their stocking-clad legs and immediately pop a stiffy. Sometimes that very well might be the intent, but for the most part stockings simply are an accessory. Usually they make someone look more formal or businesslike.
>>
>>71900789
what version is this
wait is this porn?
>>
>>71899487
>them at the funerals?
haha I've been raging this for years, same reason as always: women are sluts. I actually decided that for my funeral I'm going to hire security to enforce the rule that no skirts above knees
>>
>>71900789
I can't tell if being gay/lesbian is living the dream, or a life of frustration
>>
>>71899487
they are sluts, duh
Thread replies: 45
Thread images: 5

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.