So Reddit proved that the reviews on Rotten Tomatoes actually are rigged. Shouldn't there be a movement to demote this site from the public sphere?
Maybe you should stay on reddit.
>rigged
Biased at best, but definitely not rigged. Also that accounts for a very small percentage of the positive reviews.
>>71861131
>rotten tomatos is rigged because the people who liked it were excited to watch it
I would call you stupid but given that you come from reddit that would be redundant
#Bustergate it's about ethics in movie journalism
Why don't you get your boys from /v/ and stay on reddits movie forum? You'd be doing the locals of this board a huge favor as we've been trying to figure out a way to keep you plebs out
Seriously
if you take this cancer back home with you then all we have left to remove is the game of thrones cancer and the board is saved
>>71861131
>Shouldn't there be a movement to demote this site from the public sphere?
4chan is not your personal army
Fuck off and go rally your troops back at reddit
gtfo
Sure thing, reddit.
>>71861270
HAHAHAHAHA
>reddit cancer is going to get us more moderation through goobergate movie edition instead of the cuck spammer and cunny blaster
nice
>people who went into the movie expecting to like it generally liked it
>people who went into the movie with skepticism didn't like it
Great discovery, reddit. Bravo. Maybe we should start another gamergate-like movement to expose corruption in the film industry.
Fuck off back there and don't come back.
Alternatively, go to /pol/ and make a thread about it, I'm sure you'll get 300+ replies, assuming there isn't one already.
>>71861270
This has to be a false-flag. It's too damn unreal.
>>71861208
How much is Sony paying you to counter-post?
>>71861270
What an obvious troll.
>>71861451
I'm being 100% genuine mate. We have been trying to find a way to save this board for the last 4 years and this might finally do it.
holy shit well it has a 5.5 on imdb. not even the general population of normies like it.....
>>71861417
kill yourself my dude
>>71861533
>implying people who haven't seen the movie aren't intentionally trying to bomb it
>>71861417
Stay the FUCK out of /pol/ with this reddit shit.
Don't care. I'll enjoy the butthurt this generates either way of you autists get organized and make Goober Gate 2.0 though.
I bet you'll include BvS in there somehow. Good for a good movie to be on the spotlight again.
>>71861595
Oh, so you guys don't like this kind of garbage either? Is that why we get the threads everywhere? Because everyone tries dumping them somewhere else?
>>71861533
Top imdb users like it. It's just being votebombed by nobodies.
>>71861644
No one likes them. /tv/ is consider every other boards dumping ground and has been for the past few years.
>>71861723
Wow all 8 of them
Great find you fucking muppet
>>71861789
>/v/ calls these faggots /pol/
>/pol/ calls these faggots /v/
>They're actually a specific retarded subset of cross-posters from both boards
We need to come up with some name for them.
>rotten tomatoes
Looks like people still have no idea how it works. I swear some of you think RT has its own employed journalist team doing the reviews.
Sony in full damage control, look at all those shills
Manchildren in full damage control, look at all those redditors.
>>71861847newfags
also summerfags aren't a thing.
We get pretty much the same traffic all year.
It's merely a placebo effect.
>>71861208
And tale /pol/cucks with them, the other cancer
>>71861847
Redditors/ /boardname/rejects
>>71861968
>rejects
That sounds like a good name
>>71861595
Only reddit posters would find /pol/ humor entertaining.
This doesn't conform to my narrative, it must be the work of the enemy!
>>71861131
Why would you demote Rotten Tomatoes over what reviewers do?
>>71861595
>8 chan
fuck off
Reddit is a good site and you fags should accept it.
I knew only redditors hated this movie. Spy was awesome.
>>71862103
Well since you put it that way...
>>71862139
Its very good antibond kino but thats about it
>>71861131
There was a movement to stop corruption in video game journalism, it was called gamergate. It didn't turn out very well, but at least some journalists put a disclaimer of possible bias in their reviews now.
