What the fuck happened to him?
He was the biggest star for a decade and then all of a sudden he's doing skits on late night talk shows and acting in low budget films.
>>71860766
He was Harry fucking Potter for over a decade, and they milked the ass out of that shit. Basically he's known for one role which he happened to play over the course of many years, and that's all he's remembered for.
>>71860766
Swiss army man is the best movie this year so far.
>>71860766
>>71860892
Plus you gotta consider that Harry Potter probably made him so ridiculously stupidly rich that he can basically do whatever he wants, which is why he does stage acting and shitty indies now.
>>71860934
>Green room
>The Neon Demon
>Zootopia
>Hail caeser
>Krisha
>The Lobster
Its not even gonna be in the top 10. Theres still all those foreign films that wont arrive until the end of the year
His new Nazi movie looks pretty good imo
>>71860766
>He was the biggest star for a decade
he was and will always just be harry potter
>>71861105
in the minds of plebs maybe
he's done plenty of good shit besides the hp films
He's actually been in some good stuff. He had a minor but well done part in Eternal Sunshine and then was really good in Wilfred (although the show did get a bit weird towards the end). He's also done a bunch of voice acting, Spyro and the like
>>71861019
You sound like a fucking mega pleb
He has hundreds of millions of dollars, is only in his twenties, and can now basically just chill out the rest of his life and do only the things he wants to do. Like Rupert Grint and his fucking ice cream truck.
>>71861187
congrats you had me confused for a moment
>>71861156
You're the fucking pleb. The only thing that made him a star at all was harry potter. He's never been the biggest anything in his life
>>71861019
hail caesar was terrible
>>71861258
lol, because he's short
also i wasnt the guy who said he was the biggest star of the decade. even in hp terms that goes to emma.
just saying that only plebs think he's just harry potter. cant have seen many films if you think that shit.
>>71860766
He was never a movie star.
>>71861215
What does your best of the year look like?
>>71861373
This. By definition, if he was a star, he'd be able to sell a movie on his star power alone. The only reason people went to Harry Potter movies is because of the franchise name, not him.
>>71861346
I remember he was naked in that play, I saw horns,saw ads for that dr show and the new movie he's got coming out. He's known but nothing special.
>>71861228
>>71860937
This.
He's a filthy rich single young man who just finished a decade of lifestyle heavily tied to a huge commercial enterprise. Just imagine having the schedule of your life so well-planned with contractual penalties for most deviations. What to wear, where to go, when to go, what to say and what not to say, who to see.
Now that he's free of all that, if doing weird movies and stage plays is his thing, let him do it. That's still much better than blowing his fortune on hookers and drugs, or getting involved with a cult.
I've seen a couple movies he's been in since Harry Potter, I thought they were pretty good. He never really catapulted into stardom from HP, he played the role of Harry very well but it was a role lots of people could have played well, and I think it does credit to his character that he didn't develop a massive ego from getting the role of a lifetime.
Seems like what he does now is projects he finds interesting. He certainly wouldn't have trouble finding higher profile work given his portfolio, so it's obviously a lifestyle choice made by him.
>>71860766
>He was the biggest star for a decade
When did this happen?
He's like beiber; has all them monies at his teens and can go fuck all
>>71860766
Meh, the Neo nazi film looks interesting imho.
Imagine that you got a roll so amazing, so incredible that not only did it put you at the heart of a decade-spanning cultural phenomenon but it also made you so rich you could retire in your teens.
What would you do after that?
The correct answer is whatever the fuck you want. You already peaked at 17.
>>71860766
D R O P P E D
>>71860934
Sure if you're a fucking pleb
>>71861897
More like WHO would you do after that ?
The answer being whoever the fuck you want.
>>71862308
Jesus Christ, is there a single actor not tarnished by the jew gene?
>>71860766
he'll get interesting again when he starts beating his wife or gf like all grown up child actors do
>>71862402
He's like 5 ft tall, he can't beat nobody.
>>71862399
Let's see which one isn't star'd
>>71862308
amazing. they found the one Jew in England.
>>71860934
That movie is literally him being beaten as the dead horse that he is. For crying out loud he's dead in it
>>71862451
What's this picture, tho? Why are these specific actors posing for it? What's the occasion here, what do they have in common?
>>71862484
their studio's anniversary
>>71862451
honestly, the only reason Anton Yelchin got into that pic was because he went to the right Synagogue.
>>71862568
And now he's dead.
Serves him right.
>>71862380
Not really. He's not THAT rich and still rather awkward looking.
I would assume he's in a position to never worry about money and just takes bits he finds to be an interesting way to kill some time
I saw him in a musical on Broadway a few years ago and he was great.
He made bank from HP he just does little roles that are fun, he never has to work for a paycheck again
>>71860766
au contraire OP, out of the 3 he's the doing he best. Emma is such a fucking shitty actress i really don't see her career going anywyere. Ron is a fucking disgusting ginger and Harry has shit loads of money and is basically building up his resume by taking in weird roles. Guy is setting up to take on oscar roles
Based Dan Radcliffe is embracing the Peter Cushing/Christopher Lee niche.
>>71860766
He was a cute kid and was good for playing a cute wizard kid. Now he's a severely depressed manlet with narrow shoulders, so basically he's always good for "homely assistant" or "that irrelevant guy who dies in relevant part of the movie", neither of which sells in selfie obsessed world of people only noticing top 5%
>>71863022
>>71863177
pls stop posting
i can smell your obesity and your Hogwarts scarf from here
He probably knows he's peaked, but like the actor who played Ron: once you've been in 7 movie that were as popular as HP it really doesn't matter what you do.
Those 7+ movies and shit has generated them such infinite money that they don't need to matter anymore.
Best of both worlds. Riches of the celebrity while getting to keep a private personal life.
>>71861019
Of those that you mention, the only actually good ones are Neon Demon, The Lobster, and mayyybe Green Room.
Zootopia was also quite good, admittedly, but I'd put it in a wholly different category. It's not an adult drama, it's a kids' movie. It's really not comparable.
So yeah, as it stands, Swiss Army Man's in the top 5 films this year so far, probably top 3.
>>71861187
Nice try faggot I'm smarter than you
>>71860766
He can be set for the rest of his life much mire than faggot Malvon the sit con stupid
If you didn't like Swiss Army Man you can just stop posting desu
>>71860766
he realized that he's rich as fuck and have enough money to last 10 lifetimes so he's just doing stuff that he thinks is fun
It could be worse. At least his movies make more than double digit figures unlike a certain other Harry Potter actress.
>>71860766
>He was the biggest star for a decade
LOL
You fucking cretins cannot be serious
>>71861187
you okay?
>>71861187He's not in wilfred
thats frodo you fuck
>>71861375
I never admit to liking a film in case somebody on /tv/ laughs at me.
>>71864150
It was a foreign art film and not English made. Also it was bought up and distributed weird/not marketed its an indie film shit happens. They didnt want to make any money in theaters in the UK, and screened it for a technicality, its already been released and is on bluray/vod. Came out last year in fact and grossed like 2.5 million.
come on you cant even be bothered to actually check something..its a german production. Also emma was really good in it and its solid. Shes leading a tom hanks film next and singing in batb
Radcliffe and Elijah Wood are having the same career trajectory it seems.
>being "the guy" in "that thing" for fucking ever
>really young
>sort of drop of the radar
>other actors playing in "that thing" are being noticed left and right while you lay low
>instead of taking big shot roles, work your way up
>having fun playing in more obscure films, weird roles
>surprising people
>total bro, surprisingly likeable in interviews, down to earth
>not associated with any of the hollywood lore
Those guys are doing it right.
>>71867135
yeah well they played the major characters of gigantic franchises at a young age making enough money to live out their days in luxury.
but they actually enjoy acting so they take roles that might be low budget/indie just to keep practicing their craft.
>>71863159
he's definitely building his resume to show he isn't just HP and is capable of other roles; he was fantastic in How To Succeed.
>>71863159
emma isnt shitty especially compared to the actresses posted on this board
shes just starting to lead now shes done the same as radcliffe, she hasnt wanted to be in blockbusters yet has grossed 600 mil post potter. i like radcliffe but he still needs to get better roles, emma is leading a tom hanks film and batb when shes made it clear she want to do other thing in her life, acting is something she enjoys, but she likes to write, sing, paint etc says she want to direct.
i thought he said he's done with big budget stuff since he's already done that and now focuses and what he finds interesting.
Fuck i wish i could do that
he starred in a popular childrens series that ended. see: mark hammil.
>>71867628
theyll be throwing money at them in 5-10 and probably and hopefully not for cursed child shit but something legit
i know they dont want to do it, especially unless its proper, but theres only so many billion dollar films out there, WB will make it happen
That's just what happens when you get picked for a role when you're 10 years old that'll last for 10-12 years
He's not a bad actor, it's just that directors and such don't want people to think: "Oh, it's Harry Potter" and risk that to be the only memorable thing about a movie
>>71867549
Watson is so obviously "taking every major role possible to improve her visibility" it hurts.
She's affraid to become a nobody again. She craves the attention.
Radcliffe would be way more famous if he did that, he simply went another direction.
>>71867549
Emma is box office cancer, about the only attention she gets is from Fetishists. Radcliffe actually pursued artistic interests that took off, like theatre and more artsy films. Emma is a "painter" to her instagram fans and picks up supporting roles that she gets forgotten in anyway. There is no real comparison
>>71861539
> That's still much better than blowing his fortune on hookers and drugs
Are you kidding?
>>71867262
>making enough money to live out their days in luxury.
didn't than weasley guy buy an icecream truck and started giving away ice creams for free?
>>71867705
>>71867713
jesus christ youre triggered. all her stuff has been under the radar. Shes mostly done low budget and worked with directors shes wanted to.
>>71867713
Emma is just starting to lead, she wanted to do supporting roles and then lead. She was great in Colonia and is in a tom hanks technothroller. Also has sung since she was little. like i said she has done the same thing as radcliffe and is not box office cancer lmao look at the films shes been in regression is arguably the only one that by its size didnt do well
>>71860766
Somewhere in a alternate dimension where harry potter isn't a faggot.
>Harry potter in Black face, infiltrates the Black Lives Matter terrorist organization Black Panthers before they can commit more acts of terror on American soil.
>>71867766
>all her stuff has been under the radar
lol, yes that is generally what I would call movies that had no audience or critical reception other than that one movie based on that book for high schoolers.
She is on par with Chloe Moretz at this point, the face that people recognize, but not one to actually be a main attraction
>>71867705
You're wrong, The Bling Ring. Noah, Colonia were roles she picked because she valued the filmmaking shes stated she doesn't want to do big productions like Potter, but she did BATB (in leavesden funnily enough) because she's never sung on screen, besides briefly in goblet of fire and was excited/nervous to do so
>>71867847
You're retarded. First off shes made the same amount if not maybe more films than Radcliffe and she attended school. Look at the box office numbers and the fact shes leading a tom hanks film, shes othing like Chloe Moretz you idiot. Chloe is trying to become relevant, Emma acts because she likes to and she got BATB and The Circle two roles any actress would kill for esp Moretz lmao
>>71867549
>she likes to write
So do most literate people
>sing
So do most people
>paint
lol i've seen what she calls painting, she would have no exposure if she wasn't a celebrity.
>says she want to direct
So do the rejects who populate this board, doesn't mean they are actually passable directors.
>>71867847
you cant have it both ways. moretz hasnt made any good films. emma has been in some good ones since potter, that were low budget and shes still getting large roles. that means shes doing well as an actor like radcliffe but studio havent given him much it seems. time will tell
>>71867914
>>71867954
It doesn't matter how many "big" movies she gets shoved into, she is still "the harry potter girl" and gets no critical or audience attention. She's just there, generic actress #9, filling a space in another movie.
At least Radcliffe is making some waves in both his theatre work and his indie films he stars in, he's not just "harry potter" anymore.
>>71867946
okay man. im just saying she doesnt just want to act thats all, she doesnt want people to read her writing though apparently.
>lol i've seen what she calls painting, she would have no exposure if she wasn't a celebrity.
it seeks youre just looking for something bad to say. only one of her paintings has been photographed out of her entire collection and literally probably nobody cares, what exposure are you talking about? nobody talks about her painting im just stating shes artistic like a lot of people. i play instruments, i like film.
no worries tho im not arguing just saying
>>71860766
He literally has more than enough money from the Harry Potter movies to do whatever the hell he wants for the rest of his life.
Feels like he's just doing what he wants without trying super hard to stay relevant.
>>71868019
Okay sure mate, she was hilarious in the bling ring and her good satire had nothing to with her being in harry potter. I dont think you comprehend things you dislike or something. Radcliffe isnt making waves hes acting good in some stuff, as has Emma
>>71860937
Stage acting is great. He's a really good actor, but people in the film industry don't want to give him the kind of non-Potter related roles he wants.
He was also screwed over by studios. The Woman in Black went into re-writing and they added jumpscares and more cgi at the last minute and they cut a shitload of other good stuff. They turned an old school gothic horror into some post-2000s teen supernatural bullshit.
>>71868019
t. Chloe who didnt get considered for Belle
Shes Emma fucking Watson
>>71868091
thats unfortunate i always meant to watch the woman in black but never did, sounds like i shouldnt
>>71862451
dafuq happened to Megan Fox
>>71864623
patrician detected
>>71860937
/thread
>>71868019
>getting shoved into
They are lead roles. They never said big movies mattered. Emma has been doing shit with copolla, aronofsky, gallenberger, amenabar and now something big like beauty and the beast not because shes trying to stay relevant she would have fired her agent years ago but because shes enjoys working on films.
>>71868138
He's still good in it, it's just not as good a movie as it could of been
>>71868138
There's an older version of the movie (from the 80s). It's a tv movie, but it's not bad.
>>71868213
cool
>>71868206
i gotchu, i really wanted a creepy atmospheric horror not jump scares is most of it good besides the end?
>>71868206
Yeah, the acting is good (not just from him, but from most of the actors).
I'm very disapointed with NuHammer studios and what they chose to do with their movies.
>>71860766
>he was Harry Potter for a decade
ftfy
>>71868246
It has the good atmosphere because it was made without the jumpscares planned and the studio have then thrown a few in cause it's what they think kids want to see. So while it has several jumpscares it wasn't made around them
>>71867758
Nah. He got mistaken for an actual ice cream guy.
>>71860766
He dressed up as a girl and lost an Oscar to Leo.
>>71868246
It's not the end that is the problem. There's a good atmosphere, but they put jump scares and cgi apparitions everywhere in the movie because they were scared of people finding it "boring".
So you get good scenes that are ruined by this shit.
He raps https://youtu.be/aKdV5FvXLuI?t=1m6s
and also goes to conventions and stuff wearing spiderman masks and the like to be incognito
Slightly unrelated and idk of anyone cares. I though he was solid after Yates took over. Apparently Daniel was dunk on set and on probably most of this film. Imo its a brooding masterpiece thats dreamlike and dreary, but found his acting very good. Os it poasoble he was so drunk he didnt care and put any effort into it so much so that his performance seems ever the more natural. Thoughts?
>>71868336
he sounded a little like gambino for a second
>daniel radcliffe will never make drop a dank ass harry potter prosed mixtape
>>71861019
why do people keep talking about green room? it was better than okay but that's all.
>>71868454
probably because people are starved
>>71861228
He dos not have hubdreds of millions, you fucking moot.
>>71868464
also zootopia was compete shit thinking its somehow top 10 is completely off the wall. hail ceasar was not good either
>>71867724
Exactly my reaction! Very few things in life are better than hookers and drugs! In fact, the ONLY thing that IS better is... MORE hookers and ALL the drugs!
>>71862451
Can't tell who my favorite "star" is, Sacha or Shia
>>71862457
>>71862399
>>71862308
His mother was in charge of casting Harry for the movie.
Nepotism from the jews again.
>>71860766
Him and Jon Hamm are perfect together in the young doctors notebook
>>71868213
the best part about this, is that character who played arthur in the tv movie, also played james potter in the hp films
>>71862399
Some are black, Asian or Mel Gibson.
>>71860766
He's got enough money to never work a day for the rest of his life and still leave a giant fucking inheritance for his theoretical kids.
He's like the Notch of film, only instead of shitposting on twitter all day he just fucks around in fun indie projects.
>>71861019
>The Neon Demon
>Le edgy fashion industry is bad meme
>>71868985
>fun indie projects
>Now You See Me 2
>>71862457
there are hundreds of thousands of jews in london
it's not quite nyc or la but it's still quite chosen
>>71860766
There's many reasons to star in lower budget movies. No issue with that.
He's not a bad or great actor, but the problem is just that he's situational because of his stature. He has absolutely no star power because he's so fucking short.
>>71861019
>Above average
>Refn-tier
>Above average
>Good
I wouldn't call those top 10 material with half the year left in.
>>71860766
he is 5'4" without the charisma of RDJ and even RDJ is 5'6"
>>71860766
He does films because he enjoys them, just look at his roles since harry potter: The F Word, Horns, Swiss Army Man, Frankenstein, Now You See Me. Obviously there are some more 'serious' films as well, but he's clearly doing it for fun because he finds acting enjoyable and he has the luxury of being able to act in basically anything he wants.
He has more money than he could spend in a dozen lifetimes, he's not looking at his filmography and cringing thinking about how he's not literally the biggest star in the world any more. I'm sure he's fine with that and knows that's impossible even if he did want it.
He's also one of the most decent people in the industry, go watch any interview or read any article and you'll see that he turned out really fucking well considering how much attention and money was thrown at him for over a decade.
I like him too, I usually find his films fairly enjoyable to watch, even if I don't necessarily rate them very highly.
>>71860766
Considering the fact he isn't a total tabloid trainwreck means hes pretty far ahead of the curve for child actors. All the HP actors have faired pretty well.
>>71862451
>Kirk Douglas is a Jew
Shit, he was like the ultimate Aryan back in the day. Saying that though his true reptilian form is pretty obvious nowadays.
>>71862451
>Sean Penn
I thought he was Irish.
>>71862451
>>71862399
>people who don't know literally every major Hollywood studio was founded by jews
>>71862451
must be wrong, harrison ford is not a jew and tom cruise was born one at least
>>71870079
Harrison Ford is like a quarter I think.
>>71862451
he cant keep getting away with it!
>>71860766
He's too short to be taken seriously. Seriously he's so fucking short several directors have said they didn't even realize he was on the set.
>>71870079
>must be wrong, harrison ford is not a jew and tom cruise was born one at least
You are retarded, Harrison Ford's mother was ashkenazi jew, so he is jewish.
Tom Cruise on the other hand has no traced jewish ancestry at all, he has german, irish and english ancestry, he was brought up catholic and even considered a career as catholic priest.
He is paying dues after getting his.
Its worthy of respect.
Like he really wants to be an actor.
I'd trade my life for his in a heartbeat
t b h
>>71870166
What am i supposed to be looking at here?
>>71870995
I think its a joke about how robert is a manlet so to compensate he stands on his toes.
>>71861019
>green room
you can't be serious
>>71869658
that's true.
He's rich and doesn't give a fuck
>>71860892
This. Is OP retarded?
And how would a guy who looks like this otherwise necessarily be a huge star?
He was the kid who got the Harry Potter role. That is it.
>>71870456
>considered a career as catholic priest
look how that turned out..
kek. Tom Cruise is literally unstoppable in any endeavor he chooses to pursue.
Can you imagine how the world would change if he'd run and win the presidency?
>>71862451
>Everyone posing respectfully
>Bieber going out of his way to be a huge attention whore
Based Lynch in that right corner tho
>>71860766
after the role of a lifetime i've been busy
>>71861187
That was Frodo.
>>71868645
Hi Leddit.
>>71860766
>He was the biggest star for a decade
no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no
He was in the bigges franchise for a decade.
>make bank early
>then do indie flicks that you enjoy
seems like a good plan to me
>>71862451
Imagine being Paul Rudd in that photo...
>>71862451
I want to fuck Clare Danes.
>>71870166
Damn, Antonio Banderas looks like *THAT*?
>>71860934
This. It was simple and concise enough to keep me interested the entire way through.
>>71861019
>Hail Caeser!
>Zootopia
>Green Room
You can't be serious.
Try harder.
>>71860766
He said in a interview that he realizes nothing he does will be as big as Harry potter, so he just does things he likes. He's in the perfect spot for an actor to be in.
>>71868019
She's actually done a pretty good job of breaking the Harry Potter girl image. You can tell she's put a lot of effort into crafting her own 'Emma' persona. Unfortunately, she only plays that persona no matter what role she's in, and it's a shitty persona.
Redcliffe is based for sure, but he should've done a couple of big roles to break his typecast before transitioning to small shit.
>>71860766
>5'4''
>5'4''
>5'4''
>5'4''
>5'4''
>>71870166
Holy fuck
>>71877336
>Mark Ruffalo's height 5'7
>RDJ's height 5'8
Why nobody says anything about Ruffalo?
>>71877538
because he's not insecure about it and has an air of masculinity
>>71861019
The Lobster was dogshit. It had maybe 2 funny moments and the rest of the film was just hammering in the stupid premise that was never interesting.
>>71877211
>couple of big roles
no, only c. reilly can go from big to small roles, for anybody else it's a career suicide
>>71860766
same thing that happened to Robert Pattinson, got out of doing a massive franchise and decided to do what he wants.
>>71861276
KEK! All the aboard the fucking pleb train!
>>71861019
>>71870166
when will manlets learn
