>that based feel when the best trilogy of all time will never EVER get remade and tarnished
H U E Y L E W I S
the soundtrack is fantastic
Doesn't Robert Zemeckis have it in his contract that they can't remake it as long as he's alive?
That's pretty based desu.
don't count on it
I never thought ghostbusters would be raped either but here we are
Hell I even thought Star Wars was safe after the shitty prequels were over.
Yeah, I just rewatched them on Netflix as well.
I'm honestly surprised that nobody did a 30 year reboot where a contemporary kid goes back to 1985. They're making reboots and unnecessary sequels to everything and this one was just glaringly obvious.
>>71848010
I think Fore is their undisputed masterpiece
>>71848052
Star Wars wasn't raped by VII.
If anything VII saved the franchise.
>>71848087
The franchise was already dead and VII was utterly forgettable, just like everything JJ puts his hands on.
>>71848121
JJ saved Star Trek and Mission Impossible.
>>71848087
>this is what millennials actually believe
kek even VI was a disappointment.
imo anything without Gary Kurtz isn't even Star Wars it's just fan fiction.
"Nerd thinks he's gonna drown!"
>>71848087
>If anything VII saved the franchise.
making good movies=/=milking a cash cow
>>71848136
JJ pissed on the already decaying corpse of Star Trek
>>71848156
It's "dork"
>>71848149
VII was co-written by Kasdan, writer of Empire.
Stay butthurt though, it's amusing.
>>71848036
>tfw there's a remake after he dies
>>71848174
>g-guys it made money so it's good
>just ignore that the series is creatively bankrupt
wow
Well if it does happen they can't make Marty black.
He wouldn't know his father
>>71848052
>Ghostbusters
The situation couldn't be any different. Zemeckis and Gale have both said that while they are still alive BttF will be left untouched, whereas Dan Aykroid spent decades begging and grovelling to get a new movie done, and he happily got cucked when the remake was offered.
>>71848052
Gb is not even close to be as good as Back to the Future.
do you really thing they will ever remake a movie with a mom trying to seduce his son? or even change sex to be a girl seduce by her father? this is why i can sleep well tonight
>>71848245
You're like the people in Bond threads who post screanshots of RT not only as your only argument that Daniel Craig was actually James Bond, but that he made the best Bond films and "saved the franchise" - it's like living in upsidedown land.
>>71848210
>>71848245
why do millennials put so much stock in a website that does little more than compile opinions from the internet?
Also JJ had creative control not Kasdan.
At most Kasdan got to advise JJ while he recycled everything from IV/V and added snarky Marvel dialogue
Kurtz/Brackett/Kershner>Kasdan
>>71848343
yeah I doubt incest is why most people like BttF
>>71848356
Casino Royale saved the franchise dummy.
Just because your shit taste doesn't let you like it doesn't mean he didn't.
>>71848375
>millennials
pic related
>>71848440
BTTF is a classic retelling of Oedipus
>>71848453
not an argument
Everything JJ touches is trash, and VII is a boring rehash combined with a cynical cash grab.
>>71848580
>Everything JJ touches is trash, and VII is a boring rehash combined with a cynical cash grab
This is false because MI3, Star Trek 09, Super 8, Into Darkness, and VII are all fantastic blockbusters with widespread critical and audience acclaim.
>>71848686
>big blockbusters made money so they're good
What do you think about her body of work /tv/?
>>71848221
He said he wants his estate to keep them from doing it when he's dead. He's determined to never let it happen. He's a good man.
>>71848375
>why do millennials put so much stock in a website that does little more than compile opinions from the internet?
Because they're incapable of forming their own opinions.
>>71848711
>universal critical acclaim is meaningless
>>71847969
i never noticed how weirdly close together they're standing in this
>>71848686
they're all as generic as they are forgettable
the original Star Wars movies rested on their writing, visuals, and actors for success
JJ gets his success sully from sequels and remakes combined with more CGI.
The one movie he made that was remotely original (super 8) which was sort of like ET combined with his passion for film making as a kid has been completely forgotten.
His characters are always shallow, his plots are always a mess, and his writing is somehow gets more juvenile and snarky with every movie.
How anyone can defend his writing or plots is beyond me.
>>71848876
And it's completely forgotten today while the original Star Wars still holds up.
Maybe JJ should have put more effort into the villain or the plot so they weren't completely nonsensical.
>>71848914
All good points.
He gets "critical acclaim" (RT scores) because he just pumps out safe, cookie cutter movies based on an unoffensive, easy to digest formula.
Nobody is going to remember anything he did 20 years from now.
>>71848914
>they're all as generic as they are forgettable
People still talk about ST reboots to this day, VII is talked about every single day here, MI3 kick started the MI franchise and gave us 2 more of some of the best action adventure movie ever made (MI4, MI5) (produced by JJ, I might add)
>the original Star Wars movies rested on their writing, visuals, and actors for success
So did TFA.
>JJ gets his success sully from sequels and remakes combined with more CGI.
His strengths are understanding why previous entries of a franchise work and why some don't and fixes the franchise. That's his thing. He understands the spirit of adventure movies perfectly.
>His characters are always shallow, his plots are always a mess, and his writing is somehow gets more juvenile and snarky with every movie.
MI3 had the best Villian of the entire Mission Impossible franchise and Finn and Kylo were fantastic characters. Han was also written perfectly in VII.
>How anyone can defend his writing or plots is beyond me.
Opinions.
>>71848970
>>71849013
people talk about him every day here. so no.
>>71849132
People here also talk about capeshit. What's your point?
>>71849104
>MI3 kick started the MI franchise and gave us 2 more of some of the best action adventure movie ever made (MI4, MI5)
>2 more of some of the best action adventure movie ever made
>>71849196
Kill youself if don't think Mission Impossible 4 and 5 aren't better than anything James Bond has ever put out (sans Casino Royale).
>>71848914
>>71848970
I think JJ is vastly overrated but it's ridiculous when people say he'll be completely forgotten. He resurrected three major franchises so he'll always be remembered. Trekkies will always hate him and maybe people will eventually turn against Episode VII but his work will be discussed long after his death.
>>71849195
You say people forgot about his movies when they clearly haven't.
>implying there wont be a remake starring a character named martha, who is a whale
>>71849104
$0.01 has been deposited to your account. Thanks for your support!
>>71849294
not an argument.
>>71848732
The Ending of BTTF 3 is explained.
>>71848149
But the fanfiction that was the EU was one of the most enjoyable thing to come out of Star Wars
>>71849104
>ST reboots to this day
kek
>So did TFA.
TFA rested on being part of one of the most successful franchises in history
>His strengths are understanding why previous entries of a franchise work
It's the exact opposite
JJ's strength rests on turning established franchises into bland action movies. He's basically Michael Bay, yet it's not acceptable to hate him.
>MI3 had the best Villian of the entire Mission Impossible franchise
nothing about MI3 was anything besides generic
>Finn and Kylo were fantastic characters
they were "fantastic" in that they were rehashes of older characters with enough of a "twist" to feel modern.
>>71849309
How can you argue with someone who's got the Disney dick in their mouth and will defend any pile of shit they make just because it has a good RT score?
>>71849254
>He resurrected three major franchises
by turning them into generic, forgettable action movies.
>>71849274
Yes, people on /tv/ ironically post about The Pest, but the rest of the world has forgotten about it's existence.
>>71849398
Mission Impossible 3 is significantly better than MI2. Anyway, it doesn't matter his movies are generic or not. He'll be remembered for a very long time and if you think otherwise you're delusional.
>>71849362
not an argument.
>>71849413
got any proof it's forgotten?
>>71849359
>JJ
>Michael Bay
this is so blatantly wrong it's funny.
Bay has no idea how to edit his mess of a movie, JJ's pacing is fantastic. TFA was even nominated for a best achievement in editing Oscar.
>he didn't like MI3
pleb confirmed.
>>71849670
>got any proof it's forgotten?
I'd never heard about it until this thread.
>>71848343
It's really not that weird. I know you get all your opinions from what cracked articles and jokes comedians make, but if you think back to the future is controversial, you are deluded.
You see, when people make jokes, they tend to exaggerate things for the sake of humour. That's why it's a bad idea to get news from comedians such as Seth Meyers as well.
>>71849670
>calling someone a pleb when you defend TFA
wew
>>71849854
>implying TFA is bad or a plebflick
not an argument.
>>71849821
you do not represent the world's opinion.
>>71849839
do conservatives pretend that liberals get their news from comedy to feel better about how they get their news from youtube channels that tell you "wat THEY dont want u 2 kno!!!1" ?
>>71849941
>nice try
> I won't take that bait.
>>71849897
>not an argument.
I wasn't making an argument. You're equally as plebeian. What, you think liking big budget blockbusters makes you a patrician film enthusiast?
>>71849897
>you do not represent the world's opinion.
I've never heard a single person in my life ever mention that movie.
>>71849998
>you dont just greentext things for no reason
>like this, this is the wrong way to do it
>>71847969
Is part 3 worth watching? Loved the first two, but I'm not into westerns.
>>71850071
>get angry
>>71850018
I never said I was """patrician""". Now go back to your letterboxd General.
>>71850053
talk to more people because those movies are hugely popular.
>>71847969
>implying it hasn't already been
>It's the patriarchy, Martha! We have to destroy the patriarchy!
What did Doc Emma Brown mean by this?
