Manohla Dargis:
>Sliding into theaters on a river of slime and an endless supply of good vibes, the new, cheerfully silly "Ghostbusters" is that rarest of big-studio offerings - a movie that is a lot of enjoyable, disposablefun
What did she mean by this?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/movies/ghostbusters-review-melissa-mccarthy-kristen-wiig.html?_r=0
>>71844070
>"Girls rule, women are funny, get over it."
>"It’s at once satisfyingly familiar and satisfyingly different, kind of like a new production of “Macbeth” or a Christopher Nolan rethink of Batman."
>"Part of what makes “Ghostbusters” enjoyable is that it allows women to be as simply and uncomplicatedly funny as men."
> "And enjoy it while you can because this doesn’t happen often, even in summer, which is supposed to be our season of collective moviegoing happiness. The season when everyone jumps onboard (whee!) and agrees that, yes, this great goof is exactly what you were thinking when you wondered why they didn’t make summer movies like they used to.">
This is satire, right guy? r-right???
>>71844070
>Otherwise, the redo is pretty much what you might expect from Paul Feig, one of the best things to happen to American big-screen comedy since Harold Ramis.
This has to be a joke
>>71844469
Who is this woman and why is she writing movie reviews for the largest paper in the country?
I guess Sony just paid everyone off, right fa/tv/irgins?
TOTALLY UNBIASED WITHOUT AN AGENDA
>>71844697
>>71844698
So which is it
http://www.strawpoll.me/10715310
please vote
BECAUSE THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WAY MONEY COULD HAVE BOUGHT THE WORDS OF A NEW YORK TIMES CRITIC
>>71844759
I have to watch it just to see if the critics are full of shit, but I am not going to give Sony a dime. If it's as good as some of these reviews say, maybe I'll toss money at a theater, but they have simply not sold this to me at all. It looks like a shitty cash grab.
>>71844740
Judging by this woman's look, I'm guessing she's a lonely, middle-aged feminist-type who has been brainwashed to unironically like this crap. I don't think they needed to buy this one off.
>>71844868
camrip when?
>>71844697
You don't need to pay off feminists to shill their own products.
>>71844759
Note that the 60% who will never see it will shitpost about how any who likes it must be paid off anyway
>>71844070
>literally into the trash
>>71844920
the point of the poll was to see how many of the people here will actually give money to go watch it.
so far its 5 out of 44, and lots of people here flock to see the latest capeshit on opening night
>ITT: MAD BABYMEN GENERAL
>>71845015
Roastie detected.
>>>/tumblr/
>>71844788
It's not money. It's just feminism
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/ghostbusters-film-review-909313
The unfunny mess that hits theaters Friday, like a big goopy splat of ectoplasm, will no doubt make those naysayers feel vindicated. But the fact is that an estrogen-infused makeover, particularly one with such a comedically gifted cast, was a promising idea. Sadly, that's where the inventiveness ended.
>>71845133
Why is Eddie Redmayne wearing a dress
>>71845059
mad babbyman deteced
>>>/redit/
YFW you never cared about the film but wanted to see the ensuing butthurt.
guess how many cats the womanbaby critic has
I'm gonna give a conservative answer of 3.
>>71844070
>Hey Literallywho Movie Critic, give Ghostbusters the best review possible please
>But Mr. Sheklestein, I can't do that, I have something called journalistic integrity
>Lucky for you Literallywho, Sony has authorized me to give a large sum of money to write it
>Eh im still not sure about this
>How about this, we'll also give you gifts, VIP tickets to Hollywood premieres and events, exclusivitiy with our PR celebrity interviews for future projects, AND you'll curry some favor with the Hollywood elite. You wont be a LitterallyWho anymore!
>Sign me up!
Yeah no thanks, good reviews wont trump bad word of mouth. I think the people will speak for this movie, not Sony's damage control squad.
>>71844070
>Manohla Dargis:
Hollywood execs know exactly how to play the brain dead liberal SJWs and get them all worked up.
wasn't it just a decade ago these SJWs and Feminists were fighting AGAINST corporate greed and hollywood CEOs?
Now liberals are being used by Hollywood to pan their shitty movies... and the liberals have no self awareness that they're being used.
Since when are women underrepresented in films? It's not like it's 1950. Why are they so fucking mad at men? I don't get it.
>>71845308
I have never heard a liberal say a bad thing about Apple, Starbucks, or Chipotle.
All money-grubbing corporations that will do anything to extract every last dollar from their mostly liberal, feminist, SJW customers.
Ironic, isn't it?
Saw it at Youtube HQ. The trailer was bad but the movie is a blast, everyone around me laughed hard all the time. Solid 9/10 and definitely the best comedy of this summer.
>>71845600
Fuck off with this shitty copypasta. This is at least the tenth time I've seen it today.
>>71845708
You sound upset. When in bad mood I usually turn on my Playstation Vita and play for countless hours. You should try.
>>71844070
Hahaha what the fuck am I reading
>>71845789
And people here actually say that the /v/ cross-posting is a myth...
>>71845230
>>71845230
>tfw if the score was low i could push patrician posting and say that plebs don't get it
>tfw if the score was high i can post /v/, /tv/, etc blown out
it's gonna be great
>>71845230
My nigga. I never cared about this movie but all the buttblasted neckbeards crying over it is so exciting.
>>71845230
also GB (1984) isn't that good T-bh
>>71844070
>New York Times
come on now
>>71846006
when people post "/tv/ btfo" we know you're not serious, you're on /tv/ too, there are no SJW here
>>71846046
What is like to be a turbo-pleb? I can only imagine, considering how patrician my tastes are...
I bet you've never seen any films by Kubrick, Tarkovsky, or Malick. Lmao at your life.
>>71844070
>disposable fun
>rare
That's literally every blockbuster.
>>71844070
>mfw SJWs are gonna demand James' head for not seeing it now
Guys, I'm scared for him.
>>71845308
>Now liberals are being used by Hollywood to pan their shitty movies... and the liberals have no self awareness that they're being used.
All so some fat white male CEO and his white male Executive buddies can get rich...
Men +1000
Women -20
>>71846081
>he considers entry level pleb shit like qbrick, tark and malick patrician even in a meme sense
LOL
>>71846125
>All so some fat white male CEO and his white male Executive buddies can get rich...
I'M GOING TO SEE THIS MOVE 5X JUST TO SHOW THOSE MEN!!!!!!
arrrrgggggwareblewarbleblarg....
Just saw this film today. Solid 8/10. Not the kind of movie for the marvel crowd however.
I wonder
>>71846203
Did they use ANY ghost traps?
movies getting their own version of the video game review scale, huh?
someone posted this on twitter
>ghostbuster review: ."The message of female empowerment is more important then the faulty third act/climax. 8/10"
is this an actual review? I can't find it anywhere, looked on meta and RT.
>>71846129
>he doesn't understand shitposting
LOL
>>71846203
What was the rape scene like? I heard they went too far with it.
>>71846417
>i-i--iwas just shitposting
>i-i--ican't read
CONTINUED
BARREL
OF
LAUGHTER
>>71845230
Whatever result it got, butthurt is hilarious.
>>71845558
>Apple
You don't have a choice when the alternative is even worse.
Android is just so bad.
>>71844070
Can someone please list a bunch of other movies the New York times listed with a score below Ghostbusters?
>>71846459
no u
>>71845183
That comeback is so /tv/.
>>71846523
what the fuck? Is he legitimately doing some sort of experiment or is he just torturing a spider?
>>71844697
>within the framework of my narrative, you have been given two choices to make: either everyone is "just paid off" or they aren't. What? You don't want to pick any of those? ha ha, tough luck, kiddo.jpg
WOMEN CAN BE FUNNY TOO: the movie
>>71846622
Hes harvesting its silk on a spool. Spider silk is actually quite versatile and strong, hell they want it for kevlar vests
>>71846556
Some would say that it's /tv/ as fuck
>>71846518
Ghostbusters 2016 - 74%
Independence Day: Resurgence - 31%
Warcraft - 29%
The Boss - 22%
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies - 42%
Terminator Genisys - 26%
Ted 2 - 46%
Insurgent - 29%
Jupiter Ascending - 26%
Wild Wild West (1999) - 19%
Armageddon (1998) - 39%
The Amazing Spiderman 2 - 53%
Ender's Game - 60%
Man of Steel - 55%
Magic Mike - 80%
I just picked random ones I recognized, all from the New York Times critic that gave this Ghostbusters 74%.
>>71846899
>Man of Steel - 55%
This never ceases to flabbergast me.
Whats astounding is that the sequel is ANOTHER rehash of the first but this time using Zuul and Gozer. I mean its not like they could have used The Boogeyman, Samhain, Cthulhu, or some other weird thing
>>71844134
Before this movie I thought comedians and comedic movies were funny, regardless of the genders.
I see now, I was just being somehow misogynist.
>>71844070
Is this like when they vote the retarded girl as homecoming queen so everyone can feel all warm and fuzzy?
I think I'll be extra misogynistic now.
>>71844697
N ah, feminazi's will like it cause "muh gurl power" and nothing else.
>>71845308
>>71845558
>>71846125
There is a reason Soros likes to refer to liberals as "useful idiots"
>>71844070
Imagine being a critic in that screening and having to be all like "damn, Feig, you fuckin' fine, all classy with your purple suit and bowler hat. I would totally buy the bluray, both my site and another for me." when all you really want to do is have another drink in the hotel room. Like seriously imagine having to be a critic and not only sit in that theater while mccarthy flaunts her fat ass on screen, the jumpsuit barely concealing her chin going directly into her neck, and just sit there, scene after scene, quip after quip, while she works it. Not only having to tolerate her disgusting fucking gluteus maximus visage but her haughty attitude as everyone on tumblr tells her she's STILL GOT IT and DAMN, MCCARTHY STARING IN A MOVIE LIKE THAT?? because they're not the ones who have to sit there and watch her strut around in her disgusting beige jumpsuit; never before have you seen a head directly connect into someones neck before, no jaw, two chins, you didn't even know that existed before that day. You've been reviewing nothing but a healthy diet of Marvel flicks and later alleged DC films for your ENTIRE CAREER coming straight out of Buzzfeed. You've never seen anything this fucking disgusting before, and now you swear you can taste the sweat that's trickling down from her chin to her sagging tits as she waves the proton pack suggestively, smugly assured that you are enjoying the opportunity to get paid to sit there and revel in her "voluptuous (for that is what she calls herself)" figure, the figure she worked so hard for at Subway in the previous months. And then the projectionist restarts the screening because it was playing in the wrong format, and you know you could eviscerate every single Hillary voter in this room before the ushers could put you down, but you sit there and endure, because you're a fucking Buzzfeed writer. You're not going to lose your progressive points over this. Just bear it. Hide your receding hairline and bear it.
>tfw you have to wait for the first box office results
>>71844070
>Woman
>Jew
>Journalist
>Author of "Women and Film: A Sight and Sound Reader"
I'm shocked!
>jew york times
LMAO
M
A
O
>>71845230
>>71847370
>>71847427
Go fuck yourself
>>71845230
>>71846899
>these are the people you share this board with
You underage faggots can't even figure out how internet reviews work.
Those percents are from rottentomatoes, not the times.
>>71844070
Critics won't save this shit, f4 will make star wars $ compared to this shit
Please, please fail. Please.
>>71847506
I said they're from that specific critic who reviewed for the times. I didn't say they represent Times as a whole. Not even sure how you'd search that in a feasible way.
You would think SJWs would give the original more praise considering it had a villain without a discernible gender.
It's funny as fuck how MRA inbred /pol/ justice warrior are basically religious fanatics/creationists. No matter what, they're always right. Proven wrong? Just backpedal to the next narrative-convenient explanation. All people who reason this way should be sterilized and stripped of basic rights.
>>71844070
yeah...i totally believe this critic isnt placing her agenda in the article and really does listen to other critiques
>>71846491
t. guy who doesn't know how to operate a simple device, or just uses his smartphone like an old cellphone and calls/texts with it
Stay a shill, plebeian.
>>71847590
They never shot Gozer in the groin......
>>71847031
>>I see now, I was just being somehow misogynist.
Exactly shitlord. You now see the folly in not worshipping your womanyst overlords.
>>71845909
That's not /v/, that's Frank Underwood shitposting.
>>71844697
They don't have to.
When it comes to feminists propaganda like this movie, the critics will do it for free.
>>71847582
Its not /pol/
I checked and it took them 6 hours just to get one thread capped and all the others were off on page 10 with less than 20 posts. This is pure /v/edditora cancer
>>71847604
It's great when you see how she trashed the jungle book for being a soulless cash grab reboot yet somehow this is ok
>>71847641
They aimed for the flat top
>>71847641
yeah, saw the word I missed after posting. My bad. The originals also had strong women. The secretary was always grumpy and calling them on their shit, and Venkman's lady-friend was always onto his advances, shutting him down.
>cheerful
>comfy
>fun
this is the ambiguous wordage of a shill.
Wasn't in the sony leaks information about how they were going to do this? Pay critics and shit?
They are removing negative reviews as we speak
spread this shit around, the slider is disabled now
>>71847582
Anybody who isn't a feminist cocksucker could see critics giving this movie a free pass because of muh feminism.
Looks like /pol/ was right again
>>71844697
it's (((Sony))
what the fuck do you think, sheep
>>71844469
Ramis would kill himself if he saw this happen to his creation, how fucking distasteful
>>71847704
So in summary SONY, SJWs, and everyone else giving it high praise are completely oblivious to the fact that this movie is even less progressive than its predecessor
>>71844070
i said it a few weeks ago and I'll say it again. The critics score will be 70%-80% because muhsoginy and every positive review will bash men in some way. The user reviews will be between 20-40%. Possibly lower but I imagine tumblr will raid it to give it perfect scores bringing it up to the 30-40 range.
>>71847604
Will goggles make a come back and usher a golden age of /tv/ again?
>>71847720
Thats a bug, 8gag
I want to be recruited by ISIS.
>>71844697
didnt wikileaks leaked emails show that sony literally actually does this and even conspired to shill for israel?
http://www.mintpressnews.com/wikileaks-sony-hack-reveals-hollywoods-hand-in-repairing-israels-broken-image/205176/
why yes, yes they did
BASED
>>71847727
I remember when they remade Annie with black people and you obese /pol/ morons cried and tantrumed about it for months because you're fat, dumb, worthless oxygen wasters. Then it got critically panned and you pretended that didn't happen, and went on crying that movie reviewers are in on the conspiracy to keep down the obese fat people on your containment board.
>>71844070
Here I am, 2 college degrees and working at wendys for 9 dollars an hour, when NYTIMES pays this "reviewer" a 100k salary a year just because she is a female. I can't wait for the day of the rope
>Though Jones gets some of the film’s most memorable lines, her character channels a shameful racial stereotype — one that traces back to the days of blackface when it amused audiences to see African-American characters spook easily, bugging their eyes and running for their lives whenever confronted with a ghost
ABSOLUTE KINOGRAPHY
>>71847865
I like you
>>71845230
>>71847868
Your IQ is low enough that you save pictures of frogs on your hard drive though. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news -- you're stupid.
>>71847846
that guys review is kinda witty...
>>71844070
>the liberal media likes it therefore it's good
These leftist mental gymnastics
The NY Times are garbage for opinion pieces.
>>71847884
Well, this was all Ernie Banks was good for in GB II
It's poetry.
>>71846491
What the fuck is Android. Nigga, I use Windows 10.
>>71847926
>liberal media is a thing
These right-wing goalposts just won't stop moving!
>>71847735
The jew fears the samurai
This reviewer purely got hired because she is a fat female feminist. She didn't even graduate high-school according to wiki. I'm contacting NYTIMES right now about this biased piece of reviewer and demanding her to be fired.
>>71844134
>Part of what makes “Ghostbusters” enjoyable is that it allows women to be as simply and uncomplicatedly funny as men
how does this relate to the quality of the movie? protip: it doesnt
>>71846899
>Magic Mike with the highest score
Of fucking course
>>71847979
You get her dude!! we're gonna make pleb flicks great again like we did with our toys(videogames)
>>71847930
>Ernie Banks
Who?
>>71847930
I know, remember how he just chowed down on watermelon and said "Hell Naw" to Vigo
>>71847994
I cherry-picked a bit, since he obviously gave ultra-popular movies high scores, but I thought it was funny to see Magic Mike among his favorites.
>>71847994
Magic Mike was a masterpiece you low IQ /v/ pleb.
Even based Brody agrees
http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/magic-mike-the-musical
>>71847988
"uncomplicatedly" is also not a real word.
You'd think someone writing for the New York fucking Times would have a firm grasp on the English language?
>>71847930
>Banks
>Hudson
>>71847926
Mental gymnastics are when you say a movie is shit and organize neckbeard downvote crusades on youtube. Then when it gets decent reviews you say "all the reviewers are in on it!" Then when it gets good audience reception you say "but the Jews brainwashed everyone to like it!" As an added bonus, you also ignore the counterevidence: times when "SJW movies" got critically panned. That is a textbook example of "mental gymnastics."
Anyone who actually hates SJWs considers /pol/v/ to be SJWs. You are SJWs.
>>71847970
Yet it remains completely true.
>>71844070
>new york times
DISHONEST
>>71844697
Not gonna go for it
>google her name
>she looks exactly how I expected
just the little things in life amuse me.
>>71848067
>>71848004
Thank you, I had a Cubs game on in the background
>>71848015
The scene with the ghost train, dude.
>>71847971
yeah, sony pictures is not the same, just owned by
come on, were on /tv/ all of you faggots should know about (((Amy Pascal))) by now
>>71848075
The media is corporate, and corporations are not liberal.
>>71848071
Critics have been giving trash movies a pass because of feminism for quite some time now.
Take a look a Force Awakens.
>>71845230
>tfw this is just another shitty movie
>tfw not worth my time
I'm not even wasting money at the theaters right now, this shit has literally no relevance to my life. I don't even like Ghostbusters.
>I ACTUALLY LIKED IT
>TAKE THAT, MEN!!!
Wow, I'm convinced, buying a ticket right now!
Pathetic.
>>71845384
We've had women as action heroes for like 60+ years...and men loved them! Now it's a huge breakthrough?
>>71846899
Are all /pol/fags this dumb? It's the overall RT score, not her score.
>>71848120
Since when do /pol/ shills consider the head of a subsidiary to be in charge? Oh right, when the head of the subsidiary is Jewish and the head of the parent company isn't Jewish.
You dishonest rats are literally the worst people I've ever observed. I hope your life is agonizing.
>>71848113
I guess, if at all...but he still isnt stereotyping the culture while being run over by a ghost train
>>71848177
be careful with that edge, big boy
>>71848148
I'm sure that Mary Sue, Huffington Post, MSNBC, CNN and are all right wing.
>>71844697
is this a joke?
sony is almost bankrupt they couldnt afford to bribe anyone let alone their own employees
>>71848042
Fuck off, that leftist kike is just a wannabe Armond White.
>>71848177
Everyone liked TFA though. The obese neckbeards who didn't like it are in the minority. No one noticed anything "feminist" about TFA except for extremist lunatic leftist and rightist SJWs. Do you understand what mental gymnastics are? A good hint that you're doing mental gymnastics are when you're applying different standards of evidence to two of the same thing so that the conclusion comes out according to your agenda.
>>71848071
Of course sweetie.
>>71848148
>>71848107
I expected purple hair but she probably too old for that.
>>71848232
Ernie's performance in both movies definitely evokes minstrel-like qualities
>>71848241
The last three are almost certainly neoliberal, if not legit right-wing.
>>71848216
Ah, I assumed since I clicked their profile. Shit I feel stupid.
>>71848148
>corporations are not liberal
You can't seriously believe that George Soros isn't liberal.
>>71848247
Look at this fucking plebeian try and pretend hes part of patrician /tv/
Armond was dropped as soon as he gave up patrcianhood and wrote that gay puff piece for bvs
>>71848071
Nice try, tumblr shill.
>>71848348
You know Armond is a faggot, right? And that he's been writing for Out for years?
>>71848291
>this GG strawman will certainly disprove his point
It's the current year, try harder.
>>71848339
You've got to learn the difference between liberal and neoliberal.
Soros, Hillary, SJW identity politics, corporate media = neoliberal
>>71848339
George Soros uses his own vast fortune to contribute to causes he believes in. George Soros is not a publicly-traded corporation you halfwit.
>>71848317
>Huffington Post, MSNBC, CNN
>neoliberal, if not legit right-wing
well memed son.
What are you doing to support women in the industry, /tv/?
Are you making serious changes?
>>71848317
What? ok, stop baiting
>>71848470
She's a literal who the fuck would quote her?
>>71848225
listen fuckwit amy pascal pushed for this production and was in charge of the project how about you go fuck yourself
sony media in america is not operating under the oversight of the japanese and you're a fucking fool if you think they are
dishonesty is you, stop being disingenuous and look into the people who push these projects instead of using a bogeyman as a convenient way to spout buzzwords
as a heads up, any faggot who is still using /pol/ on this particular website is either a shitposter, a shill, or a moron.
Its not often you see a movie thats completely immune to criticism. Might as well have renamed it Safe Space
>>71848465
>>71848486
Isn't it funny how CNN and MSNBC all took hard right turns after Trump brought them ratings and ad money?
Isn't it funny how a truly liberal organization wouldn't let money sway them in such a way?
>>71848225
>dishonest rat
my, that seems pretty anti semitic you fucking bigot
There are "Fresh" reviews that look like this:
>"Several scenes where the Ghostbusters try out Holtzmann's weapons in the alley behind their offices, and destroy everything in their path along with the bull's-eye target, perhaps encapsulate the hit-and-miss nature of the comedy here."
Even the Fresh reviews admit it's only "okay". People don't turn out for "Okay" movies. We all knew it was going to be "Okay", but not "Great". The box office will be the deciding factor here.
I'm not gonna watch it.
>>71848402
>if i spam enough buzzwords at everyone i'll stop looking ridiculous
It's not working but keep going, I came here to be entertained and you're succeeding in that.
>>71848402
>SJW identity politics
>neoliberal
What?
Identity politics comes straight from the marxist playbook (the oppressors and the oppressed).
Also, a lot of SJWs are communists or socialists.
>>71848399
YEs, but threw out authenticity for pandering. He has been dropped
>>71848611
Point out the "buzzwords" that were used.
You really think left-vs-right is just a two-color spectrum, eh?
>>71848616
>identity politics
>marxist
Funny how that's been the right-wing's whole game since the Nixon administration.
>>71848555
Lol, I was talking about your >mistrel-like qualities
I dgaf about CNN or MSNBC
It's fun watching you kids completely baffled by the liberal media.
They are cucks. They are SJW's. They are Jews. They are pathetic.
They have no merit. I expected nothing less regarding this steaming trash heap of a movie. It will get praise because the cast is female. Doesn't matter how terrible it is.
>>71848511
Someone who finds meaning in the words: "Women in the movie industry deserve better, you guys. Serious changes need to be made in order to change things."
Reminder that 3rd wave feminism is when women pretend its 19 fucking 50.
>>71848682
Again, the "media" as you know it is not liberal.
Or (more likely) your definition of "liberal" is deeply flawed.
>>71848678
>You really think left-vs-right is just a two-color spectrum, eh?
>WAHHH THE RIGHT-WING DID IT
You manage to get all that stupidity in one post? Brava!
>>71848470
>Nothing will change until things change
Well, strictly speaking I guess we can't argue with that
Who hyped for the RLM review? Prediction: Ghostbusters is one of Mike's favourite movies and he's going to wake up from his alcoholic coma to fucking trash the reboot
>>71848748
>Jay: This was a terrible movie, what were they thinking?
>Mike: I actually thought it was funny and liked it a lot
>Jay: Yeah, it was pretty funny now that i think about it. I liked it!
RLM has been trash for many years now.
Reminder that RLM thought that Dark Knight Rises was a great movie.
>>71848826
Point out an instance where that has happened.
>>71844697
Have you see what they do for good reviews in the Video Game Industry?
Of course they do.
>>71848287
>obese
fat shamer! Are you not aware of your irony?! Apologize to Melissa McCarthy right now!
>btw TFA was a re-hash and a 7/10 at best
>>71844134
What a fucking abortion of a review
>>71848871
This has happened before. Not recently though, Jay gave Mike shit for liking Independence Day Resurgence.
>>71844134
>implying women are funny
>>71848071
>mental gymnastics
>neckbeard
>crusade
>/pol/
>u guys are just like SJWs
straight out of pages 2-4 of the sjw halfwit script. You unoriginal halfwit
>>71848935
Actually no since I don't play videogames because its for low IQ anti art plebs
Please give me some examples
>>71848935
OMG A GAMERGATOR U GUYS
NOBODY PAYS FOR POSITIVE REVIEWS THAT WAS LIES INVENTED BY ONLINE RAPISTS
SOMEONE HELP
I'M BEING RAPED ONLINE BY GAMERGATORS JUST FOR BEING A HELPLESS LITTLE WOMAN
>>71849072
>unoriginal
You said "halfwit" twice
>>71849094
>I don't play videogames because i can't afford them/get humiliated when i try to play them
FIXED
Video games are awesome, anyone denying this is crying over sour grapes.
>>71849156
They haven't been awesome for the last few years.
Japan ded
GGs won't let the medium grow
>>71849055
The anon was implying that Jay changed his opinion to whatever Mike says, and he isn't giving an example of when that happened.
>>71849156
Are you >>71848935 ?
>>71849318
Then please don't reply to your superior unless I post at you first.
>>71849219
Japan just created Pokeman GO.
That is the most innovative thing to come out of the game's industry in a long time.
>>71849377
No, that was created by Niantic, a troupe of ex-Google people. White and bland just like Pokemon Go.
>>71849094
Inundating receivers with extra gifts and in a few instances money (part of 'promotions') Giving away free systems and prefer access to events where they get expenses paid for.
There was guy who was fired from one of the companies and aired a lot of dirty laundry in how game reviews are corrupt as fuck because of the amount of gifts and access they get in exchange for good reviews. We also a big incident where a reviewer gave a game called kane & lynch a low score, even after the publisher bought a lot of ad space on the website he worked on, (we're talking the entire thing was giant ad for the game. He was ordered by the editors to raise his review score and when he refused, he was fired.
Also the Dorito Pope incident is a great example of how reviewers are in bed with publishers and are corrupt as fuck. Even better, the person who was caught being a corporate whore threaten to sue the company of the person who wrote the article and got him fired.
The only companies that just dump the game on you to be judged and no extra incentives were Nintendo and Ubisoft of all groups..
>>71849271
No
>>71844134
>kind of like a new production of “Macbeth” or a Christopher Nolan rethink of Batman."
>>71849457
Yeah I shooped that fake screencap for no reason in a minute and a half just to lie about who I am on an Anonymous internet forum.
How insecure do you have to be to even consider that someone would lie about what they've said, Anonymously, to save face in front of a group of Anonymous strangers for two minutes.
Some of you faggots on here are beyond pathetic.
>>71849373
Taste my cheesy cock in your mouth right now you disgusting lardball.
Feel my jizz in your eye, cunt.
>>71849613
Hey I'm Not insecure!
You're insecure!
You're a faggot for typing like this.
You double faggot!
:^)
>>71849613
Ha Ha.
Here's hard proof that I am right.
>>71847831
>muh conspiracy theory
>>71849573
Very interesting
>>71849770
Pretty nice editing software to be honest family.
I only use MS Paint.
>>71849780
You also have to remember that video game reviewers are the absolute bottom of the barrel, got fired from any job with standards and due to the fact that most review sites only focus on video games, it creates a conflict of interest since the only companies that would buy advertising space on your site would be video game ones. As opposed to movie critics who get their revenue from the newspaper or website they work for as a whole.
So you have these writer rejects suddenly given some influence, it's part of the reason why Social Justice Warriors were able to extend their influence into video games because a lot of them wanted to use their writing about games as a soap box.
A perfect example of this was someone doing a review for the Mario Winter Olympic game in 2014, and deciding that having half her review be about Russia's perceived human rights violations was a perfectly reasonable thing to do.
Also don't let the people who are trying to derail the thread with samefag editing do so. Gives the hot pocket people an excuse to delete threads with valid content.
>>71849775
>you may have piles of irrefutable evidence but it's still just a theory
>so we can dismiss it without a second thought
Keep on shilling, scumbag.
>>71844759
>Strongly Agree
>Agree
>Strongly Disagree
Your voting options are shit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/4s6of5/ghostbusters_2016_review_megathread/d573ypg
Ledditor compiled proof of bias from movie critics.
>>71850276
Stay there
>>71848748
>Thinks RLM will trash it
They fucking liked F4ntastic.
>>71850552
Ghostbusters is Mike's fave movie from his childhood. Surely he's not going to like seeing Feig and friends shit on that movie's legacy while copying and pasting obvious references.
>>71845230
Go back to /pol/ you racist white male piece of shit. Get off of my board.
/tv/ BTFO
FUCKING LONELY VIRGINS BTFO
JUST KILL YOURSELVES WHILE I WATCH THIS GREAT MOVIE WITH MY GF HAHAHAAHAHAHAH
Why are janitors deleting every single thread this movie gets?
I don't think they're getting paid for doing this but it's getting weird.
>>71845238
so btfo all you want, but when it bombs in theaters and everyone acknowledges its a turd, then what? you wanna refer to this again?
>>71844134
Seeing how it's getting mixed reviews everywhere else (even IGN shat on it) this is clearly shilling
>>71850112
>muh proofz
Let me guess the earth is flat and everyone who believes science is a spherecuck
>>71850800
>box office performance
it will bomb
even with a competent cast and director it wouldn't do well. ghostbusters doesn't have the universal appeal of star wars or jurassic park, it would be like total recall or robocop, yet another middling remake that pleased nobody.
>>71850920
its not shilling when they say shit like
>>"Girls rule, women are funny, get over it."
thats just political agenda pushing
that writer is a feminist writing that 10/10 solely because its a feminist movie.
quite literally the worst thing a writer could ever do, to lack morals
>>71847688
It's Miller time!
>>71848402
Take note:
THIS
>>71850941
is a strawman.
Troll or living the meme?
So this is the final battle against feminism?
>>71850800
>Ghostbusters is then end-all be-all answer on feminism
They really want to die on that hill
>>71850945
Just like the movie would get a 1/10 right?
>>71844070
Reminder that leddit has been hate-wanking to this movie for months and was salivating at the prospect of a low rotten tomato score.
Reminder that /tv/'s opinion of this movie is literally indistinguishable from the average /r/movies user.
>>71850945
You've seen the critics, it is getting really good ratings by the most part.
People that don't pay much attention to this whole debate don't really give a shit, there are extremely bad movies getting made all the time and normies give it all their money, they make these movies a success.
Think of things like Adam Sandler and Minions, they get a lot of hate in the internet mostly but they manage to get great profits instead of flops.
JUST
>>71851039
Nah. That will be against Hillary clinton
>>71850800
Just so we're all clear: Modern first-world feminists are silly.
>>71851117
>posting fucking stocks
It really is /v/ in here.
>>71851060
Great minds think alike.
>>71851060
very important post
however it's more like /tv/ is getting brigaded by kotakuinaction
>>71851149
Do facts disturb you?
>>71844070
Fucking globalists.
>>71844070
Hmm I wonder who could be behind this.
make sure to call out anyone who actually sounds like they care about this
>>71851195
That subreddit title really needs the capital letters.
>>71851049
literally nobody said this
>>71851061
>People that don't pay much attention to this whole debate don't really give a shit
agreed, that doesn't mean the movie has any appeal to any demographics
>>71851229
hmmmm who could it be
>>71844070
fuck i just noticed that green screen
>>71851230
>make sure to spread the damage control
Fuck you, feminism made a cunt of itself and I'm going to enjoy it.
>>71851246
>any demographics
Women in general, they love women-centered comedies.
Also, SJW I guess? Sony was pandering to them with the whole "if you don't like the movie, you're automatically sexist" but I don't know if they'd even go watch it.
>>71844070
>disposable fun
So is taking a shit.
>>71844070
Are we doing the BvS kino shit again?
>Sony is actually paying people to shill for this movie
>>71844134
Isn't it telling that the positive reviews are about 50% gender war propaganda that doesn't even relate to the content or performance of the movie?
It's like some marxist analysis of media where the media being analyzed really doesn't matter in the slightest, because the analysis is always the same. Men are bad, women are amazing, white is bad, black is good, capitalism is bad, socialism is great. If you know this, the rest is just plugging in the media into said "analysis".
>>71851343
I take my shits very seriously Anon.
