http://www.villagevoice.com/film/busted-flat-all-too-normal-activity-dominates-the-ghostbusters-remake-8841463
>tfw the bad reviews are already coming in.
>>71836099
Just like BvS.
When their best effort for marketing revolves around attacking people as sexist unless they pay and see it, it's fucking pathetic.
>tfw the bad reviews are already coming in.
>they defeat the big bad by shooting his nuts
>all male characters are portrayed as stupid or obnoxious
Who is sexist now?
>>71836099
>That page could not be found.
It still exists as a result in Google.
I smell a conspiracy.
>>71836998
Wymon can't be sexist, shitlord. I can't even.
>>71837002
Yeah you're right they just took down the review.
He's an annoy guy doing a review about it though
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-Pvk70Gx6c
>>71837002
WTF??? They killed the Village Voice article already? It wasn't even that bad on Feig at all. The Jews are really trying to do damage control.
Confirmed kino only redditors hate then
IT ALL COMES TUMBLING DOWN
TUMBLING DOWN
TUMBLING DOWN
>>71836099
Cant wait for some stupid flyover fuck to say that the village voice is nobodies/altright/conservative/~reactionary~
>>71837081
Maybe they posted it before embargo time?
What I watched for the next two hours was mostly a tragic underutilizing of four of this country's funniest women — Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Leslie Jones, and Kate McKinnon as the evil-ectoplasm battlers of the title, fighting to save a New York that is played primarily by Boston — combined with what felt like the world's longest laser-tag game.
the main performers rarely get to display their individual idiosyncratic strengths. It's particularly dispiriting to hear McCarthy, one of the most floridly gifted verbal riffers in comedy, have to utter frat-brah catchphrases like "Let's do this."
That kind of lifeless, recycled language sounds even worse when Wiig, another performer who has perfected how to do things with words, cries out, "Say hello to my little friend" before zapping a spook in the film's near-interminable final act, a glut of green beams that suggests nothing more than an f/x trade show. (Look how much technology has advanced since 1984!)
nice archive link faggot
>read the article from previous thread
>click on link now to see its no longer available
what are those cheeky jews up to?
>>71837255
At the end of the day no matter kino but why couldn't Sony pony up for a script doctor? It sounds like Dipole is a talentless bitch who never should have enabled Feig in the first place. The script sounds like the root of all probs here. who's to blame more for feig's piece of shit
>>71837255
KINO
>>71836099
Link has been murdered, dawg.
>>71837405
>who's to blame more for feig's piece of shit
Amy Pascal, Sony Pictures in general, Paul Feig himself
I'm not defending the writer, I don't know her work, but I know that a "screenwriter" on a project like this pretty much just compiles studio notes into screenplay format. It's just 12 different producers emailing you drunk at 2 AM saying "there should be a scene where x happens, it came to me on the toilet this morning and I couldn't stop laughing"
>>71836099
>already deleted
THE COVER-UP IS REAL
ghostbusters II: Damage control
So how do they slam critics in the movie?
>>71836099
>mixing Pepe and Wojak with Mike and the Bots
Disgusting
>DAMAGE CONTROL
>DAMAGE CONTROL
>DAMAGE CONTROL
The Village Voice hates everything in all fairness
>>71837624
bill murry plays a critic who gets killed
they threatened to sue murry so they could emasculate and kill him
>>71836099
>this film cost 154 million
How the FUCK did they spent that money and create this shit? And don't give me the whole "cgi is expensive" shit
Zootopia cost four million LESS and the entire fucking thing was animated
Never in my life have I witnessed a company be so incompetent, lacking any sort of self awareness, and outright childish. SONY deserves to go bankrupt
>>71837164
>they leave up the early reviews that shill for them and kiss their asses
>they take down websites they don't even own that don't give positive reviews
>and it's 100% legal. It totally doesn't violate any free speech or free press Constitutional rights or anything
>>71837677
Please tell me you're joking.
https://twitter.com/melisseanderson?lang=en
someone ask her why they pulled a senior film critic's review down.
Melissa Anderson Named Village Voice Senior Film Critic
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2015 AT 4:48 P.M. BY VILLAGE VOICE STAFF
Melissa Anderson Named Village Voice Senior Film Critic
A A
539
-
More shares
0
0
The Village Voice is pleased to announce that Melissa Anderson has been named to the position of senior film critic. A Voice contributor since 2000, Anderson is one of the country’s most incisive, exciting, and knowledgeable film critics. Starting with our December 9 issue, she will be writing the weekly column Screen Captured, in which she will survey New York's boundlessly busy repertory and arthouse film scene. Anderson also will be reviewing new releases.
>>71837700
Its sony money laundering
>"My feminism precludes me from rooting against this movie" - Sasha on 'Schmoes Know'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW4UUG_3EBQ&t=4m0s
>>71837760
Removed champ
My favorite scene is where they bust a ghost that looks just like Harold Ramis and call it a misogynistic babyman.
>>71837760
Noticed the video got removed this morning.
Cant undo history you schmucks.
>>71837760
Well we know what happened here
These people are literally waging war against free speech and the free speech. And it's all ok because they want money.
Fucking bullshit!
The Jewening is upon us lads. Anyone who doesn't like this kino will be sterilized. You've been warned.
>>71837760
Wait was this their review or a discuss about it before release? Either way this woman is toxic. Also fuck SONY for silencing people when they call out their blatant bullshit
how do we approach this without it turning it into a fucked up victim game like "gg"
>>71837255
>fighting to save a New York that is played primarily by Boston
Poor Hillary. Her propaganda machine is failing.
>>71838086
Just laugh when it bombs
>>71838024
it was a discussion and at the 4:00 mark she said this, the video got a large dislike ratio and the video was removed by the user because they are scared of being called out for this bullshit.
I CAN'T STAND THE SUSPENSE
>>71837700
Adjusted for inflation, the 84 film cost 69 million dollars.
>>71838086
You can't.
All of the feminist and progressive websites have already written their pieces of how white men are the problem with society.
>>71836099
>http://www.villagevoice.com/film/busted-flat-all-too-normal-activity-dominates-the-ghostbusters-remake-8841463
Lyl it got fucking taken down and replaced with pro feminism article suggestion.
The level of shilling and ideology pushing is unreal for a fucking b-tier movie.
>>71837760
Hey look it's the same girl who said that Seinfeld is jewish blackface!
I watched the newest preview on television the other night. The biggest flaw for me is the brightness/video game like graphics of the ghosts and energy blasts. It's just too much along with the over saturation. The comedy aspects seems to be in overdrive compared to the preview more subtle dry humor
Anyone have an archive?
>>71837703
It's legal to force reviews to be taken down before general sale, they can't prevent you from leaving the review up but they can prevent you from getting interviews with cast from movies, onset visits, promotional materials, early screenings, etc. in the future so you are at a disadvantage compared to other publications.
archive here
http://archive.is/COYGk
http://archive.is/COYGk
http://archive.is/COYGk
http://archive.is/COYGk
http://archive.is/COYGk
>>71838209
here's the village voice archive text
http://pastebin.com/KsNVYjmG
IT'S BACK AGAIN
Damn
One of these days /pol/ will be wrong.
But it is not today.
>>71838409
>http://pastebin.com/KsNVYjmG
thx
Here's the archive of the Village article.
http://archive.is/Tcufd
>Kindly allow this lengthy aside and conspiracy theorizing: I can't start my review of Paul Feig's all-distaff redo of Ghostbusters without first mentioning the stupefying chaos that attended last Thursday evening's press screening, the only one of two scheduled a half-hour apart in New York before the movie's opening. This unprecedented incompetence had me convinced, for an hour or more, that Sony, the film's distributor, had been so cowed by the gynephobic holy war that has been waged against the film on social media (including Donald Trump's Twitter feed) for the past eighteen months that the company simply did not want the movie to be seen, ever. (Would it be The Interview redux?)
>gynephobic holy war
>gynephobic holy war
>gynephobic holy war
>>71838280
>before general sale
u wot m8
IGN Review
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0-pPaxui6Y
>>71838549
Can we start killing feminists yet?
>>71838559
That is to say, before people can just freely buy a ticket and attend the movie without identification, before general release of the movie.
>>71838281
That's not even slamming this movie. They just said it was pretty fucking tepid, which is what I expected. I don't understand why this movie is being made. It seems like a waste of talent all around. Some of these actors can actually be funny in the right context but Ghostbusters should not get a remake or a third film, period. It's just a stupid idea.
>>71838409
Villages' Voice review taken down.
>>71838570
Haha blame the male director Holy shit damage control
>>71838628
Sony hiding negative reviews
It's fucking happening
>>71838570
>average flick
Why are man baby videogame plebs getting upset? do they not understand how cinema ratings work?
>end credits scene mentions Zuul
>leaks suggest building up to Zuul as the big bad
But wasn't Zuul just the Gatekeeper? Isn't Gozer the Gozarian the big bad?
>>71838570
>"Okay I dunno it it was a race thang or a lady thang, but I am mad as hell."
Is it really necessary to force all these race and gender jokes down the audience's throat? Do burgers really think/talk THAT much about race? Because that's the impression I get from movies, tv shows, news and online forums.
>>71838640
Yep
That's how the game is played.
>It really has a dedication to Ramis
>>71838640
because he's a shit director, not because he's male. it's a fair point
>>71838696
>Do burgers really think/talk THAT much about race?
Liberals do. You can't even take a shit without some leftist SJW lecturing you on the human rights struggles of klingons who think they're ponies not being able to shit right thanks to white privelege,
>>71838764
>dedicated to a man who would probably of fucking hated it
positive reviews are coming out too fast to read...
>>71838570
>6.9
For IGN, that's basically a blunder of the fucking century.
>>71838804
>would probably of
Kill yourself.
>>71838880
>missed by 8
Kill yourself.
>>71838764
Of course it does. I would have been surprised otherwise.
>>71838861
No shit. The lowest rating they've ever given a shooter from a major publisher is an A--.
From Variety's review:
Though Jones gets some of the film’s most memorable lines, her character channels a shameful racial stereotype — one that traces back to the days of blackface when it amused audiences to see African-American characters spook easily, bugging their eyes and running for their lives whenever confronted with a ghost
>>71837405
The script isn't the only problem in this movie. I suspect that they're all afraid to bash the acting of the 4 female leads because their review will be dismissed as sexist. So its easier to throw a bit of praise their way and shit on everything else in the movie.
That's how most reviews have been coming out as.
>>71838570
Real talk for a moment friends
When ever you hear anyone use the term "Haters" you should recognize instantly that they're an idiot.
Calling people with critical faculties haters is the last desperate defense of brainless shills and fan boys that can't actually fathom any real arguments to defend their choices and tastes.
Plebs basically.
>>71838817
What is this feed reader?
>>71839025
Which is hilarious, since the character was supposed to be McCarthy's.
>>71839090
feedly, it's terrific, desktop and mobile
what did they mean by this?
>>71838963
>>71838764
>>71837255
>4 of the country's funniest women
>>71839080
Every negative review I've seen so far basically says the leads were great and throw Feig under the bus
Oddly enough, even the shills consistently seem to agree Hemsworth is the best part of the movie
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/reviews/
>65%
>>71839439
>Melissa
THE PATRIARCHY GOT TO HER!
I've wanted this movie to fail ever since those scummy publicity photos at the hospital. I really hope people aren't dumb enough to pay money for this.
>>71839482
A clear case of internalized mahogany
I feel for the poor girl.
>>71838570
>ok, so I dunno if this was a race thang or a lady thang but Im mad as hell
>>71839487
good thing foreign plebs are completely sexist
>>71838741
Kinda feel bad for Fieg as he is going to have to absorb all the blame and negativity deflected off the cast.
>confirmed Fresh on RT
/TV/ ABSOLUTELY BTFO, JAMES ROLFE ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>71839652
I'd feel bad for Fieg if he hadn't spent the last year telling everybody to go fuck themselves for liking the original ghostbusters.
A little humility when he is remaking a film he knew is still loved would have gone a long way to making him seem less like a smug douche.
>>71839482
>implying gb 2016 did anything at all to attempt to not alienate original fans
>>71839598
Who the fuck thought giving Paul Feig a 150 million dollar budget for an All Female Ghostbusters was a fucking good idea? Jesus christ.
Sony deserves everything they're getting, seriously. They need to do some major purging of their Execs and just start over.
>>71839759
(((Amy Pascal)))
Is Feig gay? I get the feeling he will publicly come out to try and deflect some of the criticism.
>>71839811
the absolute mad woman
It's over lads, Devin Faraci won.
The Ultimate Blu-Ray cut will restore the dancing scene and fix everything.
I'm seeing a lot of "mostly good except for a few things in the third act" mainly-positive reviews. This doesn't really qualify as a flop.
I don't know what alternative to this movie do you guys think the studio owed you? This movie was the only possibility that Bill Murray didn't hate.
Not even paid reviews can save this POS
>>71839759
I'm one of the few masochistic nutcases that actually made the effort to read all of the leaked sony emails.
The correspondence between the people in charge at Sony is both hilarious and depressing in equal measure.
There is no doubt in my mind that the studio is awash with complete and utter imbeciles at every level.
Waiting for it to leak online, I am also willing to bet all these virtue signaling feminist are too. Pay 15-20+ bucks to see a movie that you've already seen in the commercials. There is nothing of value in this soulless remake.
>>71839969
So the scene is confirmed cut? Weird because I was at the cinema yesterday and they showedna trailer which forma split second showed all of the army guys in the background in disco poses.
>>71839982
They forced Bill into it legally. It doesn't matter what he hated.
>>71840027
>So the scene is confirmed cut?
Some reviewers say that the scene was cut from the movie and put in the credits.
Is every one here in denial? The fresh scores keep going up, no one dares to rate it bad because of the controversy surrounding it.
>>71840027
Others have mentioned that they begin to set it up and then they don't dance, but assume the disco pose. They then show the actual dance scene in the credits as if it were a credits gag, but it's obvious it was intended to be in the film itself. "We Should Be Dancing" by the Bee Gees by the way.
>warcraft makes lots of profit
>ghostbusters not getting utterly destroyed by reviews
are movies finished?
>>71840136
The reason Warcraft made a profit is because of China.
>>71840136
Warcraft makes sense since it's been a vidya for over 10 years
>>71840087
>it's a conspiracy!
Go back to /pol/ shitlord.
>>71838160
Any yet they believe themselves to not be sexist or racist. The amount of hypocrisy is staggering. Mentally they are children unfit for responsibility.
>>71836099
Though this review has worst things to say about 4chan than the actual movie. And let's be honest, they're right. No matter how shit their movie is it's infinitely better than anything posted on this site.
>>71840136
Is this your first year outside of /v/eddit?
>>71840136
Movies are finished
>>71840173
Except he's right. Nobody wants to give this movie a bad review. A few of the reviews I've read say that it's basically a 2/5 movie but they give it a 3/5 for the RT tilt. They don't want that green splat next to their name on this one, and I don't blame them.
>>71840239
It could be worse they could be tasteless plebs that pretend they've seen the movie and then flake out when asked what they thought about a scene haha
>>71840239
>A few of the reviews I've read say that it's basically a 2/5 movie but they give it a 3/5 for the RT tilt
You clearly know better than them. I bet you can also read minds.
>>71840239
this
Most of these outlets are the same ones that branded all criticism of a lackluster trailer as angry men being mean misogynists.
The idea that they might then not want to specify just how poor the film is because it now might make them look a bit silly is hardly science fiction.
>>71840363
It's like the limpwristed gestapo.
This is more disappointing than infuriating. I'd have had higher hopes for America than this.
>>71840136
Warcraft didnt make lots of profit at all. It actually barely made any.
>>71840394
What I don't understand is why anyone would want to fight a culture war in defense of a transparent cash grab remake from a studio that regularly shits out complete disasters?
This is not the hill anyone should be dying on.
>>71840555
>>71840136
It grossed 46.5 million domestic. It probably did end up making a profit, but the studio gets a smaller cut of foreign money.
>>71840555
>culture war
Go back to cripplechan faGGot.
This is now a thread for talking about how /tv/ was proven wrong again.
>>71840692
/tv/ is always right
>>71840692
you previously posted about Devin Faraci in this thread, sarcastically treating him as his word is the truth.
I now know youre here to wind us up. Please stop.
>>71840692
Go back to Metafilter, nignog faggot SJW.
>>71840800
What's a Metafilter? It's a Pokemon?
>>71840782
Well birthmoviesdeath is good for capeshit news. And I was here mostly for the GoT threads.
Now I am staying for the drama.
>>71840893
>We shouldn't try to make original things anymore
>>71840893
maybe that little girl could go watch something with a female protagonist that's actually good like The Force Awakens.
>>71840893
>Ghostbuster (2016) is for this 4-8 year old girl
>Ghostbusters (2016) is rated PG-13
>>71840933
Oh that's actually the most desperate argument so far.
>>71840933
What are your favorite quote unquote "original" films of the 2010s?
>>71840893
Because having a pussy is really what makes a hero. Not a sense of right or justice.
>>71840074
okay but thats just a random lie, he turned down ghostbusters movie for years and years
where are you getting this idea in your head?
>>71840893
>affection for capeshit and GoT
Suddenly it all makes sense.
Well the good news is that you are the exact kind of pleb that will probably really love ghostbusters.
I bet you enjoyed Jurrasic World and Terminator Genisys too.
>>71840893
But she got the Extreme ghostbusters cartoon and we already have a female team in the comics.
>>71840943
>something with a female protagonist that's actually good like The Force Awakens
>>71840933
We literally can't.
>>71840998
I don't watch movies. I just come here to see Actress feet.
>>71840893
That's right, male can't be role models for women, you shitlord.
>>71841004
>Not a sense of right or justice
Moralfags like you disgust me.
>>71840893
Good God the left has just stooped to a new low to justify their lazy open refusal to create more new shit
I am genuinely offended by this low attempt at manipulation by these pigs who just refuse to have it sink in that if they want to impress anyone then they should do it with new OC instead of appropriating someone else's work.
>>71841007
>okay but thats just a random lie
Oh lord...we got a dipshit here.
>>71841030
So quick to talk about quality but when asked about your taste you cower?
Truly nu/tv/
>>71837595
That and Feig took rewrites to it.
>>71841077
Like I said, I don't watch movies.
>>71841055
So now we agree that RT is a good measure on the quality of a film right?
What's with people saying these women are funny? The fat bitch has only one fucking running gag and that is being fat. And the gorilla is your typical sassy black woman even in real life, the other two are completely irrelevant.
>>71841100
You do, but you're scared that your plebness will come out
>>71841111
its a good measure of what percentage of people liked or disliked the film. Rotten tomatoes score has nothing to do with the quality of film whatsoever
>>71841016
>I bet you enjoyed Jurrasic World and Terminator Genisys too.
Jurrasic World had good direction but the script was absolutely terrible, it was alsosexist.
Haven't watched Terminator Genisys, it sounded convoluted and nonsensical from trailers and reviews
>>71838696
Liberals
>>71838522
Lynton isn't a moron. Rothmann is a ducking retard. Was against Deadpool every getting made and he never wanted to do Titanic and Avatar.
>>71837255
>before zapping a spook
I had no idea it was that kind of movie
>>71841111
learn how to properly use RT.
>>71840825
http://www.metafilter.com/
>>71841132
>What's with people saying these women are funny?
Kathryn McKinnon is funny in SNL, don't know about the others.
All these top critics rotten reviews
>>71841055
That only proves how easily you can shill reviewers opinions with nostalgia.
Fucking checked
Why are some people saying it has a "great cast" like it's some kind of damage control
Compared to Murray, Arkroyd, Hudson and Ramis, this cast is shit tier.
>>71841217
>Kathryn McKinnon is funny in SNL
But SNL hasn't been funny in decades, so you're a fucking liar.
>>71841208
meta-kino/antifilm
>>71841235
>great cast
>stereotypical black woman who has been in the industry for years and only getting bit parts
>random lesbian girl from american comedy show
>kristen wiig
>fat one from mike and molly who follows the director
>Chris hemsworth
>>71840893
When people weaponize children to try to manipulate the masses into putting up with their shit, they've crossed a fucking line.
Every remake gets shit thrown at it, but suddenly we're not allowed to criticize a movie because of a leftist Goebbels-esque social narrative while some fucking bitch uses a child as a shield tod eflect fromt he reality that mooching off of and remaking what men did is not "girl power" or anything BUT parasitism off of men?
Bullshit!
>>71841056
>Good God the left has just stooped to a new low to justify their lazy open refusal to create more new shit
Oh yeah the left are conspiring to destroy originality in Hollywood, it's not just the nature of capitalism in a globalized society.
>>71841322
>We're not allowed to criticize a movie because of a leftist Goebbels-esque social narrative while some fucking bitch uses a child as a shield tod eflect fromt he reality that mooching off of and remaking what men did is not "girl power" or anything BUT parasitism off of men?
>>71836099
>It's particularly dispiriting to hear McCarthy, one of the most floridly gifted verbal riffers in comedy, have to utter frat-brah catchphrases like "Let's do this."
>frat-brah catchphrases like "Let's do this."
what's with big city journalists incessantly shitting on "bros"? is it just because they're a safe target?
>>71836099
Wait, it's bad?!?!
I'm floored. Who would have guessed it was going to suck?
>>71838570
holy shit, it sounds like she is reading off a script for the review
>>71838570
>Memeable
Pardon my french but SHUT THE FUCK UP
>>71840893
>She needs heroes
>by copying men
How are women so damn uncreative?
>>71841017
Extreme Ghostbusters was shit.
>>71841217
>>71841171
>>71841111
>>71841416
>>71841331
you're a big shitposter
>>71841479
how old are you
>>71841264
>SNL hasn't been funny in decades
Hasn't been that great ever since Tina Fey left but it's still occasionally funny.
It currently has a 70% on RT.
>Jurassic World is shit
>Force Awakens is shit
>Ghostbusters is shit
Thank god I never watch remakes.
>>71841479
>>71841524
You know you don't *have* to make a new post every time the post timer expires right?
>>71841481
shut up you fucking faggot
I know more about film than you by a country mile.
Alright you know what pisses me off? The notion that adults/children cant identify with a character unless theyre the same gender/race/age. Its bullshit statistics companies pull out of their ass. Its like when comic writers create a long line of OC sidekicks for Batman thinking readers will self insert and like them. They like Batman!
>>71841564
what does knowing about film have to do with /tv/?
I saw finding dory and they played the ghostbusters trailer, and the kids all seemed unimpressed, they really dug that monster truck movie though
So this movie isn't for children or man children or even women, this movie has no audience
>>718414814u
>>71841564
>I wasted my time and money by going to school to study film theory and history
>>71839851
He was raised by a single mother and has never identified with men or masculinity.
>>71841132
Did you see it?
>>71840239
this, it's already being forced as hating women if you hate the movie. No many reviewers will want that attached to their names in the future
it's like eating your grandmas fruit salad, everyone you know hates it but grins out of politeness
>>71841418
>what's with big city journalists incessantly shitting on "bros"?
I'm just thankful shitlord hasn't become go to journalistese for white males
yet
>>71841548
>force awakens
>shit
Pick one, prequelfag
>>71841513
Older than you. You probably weren't even a fetus back when Extreme Ghostbusters aired.
Im from reddit and Im being paid to push this film.
>>71841601
Its for money laundering
My wife's son liked this movie and so should you
>>71841637
I actually never watched any of the Star Wars films at all. I just plainly think banking on nostalgia or remaking is pure shit.
>>71841558
The site has not been the same ever since moot introduced all those limits making posting slower.
>>71841677
stop talking about them like you have.
TFA isn't a remake.
>>71841702
>TFA isn't a remake.
>>71839989
Starring: Chris Hemsworth
Clearly we are not /tv/ as fuck to understand this film
UH OH
>>71841721
it isn't you retard. It's a sequel.
>>71841702
Hence why I just said "banking on nostalgia". It's either that or remakes.
Ignoring all the feminist bullshit and politicization, it was bound to end up a shitty movie anyways.
>>71838570
>6.9
>pitch perfect 2 was an 8.8
>fallout 4 was a 9.5
holy shit
real score must be at jack and jill levels
>>71841736
looks like they need to rebalance the numbers lol
Sony is well known for bribing reviewers for their big video game releases. Just look at how every Naughty Dog game is top rated even though they are all just copy pasted assets and gameplay.
I wonder if this is one of the bigger moments they've been bribing reviewers of movies.
>>71841416
Can't refute and counter-point?
Can only sling shit instead?
Yep you're a liberal. And none of your name-calling social terrorism bullying will get me to ever see this shit.
>>71841843
>videogames
This is an art board, kid
>>71841702
>>71841757
>>71841891
nice meme
>>71841757
No, it's a remake. It's literally A New Hope with a bigger fucking death star.
>>71841859
>>71841859
>social terrorism bullying
Funny you accuse others of the very thing you yourself are doing.
>>71836099
JUST.
>>71841548
Jurassic World was good because it introduced me to Bryce
>>71841885
You gotta love how video games get the superior art then when it comes to ghostbusters.
>>71841591
I agree, that kind of mentality is more damaging than people make it out to be and goes completely against the idea that these retards push for breaking down gender roles by saying you can only look up to people who are carbon copies of you.
>>71841936
It's not a remake. A remake erases the original from canon. TFA does not.
>almost every single negative review makes a point to mention the "talented cast" to get around sounding sexist
kek
>>71841702
>>71841757
>>71841914
>TFAgs in denial
>>71841971
Ghostbusters was never art always flick tier
>>71839851
No, just really fucking weird and beta.
>>71842069
TFA is killing them off so it does erase everything. TFA wishes the OT didn't exist so it can have all the money for itself.
Went to go see it with my girlfriend, expected the worst thanks to /tv/.
But wow, the whole cinema was splitting their sides at every moment. I have not laughed so hard in years.
Perfect timing. Perfect delivery. Perfect characters.
It's a perfect remake (not that anyone remembers the originals, nor will they care for them after this).
The moment the film ended I was clapping and I had tears in my eyes as I uttered "le nouveau film de Ghostbusters est un kino dans sa forme la plus pure"
It's the best kino of 2016, no doubt about it.
>No Score
>Even though
>while it isn't
>talented cast.
hahaha
>>71842124
>trying too hard/10
>>71842106
literally wrong.
http://furiousfanboys.com/2016/07/sony-may-produced-positive-ghostbusters-review-youtube/
>>71842029
I generally liked the design of things in this movie, but who the fuck thought those dorky helmets looked good at all?
>>71842091
It's considered art now, mr, philistine. Enjoy your SJW garbage.
>>71842029
not true since the Evil Dead remakepossibly since Evil Dead II
>>71842022
Reminds me of the Supergirl pilot when a mom states "Oh my little girl finally has a role model to look up to!" when Supergirl first appears. What the fuck? Like a kid can only idolize someone the same gender?
>>71842197
It's true. Sorry.
Sequel. Not a remake.
>talented cast
Who are they referring to
>>71842300
You say that, you're not sexist.
I had no problem getting to the review...seems like it's still up.
>>71838281
>http://archive.is/COYGk
Is this the same article as the UK version of the site I refuse to click it and get them paid for sucking Sony's dick. But it seems the UK site was a glowing review.
>>71838670
I think the "There is no Dana, only Zuul" is such an iconic line people think that Zuul is the villain of the first movie when she's really just a henchman.
