AVGN ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>71827277
LMAO HILARIOUS ANOTHER FAKE GHOSTBISTERS SCORE LMFAOOOOO
>>71827277
Made me check/10
>>71827358
How does it feel to be a fucking retard?
>>71827277
>>71827277
This movie looks like it has so much potential.
Why are you judging on a movie you haven't seen from start to finish?
I have a friend who has done that with movies and then he tells me "Why did they do this part or this part? and I am like "Did you even fucking watch the whole thing?" He legit was skipping the movie in front of me when we were together and I was shaking my head... that is not how you judge a movie.
I CAN'T STAND THE SUSPENSE!
if it's good, fine, but it better be great.
but I hope it sucks fucking balls because I'm gonna shove it hard in their faces!
>>71827414
Would you need to watch Norm of the North in order to judge its quality?
Tom Rothman and Amy Pascal on suicide watch.
This is going to rob them hard.
>>71827534
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_secret_life_of_pets/
>>71827414
I've seen the trailers, I was not convinced. Didn't seem like something I would enjoy as a fan of the original Ghostbusters. I'll wait for the reviewers I usually look up, if they say its good I'll think about it but even then I might just wait later on and pirate it or catch it on cable/netflix one day.
There is no point in seeing a movie blindy when you already didn't like a trailer. A trailer is supposed to sell you on the movie, to get you excited to watch it. If it doesn't chances are unless you hear it from friends or reviewer/critics then you shouldn't bother wasting your time and money watching a movie you're not sold on.
That kind of mentality is why we still get soulless remakes and reboots, because hollywood knows fuckers like you will still go see the movie based on the name alone.
>>71827277
>that banner image
Let me guess, they're going to have at least one joke about shooting the gun resembling an ejaculating penis hahaha
>>71827414
This is a comedy movie, that means if it doesn't make people laugh it's a failure. Unless they deliberately chose the least funny jokes to show in the trailer, it's safe to assume this will be a piece of shit.
>>71827534
Is that girl trying to force a dildo into that poor dog's mouth???
BTW It wont be in China cuz they have NO GHOST policy.
This thing just got kicked in the dick
>>71827630
>No China Release
>Remake/Reboot of a cult classic that's only really popular in America
>All Female Cast of 2 C listers and two unknowns
>Releases in between the Secret Life of Pets and Star Trek, Ice Age
>150 Million Budget, not including advertising.
It's dead, Jim. If it makes 300 million I'll be surprised. Either way, this won't get a sequel unless Paul Feig sucks some major dick at Sony.
>>71827630
Is ghost a slur for pasty white bitches? Do they also ban spooks too?
>>71827414
Do you necessarily need to enter every sewer to check what flows there? No, you already know that it's full of shit. Either through experience or just judging from the smell.
>>71827710
Not to mention the 40+ TV spots they made for this thing... over 40 of them!
>EVERYONE IS CALLING THIS THE MUST SEE MOVIE OF THE SUMMER
>EVERYONE
Who even talks like that?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Lrj0AEEcA
>>71827759
They ban supernatural.
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/10/no-ghosts-allowed/411940/
>>71827810
Didn't they also released a clip titled the "Final Battle" where they show about a minute of the climax of the movie?
Thats like if in Civil War they showed the Tony and Captain America fight at the end and showed Buckys arm getting blown off.
>>71827710
They've spend a fucking fortune advertising this. Easily the most shilled movie of the year
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8
>>71827810
>must see movie of the summer
>review embargo
So its must see movie of the summer according to the director, or producer?
>>71827277
MISOGYNISTS RACISTS AND OTHER AWFUL PEOPLE BTFO
Apparently this follows the Maleficent approach of 'strong female characters' by making every single male character shit.
>>71828014
Sony paid someone to change their name to "EVERYONE" and plug their movie.
https://youtu.be/CeCiTwuyWq0
Ouch.
>>71827627
holy fuck i thought i was the only one who saw that
>>71827277
That guy on the poster look shoe-horned as fuck
reminder that sony literally got sued and settled because they made up a fake movie critic to shill their movies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Manning_(fictitious_writer)
just a reminder, James Rolfe is sitting in a comfy chair geeting head while you post on 4chins
>>71828067
>literally who
>ouch
>>71828132
He's sitting in a comfy chair while prepping the bull
The thing that bugs me is that the Original ghostbusters was a family film that also happened to be funny.
The new ghostbusters is a slapstick comedy that just about also manages to be a family film.
"LOL WE SHOOT HIM IN THE DICK"
"LOL WE GOT A SUPER SEXY SECRETARY BECAUSE THE ORIGINAL WAS SUPER SEXY AND WE'RE SUBvERTING THAT RIGHT?"
Paul Feig relies on crude humour and MM relies on fat jokes, when he has to limit that, he can't write for shit.
"But Spy didn't have those"
No he replaced with "look how fat she is" with "look how frumpy she is" big difference. He even cast Miranda in it, he wasn't even subtle.
>>71827277
I don't care if the movie sucks, I just wanted it to happen so you manchildren keep crying about it.
>>71828346
>muh sit on the fence man
well done on your shit opinion.
>>71828318
What about Statham's dialogue?
>>71828318
>The new ghostbusters is a slapstick comedy that just about also manages to be a family film
I think it's just trying to catch a different public this time, it's clear they hate the classic fans and want new ones, as long as they are women and/or prefer this movie:
http://www.cnet.com/news/new-ghostbusters-cast-ad-lib-replies-to-youtube-trolls-in-movie/
>>71827810
The "must see movie of the year" = A phrase they can say for a film that makes it seem like everyone is loving it but doesn't (or at least is ambiguous enough not to get fined/sued for false advertising).
It's what blockbusters say when they have no credible quotes saying how good a film is.
>>71828398
>dismissing every critic as a "troll"
i fucking hate the internet today
>>71828368
I'd argue that without Statham, the film would be a piece of shit. His performance makes it more than his lines.
>>71828318
>He even cast Miranda in it
she would probably have made this ghostbusters film a bit better
>>71827630
>Giant ghost looks like cartoonish Dan Aykroyd
>Melissa McCarthy literally castrates an effigy of Dan Aykroyd
BRAVO FEIG
>>71828474
I don't know if it's true but I keep reading that Sony is actively deleting any negative comment by females about the movie but only keeping the male ones just to keep this fire and blame it on sexism.
Learning that they're actually making references to the YT trolls in the movie kinda makes me believe it was true.
>>71828318
No, the original ghostbusters is about professors who resort to working a blue collar job of being essentially a fancier exterminator and the hilary of the situation between this disparity.
Also it depicted a blue collar job as something glamorous and showed that despite getting dirty, you're doing something to save the city every day. The fact that this point of view in movies is very rare at the time and was popular due to it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuDZbV9eZTc
Hmmmm
>>71827616
Uh, it's not even near her crotch area. That's p. desperate of you.
>>71828690
I can't take this video seriously but I thought the movie didn't air yet?
I like how no one is going to remember this piece of shit after it's initial release in cinemas
So when can we expect actual reviews to start coming in?
>>71828690
why do niggas love doing reviews inside their cars? some of them actually drive around
>>71828773
Today
>>71828830
thats their home.
>>71828764
Remember What?
>>71828764
>no one is going to remember this piece of shit after it's initial release in cinemas
SJWs certainly will, they already treat it as one of their biggest successesand they certainly won't let people forget it. Just like they love to remind others of Gamergate, rape culture, Trump supporters and white privilege.
>>71827277
Not even tumblr defends this shit
>>71828966
>Not even tumblr defends this shit
Dude, those nutjobs are all creaming themselves for the movie and how progressive it is, the most popular posts are full of their blind praise and shitting on anyone disagreeing.
>>71828966
if the final scene is literally them destroying the final ghostshit by shooting him in the dick then it's going to be pretty entertaining to see all the SJW try to gloss over how obvious this scene really is and try to pass it off as a mere coincidence that signifies nothing
>>71827534
What the fuck is that red thing?
>>71829144
Her left leg.
>>71829144
The critical consensus bar. Or a dildo.
>>71829196
That's a big leg
>>71828690
Are you sure he wasn't watching a Sweded version of the Ghostbusters from a ghetto video store?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_As38a1TY4
>>71829111
That's satire.
>>71829196
Unfortunate.
>>71829304
I didn't mean it as an example of praise, judging by the amount of likes and reblogs they really took it seriously tho.
>>71828538
Aykroyd is Dickless now?
Shit did GB2016 just get Meta?
>>71829111
to be fair that was posted by a tumblr nut before the movie even came out.
but you can expect more of this shit anyway because a lot of them are now are investing themselves into the political narrative around it. so they will purposefully downplay their issues with it and play up the aspects that they liked.
it's so fucking ridiculous that we've gotten to a place where some crappy hollywood remake is a violently political thing and certain people are going to be careful about how they speak about it and cover up any issues that they might have because of their greater "political" views.
and we thought Gen X and grunge-era political indifference was cringey. our generations hyper-politicized obsessions over the most superficial consumerist bullshit are a fucking sigh and a half.
>>71828033
>Harold Ramis is a bronze bust towards the beginning
>at the end it says "For Harold Ramis"
>>71828538
>>71829378
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-tYZkJ2p54
how long till the embargo is lifted
>>71829387
Yeah, that rustled my jimmies.
>Wait until he dies
>Make a shitty reboot
>Cynically call the cash grab a tribute
Fucking disgusting.
>>71827277
even tho it's fake. does someone here actually pay any attention to rt ratings?
>>71828067
THIS GUYS HEAD IS FUCKING HUGE
>>71829523
Fun fact: Peck never once blinks throughout the film.
>>71829669
I do. I only watch movies if they have certified frash rating on RT.
>>71828966
tumblr has a small but vocal anti-sjw faction
>>71827277
You mean JewWario mode.
Saw it at Youtube HQ. The trailer was bad but the movie is a blast, everyone around me laughed hard all the time. Solid 9/10 and definitely best comedy of this summer.
>>71827414
It already lack 2 things that made original good Fresh idea and great cast of main characters.
>>71828746
don't let he/her/xir/xim get to you, cisgender scum can't help but be problematic when presented with how the REAL WORLD is now. Its fucking 2016, grow up already man babys
>>71827627
>>71827534
>>71829144
>>71827534
unfortunate banner
>>71827277
>add a black character for muh diversity
>shes an overweight sassy black woman
hollywood is a laugh riot
>>71827414
I know this is probably bait but still this is the same kind of shit people were saying when Robocop 2014 was coming out and just like that people need it explained to them that this is not our first goatfuck.
Every single fucking thing about this movie sounds awful and yet we're still supposed to "give it a chance".
Why? Sony never gave Ghostbusters 3 a chance. Paul Feig and McCarthy and every other prick involved didn't give the fans a chance when trying to explain why it looked awful.
But now audiences are supposed to pretend they don't know dog shit until they step in it and give the movie a chance it hasn't earned in any way?
>>71827534
RED ROCKET RED ROCKET
>>71827277
Honestly I see this happening. Not because the movie actually is good, but because the backlash critics will receive if they score it bad. Suddenly fat tumblr whales will come out screaming that certain critics are misogynistic and all this bullshit.
>>71827627
my dude
>>71827386
>91% want to see it
It might not get good ratings, but it will be a financial success.
Prepare for months of "TAKE THAT PATRIARCHY" comments and articles.
>>71827810
>EVERYONE IS CALLING GHOSTBUSTERS THE MUST SEE-MOVIE OF THE SUMMER
>that like/unlike ratio
>>71837075
91% of the people who looked it up specifically and were logged in.Unless they changed the system since last time I checked.
It's not hard to get 90+% of interest if you specifically ask people who already showed interest.
>>71827277
>leslie jones deadpan performance
i don't think i know what deadpan means anymore
>>71827487
those who've seen it has said that it was shit, apart from the paul feig fanboys who eat his shit right up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-Pvk70Gx6c
>>71829111
As we are not "legion" I highly doubt tumblr is either.
Besides, isn't tumblr mostly for porn anyway?
>>71827414
https://youtu.be/n-iQ_Qu3cfw
>potential
Check this """"""""""acting"""""""""" out
>>71835760
kek
so what do you believe the actual score will be, will it beat the original's 97%?
>>71827414
KEK
>>71838660
>this country's funniest women
WOMEN
AREN'T
FUNNY
ruh roh
is there an alternate universe more shit than this one?
the answer is no
>>71839077
>6 rotten, 9 fresh
there's still hope
>>71839144
read it again
>14 fresh
>8 rotten
>>71839161
really? here it doesn't say that
Reminder this movie needs to make $300 million worldwide just to break even. Reminder Sony wants $500 million to justify starting a new franchise.
>>71828966
>>71829111
>tumblr is one group of people
I guess 4chan is becoming the "/pol/: [topic]" site.
>>71827386
>91% want to see
What does this even mean? 92% of humans want to see this movie? Will Ghostbusters be the most profitable movie of all time?
>>71827534
>>71827544
>there's no way that the big red dick/bone thing is real
>click the link
>it is
That made me laugh more than anything in the Ghostbusters movie
/tv/ is
once againlike it always is
BTFO
>>71839406
it means the RT members who go to the RT page of the movie they want to see, clicked "want to see." rather than "don't want to see."
Its basically meaningless.
>>71839190
it's gone up
APOLOGIZE
>>71839607
i bet they were paid
>>71838335
Judging from the first 25 or so reviews on RT, it looks to be about 75% which would be comically absurd.
>>71839607
>every positive/semi-positive review lambasts the "haters" rather than addresses the quality of the film
>even the most positive reviews say the movie itself isn't great, but, like, the women are soooooo totally fuNNy!!! xD
What a shitshow. Use the reviews to separate militant feminists from actual people.
Most critics know all the hate this movie is getting so just to be retarded contrarians and go with the SJW feminist movement are gonna give it a good score.
>>71828895
She even looks like a gorilla when someone draws her.
>>71837075
It doesn't mean shit. Sony already released the financial expectations and said they'd only get 50 million in revenue.
The movie's budget is 150 million.
How can it be rated higher than Batman vs Superman? It's so much worse than BvS...
>>71839783
>contrarians
Ghostbusters trailer was the most disliked video in YouTube history. If anything, people that like it are the contrarians.
>>71839988
that's what he was saying
>>71840026
Oh. Whoops.
...I'm very tried and probably dyslexic...
>>71839607
Is this going to be a GamerGate-kind of case where someone from the female staff fucks reviewers just for this kind of critics?
Sony was already desperate for making people like it and, since it didn't work, they started putting out a shitload of trailers (so, giving you away pretty much all about the movie or all you needed to know), deleting bad comments in their site and adding references to internet trolls in the movie just to please whoever their target public is.
It's so weird the critics are almost all positive and just a few bad ones actually addressing what was bad with the film.
>>71840165
Send in Leslie Jones
>>71840191
>Leslie Jones
AW HELL YEAH!!!
I'll take her.
>>71840165
>It's so weird the critics are almost all positive
Or maybe it's just a good movie.
>>71839607
>review starts with THIS WILL MAKE MISOGYNY MAD
>literally starting a review with Y U MAD THOUGH
>>71840165
>Sony was already desperate for making people like it
No they weren't
They never stopped the director and the rest of them from their crusade against men during the marketing
>>71840258
>MRAs crying over it
in what fucking universe is this happening
>it keeps rising
/tv/ BTFO
>>71840258
>Or maybe it's just a good movie
That doesn't make a movie perfect, there's always at least something wrong.
>>71840316
They know they get reactions from those kind of comments and, since men will obviously respond, they shield themselves saying it's just misogyny, GG, etc.
>>71840332
>in what fucking universe is this happening
You can check out the "manosphere" to see them whining about it just like they whined about Fury Road and The Force Awakens.
>>71840165
Ya something strange is going on...I dont believe the over glowing reviews
>>71840257
>>71840458
>Ya something strange is going on
It's clearly a cuckspiracy.
>>71840324
>They never stopped the director and the rest of them from their crusade against men during the marketing
Dude, Sony makes movies with Adam Sandler (the bad ones), they really don't give a shit because they think anything they do will be liked.
It backfires and they keep doing it but I guess bad publicity is still publicity, especially with this one movie.
>>71840165
Something really doesn't feel right about the reviews, Sony cannot be that desperate to literally bully and bribe the critics into giving positive reviews.
>>71840486
>Y258d3d
You're a redditor
Don't post at me like you're my friend
>>71840420
yes clearly men's right activists who have better things to do are the only ones crying about this
>>71840359
>70%
THEY CANNOT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH THIS
>>71840537
>You're a redditor
Way to assume things, anon, I just google these pictures. But yeah, Reddit is the source here.
>>71840553
>men's right activists who have better things to do
They don't have better things to do though.
>>71828318
>super sexy secretary
I never thought she was that hot, I actually thought she was kind of a bitch who ended up lusting for Egons cock, but nobody really treated her as some desirable being. She was almost completely ignored. It felt like she was a real secretary.
>>71839450
If you believe these reviews youre fucking stupid.
comon guys the trailer is bad enough to question everything and not pay $15 for this kekery
Did they just pull the tomatometer?
Willing to bet Donald Trump will see this film and Tweet to his followers that it's terrific and y'all need to see it.
>>71840703
I have never seen it.
I think they are only going to put it as soon as it's mathematically impossible for it to be rotten.
>>71840703
it was never there
>>71840703
>>71840789
>>71840794
ask me how I know you're fresh from reddit
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/reviews/
>>71840848
the tomatometer isn't there you dumb fuck
>>71840733
he already tweeted that it looked like shit a few months ago
>aggregated reviews
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/reviews/?type=top_critics
lel
>>71840703
It's weird how movies with 5 reviews have one but this doesn't have it displayed with 30 reviews.
>>71840901
They mean nothing, but then again aggregated opinion means nothing as well. Just because the public likes or dislikes a movie doesn't indicate the movie quality. But try telling that to Marvel fans.
I just want to see the blonde one fucked by a ghost. Is that too much to ask?
>>71841122
Just make a commission to Shadman, I bet he will be happy to do it.
>>71841262
He'd throw in a horse and a ton of tattoos and shit.
>>71840901
Spy was actually great anti james bond kino
Can't wait for Hillary to call it stunning and brave and a new chapter for all Americans.
>>71841122
>I just want to see the blonde one fucked by a ghost
Lucky for you she's a ghost lover!
http://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/1836458
>>71841286
>He'd throw in a horse and a ton of tattoos and shit.
A ghost horse?
>None of it adds up to much more than an average summer entertainment - never bad enough to warrant the chauvinist hatred, rarely good enough to deserve the feminist support.
Why are movie critics so retarded? chauvinism is a derogatory term for PATRIOTISM, what the fuck english is my second language and I know this.
>>71841375
Ghostbusters came out in 1984 and Reagan won in a landslide. It was a stunning and brave and a new chapter for all Americans.
>>71839077
Why do some of the Fresh ratings look almost copy-and-pasted generic? It's like they're being shilled
>>71829283
Is that movie any good?
>>71841471
Just like Hillary will win!
>>71837976
nice joke referencing limp male dick premature weak ejaculation not being able to hold it up male bashing episode.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>71841779
Critics are biased because they've made it political
>>71839406
It says it right there. 91% of the 66,700 people who rated the movie on RT want to see it.
>>71841884
>reviews counted
>>71841779
lol they pulled it again
>>71841910
>>71841884
i c ur point, sry
>>71830611
Was this intentional?
>>71828018
Hey now resident evil movies do that and no one batted an eyelash
>>71841044
>2016
>still being upset that batshit vs capeman was garbage and everyone else realized it but you
>>71828181
Hi not American here but what is mean by 'prepping the bull" I have come to hear it alot around here but don't know what is mean
The US hasn't chimed in yet. All these fucking Remain reviewers being cucks
>>71842218
The US is more cucked by SJWs than Britain is.
>>71841779
/tv/ btfo desu
>>71827277
>>71842349
http://gb.imdb.com/title/tt1289401/
>>71842218
All the US critics were the ones lambasting James Rolfe. Expect the score to rise higher
>>71841779
every reviewer is giving it the lowest possible "good" rating to avoid being charged with misosoupgyny
>>71842349
ITS BEEN 5 YEARS ALREADY STOP
>>71827414
This is embarrassing. Sony will do anything to try and save this piece of shit
>>71842551
http://furiousfanboys.com/2016/07/sony-may-produced-positive-ghostbusters-review-youtube/
Sure the reviewers are buying into this garbage but what about them box office numbers though?
If this is a financial failure we've won.
>>71838660
>That kind of lifeless, recycled language sounds even worse when Wiig, another performer who has perfected how to do things with words, cries out, "Say hello to my little fried" before zapping a spook in the film's near-interminable final act
>spook
Holy shit. Since when are mainstream movies allowed to be so openly racist?
>>71842776
THEY will still act like they won just because of the reviews though
it'll be funny because people will most likely forget about it in a few weeks like they did with the robocop and total recall remakes
>>71839077
This movie is good to vet all the critics that are not shit
>>71842776
>Sure the reviewers are buying into this garbage but what about them box office numbers though?
Paul Feig last film grossed more than the budget of the new Ghostbusters. It's gonna do well enough.
>>71839415
Its a leg you sperglord faggot
>click top critics
>more than half are rotten
>>71843316
>the only critics that matter hate it
of course.
>>71829111
>baby-men
>manbaby
why do they think that this insult signifies anything other than just how mad they are?
>>71843316
>Buzzfeed is a top critic
>BUZZFEED
I watched the first two movies the other day for the first time in like 10 years
everyone is wearing some serious nostalgia goggles.
>>71843396
People like you should be bathed in acid.
>>71842776
How can a person do stuff like this and look at themselves in the mirror? Wouldn't a person whose whole job consists of lying, cognitive dissonance, and just being scum eventually just kill themselves?
Phony reviewers should be tarred and feathered
>>71843423
meant for
>>71842566
>>71843316
This Stephen Whitty person seems right on his head.
It's crazy that Americans care so much about being opinionated about this mediocre film...
>>71843396
I watched them for the first time ever just this year. No nostalgia goggles at all, but you're just a memeing nu-male so why am I even responding to you
>>71843451
>Americans
It's a huge UK contingent of faggots as well. The core of SJW-dom is USA and UK.
>>71843316
>Manohla Dargis
>is that rarest of big-studio offering
Whaaat?
Seriously... What?
>>71843508
>disposable fun
Literally calling the movie fast food and that's a "positive" review.
>>71843612
Hahaha...
It's so confusing, thanks . "It's a bad movie, but you probably gonna like it".
>>71828318
>WE GOT A SUPER SEXY SECRETARY
No she wasn't
>>71843612
>>71843705
The movie is bland.
By not taking taking risks that could make it very good it didn't have the chance to do something too bad. Its not particularly enjoyable but people have a hard time pointing out specific bad things.
>>71827414
I'll be 100% honest here. The movie looks fucking good. People are just trying to act edgey because its a reboot and not containing the old actors as main characters. The team look like they will have good chemistry and the effects look ghostbusters style.
>>71843369
Like I needed more of a reason to not give a shit about rotten tomatoes
WHITE MEN BTFO
It's over.
>>71843420
And what do you think should happen to people like you who wish death on others because they said something you don't agree with about a movie that's older than most people in this thread?
>>71843878
I bet you also enjoy having pineapples shoved up your ass too
>>71843878
This. The real problem is the fact that people are even paying any attention whatsoever to whining manchildren who will forever be wearing their rose-colored glasses. Nothing will satisfy them, anyways.
>>71844250
worthwhile post, thanks for the contribution, senpai. Totally not confirming the fact that people who are against this movie are generally juvenile
>>71827414
>>71832599
>>71844250
Are you implying I am hitler from Little nicky?
>>71841500
It's alright to watch once. I personally would have liked more sweded stuff, but it's still a decent movie.
>>71844370
Senpai? Go whack off to jap cartoon porn, better yet, play in traffic, it's excuse makers such as yourself that allow turds like this to be produced and any criticism to be labelled "omg h8rs misogyny"
>>71844562
>not knowing about the word filter
baka desu senpai
>Critics Consensus
>Reviews Counted: 41
Summer blockbusters like this usually get almost 200 reviews. RT is counting the chickens before they're hatched. I wonder why.
>>71844562
Hello newfag
>>71844629
>are there even moderators to control this insane place??!!!
>[Deleted]
>>71844562
newfag dectected
When are they going to allow user reviews do you think?
YFW you didn't fall for the Ghostbuster hate meme
>>71831028
What a cuck
Missing out on true gems based on pretentious ppls opinions
It looks harmless.
Probably would be quite a fun watch, I think there will likely be some uite funny/charming moments, but eh, looks average overall based on the trailers.
Not a huge fan of Mcarthy's "I'm normal but kinda fun and crazy" humour but she's okay I guess.
>>71828181
James Rolfe instantly became based as fuck when he said he wasn't going to see the movie and triggered the fuck out of feminists and nu-males.
>>71841772
>6.5/10
good lord, its borderline terrible
>>71843316
>buzzfeed
>top critic
What. The. Fuck.
Hollywood execs know exactly how to play the brain dead liberal SJW crowd and get them all worked up.
wasn't it just a decade ago these SJWs and Feminists were fighting AGAINST corporate greed and hollywood CEOs?
Now liberals are being used by Hollywood to pan their shitty movies... and the liberals have no self awareness that they're being used.
>>71845725
Does Breitbart or one of its cousins have a "top" critic?
>>71844432
>>71827277
>>71827293
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/
>>71845889
>Now liberals are being used by Hollywood to pan their shitty movies... and the liberals have no self awareness that they're being used.
LOOK AT ME! I'MMA NERD!!! LOL
>>71841779
/tv/ BTFO Count:
18,788,032,621,917,430,882,004,731
>>71846026
That picture is how I imagine the entire ghostbusters theater will look like next week.
>>71845973
God damnit. Is this shit actually good then?
>>71846923
No, check the top critics score.
How does it feel, guys?
We already won.
https://youtu.be/is31GGfhz8o
>>71829111
RAARRR MOLLY MAD! MOLLY SMASH PATRIARCHY! PATRIARCHY HURT MOLLY!
people are still afraid of giving it a bad score, wait a year or two and it will go down to at least 50%
>>71829387
I'll leave it at this
Women and fun are two words that don't correlate, unless for sex.
>>71847048
絶対ブスだよ
