[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
/lbg/ - poll results edition
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 44
File: cringe.png (3 MB, 1400x3200) Image search: [Google]
cringe.png
3 MB, 1400x3200
you guys have awful taste

raw results to come
>>
Official /lbg/ Shitposters to Avoid, 2016 Edition:

dropout_bear
jackieray
link_gorro
lozjudai
machill54
nosaj
smoothhands
steakbro
CobraRocky
Sheepsterp
Synt
myrmician
m_obvs
rostova/
steakbro/
coryburning/
nuts/
belisarius/
sjutten/
bvgf/
mollykins/
kirbytalksfilm/
>>
>>71778035
Literally who are the faggots that have that imdb-core taste on /lbg/ ffs
>>
File: 082.gif (173 KB, 600x630) Image search: [Google]
082.gif
173 KB, 600x630
>top director: Stanley Kubrick
>>
>>71778035
>you guys have awful taste
'no'
>>
>>71778035
Heeeey thats pretty good
>>
>>71778035
>PTAfags

dropped
>>
>>71778035
Wow that is utter shite
Do another one but this time add all the usernames under the choices so we know who is a ducking pleb cunt
>>
>>71778132
If you're an imdb voter.
>>
>>71778055
Daily reminder this fake list was made by one of these people:

dropout_bear
jackieray
link_gorro
lozjudai
machill54
nosaj
smoothhands
steakbro

The original list had these people on it and one of them got assblasted and added more people to make themselves look better.
>>
327 movies were voted for in total

unfortunately when there's this much variety, shit rises to the top

http://pastebin.com/TdsCBnsz
>>
better than i expected desu
>>
>OH MY GOD THOSE FILMS ARE ALL KNOWN AND CANONIZED
>AND THESE DIRECTORS UGH ALL THE USUAL BIG GUYS
>FUCKING SHIT, YOU GUYS HAVE AWFUL TASTE
Pathetic.
>>
>>71778035
Think I'm just about done with this general.
>>
File: date.jpg (11 KB, 381x358) Image search: [Google]
date.jpg
11 KB, 381x358
>>71778035
nothing i submitted is on there, which looking at that list I feel is a good thing
>>
>>71778170
>unfortunately when there's this much variety, shit rises to the top
lmao'ing at ur life if u think any of those films is shit

fucking kill yourself pretentious wanker
>>
>>71778170
>shit rises to the top
Glad it didn't happen, then
>>
>>71778170
M8 mumblecore is a genre and a movie , the movie is by tao lin
>>
File: image.jpg (195 KB, 1332x576) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
195 KB, 1332x576
http://letterboxd.com/machill54/

Hate watching stuff on laptop, feel bad for anyone that has to do all their viewing this way.

Alien Zone (great name for a film with zero aliens) had 2 scenes that were fairly effective totalling about 45 seconds of screen time and then a load of shit.

>>71778035
dumb poll for idiots
>>
>>71778235
oh ok
>>
This list isn't disappointing but it feels uninspired

>>71778165
>>71778055
I didn't make either of these lists, little man
>>
First off, stop with IRC shitposting shitposting. It's getting old.

>>71778035
The three votes category makes for a decent watchlist (minus Inherent Vice).
>>
File: filmcore.png (3 MB, 1350x2700) Image search: [Google]
filmcore.png
3 MB, 1350x2700
d-do y-you guys just wanna pretend like these were the results
>>
Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
Armond White
Daniel Kasman
Adam Cook
Eric Hynes
Amy Tuabin
Kent Kones
J. Hoberman
Richard Brody
David Jenkins
Peter Labuza
Jordan Cronk
Matt Prigge
R. Emmett Sweeny
Caklum Marsh
Miriam Bale
Genevieve Yue
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Dave Kehr
Scott Trafoya
Scott Foundas
Matt Zoller Seitz
Ben Sachs
Keith Uhlich
Dennis Lim
Jake Cole
Sean Gilman
Glenn Kenny
Michael Sicinski
Zach Lewis
Matt Lynch
Matt Singer
John Lehtonen
Neil Bahadur
Scott Tobias
Ryland Walker Knight
Filipe Furtado
Adrian Martin
Cristina Alvarez-Lopez
Mike D'Angelo
Dan Sallitt
Vadim Rizov
Fernando F Crocoe
David Bordwell
Kristin Thompson
Tag Gallagher
Nicole Brenez
Michael Koresky
-nosaj
>>
>>71778251
RWYW
>>
>>71778235
LMAO at this fucking OP. I hope you all realize that the person behind this poll is a complete imbecilic pretentious embryo.
>>
I'm represented on this list by one of the directors I chose a film by.

This list is embarrassing.
>>
>>71778296
kill yourself nosaj
-everyone
>>
>>71778290
No
>>
>tfw a brighter summer day is becoming more recognized
>>
>>71778304
I didn't make the poll pal I'm just letting him not mumble core is a real movie
Calm yourself
>>
>>71778035
TSPD core, not bad but nothing surprising

>>71778055
should add steakbro a third time t b h
>>
Well I don´t know what people were expecting. Of course generally liked things go to the top. It could have been worse since we didn´t have Dark Knights or Pulp Fictions there
>>
>>71778035
HA
HAAHAHAHAHHA
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>71778035
gay af
>>
>>71778343
what did you expect to happen after it got a bluray release from Criterion
>>
>>71778296
If you're going to create a meme list you may as well put king todd on there
>>
File: 0e9.jpg (24 KB, 499x499) Image search: [Google]
0e9.jpg
24 KB, 499x499
>mfw every time someone mentions /lbg/ outside of /lbg/ i'm going to post this chart and make fun of them
>>
>>71778251
what a guy!
>>
>>71778165
Daily reminder that you were so new that you listed other shitposting irc fags as good users and now we actually have comprehensive list of the users ruining this general.

So >>71778055 which one is you?
>>
>>71778418
Because popular film can't be good? Oh well.
>>
>>71778035
the results aren't so bad desu, for all the complaining there's nothing there that you should realistically feel offended by. of course there's going to be kubrick, coppola, scorsese, lynch, kurosawa, ozu, tarvosky, pta etc. they would all be on most credible critics all time lists.
>>
>>71778035
if you filtered out PTA this would be a great list
>>
I suppose the one good thing to come out of this is that the worthlessness of aggregate polls of this type has been reaffirmed in my mind.
>>
>>71778453
The point is it looks like all the other top movies list that literally every publication puts out
Was expecting directors like tsai ming-liang,benning and other lbg favs on the chart instead of just the usual stuff.
There is no /lbg/ define taste or charm on the chart, take the label off and it could be from criterion or sight and sound
>>
>>71778170
lol i was the only one who voted for public enemies
>>
>>71778543
>>71778543
>EXPECTING BENNING TO BE A MAJORITY FAVORITE
Absolyt pretentious twat
>>
>>71778543
because we tend to filter out the basic IMDb bitches that post their profiles here and remember the memorable users

vulgar auteurism is uterally nonexistent here yet everyone talks about it
>>
File: 1385242525394.jpg (16 KB, 402x300) Image search: [Google]
1385242525394.jpg
16 KB, 402x300
>>71778555
Are you me?

Checked.
>>
>>71778170
>only one other person had Wild Strawberries
sad desu
>>
File: favorites.jpg (314 KB, 1167x667) Image search: [Google]
favorites.jpg
314 KB, 1167x667
>>71778579
>>only one other person had Wild Strawberries
That was Stanley Kubrick
>>
File: disappointment.jpg (23 KB, 620x363) Image search: [Google]
disappointment.jpg
23 KB, 620x363
I regret participating,
>>
>>71778543
you won't get people discovering their own taste in these threads, as soon as someone posts a film they've enjoyed/hated you will get typically get backlash if it goes against the grain at all.

someone posted that they didn't enjoy seven samurai not too long ago and they pretty much got chased off /lbg/. reddit is known for its hive minding but it's the exact same behavior in board generals
>>
>>71778559
>pretentious because I assumed the actual /lbg/ '''community''' would vote for more obscure stuff
Nah next time this poll happens only let regulars vote because I'm sure cross posters and randoms decided to weigh in and this made the chart look overwhelmingly generic
>>
>>71778350
Come on, mate. I obviously know you're not OP. I just commented upon your post/info to scorn at the tard.
>>
>>71778621
There wasn't a single Benning movie voted by *anyone*
>>
>>71778636
>>71778621
You should feel pretty embarrassed right now, haha
>>
File: 1467915703624.jpg (6 KB, 150x150) Image search: [Google]
1467915703624.jpg
6 KB, 150x150
>>71778035
pathetic
>>
>>71778621
You've sunk to the fucking meme magic realm lad. Go and find Benning film in a poll like TIFF, S&S or hell, I go even as far and say any director's favorite (those criterion lists)
>>
>>71778686
Disappointed really
>>
File: 1467827967282.jpg (19 KB, 413x395) Image search: [Google]
1467827967282.jpg
19 KB, 413x395
>mfw /lbg/ "patricians" are butthurt
>>
File: lbg reference guide.png (608 KB, 765x1110) Image search: [Google]
lbg reference guide.png
608 KB, 765x1110
if your name is in black just go ahead and off yourself
>>
>>71778575
great taste anon. now that im thinking i did change my Mann pick
>>
>>71778192
This
>>
>>71778705
It's not about the films being chosen being critically acclaimed it'd about the chart being generic in the sense that the same movies get mentioned everytime, that's my beef with it.
That might be because these movies are great but I refuse to believe everyone in this general has the same taste as reddit,criterion and so on
>>
Pretentious /tv/ snobs rating and ranking films baka...

No great film is better or worse than another great film. Comparing Kubrick's work with Lynch's work won't get anyone anywhere. Both made excellent, but different films and both have long living legacies. Both pioneered different aspects of film making. Putting a number, a tier, or a ranking on these movies does no justice.

Instead of talking about which movie better. Let's talk about the damn movies!
>>
>>71778794
If you make a collected list of directors' favorites that they've given to Criterion (only source that collects these that I know of) it would be pretty popular to any S&S, Tiff etc. list. Hell if you refute this my autism just might be strong enough to go and make bullshit chart with their combined votes.

You've sank to meme magic realm. Out of touch. Get back to reality. Don't let your memes be your life
>>
Public Enemies fucking sucks
>>
>>71778794
>I refuse to believe everyone in this general has the same taste as reddit,criterion and so on
Why, though? The more people, the more the obvious choices will rise to the top. And I don't see no problem with that.
>>
File: 1426947689582.jpg (118 KB, 900x675) Image search: [Google]
1426947689582.jpg
118 KB, 900x675
>>71778035
>/lbg/ confirmed embryo taste
lmao
>>
File: file.png (24 KB, 376x76) Image search: [Google]
file.png
24 KB, 376x76
HaHa!
>>
>>71778841
t. someone whose taste matches the list
>>
>>71778837
My point is that this chart lacks /lbg/ flair and is no way representative of the community on /TV/'s taste.
Talk to the regulars on irc and ask for their top ten and you'll actually get a unique chart
>>
>>71778841
>*Michael Mann* fucking sucks.

ftfy
>>
>>71778802
No. As a great film is better than a good one, and a good one one is better than a mediocre one, and a mediocre one one is better than a bad one, and a bad one is better than a terrible one, and a masterpiece is better than them all, every given two or more things are apt to comparison and judgement of better or worse. This doesn't detract from their value by themselves in any quality realm, or invalidates discussion and analysis.
Therefore, gay post yours.
>>
>>71778935
You realize that not everyone is part of that circlejerk right?
>>
>>71778192
Yeah, almost as sad as the sperg assault two threads ago
>>
>>71778935
>representative of the community on /TV/'s taste
It has The Thing in it. That tells something right?
>>
>>71778935
>Talk to the regulars on irc
I don't communicate in memes, so I'm not sure how I would do that.
>>
>>71778975
This is a shit faulty analogy as the films are different. X is great film about Y, while B is good film about Z and are barely comparable.

You don't compare Benning film to Bay film.
>>
>>71778035
I thought we told you not to fucking count steakfaggot's votes
>>
File: haha.gif (871 KB, 245x230) Image search: [Google]
haha.gif
871 KB, 245x230
>>71778730
i have friends who couldn't tell you a single directors name who have seen more than 1000 films, i would be embarrassed to show my face on this board if i was those guys
>>
I bet some faggots chose more than one film per director.

>all I know is Kubrick and PTA

cf. the list
>>
You people should realize that any- ANY-(ANY) result would be criticized, laughed at, called shit. This one is fine, but it would have been better if OP wasn't a lazy nigger and had made a chart with all the films voted, including pictures for better reference, doesn't matter how big.
>>
>>71779079
>OP wasn't a lazy nigger and had made a chart with all the films voted, including pictures for better reference, doesn't matter how big
Are you retarded? you want me to make a chart with 327 films and pictures listed?
>>
>>71779018
this is why i don't rate movies

one of the most useful things about ratings is that you can compare them to other ratings, but not a lot of movies are directly comparable
>>
>>71779079
I like this idea. Put usernames under it as well
>>
>>71779018
Yes, I do. And so can anyone interested in doing such, contrary to killing the exercise beforehand as stupid or unnecessary.
It's a 'shit faulty analogy' because of your low cinematic capabilities.
>>
>>71779079
>You people should realize that any- ANY-(ANY) result would be criticized, laughed at, called shit.
we will never know, because the actual result IS 100% embryo-tier, we're not joking.
>>
>>71779098
Obviously yes.
>>
>>71779121
>we're not joking.
where's that poster about ircfaggot samefaggot kill yourself when you need him

There's no fucking *we* here, redditor
>>
>>71779143
Here are all the votes: >>71778170

go ahead and do it yourself
>>
File: 1468015137297[1].jpg (1 MB, 1400x3200) Image search: [Google]
1468015137297[1].jpg
1 MB, 1400x3200
>>71778035
Green = Patrician taste
Yellow = Acceptable/Mainstream answer
Red = Completely pleb and/or pretentious pile of shit
Pink = faggot
>>
>>71779108
Nah, everything is comparable.
>>
>>71779209
filtered
>>
>>71779209
lol this chart is going to start attracting non-/lbg/ embryos to start posting in these threads
>>
>>71779211
Nobody is denying that, but not every comparison makes sense.
>>
>>71779209
>tripfag and his shit opinions
I pass
>>
>>71779209
>late spring
>pleb or pretentious
now I've seen everything
>>
>>71779371
Ozu's failure as an artist is a reflection of the Japanese people as a collective lacking empathy and conception of the numinous. His films lack 'that spark of emotive connection' because his people lack the internal awareness and emotional volatility that permit European art to communicate on a more profound and abstract level, just as they lack the ability to relativise their experience of reality. The results – as women are incapable of making art about anything other than their vaginas, so too are the Japs incapable of making art about anything other than being Japs.
>>
How about Eraserhead, lads?
>>
>>71779209
you're the fucking pleb mate
>>
>>71779209
is there actually a tolerable tripfag on /tv/?
>>
Looking for a silver lining, at least Welles, Mizoguchi, Ozu, Vertov and Yang made the list.
>>
>>71779209
kys fammm
>>
>>71779394
stay mad, senpai Ozu+Mizoguchi are the peak of cinema as an art
>>
>>71779572
>so new he doesn't recognize a copypasta from fucking May
>>
>>71778035
I PROPOSE:
Just pick 25 random films regardless of the number of votes
It will be a 1000% more interesting list
>>
>>71779156
>There's no fucking *we* here
spoken like a true 4channer xD
>>
>>71779598
Yeah, I'd seen it before, but it still triggers me
>>
>>71779609
Ok, I put the list into a randomizer. Here are the first 25 it picked:

Michel Strogoff (Viktor Tourjansky, 1926)
Sansho the Bailiff (Kenji Mizoguchi, 1954) [x4]
The Passion of the Christ (Mel Gibson, 2004)
Heat (Michael Mann, 1995)
Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) [x2]
What Time is it There? (Tsai Ming-liang, 2001)
A Separation (Asghar Farhadi, 2011)
Daisies (Věra Chytilová, 1966) [x2]
Repo Man (Alex Cox1984)
Her (Spike Jonze, 2013)
Requiem for a Dream (Darren Aronofsky, 2000)
Mod Fuck Explosion (Jon Moritsugu, 1994)
Three Times (Hou Hsiao-Hsien, 2005)
Marketa Lazarova (František Vláčil, 1967)
Mouchette (Robert Bresson, 1967) [x2]
Yeast (Mary Bronstein, 2008)
Millennium Acress (Satoshi Kon, 2001)
Amarcord (Federico Fellini, 1973)
Window Water Baby Moving (Stan Brakhage, 1959)
Network (Sidney Lumet, 1976)
Eyes Without A Face (Georges Franju, 1960)
Mindgame (Masaaki Yuasa, 2004)
The Shining (Stanley Kubrick, 1980)
Once Upon a Time in America (Sergio Leone, 1984) [x4]
Amadeus (Miloš Forman, 1984) [x2]

better?
>>
File: 1444372438311.jpg (18 KB, 500x501) Image search: [Google]
1444372438311.jpg
18 KB, 500x501
>>71779598
>implying it's not true
>>
>>71779653
a few stinkers but in general YES
>>
>>71779653
Way better, holy fuck
>one of my picks made the list
/luck/
>>
>>71779609
It will be a false thing. More interesting because of being unusual, but that's it.

>>71779673
Name the 'stinkers', btw
>>
someone suggest me more movies to check out for my low budget / high concept list

http://boxd.it/EI3O
>>
>>71779722
The Passion of the Christ (Mel Gibson, 2004)
Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) [x2]
A Separation (Asghar Farhadi, 2011)
Her (Spike Jonze, 2013)
Requiem for a Dream (Darren Aronofsky, 2000)
Millennium Acress (Satoshi Kon, 2001)
Once Upon a Time in America (Sergio Leone, 1984) [x4]
>>
>>71779722
Her and Requiem for a Dream
>>
>>71779722
Not him but Requiem,heat,her and the shining
Although the shining isn't bad just not Kubrick's best
>>
>>71779743
Ayyyyo, plebbit hows it goin?
>>
>>71779767
can you go away? you clearly don't belong here
>>
>>71779763
Heat is a masterpiece
>>71779743
A Separation is a masterpiece
>>
>>71779743
>>71779752
>>71779763
wew lads
>>
>>71779798
>Heat is a masterpiece
bad form, it's Mann's most overrated film
>>
>>71779825
saw it yesterday, blew me away
everything that is good about crime cinema
>>
Heat is garbage.
>>
>>71779825
It's not a masterpiece and it is his most overrated film, true. But it's still excellent and in his top 5.
>>
>>71779899
This is the extent of most of /tv/'s ability to pan films. Embarrassing.
>>
>>71779209
Kill yourself
>>
>>71778163
most of those movies are not in imdb's top 250
>>
>>71778035
Uh this is a great list of films? What is everyone's problem jesus christ
>>
>>71780196
post your letterboxd account
>>
>>71779971
nah. Mann's top five is
<Miami Vice
>The Insider
>Thief
>Manhunter
>Ali
>>
>>71780196
its fuccin basicc
>>
>>71778730
u think u sump'n special brah say sump'n *push* say sump'n *shove* yea thot so.
>>
>>71779394
What the fuck does this even mean?
>>
>>71780234
>no last of the mohicans
>>
>>71778035
>12/27 are black and white
pretentious as hell
>>
>>71779598
>copypasta
>implying it isn't true
>>
>>71780234
>Ali
>>
>>71780342
what is pretentious about black and white? hopefully you're """pretending""" to be retarded
>>
>>71780264
I swear to god any result of the list will be shit on one way or another, this list is actually decent.
>>
>>71780341
it's his most Hollywood film. essentially feels like it was made for the opportunity to further his career.

>>71780359
one of the best "biopics" ever filmed.
>>
>>71780342
Pretentious is a meaningless buzzword used by plebs, like yourself
>>
>>71780390
this
>>
>>71780381
Collateral feels like his most hollywood, and probably his most overrated
>>
>>71780342
are some colors more pretentious than others?
>>
>>71780412
Collateral only gives in to conventional filmmaking in the last fifteen or twenty minutes - the film should have ended with Vincent running away after the car crash. having the character of the lawyer return and the entire chase sequence was unfortunate and unnecessary, but up to that point it's very good.
>>
newfig here
why ppl hate the following directors?

kubrick
PTA
mann
tarkovsky
>>
>>71780512
its a meme. all of them are good.
>>
>>71780512
it's really more of a shitting on what's popular rather than dislike. Are you new to 4chan or the internet in general?
>>
>>71780512
also teenagers form their identity around shit that they like and other teenagers know that shitting on what they like is a way of shitting on them.
>>
>>71780512
basicc af
>>
>8 votes

bring back letterboxd class of 2013
>>
File: Capture.png (662 KB, 677x599) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
662 KB, 677x599
http://letterboxd.com/evolution_rex/
>>71778035
I'm surprised, this is barely above my taste.
>>71778192
this is a true statement.
>>71778730
No
>>
File: 1441029318932.jpg (762 KB, 1958x2937) Image search: [Google]
1441029318932.jpg
762 KB, 1958x2937
>>71780234
>no blackhat or PE
>>
>>71780512
I never really understood the praise for Mann. He makes decent films but nothing really stands out.
>>
>>71780760
It's a meme forced by steakbro and Nosaj.
>>
>>71780751
Blackhat could be better than Manhunter. i just really like William Petersen's performance and the cold, geometrical shot construction in Manhunter.

still waiting on a Public Enemies rewatch.
>>
>>71780796
Reminder that I will fricken k*ll you if you continue to post at nosaj the way that you are posting at nosaj.
>>
>>71780810
manhunter is great, just dont understand your love for the insider
>>
>>71780751
Blackhat is fucking garbage whoever made the casting and allowed that garbage of a script to go through should get fucking executed
>>
The Insider is Mann's masterpiece. Pity that still so few people have opened their eyes to that.
>>
>>71780865
it's Mann's best character-driven work. essentially Heat without the need for showy gunfights to keep the audience interested.

>>71780967
have you considered not being so angry all the time
>>
File: 1467503780638.jpg (121 KB, 444x460) Image search: [Google]
1467503780638.jpg
121 KB, 444x460
>>71778035
Lawrence of Arabia is literally romanticizing the British permanently fucking up and radicalizing the Middle East with a bunch of crazy sand nigs from the more Western cultured Ottomans. It's probably the worst thing the British did in WWI, pretty disgusting.
>>
>>71781078
on point
the movie is visually appealing, but the message is pretty problematic
>>
>>71781078
>>71781150
Ugh, too true. I can't even grasp why a film like that is allowed to be exhibited or even purchased in 2016.
>>
>>71780512
Everything but PTA is a meme
People hate PTA because he's overrated and his movies are hit or miss
>>
>>71778035
>Touch of Evil (Orson Welles, 1958) [x2]
>The Touch of Evil (Orson Welles, 1958) [x2]
you should probably fix this
>>
>>71781322
I'll do it on a letterboxd list. hold up familia
>>
>>71781291
bad post
>>
>>71781291
bad post
>>
>>71781322
>>71781336
Thanks. the actual count is three votes for Touch of Evil which means it should be on the chart, but the vote count as director is correct.
>>
>>71781023
Its a bit too oscarbaity for me. Looks good thou
>>
>>71778035
Yikes

This is why i'm moving to /advanced/
>>
>>71781838
Be more than welcome to stay on that garbage general
>>
File: 2111.jpg (947 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
2111.jpg
947 KB, 1920x1080
>>71781502
What if they're different versions of ToE they rated? HMM?
>>
>>71781863
At least their favorite movie isn't a Coppola flick ROFL
>>
>>71781881
Epic, retard
>>
>>71781838
Bye :)
>>
File: image.png (2 MB, 1292x1184) Image search: [Google]
image.png
2 MB, 1292x1184
http://letterboxd.com/bvgf
>>
>>71781838
Bye :)
>>
>>71780725
>the leafy trap of evolution_rex
>>
File: lb.png (709 KB, 653x593) Image search: [Google]
lb.png
709 KB, 653x593
https://letterboxd.com/sk00/
>>
>>71781078
t. Turkroach
>>
>>71778035
>the cranes are flying and inherent vice has the same amount of votes as 8 1/2, Eyes Wide Shut, A Brighter Summers Day, The Mirror, Barry Lyndon, Eraserhead, Man With a Movie Camera, Citizen Kane, and Late Spring.

Pretty good besides that tbqh.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTJvdGcb7Fs
>>
>>71783110
The cranes are flying is good tho
>>
Film Analysis 101-tier
>>
>>71783110
Inherent vice is good tho
>>
>>71781881
>Apocalypse Now
>bad

Good riddance.
>>
>>71783152
>>>/advanced/
Bye :)
>>
>>71783152
So?
>>
>>71783143
>>71783160
Yeah there both pretty good but there nowhere near as good as the other films.
>>
>>71780512
they are just average

only an embryo would think they're super good
>>
>>71783202
That's a point

>>71783614
None of them are 'average', homo embrius.
And Kubrick and Tarkovsky are top 20 directors.
>>
File: 1468006469360.jpg (232 KB, 554x548) Image search: [Google]
1468006469360.jpg
232 KB, 554x548
>>71783684
>Kubrick and Tarkovsky are top 20 directors
>>
File: 1468006469360.png (543 KB, 554x548) Image search: [Google]
1468006469360.png
543 KB, 554x548
>>71783684
>Kubrick and Tarkovsky are top 20 directors
>>
File: 1465678409730.jpg (112 KB, 900x900) Image search: [Google]
1465678409730.jpg
112 KB, 900x900
>Kubrick and Tarkovsky are top 20 directors
>>
File: 1465678409730.png (1 MB, 900x900) Image search: [Google]
1465678409730.png
1 MB, 900x900
>Kubrick and Tarkovsky are top 20 directors
>>
>>71784243

Why masturbate in such an exaggerated way.
>>
https://letterboxd.com/m_obvs/list/lbg-s-favorite-movies/

Had to fix Touch of Evil, Rocky, and Taxi Driver. Removed "Tríptico Elemental de España" because it's a compilation.
>>
>>71784380
because it helps me masturbate
>>
>>71784380
And why not? Sometimes you gotta go the deep end

>>71784414
Nice work, mate
>>
>>71783614
Tarkovsky is the best though
>>71783684
Yes top 20; Tarkovsky is number 1 and Kubrick is number 20
>>
>>71784809
SAUCE
A
U
C
E
>>
>>71778035

>the god father

into the trash
>>
>>71780359
His first great film.
>>
>>71778730
>tfw you finally make it onto one of these charts
>>
>>71785049
what's wrong with its face
>>
>>71785094
FUCK OFF
>>
>>71785094
im not kissing it
>>
>>71778035
>>
>>71785331
fixed that also >>71784414
>>
>Rocky in top 100
Honestly, why? What makes it a top 100 film?
>>
>>71785942
you'd have to ask the user who put it in their top 10 list
>>
>>71778035

Babbys first film the list.
>>
>>71785982
rude
>>
>>71785942
heh, i voted that one in myself
just a real personal favorite movie. that and the ten commandments (both) made me like film
>>
>>71781291
bad post
>>
>>71784414
I like this list because it shows the variety of films voted for, unlike the one in OP.
>>
>>71778035
anybody who expected any result different from this is stupid
popular things get to the top when you do stats on a large group of people, that's not surprising at all
>>
>>71780512
>>71780539
>>71780557
>>71780594
>>71781381
>>71781433
>>71786086
>>71783684
I spend a lot of time on this board and I remain consistent in my negative opinion of Paul Thomas Anderson. That's all there is to it. I am no "troll", I am not "tricking" anybody. I just dislike your favorite director and apparently that gives you hurt feelings. If you don't like my opinions then you're free to dismiss them. I will however not stop posting them as they are my authentic opinions. If any poster here turns a blind eye to people wrongfully praising an undeserving director and lets the inauthentic discussion go on undisturbed then they are inauthentic about film. It's as simple as that.

If everyone stays out of threads pertaining to media they don't enjoy and only discusses directors their like then this place becomes a circle jerk. If you want to praise PTA in peace then you're on the wrong website. This isn't some "good times cinema talk" forum. This is a battleground. Authentic thought vs inauthentic thought. Art vs entertainment. Neurotypicalism vs Autism. PTA and his disciples are my enemies and I will continue to fight. Call my battle strategies ineffectual, ignorant and misguided if you wish, but you will never take away my right to voice my opinions. You're not downvoting anybody into silence here.
>>
Are we going to migrate to Cinemos when it's up?
>>
File: chill man.jpg (60 KB, 500x444) Image search: [Google]
chill man.jpg
60 KB, 500x444
>>71786421
>This is a battleground. Authentic thought vs inauthentic thought. Art vs entertainment. Neurotypicalism vs Autism. PTA and his disciples are my enemies and I will continue to fight.
is this what autism sounds like
>>
>>71786421
fwiw, i agree with you
>>
File: 9280318[1].png (29 KB, 633x758) Image search: [Google]
9280318[1].png
29 KB, 633x758
>>71786421
>korinefag will never come back
>>
how to make a chart like the one in OP?
photoshop? what size to make the square
>>
>>71786421
never go full autism
>>
>>71786905
>how to make a chart like the one in OP?
i used paint

>what size to make the square
it isnt a square
>>
>>71786905
Make a list on letterboxd/mubi/wherever and then screencap it. It's much easier and everything will be aesthetically pleasing.
>>
File: Screenshot_99.png (165 KB, 699x315) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_99.png
165 KB, 699x315
Has this happened to any of you? I'm obsessed with this fucking movie lads
>>
File: Screenshot_100.png (81 KB, 234x260) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_100.png
81 KB, 234x260
>>71788046
also relevant
>>
>>71786421
You are the worst person I've ever made
>>
>>71788046
south park b.l.u. and that's it
>>
>>71787115
but how did you keep the film stills in high quality
thanks
what size did you make the template
>>
>>71778035
Holy reddit

>I voted on this list
>>
>>71786421
I understand hating the master and inherent vice, but did you really hate there will be blood?
>>
>>71788404
pls rrespond
>>
>>71788882
>I understand hating the master
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
>>
>>71788888
>>
>>71788882
It's hard to hate that movie, but it doesn't have a lot going for it from a non-technical standpoint
>>
>>71788888
i just copied google images thumbnails because they're good size and quality

image size should be displayed there on desktop 4chan
>>
Bunp
>>
>>71778035
>pretending to like persona

hahahahaha
>>
>>71790529
i liked persona
>>
>>71778035
What does /lbg/ mean? Lesbian, Bisexual, Gay?
>>
did this film invent cross-cutting?
>>
File: ilymbg.jpg (811 KB, 1024x736) Image search: [Google]
ilymbg.jpg
811 KB, 1024x736
>>71790705
likes big guys
>>
File: ss (2016-07-09 at 09.59.30).png (132 KB, 511x735) Image search: [Google]
ss (2016-07-09 at 09.59.30).png
132 KB, 511x735
He's right you know.
>>
>>71791302
That's not even the first time Vertov did it
>>
>>71792236
i'm pretty woefully uneducated about the history of film. it's interesting to see how much older most editing techniques are than the average person would think.
>>
tfw going to see neon demon too day

excited
>>
File: recent.jpg (47 KB, 644x282) Image search: [Google]
recent.jpg
47 KB, 644x282
who was asking about musicals yesterday?

Whoever you are add 'The Lure' to your watchlist.
>>
>>71792979
Musicals, aye?
Let's make a list!
>>
How can you tell when a film has good editing?
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 44

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.