Reminder to participate in the LBG top films poll
you can either (1) reply to me with your profile and I'll count your favorites (2) reply to me with a published list on your profile of your top 10 films or (3) use this google docs form (requires sign in):
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1RVr10EbObIqg-6kzKf7NL9CM9Dp2mlNPYsYBq2qIcaM/viewform
either way each film you submit will get one (1) point.
Just wondering but what is the deadline?already submitted just wanna know when will we see the "results"
But I don't have an account...
>>71641559
depends. if in four days no one there are still people submitting ballots then i'll keep it up. if not, i'll release the results.
>>71641581
imdb/rym/mubi/criticker works too
>>71641462
My favourites are
Drive
The Dark Knight
The Dark Knight Rises
Problem Child 2
Interstellar
my account is letterboxd.com/bel, thanks
>>71641604
*if in four days there are still people
I predict embarrassing results
>>71641697
submit yours so they're less embarrassing
>>71642167
Statistically speaking, things don't work that way
>>71642197
oh man I can't wait to check out Modern Romance soon. heard great things for years.
Am I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real person
Am I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real person
Am I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real person
Good one, bunny guy
Am I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real personAm I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real personAm I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real personAm I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real person
Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)02:17:54 No.71642476 ▶
Am I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real person
Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)02:17:54 No.71642476 ▶
Am I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real person
Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)02:17:54 No.71642476 ▶
Am I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real person
>>71642359
It's perfect
a brighter summer day is in first place right now
Great thread fellas!
>>71641462
>>71642828
add this
Nostos
Sans Soleil
Tríptico Elemental de España
La Chute de la Maison Usher (Epstein)
Man With a Movie Camera
Anticipation of the Night
Zerkalo
Water and Power
Un Homme Qui Dort
The Color of Pomegranates
>>71642876
Account?
>>71642891
kailasha
Am I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real personAm I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real person
Am I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real person
holy shit
you guys are autistic
>>71642940
im wary of counting triptico as one film but ok
sans soleil and a brighter summer day are tied now
>>71643153
how many entries do you have already?
>>71643182
seven legit ones + one joke
Am I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real personAm I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real personAm I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real person
Am I right in assuming that "StakekDude" is not a real person
>>71643202
Good thing you are the judge of the thing and your wiseness shall show the truth
>>71643323
I'm releasing the raw votes when it's done
post yfw >big Al Weerasethakul
Is this kino?
>>71643548
>Big Al Weerasethakul
>>71643202
did you count Story of Film an Odyssey as an one film?because if you didn´t A) fuck you and B) put Millennium Actress there instead
/lozjudai
>>71643663
nosaj
wasnt a guess
>>71643663
Wanna more recent pic of me? Also post your face :3
>>71643663
Juho Liposuction
>>71643741
fucking sony
>>71643663
A young Paul Dano
Reminder that I will fricken k*ll you if you continue to post at nosaj the way that you are posting at nosaj.
>>71643741
L M A O
>>71643740
it aint mestarts playing
>>71643741
rate my facial aesthetics
>>71641462
Please add these:
Cannibal Holocaust (1979)
Cannibal Ferox (1981)
The Mountain of the Cannibal God (1978)
Eaten Alive! (1980)
Jungle Holocaust (1977)
The Man from the Deep River (1972)
The Cannibals (1980)
Cannibal Apocalypse (1980)
Papaya: Love Goddess Of The Cannibals (1978)
Ultimo Mondo Cannibale (1977)
Emanuelle And The Last Cannibals (1977)
>>71643946
Account?
>>71643963It's a joke.
>>71643946
You like eating real human beans?
>>71641462
Quei loro incontri (Jean-Marie Straub and Danièle Huillet, 2006)
Je vous salue Marie (Jean-Luc Godard, 1985)
Stray Dogs (Tsai Ming-liang, 2013)
In Vanda’s Room (Pedro Costa, 2001)
7 Women (John Ford, 1966)
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (Tobe Hooper, 1974)
Peggy Sue Got Married (Francis Ford Coppola, 1986)
The Taking of Pelham 123 (Tony Scott, 2009)
They Live By Night (Nicholas Ray, 1948)
Rio Bravo (Howard Hawks, 1959)
/nosaj
>>71644082
>The Taking of Pelham 123 (Tony Scott, 2009)
>>71644112
>game of thrones
>>71644028
Yes.
>>71644112
>t. reddit
>>71644112
>/got/fag
>expects to be taken seriously
>>71644171
>>71644188
>>71644149
>The Taking of Pelham 123 (Tony Scott, 2009)
http://letterboxd.com/bvgf/
>>71644233
>>71644233
>/got/fag
>expects to be taken seriously
>>71644282
>>71644248
>The Taking of Pelham 123 (Tony Scott, 2009)
>>71643741
nigga you look punchable
>>71643741
Who is this meant to be?
1. Drive (2011)
2. Drive (2011)
3. Drive (2011)
4. Drive (2011)
5. Drive (2011)
6. Drive (2011)
7. Drive (2011)
8. Drive (2011)
9. Drive (2011)
10. Rocky (1976)
>>71644315
>/got/fag
>expects to be taken seriously
>>71644344
>>71644422
nicedubn
>>71644149
>>71644171
>>71644188
>>71644344
>>71644412
>>71644422
>vulgautists to the rescue
>>71644472
>/got/fag
>expects to be taken seriously
>>71644344
>>71644412
>>71644422
>The Taking of Pelham 123 (Tony Scott, 2009)
>>71644513
>twittermemefag
>expects to be taken seriously
>>71644513
dumb ghettoposter
http://letterboxd.com/steakbro/
>>71642731
probably
Are there really people who think Scott's Pelham is better? Wew
>>71644577
who the fuck names themself steakbro
>>71644589
>/got/fag
>expects to be taken seriously
>>71644549
>>71644543
>The Taking of Pelham 123 (Tony Scott, 2009)
>>71644658
>2012memefag
>expects to be taken seriously
>>71644682
>The Taking of Pelham 123 (Tony Scott, 2009)
>>71644650
Come on, without autism
>>71643741
He has a gf and you don't. What is your excuse?
you post a list, go for a shit and then come back to this
>>71644781
Because girls are only in the way when you start to fuck like men.
>>71644781
Sir, excuse for what, sir?
>>71644722
>memefag
>expects to be taken seriously
>>71645003
>va memer
>having the audacity to call other people memers
>>71645178
>>>/vautism/
https://letterboxd.com/film/out-for-a-kill/
>An unsuspecting university professor is an unwitting accomplice in a foiled Chinese cocaine deal. Wrongly imprisoned, he escapes to take his revenge and prove his innocence.
>>71641462
Goodbye, Gyulsary! (1968, Sergei Urusevsky)
Yanco (1961, Servando González)
Khrustalyov, My Car! (1998, Aleksey German)
Qivitoq (1956, Erik Balling)
A Man There Was (1917, Victor Sjöström)
Falling Leaves (1966, Otar Iosseliani)
Tundra (2007, Carlos Casas)
My Friend Ivan Lapshin (1985, Aleksey German)
Mother Dao, the Turtlelike (1995, Vincent Monnikendam)
Erotikon (1920, Mauritz Stiller)
/theine
>>71645219
And those are your favorite 10 films?
hmmmmmmm
I haven't been writing reviews or watching premium kino this summer. Sorry, bros.
Also, how was the reaction to the "pronouns" feature? I'm definitely moving to Cinemos if they're going to make me a part of their Tumblr propaganda. The site was already inclusive and used "they/their" without problems.
There's like literally 3 movies that have more than 1 vote right now
>>71645251
..yes?
>>71645219
Picture of you
>>71645268
We don't have to make it a top ten. It can be a general favorites list
https://letterboxd.com/sk00/
Decided to start working my way through some Wong Kar-Wai.
>>71645259
That was/is a complete disgusting shitfest. Most of the cucks on /lbg/ don't mind it much, though
>>71641462
The Devil (1972) (A. Zulawski)
Somewhere (2010) (S. Coppola)
The Master (2012) (P.T. Anderson)
The Face of Another (1968) (H. Teshigahara)
Two-Lane Blacktop (1971) (M. Hellman)
Distant (2002) (N.B. Ceylan)
Nashville (1970) (R. Altman)
Days of Heaven (1972) (T. Malick)
The Conformist (1970) (B. Bertolucci)
The Apartment (1960) (B. Wilder)
>>71645505
account?
>>71645570
http://letterboxd.com/Redwell/
RIP KIAROSTAMI
https://letterboxd.com/samturret/
r8 but no h8
>>71645064
>memer
>opposed to memes
>expects to be taken seriously
who said they wanted to be added?
>>71646312
https://www.autismspeaks.org/what-autism/world-autism-awareness-day
>>71646062
>no h8
>/lbg/
Good luck
>>71646312
lmao new-fag
"yikes" isn't related to the number of films watched
>>71646312
the fuck does yikes even mean, there shouldnt even be a yikes/god shit, this is lame mate
>>71644384
Lozjudai
>big al weerasethakul
>>71647113
Abdullah, pls
What are some kino television shows that i should download from BTN?
Why is THE REVANANT so good guys
its like a john ford film where everything went wronf
>>71647677
https://broadcasthe.net/torrents.php?id=79367&torrentid=116543
>>71641462
http://letterboxd.com/ay496/
voted on the doc, but my 10 are:
PlayTime (Tati)
Late Spring (Ozu)
A Brighter Summer Day (Yang)
Three Times (Hou)
Sansho the Bailiff (Mizoguchi)
Ordet (Dreyer)
Duck Soup (McCarey)
Tropical Malady (Weerasethakul)
Close-Up (Kiarostami)
The Rules of the Game (Renoir)
Really sad about Kiarostami's passing, surprised its not being talked about anywhere here (but probably shouldn't be)
>>71648353
Pretty rude, friend
I'm confused about the amount of 'films watched' on Letterboxd. Are you meant to add the films that you've watched since joining the site, or add all the films you've ever seen?
![Happy.Together.1997.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-WiKi.mkv_snapshot_00.04.29_[2016.07.02_21.43.51].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/9kP9ZrH.jpg "Happy.Together.1997.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-WiKi.mkv_snapshot_00.04.29_[2016.07.02_21.43.51].jpg")
>>71649204
up to you
when i started my account i added everything i could think of that i had seen, but now i sort of wish i had just added stuff as i watched it
>>71646312
Where's machill?
>>71649204
I just added the stuff where I could actually remember at least parts of what happened, and where I remembered if I enjoyed it or not.
>>71647686
Lubezki
>>71649204
If I've seen it I mark it as watched. Usually when going through lists.
Who are the retards saying "/tv/ was always like this"? Redditors who've been hear a couple years? Even then the quality had a taken a nosedive just within the past few months. "It's the shit we live in, that's why you're addicted". Wrong. I post in /lbg/ and only check the rest of the board about once a day anymore when I used to spend hours
Good night /lbg/!
How do you pronounce "machill54"? I say "muh-kill fifty four". It's not muh-chill is it? That's not as smooth
>>71649658
muh shill fifty for
http://letterboxd.com/abbyzowabby/ pls rec me some less shit taste
>>71649204
if you dont add every movie you ever watched in your whole life, autists will condescend you for not having watched as many movies as them
>>71647686
it's not
it's pretentious but in the actual sense of the word and not the reddit sense
like saying
>Malick is pretentious muh grass muh God
is reddit, but
>Innaritu makes shallow movies with epic cinematography and faux depth and can only reach for cynicism as a result of having nothing genuinely thematic to speak of as an artist apart from topical garbage
is how pretentious actually makes sense
>>71646312
3000+ yikes :)
>>71650022
Agreed. I feel similarly about Villeneuve, especially with Prisoners. THATS the real definition of pretentious, not films that are less accessible or unconventional. I find almost zero films pretentious, because most directors film with sincerity. It's the ones that only pretend to be deep that are offensive. They don't have anything to say, but they sure do their best to make people think they do
>mfw can't watch any movie until I buy a new hard drive
what are some good short films on YouTube for this feel?
![Happy.Together.1997.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-WiKi.mkv_snapshot_00.17.58_[2016.07.02_22.06.06].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/bL7LR7I.jpg "Happy.Together.1997.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-WiKi.mkv_snapshot_00.17.58_[2016.07.02_22.06.06].jpg")
>>71650126
where did the idea that PRISONERS is attempting to be deep or thoughtful come from? it never really struck me as anything other than a well-paced thriller.
>>71650022
Your post is the definition of pretentious.
>>71650126
>iniarritu
>nothing to say
I hate to play this card, but you're probably a moron that simply didn't get it.
>>71650022
watch more movies from Iñarritu, the themes on The Revenant are really coherent with his filmography
>>71650195
I felt it was completely bogged down by a) pointless symbolism and b) scenes of "emotional intensity" that served to move the viewer, yet had inadequate set up, acting, and impact as a result. It completely lacked nuance, and, as such, made scenes of emotional breakdown or morally ambiguous torture seem like concepts weakly strung together; pieces of emotion meant to affect the audience, even though they didn't smoothly fit and the story was not there in a deep or thoughtful or even subtle sense
>>71650195
Happy Together was filmed in Argentina, right?
>>71649924
....p-pls.....
![Happy.Together.1997.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-WiKi.mkv_snapshot_00.49.25_[2016.07.02_22.57.53].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/wvQgf4w.jpg "Happy.Together.1997.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-WiKi.mkv_snapshot_00.49.25_[2016.07.02_22.57.53].jpg")
>>71650532
yes
>>71650507
when you talk about symbolism, you're talking about the snakes and mazes, right? think i talked to you about this in another thread. imo, neither was intended to represent or imply anything, but were pretty simply just clues to the identity of the killer. as far as your other point, i thought that the performances, particularly Jackman's, were quite good.
>>71650661
That's a fair point about snakes and mazes. I disagree about performances, I found only Jake and Paul to be very good. I do need to rewatch it though, the first time was with friends and they massively hyped it and I ended up disappointed. It's hard though, because I do disagree about pacing; the "bogged down" made it feel so long. At one point I thought surely it was over, but there was still an hour left. It was too small a story stretched over too long a runtime.
>>71650251
the revenant has one of the weakest scripts i've ever seen and Innaritu adds nothing but time and padding with the direction
>dude dead wife lmao
>dude revenge is meaningless lmao
>dude the racism on the american frontier was bad lmao
it's cringeworthy, and also by far the worst Lubezki I've ever seen. He keeps panning around during actions sequences like its a fucking video game instead of being cinematic. Children of Men is how to properly do long takes, not the opening attack in the Revenant. Cuaron is leages ahead of Innaritu
>>71645930
Oh fuck it's true:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-36709240
>>71650971
>film is a narrative plot-driven medium
Next you're gonna say Vertov, Marker, Benning, Brakhage, Reggio, and Jarman are all "DUDE MEMES LMAO WERE DA SCRIPTZ NIGGA"?
Get some fucking taste.
>>71650638
you said you don't even like movies you fag
>>71651274
......? I said I hadn't watched that many yet? I do like them, I just usually don't have the time/ attention span for them. I'm trying to get into them now, that's why I'm here. jesus christ dude.
How do I get the motivation to watch movies back?
>>71648638
It wasn't meant to be,
http://letterboxd.com/Rorscach00/
>>71651090
no you retarded nigger, but Innaritus films have empty visuals even if they're pretty
they require context to have meaning, and Innaritus context is either absent, shallow, or juvenile
Malick is how you make near visual only films with visuals that directly convey emotion and thematic material. Innaritu just cuts to trees and rays of light inbetween epic revenge story nonsense
http://letterboxd.com/nuts/
Added some more accounts that posted because of the poll, as well as some from >>71646312 here.
>>71648599
Best list posted so far.
>>71648599
Why have you mostly stopped rating movies?
>>71653368
IN what way is kailasha better than theine for example?
>>71654365
it's pretty arbitrary
a silly popularity contest at best
kailasha is just a little more well known?
>>71653368
How does one move from pleb to patrician? If it involves jerking off over Malick and Refn then I'm out
>>71649406
agreed, what to heck??
>>71649658
I don't really know, I think I say mah-chill, but technically ma-kill is probably more correct
>>71655241
>>71655241
Those lists are for shits and giggles, don't take them seriously.
>>71653368
>>71646312
>finally on the list
i feel so happy
>>71654365
because cinemos patricians > lettershitters
letterboxd.com/diest/
>>71656570
a single man is depressed fagkino
more people should watch it
![Happy.Together.1997.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-WiKi.mkv_snapshot_00.54.20_[2016.07.02_23.06.34].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/dyopNyS.jpg "Happy.Together.1997.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-WiKi.mkv_snapshot_00.54.20_[2016.07.02_23.06.34].jpg")
>>71656704
i concur
surprised such a great film was directed by Tom Ford, of all people
>>71655749
What's your name? So I can take you off and ruin your happiness.
>>71656858
meanie
>>71656704
>>71656795
it was alright. Very pretty film and nice wardrobe on everyone, kinda felt like a perfume/cologne commercial. Everything felt and looked very superficial. None of the relationships the main character had/developed felt real. I didn't particularly enjoy the ending but I have no ideas for how it should have ended. With that said, I still agree more people should watch it.
>>71656908
>None of the relationships the main character had/developed felt real.
Wow, grats on being dead inside.
>>71641462
http://letterboxd.com/elibroo/list/favorite-movies/
>>71653368
>punq
>has over 18,000 movies
>hey he must have some pretty good recommendations
>check his ratings
>only 21 were rated 5 stars
>63 were rated 4 and 1/2
>186 were rated 4
>out of 18,000 movies, he only thought 270 of them were good
>he also like chappie
wtf does he watch
>>71656858
evolution_rex
>>71657197
Anything with three stars or more is good, no?
>>71657197
>only 4 or above can be considered good
Don't be daft, a 6/10( 3 stars) is the default definition of good/decent
Also, Idon't believe PUNQ's lies
>>71657190
>whiplash
triggered
>>71657275
i always thought 3 was average, 3 and a half was above average, and 4 was good
maybe he has a different rating system
even with 3 and a half tho that's 1,086 out of 18,376 that he thinks are at least above average, which is about 6%
does he just pick movies out of random and watch them or something
>>71657197
I admire his dedication, but he really hasn't come away with much considering how many movies he has seen.
That's what you get when you watch movies for the wrong reasons.
I rather be an embryo for another 5 years than do what he has done.
Hmmmm Alan Clarke coffret for £85 on zavvi, might get it
>>71657728
Update: I got it
Sing Street is out so gonna watch that, that dudes movies always make me cry like a baby
>>71657728
>>71657947
>image.jpg
Anybody know which of the Mr. Vampire sequels are worth seeing?
>>71641462
Ménilmontant (1926, Kirsanoff)
Badlands (1973, Malick)
Psycho (1960, Hitchcock)
Gummo (1997, Korine)
The Earrings of Madame de... (1953, Ophuls)
Window Water Baby Moving (1959, Brakhage)
The Return (2003, Zvyagintsev)
Manoel's Destinies (1984, Ruiz)
Sedmikrasky (1966, Chytilová)
L'ange (1983, Bokanowski)
/herb_guy
Pulp Fiction will win. Shit poll. Not participating.
>>71658236
>I'm not going to vote because the systems rigged!
>>>/pol/
Maybe Claude Lanzmann will be the next to die
>>71658236
>>71657197
i think he uses a positive rating system were everything 2.0 and up means good, it's a rym thing
https://rateyourmusic.com/list/SellMeAGod/why_i_rate__a_word_about_thee_benefits_of_a_positive_rating_model/
>>71658228
>Third greatest film ever made? I surely don't think so. Very uninteresting and isn't capable of being an entity of its own, admittedly some parts are ok though (the ending mainly).
not a good look, fäm
>>71658520
>it's a rym thing
no, it's just a thing in general
people use it for all sorts of media
>>71654084
I just don't like to rate shorts. By number (but not time), I've mostly been watching Brakhage shorts. I just give a heart to shorts when I like them a lot, and don't when i just kinda like them or don't like them.
>>71654062
thanks
>>71659042
Fair enough.
>>71657197
he also watches movies at 2x speed
Why?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5232946/
>Two hot rod racers take a challenge to race across the nation for pink slips not knowing that there competitor is a serial killer.
Are we still voting in the poll?
https://letterboxd.com/CianLangan/
1. Citizen Kane (Welles, 1941)
2. Metropolis (Lang, 1927)
3. La Grand Illusion (Renoir, 1937)
4. Rear Window (Hitchcock, 1954)
5. 2001: A Space Odyssey (Kubrick, 1968)
6. 8 1/2 (Fellini, 1963)
7. Once Upon A Time In The West (Leone,1968)
8. Stalker (Tarkovsky, 1979)
9. Barry Lyndon (Kubric, 1975)
10. There Will Be Blood (Anderson, 2007)
>>71658520
Holy cow, what a fucking faggot. Only retards would use such a system
>>71659641
PR is the least pretentious of the rating systems buddy
Any recommendations for East Asian noir films? Does it exist
>>71659664
It's a thing to be used exclusively by idiots. It denies a whole world of films/music a more accurate rating. And the explanation for the high tiers per that particular faggot is merely cringeworthy.
>>71659683
Kind of gay and sappy; AB deserves much better. And the period is just poor form.
But it's what should be expected from those '''''patricians'''''
>>71659714
Because four scales for films you don't like is so accurate
>But I'll tell you one thing. There's nothin' like buildin' up an old automobile from scratch and wipin' out one of these Detroit machines. That'll give you a set of emotions that'll stay with you. Know what I mean? Those satisfactions are permanent.
>>71641462
http://letterboxd.com/miar94/list/lbg-top-10/
there you go, famiglia
>>71660128
wtf I wanna marry Lauren Bacall now
What did he mean by this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPQTAHbD5o8
http://letterboxd.com/Breaded/
What the hell >>71660128 did this get deleted for?
It was just a nice picture of Stewart that makes her look slightly like Connelly.
>>71661111
>8. Complaining about 4chan (its policies, moderation, etc) on the imageboards may result in post deletion and a ban.
You're treading on thin ice.
>>71661213
Not him, but enjoy your ban faggot.
>>71661050
>He didn't learn to read until he was 13
kek, i respect him more tho
>You were issued a warning! ;_;
>The quality of posts is extremely important to this community. Contributors are encouraged to provide high-quality images and informative comments.
What did he mean by this?
>>71661323
>look at how edgy I am posting black cocks and calling ppl cucks
Found the cuck
>>71661323
>change your mac address
you know that you dont expose your mac address to websites, right?
you meant IP address right?
i fucking hope you meant IP address or i've lost all respect for you
>>71661429
thats because certain image hashes trigger auto deletion/auto report/auto ban/ etc
>>71661429
>>71661398
>>71661323
why don't you fuck off, you underage piece of shit
>>71661488
I'm not a mod, just someone that thinks that derailing a legitimate thread like this one is an extremely childish thing to do
>>71661528
>derailing a legitimate thread
letter box general shit is fucking cancer
its literally a fucking thread for redditors to share their profile pages & socialize
it should be fucking banned
>>71661551
then why don't you just
I
G
N
O
R
E
it
insted of being a fucking child about it
>>71661576
im not even that guy though
>>71661600
Good going. It's absolutely unjustifiable to delete the KS pic, even more when the circumstances are as in this case
>>71661608
I don't care who you are
I don't go to capeshit threads and tell them that they're stupid, although I do think they are
If you feel the same way about lettreboxd just ignore letterboxd threads instead of being a fucking child
>>71659565
>Citizen Kane is the best movie ever.
When will this meme die?
ENTIRE THREAD FULL OF MENTALLY KUKKED BLOGSHITTERS AND REDDITORS WHINING ABOUT TUMBLR
YOU COULD TAKE ALL THE SCREENWRITERS IN HOLLYWOOD
PUT THEM IN THE SAME ROOM FOR 10 YEARS
I REPEAT
10 (TEN) YEARS
AND THEY COULDN'T MAKE UP A FILM ABOUT COMMUNITY MORE KEKED THAN /LBG/
HOW DOES THIS *GENERAL* LIVE WITH ITSELF
LITERALLY THE BIGGEST KUKS OF /TV/ IN THE HISTORY OF THE BOARD
MY FUCKING SIDES ARE IN GIGA-ORBIT
YOU ***CAN'T*** MAKE THIS SHIT UP
SO IT IS TIME FOR /LBG/ TO LEARN 2 NEW (TWO) WORDS TODAY **FREE OF CHARGE**
>COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
"AYY THE SITE IS SHIT BUT LETS USE IT"
>B-BUT MY PHONE LAYOUT AND AND AND
SHUT THE FUCK UP.
>B-B-BUT I LOGGED **FILMS** AND IT ROOK TIME
S U N K C O S T
NO NEED TO TIP.
>>71661704
thats all fine & dandy you asshurt little parrot, i see you're stuck in some sort of autistic loop of calling everyone a child
the fact is, if you ignore cancerous shit, eventually it spreads & ruins the whole board
ignoring things is usually not the best course of action, the best course of action is to attack it
>>71661696
Thanks it's a nice picture. I found it from here
https://mubi.com/notebook/posts/weekly-rushes-fake-coens-trailer-apichatpong-begins-rohmer-s-swimsuits-woody-s-next-films
>>71661741
really makes you think...
Everybody in this general is wearing a fedora, some bright whiteknight fedoras, some black-as-my-soul edgelord fedoras. Why can't we ever not sperg out like master fedorian vapists and just enjoy or ignore something. All this chatter, desperate slobbering, pathetic piss poor trolling, is more horrifying than most of our thread subjects.
Why is there no good Moby Dick film adaptation
>>71661753
You're the kind of retard that argues in youtube comments
>>71661839
you're the kind of retard who shares his little letterbox profile & hopes someone will be impressed enough to be his friend for a few days
sad
>>71661796
because moby dick isn't good
>>71661839
This thead is Hitler.
People mistake made not attack Hilter.
We attack Hither
now
>>71661796
wasn't the 1956 film good?
remembered it being somewhat good
>>71661741
shut up amaranth
I was going to post my profile but this thread is so fucking shit you guys don't deserve it
>>71662019
nice blog faggot
subscribed
What other film sites, in addition to letterboxd, do you use?
>>71662019
liked
upvoted
subscribed
retweeted
wheres your referral link bro
>>71662076
iCheckMovies
>>71662076
4chan
>>71662046
>proving my point even further
I hate letterboxd
>>71661894
>John Huston
>good
Pick one.
>>71662164
Why even shitpost about a director? Try the cuck thing, it's more popular
>>71662076
imdb
dvdbeaver
trakt
nfb.ca
netflix
tmdb
karagarga
cinematik
hdbits
cinemageddon
>>71662197
I wasn't shitposting. I genuinely think he is a bad filmmaker.
>>71662126
>i teek lee morelaee positiooo in le 4channairin diskourse
>>71662229
>being a shiteating faggot with irreversibly pleb film taste
>>71662227
Why?
>>71662124
Where can you talk about film on 4chan?
>mfw submitted my 10
I'll be a part of /lbg/ history forever
Also, I only submitted one film per director. Anyone else doing that?
