RATE. DISGUST. WATCH
>>71629624
First for Letterboxd.
Second for Sofia
http://letterboxd.com/Robtarded/
https://letterboxd.com/CianLangan/
So we're 7 months into 2016 now, what are your 7 favourite films of the year so far /lbg/?
>>71629744
We're 6 months and 4 days actually, you retard
>>71629827
hah triggert
>>71629827
Sorry, I'm not sure how it is overseas, but on our calenders July is the 7th month
changelog
>moved Nuts the queen of Reddit to the correct position
>>71629744
i don't think i even have 7 favorites from this year to be honest
>>71629744
i haven't seen 7 films i've liked yet
>>71630010
only correct list
>>71630010
(reposting bc apparently other thread is over, whoops)
http://letterboxd.com/abbyzowabby/
somebody help me, i've royally shit my taste!
no but seriously i just made an account yesterday, i don't actually watch that many movies, but r8 me h8 me deb8 me or rec me some better shit pls
>>71630010
do a shitpost version of this plz
>>71630098
>Legally Blonde - 4 1/2
>Clueless - 2 1/2
explain
>>71630131
WDHMBT
>>71630131
that is the shitpost version
>>71630010
>i've been moved from god tier patrician to yikes tier patrician
rude
also
>punq in patrician at all
i didn't think it was possible for someone to have seen so many films and still have taste that shit
>>71630147
sure dude: legally blonde is a good film, clueless is a mediocre one
hope that helped ;)
>>71630193
embryohands please go
>>71630193
embryohands please go
>>71630201
poor form
>>71630193
PUNQ is conning
>>71630251
fight me loser
>>71630193
Explain how punq has 'taste that shit'?
>>71630283
>>71630201
>>71630098
>Another mentally diseased embryo finds his way to this general
>>71630010
I want to edit this to improve it but don't know an app for my phone that would let me select and move the names so I can't be bothered
punq watches movies at 2x speed
>>71630316
>>71630358
>"his"
>passive aggressive greentexting
come say it to my face, kiddo
>>71630425
>LE MAD MAX WAS LE BAD XD
>LE REVENANT IS LE PRETENTIOUS FARTHOUSE
-/lbg/ lesbian boys general
>>71630425
>LE MAD MAX WAS LE BAD XD
>LE REVENANT IS LE PRETENTIOUS FARTHOUSE
-/lbg/ lesbian boys general
>>71630398
what a cuck
>>71630508
you sound very triggered
>>71630425
At least #1 is right, but
>Chappie
>Trumbo
>Ant-Man
This guy is probably a common pleb with very special autism that allows him to watch so much
>>71630425
>you will never be this pleb
thank you g_d
>LE MAD MAX WASN'T LE BAD XD
>LE REVENANT ISN'T LE PRETENTIOUS FARTHOUSE
>>71630575
gee what a field day this must be for you and your boring-ass garbage life, sargent fucktard
>>71630508
t. embryo
>>71630358
Clueless is a meme flick and the person who keeps spamming it here is a literal Redditor.
>>71630010
Don't hijack my edit, please. I tried to find him a good home.
I also added some people who I missed earlier.
>>71630193
Deal with it.
>>71630395
Edit it how?
>>71630425
Hmm, I still think it makes sense to keep him as a yikes tier "patrician".
A reminder of how not to approach film.
I can shift him across if you would prefer it.
http///www.letterboxd.com/fat
Always down for more recs I can put on my watchlist.
>>71630025
that's because it has been a literal dumpster tier year thus far
>>71630741
Move myself out of the bottom left quadrant to the top left corner.
move tsar to the top right
delete everyone else
only then will you have a good list
>>71630851
Rate. What. You. Watch.
http://letterboxd.com/sk00/
>>71630970
I do; I give it a heart if I like it
>>71631050
RWYW
>>71631050
How do I know whether you liked it a lot or just a little?
>>71630851
>tsar's lapdog to the rescue
>>71631145
I do; I give it a heart if I like it
>>71631149
You don't
Best Paul WS Anderson kino?
>>71630201
>>71630283
>>71630434
It's your first day here and you're already making enemies.
>>71631249
Rate. What. You. Watch.
![Kakera.avi_snapshot_01.17.22_[2016.07.05_00.55.06].png](https://i.imgur.com/TUBNZj8.png "Kakera.avi_snapshot_01.17.22_[2016.07.05_00.55.06].png")
*BRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPP*
>>71630851
What does tsar's dick taste like? Are you and cuckburning fighting for his affection or something?
>*BRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPP*
Was it autism?
>>71630425
>Chappie
Top kek, that movie was a mess.
>Trumbo
Boring by the numbers Oscar bait that blatantly lies about Dalton Trumbo and why the blacklist was created.
>Ant-Man
Fucking seriously?
>>71631224
>>71631303
I only dream that one day he will hold me in his arms, look me dead in the eye and say 'my hero'
>>71631271
I do; I give it a heart if I like it
>>71631263retribution
>>71631358
There is literally LITERALLY nothing wrong with Ant-Man
>>71631367
How do I know whether you liked it a lot or just a little?
Who has the darkest skin, nosaj or mashill?
>>71631433
You don't
>>71631279
stay the fuck away from me dumfuck cunt
>>71631447
Rate. What. You. Watch.
http://letterboxd.com/lozjudai/
>>71631436
Nosaj is a potatonigger but Mashill is from Scotland so might as well be a Paki.
>>71631498
I do; I give it a heart if I like it
>>71631436
nosaj is some fat mentally diseased irish white teen that wants to be a nigger real hard
>>71631520
they're both nig-nogs at heart
>>71631520
I am not from Scotland laddy I think u should check your sources
Speaking of Scotland has anybody watched The House of Him?
>Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds
Another quality freeleech to be had, boys.
http://letterboxd.com/nicktkh/list/nicks-top-10/
r8 my top 10
>>71631530
How do I know whether you liked it a lot or just a little?
>>71631664
pleb/10
![00000.mpls_snapshot_02.07.54_[2016.07.03_13.04.51].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/5vn0dmO.jpg "00000.mpls_snapshot_02.07.54_[2016.07.03_13.04.51].jpg")
>>71631664
TDK is really bad tho
People always rant about TDKR but at least it was funny as shit, like a blooper reel
but TDK is a serious attempt that is very juvenile.
>>71631664
boringest list i've ever seen
http://letterboxd.com/evolution_rex/
>>71631750
le TDK is the worst of the three meme
>>71631842
what do you think about jurassic world? Just curious
>>71631750
No, The Dark Knight isn't in any form bad. It's a pretty good film, as was TDNR- in a minor extent- and Begins. Hated and attacked with nonsensical superlatives by hipsters and contrarians.
>>71631842
>the convoluted crust of evolution_rex
>>71631842
>the bacchanalian hootenanny of evolution-rex
>>71631842
>the rosy crossing of evolution_rex
>>71631898
DK and BB are at least good films. DKR on the other hand is the "Return of the Jedi" of the batman films
>>71631999
>Return of the Jedi
>bad
:^o
>>71631861
the Jurassic Park series has always been a bit cartoony but watching Jurassic World was like watching a Marvel movie. It nonsense where I couldn't give a shit about what was happening with the plot and the characters. But, like Marvel movies, it wasn't necessarily bad. It's just extremely uninteresting and unless they go with a more unique approach in the fifth one, I have no interest in seeing it.
>>71632039
dumb "90s kid"
>>71632039
>return of the jedi
>disappointing last film of an trilogy that`s just mediocre
>>71631999
No, it's the Revenge of the Sith of the batman films, meaning it's the only one worth watching because of how hilarious it is and if you take any of the Star Wars or batman films seriously, you're autistic and have shit taste.
>>71632094
Oh, if you meant that, then true, both fit this boot. Sorry there, mate
>>71632039
Kill yourself
bet you faggot post about PAINTERLY DIGITAL IMAGES and 'IT IS NOT BRUTAL IT IS CLEAN IMAGE DIGITAL BETRAYS' reviews
and worship brazilian mentally obese man tit
>>71632112
*tips fedora*
>>71632173
wev boy I think you mixed up your Star Wars films
>>71632112
*tips fedora*
>>71632179
*tips over his mountain dew as he plays with his autistic starwars lego set and action figures*
I´m actually surprised that VA memers aren´t on about the Prequel filmsunless all the people who are shitposting about prequels are being serious
>>71632173
>>71632245
Good going, Captain Autismo
>>71632265
VA memers took a liking to painterly digital sculpting in time and space wars prequels just before The Force Awakens and tried to shill them as good films, especially 1 and 3.
>>71632313
1 is below mediocre
2 is horrible
3 is hilarious
>100 posts in 1 hour and half
>>71632367
The same applies to the Rebuild of Evangelion films btw
What a difference a day made
The recurrence across the franchise of villainous, tentacled robots whose very shape and motion displays their primary function to destructively penetrate any object, along with the gendered specificity of Driller’s mechanical take on the vagina dentata myth, exemplify the extent to which these non-humanoid Decepticons’ perceived threat is dramatised by figures of rotation rooted in hyperbolic, normatively gendered visions of castration and penetration. The deployment of the trope of rotation in these action sequences visually configures power persistently in terms of an outwardly displayed capacity and desire to penetrate; this is mastery as a (frequently slow motion) ‘screwing’ of the space of action, or of opponents’ bodies. It’s an intensification of the ‘phallocentric bias’ that Scott Bukatman finds at the heart of science fiction’s technological sublime (28); and one that we might, at first glance, dismiss as an expression of the alleged machismo of Bay’s directorial approach, hinted at in his notorious description of his aesthetic as ‘fucking the frame.’ But while these connotations are repeatedly made available through the franchise’s visual elaboration of its narrative action, to understand the rotational aesthetics of the action sequences only in these terms risks perpetuating the essentialising, binary conception of gender that underpins both phrases like ‘fucking the frame’ and the easy designation of visions of penetration — spatial or physical — as masculinist. Equally, in Bukatman’s discussion of science fiction films like Blade Runner (Ridley Scott, 1982) and Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Steven Spielberg, 1977) that figure the technological sublime in terms of a pronounced ‘spatial probing’ (29), he reminds us that the ‘overdetermined phallocentric thrust’ of these visions ‘should not blind us to the overwhelming need to map ourselves into the anxious spaces of first industrial and now electronic culture'
>>71630095
0/10
'Fucking the frame' is a great expression
>>71630010
>mfw i'm finally on it
https://letterboxd.com/xvesav/
Rec me something
>>71632584
>mfw I keep going more left and left
>>71632590
Id recommend watching the documentary Eurocrime!
>>71632590
fucking autistic faggot
>>71632761
Id recommend Rating What You Watch!
>>71631963
STOP. THIS MEME WAS NOT MEANT FOR YOU. YOU'RE MESSING IT UP
>>71632804
I'd recommend looking at whether I give the film a heart (representing that I like it) or not
>>71631842
>the plz give me a (You) coz i'm failing this meme of evolution_rex
>>71632988
I'd recommend coming up with a system to let the person looking at your profile know whether or not you liked a film a lot or just a little ("rating" seems to have caught on as a way to do this, you should check it out imo)
On the matter of this memetic autism with machill and the rwyw lad, it is indeed a lot clearer when classic ratings are used; sure the heart-when-I-like-thing has its own more brutish purpose, but the binarity of it disallows a better, fuller perspective about the person.
post your 1/2 stars
>>71633368
it's foolish to think that a movie can be reduced to a rating tho. Imo if you want to know if you should watch a movie based on someone's appreciation of it, you should read his review and eventually the rating can help, but review > rating.
>>71633373
Memelord pleb
1 <3 = 1 like, 1 log = 1 prayer!!
>>71633166
I'm happy with my current method, I previously checked out rating what I watch but prefer this, thank you for the advice
>>71633368
autism is the best meme of all.
>>71633413
>it's foolish to think that a movie can be reduced to a rating tho
every time you 'heart' a film as opposed to not 'hearting' it you are reducing it to a rating
you're a moron
>>71633566
heart is emotion ya dumb fucking autist
>>71633368
>binarity
>a principle of analysis requiring that a linguistic system, as a phonological, case, or semantic system, be represented as a set of binary
umm...
>>71633607
epic xd
>>71633413
not everyone writes reviews
ratings are easier
not everyone can be bothered rating
like/dislike is easier
>>71633566
i'm not machill.
To 'heart' is kinda stupid too, but it feels more subjective.
>>71633429
>I'm happy with my current method, I previously checked out rating what I watch but prefer this, thank you for the advice
*pushes you up against the locker*
You're makin a huge mistake here bucko
>>71633166
I'd recommend letting people do what they want, otherwise I will have to report you to the cyberpolice for bullying.
>>71633670
>rating is hard and bothersome
Come on, it takes a couple of seconds of thought
>>71633726
*laughs at the skinny lad getting shoved in the locker*
*high-fives my bullying mate*
>>71633739
>Come on, it takes a couple of seconds of thought
if you are a pleb that pretends to know if film is 3.5 or 3
it is insane how angry people consistently get about this. Letterboxd is just a film diary website, you can use as much or as little of the functionality as you want. You don't have to follow any body, if it upsets you that people don't rate then just ignore them
Why don't people get angry at people who don't write reviews for every movie? There's the functionally right there on the site, lots of people do review movies, and it makes your profile less useful to the reader if you don't, what are you some sort of special snowflake or something???????
>>71633849
Sorry, didn't realize I was talking with a disabled person
>>71633736
>not knowing that LBG stands for Large Bully General
literally how new
>>71633739
Wrong. Also, trying to apply the same rating scale to different kinds of films doesn't work, especially when you delve into more abstract works.
I've contemplated deleting my ratings multiple times, but at the moment am happy with just not rating most non-narrative films I watch.
I get why people find it dificult to follow those who don't rate, but usually you can get other indications of their taste and how it matches yours.
Personally, I don't follow anyone who doesn't rate unless they consistently write reviews or I know them personally, or speak to them somewhat regularly so I can further discern their thoughts on films.
If there was a delete all ratings button Letterboxd, I would probably press it, tbqh.
>>71629744
I only seen a couple I've given over 3.5 stars this year, and I've really been trying to pick up my viewing pace too. So many that drop off in the second half or are uneven throughout
http://letterboxd.com/nuts/
RIP Abbas Kiarostami
RIP Ridley Scott
>>71634250
he looks miserable
>>71634282
it's not a meme
>>71634282
Holy fuck,I still haven't seen any of his films
>>71634282
he was a hack
>>71634282
I hope you're memeing, you faggot
STOP DYING YOU IDIOTS
>tfw pretend to like patrician movies in my ratings
>>71634282
WHAT THE FUCKKKK
>>71634345
you expected him to look like something else?
>Today started to watch Kiarostami
>Like Someone In Love
>Faggot decides to die.
Well now
Oh, fuck, it is true! And I thought he had at least more 6 films in him. LSSIL is a great final film, but wow, that's sad.
Top 60 director ever
fuck
rip
WHY IS EVERYONE DYING
EVEN YELCHIN
FUCK
THE PALE HORSE HUNGERS
who the fuck in media industry pissed him off
>>71634282
oh man, that really hurts
Godard will outlive everyone.
>>71634282
I know what I'm watching tomorrow.
RIP in pieces, sir.
>I really REALYL cared about this literal who that I never met
fucking thread is silent about memestami for decades in 4channarian years and now suddenly everyone loved him and he was iconic
cant maeh this sut up
>>71635075
this is autism
>>71634978
godard was murdered in the 60s by the FBI for his communist sympathies and replaced with a robot godard
>>71635212
60s Godard is far less interesting than recent Godard
>>71635075
Every serious person on film 'loved' him/his cinema, and he was giant in the medium.
But this general is full of embryos, so I'm sure some people might be pretending in the sad train
>>71635075
disrespectful
>>71635075
Close-up was literally a /lbg/ film club pick
I think there's a large contingent of people here who will have watched Close up/certified copy/like someone in love at least
>>71635268
More interesting true, considering that it covers a lot more time, but not better. It's still an excellent overall part of his filmography, but that sprint in the 60's is unparalleled in excellence, imagination and vigor.
>>71635268
that's the point, post-60s robot godard is controlled opposition. much like the CIA invented """modern art""" as memetic warfare against socialist realism, robo-godard is a CIA plant who was put into place to draw communist sympathizers out of the woodwork. zizek is one as well
FYI: anyone who has discussed godard on this board has been put on a list
>>71635461
Someones been reading too much Pinecone
>>71635505
*pinches bowtie, water squirts out and splashes you in the face*
haha, every time!
*honking noises*
>terrorist dies on the 4th of july
>listening to music on shuffle
>this song comes up https://youtu.be/W5dcEXpViiI
>hear the news about Kiarostami
>start tearing up
Did Taste of Cherry touch anyone else's heart? Made me look at suicide differently.
Holy shit, I didn't even know about her ;_;
>>71635747
It was definitely moving, but deeply depressing.
I always disregarded suicide cases as weak-minded people and his film helped me gain some perspective, that's for sure.
>>71636144
>The trial story of Viviane Amsalem's five year fight to obtain her divorce in front of the only legal authority competent for divorce cases in Israel, the Rabbinical Court.
I'll pass, but let me know what you think.
>>71636344
It really is the final part of a trilogy that started in the first half of the 2000's. It's far from sjw garbage
Made a new chart based on how many films the person watched to see if it has anything to do with what makes a person Shit Tier or God Tier. The results may surprise you.
:^(
>>71636485
*tips fedora*
im so criterion i shit bluray covers
>>71636485
THE LIST GOES ON
>>71636478
This is actually interesting, thank you for posting, even if it a) it's extremely autistic of you to spend time doing this and b) you left me off bitch
>>71636485
maybe with all these entry level directors now dead they have to move on to directors with substance
>>71636478
how did you determine yikes v god
>>71636573
(u)
>>71636788
how much they contribute to lbg/letterboxd
>>71636478
Neat. A lot of people are missing, though.
If you have the time, see >>71630741 for a reasonably up-to-date list of users.
>>71636788
>everybody is entry-level
>entry-level is literal garbage
kys
>>71637013
what is this pie meme
>>71636849
I didn't put non-/lbg/ Letterboxd celebs like Eli, SJB, PUNQ, windyblue, and lyzette. Also avoided people who have an inaccurate number of films watched like CianLangan.
>>71637097
>Shorts don't count
EP I ´k
Post director(s) that will die in 2016.
>>71630010
>PUNQ
>In 2015 I watched a "modest" 2033 feature films and 1768 shorts = a total of 3801 new films seen. Would have been more had I not married and had a baby boy during 2015. Still means I UNOFFICIALLY broke the Guinness Book of Records entry for 'most feature films seen during a calendar year' for the 4th consecutive year! As we turn to 2016 I've seen a total of 17,476 films in all.
What a loser. Get a life!
>>71637224
not a director but this guy will be gone real soon, i only just realised he's 85 and has been smoking since he was a kid
>That Kiarostami thread
I enjoy funposting too much!
fun post is fun!
>>71637224
Mel brooks
Woody Allen
and.........
jean-Luc Godard
>>71637491
Fucking hate this cunt
kiarostami never made a good movie
>>71637635
Why? He's completely harmless
is that yoour final answer
>>71637491
How old is this guy? Surely he must woefully neglect his family if he's watching that many films a day. Is his life that empty? Does his wife literally do everything for him in his life?
>>71637873
He apparently has a child
>>71637964
do you think he had sex while watching something?
>>71638012
He probably watched Shame while he did
>>71631266
good.
>>71635075
kys
>>71638171
Nice
>>71638282
Go on tell me why
The BFI just tweeted 'forgot about Dreyer?', I am hooting and hollering at the top of my lungs and clapping furiously. The neighbours are mad
>>71635075
that was epic, that was epic for the winnn
>>71638306
Thanks
>>71638343
Complete madman
everybody itt 2bh
>>71638171
More like RaVolte-Ing
Why aren't there 'cringe comedy' movies.
>>71638504
Field day, huh?
>>71638504
can u post a link to that miami vice review pls?
>>71638691
https://letterboxd.com/silentdawn/film/miami-vice/
Rate me: https://letterboxd.com/PersonDudeGuy/
>>71638774
lurk for at least another 2 years before posting again
>>71638817
Elaborate?
Or do you just mean to say that no one looking to watch good movies and improve themselves is welcome?
VVitch was a total meme. Every frame of the film tried to be as spoopy as possible, the mystery in the plot was completely absent, and it follows the modern horror norm of just being a vehicle for unsettling visuals instead of focusing the horror through pacing and plot
but that ass...
>>71629744
http://letterboxd.com/dontpokethebear/list/2016-films/detail/
have yet to see son of saul, knight of cups, or midnight special
seeing swiss army man tomorrow. i tried to see neon demon last week but the fucking projector in the theater broke and I ended up seeing the fucking shallows instead. it was the last evening it was playing in theaters. i am fucking mad
>>71638774
You're okay, friendo. As always, wmf
What the fuck did he mean by this?
>>71638691
I can't keep up with these pronouns
>>71630010
>i got moved to almost bottom tier
>james healy and eli are less pleb than me
reddit: the image
keep me in yikes tier because I dont meme or spend enough time in this shithole but be realistic
also
>dropout_bear and link_gorro that close to god tier
jesus
wtf cimino is dead too?
>>71639046
I really don't get the missionary joke
>>71638504
PlebTA fans are not the same people who adore Tarkovsky for the genius he was
Anyone here seen taxidermia?
I saw it a long time ago and only remember that it features puking and a fire shooting dick.
May actually rewatch it seriously since it looks pretty fucking neat.
>>71638971
I could see that as a valid complaint, but can you see how that might not be considered a very strong one?
A horror MOVIE should focus on unsettling visuals. The plot wasn't necessarily an inherently frightening one but it was serviceable.
Striving for ever frame to be unsettling is not a bad thing by any means, and the movie was not conventional by modern broad release standards.
Maybe not a masterpiece, but anything above average in modern horror seems great nowadays just like the babadook and it follows.
>>71639068
the charts are troll images or made by people who haven't been here since the beginning, they don't know their ass from their elbows
>>71639097
it's a pun on heaven you dope
>its a link is a pleb episode
>>71639126
>A horror MOVIE should focus on unsettling visuals
yeah, but not for literally EVERYTHING
look at Alien or the Thing. It sets up the setting in a way that's pretty normal. The VVitch makes walking in a field and playing with a Baby seem like it's supposed to be as scary as Jack chasing his son with an axe at the end of the Shining.
I don't even watch most horror movies, but it seems to me like the thing I dont like about them is the fact that the horror comes more from visuals/effects than the plot and the VVitch did just that. The "plot" meanders entirely for the middle 45 minutes of the film capitalizing on hysteria to replace character motivation. the only person in the entire movie with coherent motivation was the father; Thomasin and the Twins made no sense as to whether they were possessed or not and the fact that Thomasin becomes a witch at the end is literally only to show the spoopy magic orgy
TOP DIRECTORS ALIVE
1) Bong Joon-Ho
2) Al Weerasethakul
3) Paul Thomas Anderson
4) The Dardenne Bros.
5) Claire Denis
6) Wong Kar-Wair
7) Alfonso Cauron
8) Takashi Miike
9) Wes Anderson
10 Spike Jonze/Charlie Kaufman collabs or solo projects
>>71639281
that's every episode!
>>71639391
Who the fuck is "Al" Weerasethakul?
>>71639402
get in here
>>71639391
>no HHH
>no Malick
>no Leigh
>no Farhadi
>no Costa
>no Sokurov
>no Scorsese
>no Lynch
>no Zhangke
"no"
http://letterboxd.com/steakbro/
>>71629744
http://letterboxd.com/steakbro/list/2016/
everything below 8 is 2.5/5 or lower. hasn't been a very good year, imo.
>>71639447
bad thread
>>71639391
>no Coens
>no Fincher
>no Scorsese
>no Mann
>no Spielberg
>no Peterson
>no Coppola
>no Alfredson
>>71639391
>no Godard
yikes
>>71638971
>a total meme
>spoopy
>film is a narrative medium
>le ass doe xD
I was gonna give you the benefit of the doubt but then I go check your profile.
>825 films watched
>only 55 this year
>Hot Fuzz and The Big Lebowski are considered pinnacles of cinema to you
>>71639485
The last name is Jia, not Zhangke.
>>71639297
Fair enough.
Viewed objectively those are all perfectly suitable. Makes me revaluate the movie a bit. I still like it a lot as a fan of horror movies and a person who's hated most of the jump scare BS of the last decade.
But they really don't explain the twins at all and there's absolutely no arc comparatively to Alien or The Shining. That's what you mean by plot right?
That the movie starts steeped in dread and stays that way with only a bit of upward movement. Otherwise its all in one location and with the same general stakes, etc.
>>71639557
he may be an embryo however that doesn't make the /v/vitch less of a meme
>>71639443
On the set of Tropical Malady Weerasethakul became frustrated at people mispronouncing Apichatpong so he requested everyone on set call him "Big Al" and it stuck around
The VVitch sucked because it has that annoying hipster SLEEK look to it. Everything is SLEEK. Look at me this composition and movement is SLEEK. It's CINEMATOGRAPHIC.
Literally could not suspend my disbelief at any moment because of how fucking boring the film looked in every aspect.
No flair, no identity, in the same trash bin with Green Room.
who else misses the lbg /glorydays/
>>71639630
what the fuck are you talking about
