>GoT starts as series where there are no clear cut good guys / bad guys
>season 6 ends
>clear cut definition of who is good and who is bad
How do you still enjoy this shit?
>>71462092
It's kind of like I've gone too far to give up, I need to see it to the end
actually since the start the starks are the "good guys"
are you pretending to be retard?
>>71462143
Hindsight bias: the post
>>71462223
no, that was extremely obvious to everyone but you apparently.
>good guys are feminists
>bad guys are gamergators
>>71462958
>females in GoT
>good
ok, buddy
>>71462092
Danaerys started as a clear protagonist and she's developed to become more power hungry and is likely to go the route of the Mad King
Jaime Lannister started as a pompous douche Chad, and has developed into a chivalrous person who wants a lot of different things. The most relatable imo.
Tyrion started as a weirdly conniving midget and has become a righteous, intelligent leader that nobody takes seriously, and no he is the ultimate underdog.
I could go on and on. There's no clear good guy except for Jon Snow. And there's no clear bad guy except for Cersei. Everyone else is scattered across the board.
I know right, the whole time I was watching the first season I was like, Boromir Stark, is he good or is he evil? And Ser Handsome de Charming von Incesto, is he good, or is he bad? I can't tell, it's so deep
>first 2 minutes of the show was a zombie attack
>muh moral dilemmas and uncertainty of character
Whoever writes this shit is a fucking hack. How can you enjoy this cliche generic shit?
>>71462092
it doesn't matter anymore. there are fan favorites. the customer is always right.
