ITT horribly misleading posters
>>71298795
the original was SOOO BORINGGGG
>>71298807
Pleb
>>71299040
Yeah no it was pretty shit paisu semdes
>>71299449
shut up child
>>71298807
Please leave and never come back. It's the second best one after Road Warrior.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gb1uDc_qa-4
>>71298795
whats misleading about it? its a cop with a car, a shotgun and an explosion in the background. its basically the whole plot of the movie. you fucking retard
>>71301581
its shit. take off your cum-tainted sunglasses you fucking old fag.
>>71301645
I bet you're one of those faggots that liked Furiosa
>>71301645
I hadn't even seen it until a month or two ago and it was great
>>71301779
>ThisWasDumbAndNotHowNightsLook.jpg
In a stylized action fantasy movie it can look however the fuck he wants it too.
>>71301581
everyone on this board is a shit eating millenial and disappoints me terribly
>>71301581
The crashes and shit were fucking balls out in this movie
>>71298795
I wanted to see all them work together, instead gypsy danger stole every kill wtf
>>71302599
>all them toys
>for 10 minutes of fame
Cherno and Crimson deserved so much fucking better
>>71301779
>filename
yeah it should've been shot in the director's backyard with nothing happening for an hour
OOOH ARE THEY GONNA GET THE ICE CREAM???
spent years before this was commercially available thinking it was the greatest thing i had never seen.
what a fucking letdown.
>>71302246
I love road warrior, and like the first (you can't deny the 1st act has pacing issues)but fury road is the best, deal with it
Fuck millennials though
>>71298795
>>71302976
>badass posters
>badass movies
And where is the problem?
>>71299380
JUST
>>71301779
Everything appears more blue at night. Bezold Bruecke effect compounded on top of Purkinje shift.
>>71303453
It's just a blue filter on camera lens you pretentious double nigger.
>>71303453
>>71303718
Forgot to to mention that it does look nothing like night, it's a very cheap method to avoid the extra cost of actually filming at night.
>>71301581
honestly my favorite scene in any mad max movie.
>>71303718
It's a blue filter that's trying to simulate a real, perceptual effect. I can point you to scientific papers that simulate the blue shift at low light conditions.
>>71303829
yeah right, like I give a shit about your 0.0001% chances of happening "real life" effect.
It looks like surreal shit and the sole reason it exists is for financial purposes. That's not even mater for debate it was created for that very purpose since filming at night can become a pain in the ass. learn to cinema before going technical.
>>71299009
Thinking of hanging this in my bedroom
>>71301591
Its called mad max and that is goose you fucking troglodyte
>>71303942
I know cinema from the inside. Just because it is done to make day scenes appear like night, the reason the blue filter is added is because it simulates the human perception of dark scenes. Otherwise it wouldn't be used.
>>71302809
>I have the attention span of a fruit fly the post
I think Capeshit is more your thing
>>71304077
>it simulates the human perception of dark scenes
you're saying it's used to make scenes at night because it darkens the picture? Colour me confused I hadn't noticed!
>>71304150
You can make scenes darker without adding blue tint. But making it blue conforms with our perception of what dark scenes look like.
>>71304077
Yea humans don't percieve darkness as blue, Darkness is the abscence of light
>>71304219
>Darkness is the abscence of light
That's wrong.
>>71303946
You should think of hanging yourself alongside it.
>>71304288
You what motherfucker? Fuck off.
>>71299009
when i was like 9 and i heard "blade runner" i thought it would be a ninja movie where the main character runs on his enemies katanas during a fight scene
>>71304345
Darkness is not absence of light. Depending on your adaptation level, the same amount of light might appear white, grey or black.
>>71304077
Nigga have you ever been outside at night?
>>71304393
Why are you being a nitpicking faggot?
statement:
>Darkness is the abscence of light
isn't wrong in the slightest, we're talking darkness, it's an absolute, you're talking shades.
>>71304320
>>71302851
Oh God, is that one of those Polish movie posters?
>>71301779
The whole night sequence was shot during the day and filtered blue and shit for night.
>>71304496
It is incorrect though. The perception of darkness is related not only to the amount of light but also with your current adaptation level. My PC monitor has perfect black level during the day but at night, when I'm adapted to much lower luminance, the black level appears grey at best. The stars appear white at night but during the days, they are so dark you can't even see them anymore.
>>71304482
I've even been out during the day. Still, doesn't change the facts.
>>71304645
Thank you captain obvious.
>>71304645
Yes. I think it looked horrible.
These two would look better senpai >>71302851 >>71304575
>>71304716
F-fine next time I won't share my insider secrets...
>>71304728
meant for >>71303946
>>71304674
>My PC monitor has perfect black level during the day but at night, when I'm adapted to much lower luminance, the black level appears grey at best
okay I got it, you're fucking retarded. I'm amazed (or puzzled?) that you even managed to somewhat grasp the concept of light rays.
>>71304850
What did I say wrong? It's all true.
>>71304952
Well first and foremost you denied something that was unarguably true which is that darkness is the absence of light, it's the 101.
Secondly you monitor doesn't appear gray, it always was, a certain amount of light leads to "diminishing returns" if I could say so (I'm no physician, bear with the terms), so when you're in a dark environment your monitors shows its "true" colour as there is no outside light to dissolve the one that's emitted behind it.
>>71298807
Nah man watching a cop see everything he believed in slowly collapse with society was awesome. I wish there were more movies about the period right between society being stable and its apocalypse like Mad Max.
>>71304952
I've sat here for 10 minutes trying to figure out how to dress your retardedness. I don't even know where to start.
1) Darkness is the absence of light. Go into a hole in the ground away form any source of light and you won't be able to see. Your yes adjusting to darkness is just your brain picking up tiny sources of light and forming a picture form that. If there's no light, then there is no picture. If you're in a hole, then you won't be able to see your hand in front of your face. I don't care if the fact that your monitor is back-lit makes it appear gray at times, darkness is literally the absence of a light source. This is just a fact one should understand from life experience.
2) The blue filter effect looked horrible and unconvincing. Never have my eyes adjusted to a blinding blue light with and obvious sun hidden behind clouds. Never have stark silhouettes and facial shadows appeared in the dead of night as if it were the day. no matter how much your eyes adjust, night will never, EVER look like that. It just looked cheap.
I don't know how you could argue otherwise.
>>71305203
>you denied something that was unarguably true which is that darkness is the absence of light, it's the 101
I gave you an example of things being dark or bright even though emit the same amount of light.
What you describe is light adaptation, there is less light in the surround so my visual system is more sensitive. This causes the stimulus that appeared black to become greyish.
Now something to blow your mind - color is not a property of things you look at, it's a psychological phenomenon. Whether something is bright, dark, blue or yellow depends more on your visual system and its adaptation than on the reflected wavelengths. Darkness is just a way of your visual system of interpreting the stimulus that's below your current adaptation level's usable range. It has little to do with absolute luminance of stimulus.
>>71305511
>color is a psychological phenomenon
fucking kill yourself.
>>71305495
>1) Darkness is the absence of light. Go into a hole in the ground away form any source of light and you won't be able to see. Your yes adjusting to darkness is just your brain picking up tiny sources of light and forming a picture form that. If there's no light, then there is no picture. If you're in a hole, then you won't be able to see your hand in front of your face. I don't care if the fact that your monitor is back-lit makes it appear gray at times, darkness is literally the absence of a light source. This is just a fact one should understand from life experience.
Just like a camera, your visual system is limited in the range of light it can see at any moment. When you adapt to a certain luminance, anything too much above that amount is going to appear white and emissive and anything below that range will appear dark, and shifting the adaptation level changes those cutoff levels.
The screenshot you posted is too bright. I've seen the movie graded on a professional grade monitor, it looked much more realistic and convincing.
>>71305631
This will be illuminating for you:
http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2014/11/10/361219912/if-the-same-shade-looks-both-yellow-and-gray-whats-color
>>71305756
>why can't I hold all these contradictory theories
>>71298795
lol
>>71305926
That's the current state of science. This guy's work is used everywhere for color mapping, including Windows color management.
>>71305756
>>71306038
sorry but it falls flat from the very first assert
>This is a re-creation of a color plate from Interaction of Color, by Josef Albers. The two X's are are exactly the same — it's the different backgrounds that make them look like very different colors.
The X don't look different at all. Looks like this guy and those supporting this theory have damaged eyes.
>>71305711
It was bright blue in the theater. Too bad I watched this shitty movie there instead of on "a professional grade monitor"
>>71306145
Seriously? The one on the right looks yellow to me and the one on the right looks grey. If you can't see it then I guess you're in the minority.
>>71306284
>the one on the right looks grey
the one on the left*
>>71306284
I do have good eyesight but I didn't know I was in the minority.
>>71301581
>That split second of the eyeball popping out
Fucking perfection.
>>71306388
Well, nobody seems to mention it in the comments.
>>71306460
circlejerking
>>71306447
Do you know if they reused that shot in Toecutter's death at the end of the movie, or if it's a different shot? I wouldn't be surprised if it's the same shot since this movie was made with almost no money.
>>71306474
Basically, I made myself a career of modelling those color vision effects. The amount of evidence for the existence of color adaptation is overwhelming but everyone's vision is slightly different. Have you ever been checked for color blindness?
>>71306654
color blindness is textbook damaged visuals.
>>71306690
True. Have you ever been tested?
>>71306749
Why should I? Are you trying to pretend that if I don't see 2 different shades for the crosses I'd be colorblind?
>>71306799
I'm curious. I worked with a color scientist who found out at 35 that he's color blind. With a 10% rate in male population, it's the first thing we test for before running experiments. Color blind people are the most common explanation for outliers in data.
>>71298795
That pretty much is Mad Max, did you only watch Road Warrior and assume the original was the same?
>>71306912
Well your guy DOES say that the crosses are the same colour, so that was really stupid to ask, sorry.
>>71306969
They have the same spectral power distributions but they are not supposed to appear the same. The left one is supposed to look grey and the right one is supposed to look yellow. That's what the whole article is about.
So, have you ever been tested?
>>71303072
>>71304114
expectations of what the movie was going to be were not close to what the movie actually was
>Max (Mel Gibson), an officer with the Main Force Patrol, launches a personal vendetta against the gang when his wife (Joanne Samuel) and son are hunted down and murdered, leaving him with nothing but the instincts for survival and retribution.
literally the description google provides. why spoil what happens in basically the climax of the movie? in death wish, charles's family gets attacked about 10-20 minutes in. i was kinda expecting something like that, and not Vacation Max and Boring Wife: Driving Cars Kinda Fast Road
>>71302599
Not permanently deploying jaegers on the breach to spawn kill the fuckers.
Bad writing the movie
Still a 8/10
>>71307050
>They have the same spectral power distributions but they are not supposed to appear the same
Man are you really genuine? There's no way you're trying to push that shit with a straight face. It's like these pictures that are supposed to appear moving, if you know the trick, it simply doesn't work because your brain processes it properly and then you have to actually concentrate to make it look wrong "as intended".
Me seeing it as it is just makes me an informed person, not a colorblind. I suppose you still have work to do on the subject.
>>71307080
I cared a lot more about his wife and sprog than Charles Bronson's family. I guess to each his own, but I liked the structure of the movie. It allowed for a great cameo by Ted Cruz.
So if The Road Warrior is set three years after the first Mad Max, what the fuck happened to society? It was obviously collapsing in the first one, but what happened in just three years for S & M bandits to start roaming the outback in souped up cars? There were still ice-cream shops and cabaret bars in the first one
>>71307264
I'm just honestly curious. What you're saying contradicts a lot of physiological data we have about the human visual system. You can't on a whim change your color adaptation, it's a process that happens in your cones. I'm seriously curious what could cause this. Have you ever taken an Ishihara or City test?
>>71298795
i just realized how homoerotic that poster is
>exposed v-taper
>that lowkey bulge
>>71307451
Not that I can remember, just seen those images shown to kids, you know that shit with dots. That said I don't adapt "on a whim", it's just that seeing the image it's so obvious it's trying to trick me that I processed it as a shitty make believe. Brain's a pretty fast machine yo.
>>71307509
>doesn't feature any silent lamb
>no one has a butterfly on the mouth
that fucking let down.
>>71307371
I think the remains of world governments had a nuclear war in between the movies in a last ditch effort to gather resources. Kind of like in Fallout.
>>71307560
That would be one of them, if you were color blind it would detect it.
I know the brain can do a lot with the signal that comes from the eyes but the visual adaptation happens in the retina, even before the signal reaches the brain. It's not something the brain can override.
>>71302976
that movie was something else but in a good way. way funny though if you're drunk or stoned
>>71307371
It's implied in the intro of road warrior that there was a nuclear war
>two mighty warrior tribes went to war and touched off a blaze which engulfed them all.
>>71307555
Don't be surprised at Mad Max films being homoerotic
>>71307602
This
Only a small fraction of the movie was spent on the moon and lunar settlements aren't the focus of the film either.
>>71301779
>>71299009
And they say redditors havent invaded this board
>>71308061
Who says that?
>>71307602
>>71307761
Clarice tells a story about the lambs, and
Bill puts that moth in the mouth of his victims you spergs
>>71307715
>>71307555
Gayboy Berserkers and Smegma Crazies
>>71298795
>No one posted The Thing
Yeah I thought it was gonna be about an astronaut with a glowing head, instead it's some terrifying goo monster in Antarctica.
>>71307347
kek
it at least takes place in an interesting world - crumbling society, crazies getting bolder and cops are good-natured biker types
>>71298795
There also exist horribly unmisleading posters. Apparently they used this for 10 Cloverfield in some country.
>>71298807
>Cundalini wants his hand back.
>>71308554
I dunno man, I feel like that visual sums up the movie well, with the blueness and the fact that "the thing" is a faceless being that could be any character in the movie.
