oops
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ghostbusters-tracking-40m-50m-us-905913
wasn't Fant4stic tracking similarly last year?
they are overly optimistic that it will make this much.
realistic prediction would be in $30M.
>One of summer's most anticipated
who, just who anticipates this movie? No one of my leftist friends wants to see it, none of my right wing friends wants to see it, fuck I know a few feminists who doesnt want to see it.
Are they just lying at this point?
>>71218300
Maybe it would be tracking higher if they didn't spit bile at the "nerds" who are the ones who spread word of mouth and go out in droves to see shit like this at every possible turn.
>>71218530
More like in denial.
>>71218530
I anticipate shitposting about this film
If this flops, sexism wins.
>>71218716
that's a good thing.
>>71218716
If this film succeeds: Drumming up artificial controversy and using pandering as shield for creative bankruptcy will become common place and the jews will win.
It being a failure will be a
40m tops.
>>71218530
it'd be a good family flic, i guess
The best thing is it wont fail because its a shitty movie, itll fail because of the crusade against it.
>>71218970
No, the best thing is that if it fails, it will be entirely because of how Feig, the cast and Sony have been acting. Poetic justice.
>>71219539
No, youre wrong. The movie did everything perfectly. Its the misogynistic Internet hate crew that sabotaged the movie.
Fembusters will probably choke and make 50 million domestically.
Don't believe me, check my 5.
>>71218530
I am anticipating this movie. I don't buy the anti-hype. Ghostbusters is awesome.
Pretty hilarious that they have no statistics of pre-sale tickets like every other blockbuster that comes out.
Wonder why.
Post your predictions. I'll start.
>People will walk out of the movie during the dance number
Will we stream this once a decent cam comes out?
>>71219800
Good news, you got dubs! Bad news, no 5. Guess your post is as meaningless as your!
>>71219803
>$0.08 has been deposited into your account
>>71220055
>Bad news, no 5
I stole them from him.
WE WON GUYS XDD
>>71220222
Still no 5 Mr. Trips
>>71220282
actually /v/eddit did
real /tv/ posters are very excited to see this flick
>>71220308
Patrician /tv/ posters only care for the original.
>>71219769
>Its the misogynistic Internet hate crew that promoted the movie.
fixed that for you. I mean, it's not like anyone would care if it wern't for this bullshit 'controversy'
>>71220348
Patrician /tv/ knows the original are pleb trash for low cineIQ children of imdb.
>>71219803
>t. Bill "there's-no-gun-to-my-head-making-me-say-this" Murray
>>71218552
guys we got a nerd here
>>71220402
HOW DARE YOU
>>71220452
Get out.
HEY MYSOGYNIST SEXIST PIG MEN!!!
Why won't you give us your money to come see our movie?
>>71219803
This isn't Ghostbusters faggot
>>71220505
That's pretty much the jist of the Ghostbusters advertising campaign...
Triggered feminist man haters begging men to come see their movie. lol
Why is it all videogame playing cancer against this movie?
>>71220505
At this point, it's just a bunch of feminists triggering each other now.
None of my friends even talk about his movie much less care to go see it.
I don't think there is much interest from men or women.
Non stop feminist cryng & whining has turned off 90% of the general audience to this movie.
>>71219803
I'm kind of with this guy. I don't expect it to be as good as the originals or good at all, but I expect it will entertain me due to a number of factors. I'm not one of those guys that gives a shit about 'fun' too. The movie just doesn't seem that terrible aside from the giant ape.
>>71220697
In Bruges is a "fun" movie
This movie couldn't even be saved with the rose tinted glasses of a double perc bong rip.
>>71220383
Thats if it does well.
"We won! We used their hate as free primotion and came out on top!"
>>71220819
>In Bruges is a "fun" movie
Sure if you're a mouth breathing pleb
c-can't wait to watch it with my /tv/ bros.
>>71218449
Yep, F4 projections were around $46 million, it made $25M instead.
>Sony's Ghostbusters popped up on tracking Thursday, with early estimates suggesting a North American debut in the $40 million to $50 million range over the July 15-17 weekend. The studio, which has yet to wage its biggest and final marketing push, is no doubt hoping for the higher end, considering the movie cost a hefty $154 million to make.
its already a flop
>>71220977
The budget isn't even taking into account the marketing it's been needing. It's gonna cost the studio's waaaay more than that.
>>71220697
Then you have a shitty sense of humor if you think anything they've shown is humorous at all.
>>71218300
did they spend more money trying to push this than anyone did trying to push hillary?
Sony, when a product is failing so bad you dont double down in the spending. Thats gambling logic
>>71220890
What, you think it's le deep? It's a fun little dark comedy.
Cg isn't "fun" and if you think it is you're a fucking mongoloid.
>>71220893
same but a shitty cam rip will do
>>71218300
I think they are being overly optimistic.
The ship has sailed on remakes, and this is garbage even by shitty remake standards.
The movie will have no family audience. It opens between Secret Life of Pets and Ice Age 5. Finding Dory will still be going strong.
Normie adults have no interest in this, it doesn't look like a major must-see blockbuster like Star Wars or Marvel.
Melissa McCarthy's audience feels alienated by this. The core Ghostbusters audience feels alienated by this.
This movie is for
N O B O D Y
O
B
O
D
Y
>>71218530
im anticipating it failing and endigs some of the most awful producers careers
>>71221077
>you're a fucking mongoloid.
>>>>>>In Bruges is a "fun" movie
Fucking mouth breathing pleb
>>71220977
Let's recast Ghostbusters 2016 with men
>Charlie Day (nerd)
>Dave Chapelle (black)
>Tom Segura (Murray replacement)
>David Koeckner
>>71221151
Elaborate instead of just saying words.
If you're smart enough to.You arent
http://mashable.com/2016/06/19/finding-dory-box-office-record/#Ik3MVCtMj8qC
Women will save it
Who cares how many basement dwelling manchildren complain
>>71221193
Hey hitler
>>71221140
ice age 5 alone will wreck this movie to pieces. There is something hillarious about that
>>71218300
didn't they say last week that they expect a 150+ million opening?
>>71218530
Saying shit like most anticipated or number 1 movie of the summer is an old marketing scheme people want to be a part of something if they think everyone else is doing it
>>71218300
Probably 30 mil. Hopefully lower.
I'm guessing feminists will make up for the "sexist manchildren" by buying two tickets for their singles night. Which is sad because they could save that money for food or rent or something important.
And I'm sure there will be some ironic hipster morons wanting to see this movie for irony purposes.
>"It looks so bad. "
>"Let's go see it and help get it a just as awful sequel"
>>71221193
Even if all the original characters were still alive and in the movie it wouldn't be good. 35% of why it's so popular is nostalgia and gilded memories.
>>71221193
>Venkman like character played by Sam Rockwell
>Nerd character played by Michael Cera
>Rough around the edges character played by Danny McBride
>Black nerd played by JB Smoove
>>71221337
I still think it's a good kids movie.
>>71221307
its like a kid who expects a new computer for christmas before his mom takes him shopping foir new clothes anon. 50 millions is probably what they need to justify the sequel
>>71221193
Bill Murray is unreplaceable
>>71221382
So is Tom Segura.
>>71221250
But that's not only a kids movie, it's got a young enough crowd that saw the first that make it feel like a nostalgic retread. And it's a date movie. And it's something you can see with your folks.
It meets a lot of demographics.
>>71220402
>cineIQ
everytime I come to /tv/ there's a new term I've never heard of before.
>>71221395
He's djing now. and he just came out as omni-bi
>>71220977
$150 million in production. How much for marketing? I'm guessing a good $100 mill. Maybe a tad more.
Movie needs to hit $250 million to break even.
If it fails that, there will be no sequel.
Let's see if foreign totals can give it that.
>>71221415
Murray?
>>71221361
Actually would watch as fuck
>>71221437
The studios only get about 25% of foreign gross. And only about 60% of domestic. They have no shot, unless the toys become super popular. Are they doing toys even?
>>71218300
I'm really happy that mindless sequels reboots and remakes are underperforming this summer.
>>71221492
They are. They were clever in that you have to collect all of them to complete the evil giant ghost monster.
Too bad they look like shit
>>71221457
wish I could stab Molly
>>71218530
>seeing or not seeing a movie is now purely politics
I wonder if people like you unironically think this. I mean seriously, how out of touch can you get with the world?
>>71221457
>that moment when your baby man is like
this not ghostbusters, title says ghostbusters but title lie. Baby man work hard, baby man want fun and exciting movie experience
>but you have an exepnsive jo-jour, blogging degree and you just know better
>>71221595
I wouldn't even see this movie high if my gf promised me a blowjob during and afterwards.
>>71221681
thats because you dont have a gf anon
>>71221111
>cam rip will do
That's the only acceptable quality to watch this movie.
>>71221457
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8
>>71221894
Stop posting your shitty videos here.
>>71221944
no.
>>71221193
Why not recast it with women who are actually well-known outside of a dying sketch comedy program?
>>71222156
Well known AND funny. Yeah, that's it. Maybe we could cast a unicorn or two as well.
>>71221894
>Alludes instead of eludes
Moron.
>>71221457
It still blows my mind that someone was paid to write this.
>>71221193
literally whos
>>71220977
How the fuck did this movie cost $150 million to make? Sure as hell can't tell from the trailers.
>>71222412
50 million was used for catering for Melissa McCarthy and 25 million was used to make Leslie Jones behave like a human being or least try their hardest.
>>71222502
The jews pocketed 40mil, leaving 10 to make the actual movie
>>71218885
Yeah, because everybody wants to explain to their kids that the Ghostbuster lady was talking about all the same cracks you're supposed to make sure are clean in the bathtub.
That won't feel awkward at all.
>>71218885
>family flick
>>71223145
kek my goodnessmy god
im trying to think if i'd find that funny if i were a woman but its just so obvious and flagrant. not that thats not been done in comedy before. could it be that women are just behind in comedy?
>>71223145
WTF, that the ghost from the ghostbusters logo.
>>71223752
but it also alludes to the stay puft man in the first ghostbusters! do you see that? do you remember the stay puft man and how bizarre and funny that was?
>>71218300
Any idea when is the embargo being lifted?
>>71218300
Good going /tv/ you guys actually helped it
That's ton of money . This will have no problem making its budget twice
>>71221398
Insert cuck/virgin insult here.
>>71223145
top level humour, truly a masterpiece.
>>71221894
I feel that satire falls a bit flat for being made by men with actual acne.
Additionally, I'm still amused at how ableist it is to make fun of people's skin condition. So much for social justice.
>>71223145
That's them, literally killing the franchise.
They're totally fucked, everyone will drop it for Star Trek now that the actor died.
>>71224401
They should throw their cast under the bus. Not of proverbial kind.
It's the only solution.
>>71222297
Charlie Day, the main writer from always sunny
Dave Chappelle, funny black man
Tom Segura, stand up comedy monster, he also has a distincg face and presence and would look funny just wearing a jumpsuit. He would match the sarcastic detatchment.
Knoechner, the bald guy from every will ferril movie
wtf i hare you know
/tv/ once again can't decide what is a success and what is not.
Love these threads
>>71224043
Yeah I remember the stay puff man... but that was the logo ghost, the ghost that I used to draw when I was little and make Ghostbusters member id cards.
Dream cast:
Eva Green
Amy Mcadams
Kate winslet
Jessica Chastain
Big guy as secretary
>>71224443
Enjoy your poosy drink
>>71224554
Morgan Murphey would be a good murray replacement
I have no idea who any of those chicks are
>>71224595
>I have no idea who any of those chicks are
You don't know ANY of those names? How long have you been coming to /tv/?
>>71218300
when does this goddamn come out already, i am desperate to see the metacritic and RT reviews/scores and the absolute fallout if it does really well or really badly, either way it's going to be amazing
>>71224443
Actually they could have remade it with the four guys from Anchorman, with Christina Applegate as the secretary, and that would have been a fun watch.
>>71224620
I don't pay attention to womens credits. I've never watched a movie because of a chick who was in it.
>>71218530
>none of my friends want to see it, who else possibly could be left once they're out of the picture?
I'm not saying this movie will be successful, nor should it be, but the silent majority of literal plebs who will literally go see anything at all can make or break some movies. It's why Adam Sandler/Kevin Hart etc. movies are always profitable. If you ever see something abysmal and wonder to yourself
>who the fuck is actually paying to watch this
it's them
>>71218300
Let's be serious here for a moment, if this movie is a complete commercial and critical failure, how BTFO will feminists be? They seem to be pinning all of their arguments on the fact that if you won't pay to see this movie or dislike it, you hate women. If it fails, then won't it be a proof that everyone hates women? Could the Ghostbusters remake potentially kill feminism?
>>71221337
I just don't get how with movies and videogames, the turd you enjoyed as a kid is considered a classic in the present. I watched power rangers and listened to backstreet boys as a kid, and sure i get nostalgia, but i don't think of that as classic stuff.
>>71224744
They'll just fall back on teethette and boogaloo making the worst star wars of all time and still selling it.
Is a $40m-$50m opening enough for Sony to break even on this film?
What was its budget?
>>71221193
I dont even care they went 4 women. Personally id done 2 guys 2 girls. Problem is the shitty script and horrible casting.
>>71224401
>dat timing
meme magic saved us from the leftist menace yet again.
>>71224807
150 million.
>>71224828
>150 million dollar turd
They could have made 3 or more good movies with that money. Instead they rehashed a refried dog turd with a shiny recognizable logo on it.
So shitting on the fans of the franchise, calling anyone who remotely question the quality of the film a sexist, and being general gas bags wasn't a good ads strategy?
Who would've thought!!!
Why do leftists think shitting on people is a sound strategy to make people do what they want? Calling me a sexist shitlord makes me LESS likely to do what you want, not more.
>>71222279
Not only paid to.write this. But coming out and saying youre sexist if you dont like my movie. How he didnt get laughed out of hollywood is beyond me.
>>71224828
How much do you guys think they are spending in marketing and shill tactics? The cast has been everywhere for a movie nobody wants to watch, and they are selling the videogame with a free copy of the movie. Liberal websites are gonna shill it for free, but i don't think magazines and all of these tv appearances are cheap.
>goober gate won
>>71224752
Received wisdom. People are told that stuff is good, but they won't really check it.
Some stuff from that time was good though.
>>71222156
That and actually have someone write a proper sequel.
>>71224828
$150m budget + $50m-$75m advertising + movie studios don't get 100% of ticket sales = They better pray the movie does great overseas.
>>71224689
This. I went to see pacific rim opening day. Walked in the theater and it was super fucking crowded. I figured oh shit everyone here is for pacific. I got to my theatre and it was basically empty, confused i went outside to see the lines. And i shit you not 7 theatres all playing grown ups 2 with humongous roped off lines. I died a little that day.
>>71224752
>I watched power rangers and listened to backstreet boys
Kys
>>71224801
>teethette and boogaloo
What the fuck are you saying
>>71224908
>Why do leftists think shitting on people is a sound strategy to make people do what they want?
You're an idiot, mate.
>>71225042
>mfw a show like power rangers and music like backstreet boys is still more creative then half the shit nowadays
INB4 some millennial gets ass hurt.
>>71224554
Sounds good .
>>71225029
It would be pretentious if it weren't an objective fact, but people really do love mediocrity. I guess it's just safe or something.
>>71218300
Why is /tv/ so obsessed with this movie? Let it go, guys.
>>71219891
The dance number got nixed from the final cut.
And now for some box office autism:
I can't see this making more than $100M domestic and $150M overseas. That's $250M total for a movie with a budget of $150M + marketting. So it would need to make $300M just to break even. Sony was probably looking for $500M in total.
>>71225029
Pacific rim was also awful
although not that horrific
>>71224936
Why to people still care about a 2 year old dead 'movement'?
>>71225085
Those are the two main characters. Teethette, the lovable girl with no personality at all and magnificent gnashers. And John Boogaloo, the black man with the same personality as Icarly.
I feel like /tv/ is too dumb so I'll just ask straight out, do people here realize a $30 million US debut is already considered successful?
>>71225042
>kys
go back to facebook friend.
>>71220222
Check my 5
>>71225159
Because it won and they're still butthurt, you never hear the people on the pro side still talk about it's always people who were anti.
Sad.
>>71225102
>backstreet boys
You should be ashamed of yourself, there was great music in the 90's and you listened to fucking backstreet boys, you probably listened to new kids on the block too...
>>71218716
If it flops, rationalism wins.
>>71224378
>>71225239
>because it won
>anita, quinn and probably more are rolling in money right now
>>71225202
According t9 who?
>>71225317
According t9 movies around that budget being called a success at 30, a smash at 70, and the record holder at 90.
>>71218530
My son saw the commercial (He's 9 and loved the original GB movies) and said "They made a Ghostbusters with girls? That is stupid."
A tear rolled down my eye, knowing that I am raising him right,
>>71225291
Then why are the antis still so salty about it after all this time? They're constantly bringing it up like sore losers while the pros have just sort of moved on.
>>71218822
>It being a failure will be a....
Shutitdown.jpg
>>71225202
Not for the Summer it ain't!
You need to open to $100M to earn the title "Summer Blockbuster".
So Rothman and Pascal of the Bialystok and Bloom of Sony?
Rothman already tanked with Trank at Fox.
Wait.
This isn't out, right?
>>71225427
Despite the fact until this day, 90 is the record holder?
No, it is not.
They need to make back the budget + advertising before they even make back their investment. That's >$200M they need to make back. Add to the fact that the movie is releasing when there's a lot of competition and they don't get 100% of ticket sales, and you're looking at a likely loss of several tens of millions of dollars, at least.
>>71225391
The losers packed it up and tried to move on hoping to forget it ever happened.
>>71225467 meant to respond to >>71225202
>>71218530
>tfw when everyone on different political spectrum couldn't give a fuck.
true equality and unity.
>>71225483
But why are the antis still so salty about it? Shouldn't they be basking in their victory?
>>71225455
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/weekends/byseason.htm
>>71225512
Easier to blame everything on one group of people, kind of like what the pro people do.
>>71224908
I don't know... narcissistic belief ?
They are morons ?
>>71225368
>According t9 movies
N9t an argument
>>71225483
try again.
Let's give this movie the Bill Hicks Basic Instinct exam.
> I saw this movie this year called last year called er, 'Basic Instinct'. Okay now. Bill's quick capsule review:
> Piece-of-Shit.
> Okay now. Yeah, yeah, end of story by the way. Don't get caught up in that fevered hype phoney fucking debate about that Piece-of-Shit movie.
> "Is it too sexist, and what about the movies, are they becoming too.."
> You're, you're just confused, you don't get, you've forgotten how to judge correctly. Take a deep breath huh, look at it again.
> "Oh it's a Piece-of-Shit!"
> Exactly, that's all it is. Satan squatted, let out a loaf, they put a fucking title on it, put it on a marquee, Satan's shit, piece of shit, walk away.
> "But is it too, what about the lesbian connot.."
> You're, you're getting really baffled here. Piece-of-Shit! Now walk away. That's all it is, it's nothing more! Free yourself folks, if you see it, Piece-of-Shit, say it and walk away. You're right! You're right! Not those fuckers who want to tell you how to think! You're fucking right!
>>71225494
Mad Max was on a similar budget and made 300 million total, and was considered a success enough they immediately greenlit sequels.
>>71218716
Just like Fant4stic flopping meant racism wins, right?
>>71225371
What do your husband and the father think about this?
>>71225571
>according to facts we can study up to this point
>not an argument
>>71225557
Yeah man everyone is exactly the same as everyone else, no side is better or worse then any other everything is just the same. You're so fucking wise how can I be as smart and wonderful as you? You should write a fucking book or something people need to hear this!
>>71225578
Seeing as anita got away rich instead of being publicly shamed, I would say so.
>>71225645
Please calm down. Don't get upset when parallels are drawn.
>>71225604
To these people, media isn't just a form of entertainment. It is a tool used to advance whatever agenda they want advanced. And if that piece of media fails in its aim to advance some agenda, that that means whatever is the opposite of said agenda 'wins'.
>>71225513
This is worldwide.
>>71225643
Glad you understand
>>71225781
When the threads hit it made a 40 million debut, don't question why articles are calling it a success.
>>71218885
In what fucking universe?
>>71221437
Movie needs to make 250 mil profit to break even.
That's 500 mil + gross.
>>71225885
>It needs to make a profit to break even
>>71225885
Shut the fuck up
Movie only needs to make 10 million dollars to be considered a success
Stop typing out of your ass
>>71220977
>which has yet to wage its biggest and final marketing push
What the fuck else are they going to do? Go door to door and demand money lest they queef people to death?
>>71225957
wat
>>71225391
>>71225512
They're "salty" about everything, 24/7.
One good thing about this flick is that it will be a great test to see if pandering exclusively to feminists/SJWs/Liberals and antagonizing traditional fans is a viable marketing strategy for mainstream success.
>>71225217
>>71218300
Who here thinks this looks pretty funny tbch. I laughed at the trailer its looking like an insta classic senpai
>>71226550
Here we go.
>>71224814
I would prefer the team to be three white women and one big black man, because /tv/ could still lose their shit.
>>71225371
what does your sons father think of this
>>71224554
Only Amy Adams would work man all the others are not even remotely funny or would work for this movie.
2016: the year UK left EU, trump was elected president of US and SJW died
>>71218970
People said the same thing about Fant4stic. If the critics shit on it for being a bad movie, despite SJWs trying to argue that the crusade against it was racism over MBJ being cast as Johnny, then I would argue that it is possible the same may happen here, especially considering that like Fant4stic, the reason for vitriol against this has nothing to do with the SJW cause as much as the fact that the fundamentals of the movie as a vehicle to tell a story as well as the story being told as well as the adaptation when compared to the source being adapted or reimagined are complete fucking shit.
To the anon above, as well as >>71225746
I would simply say that for all of the lead up damage control from the Salons and Mother Jones, and Vice, and Huffington Posts who dismissed pre-release hate as bigotry, I would challenge you to try and find a piece post release that tried to defend Fant4stic from the criticisms of the movie reviewers who lambasted the fuck out of it. Try to find a piece that says that bigots won because Fant4stic failed.
You won't, because they weren't there. Yes, SJWs will assume out the ass and defend hot shit just because it has even the slightest affiliation with a minority and is being shit on by the internet, but as Fant4stic's actors and production brought attention to the hate being thrown their way by shitting on the haters in public just as those affiliated with this reboot have done, I would wager that we didn't like Fant4stic before it was released because the plot and script was leaked, and we thought it was shit. The exact same thing happened with this Ghostbusters reboot. I'm not a betting man, but if I were I'd say the calm that was found upon the release of Fant4stic by those who defended it pre-release, who are doing the same thing with Ballbusters, will more likely than not find that same calm when they and the world discover that it wasn't sexism behind the shit being flung at it. It was simple basic uncomplicated taste.
>>71221269
I still can't believe there's 5 Ice Age movies. I mean I liked the first one, but I didn't think it was 4 sequels good
BUILD THE WALL
A reminder that not wanting to see this piece of shit apparently makes you a misogynistic Hitler.
>>71227340
Terry Crews as Veddemore
>>71224060
It has to be on the day of.
>>71218716
when this flops, Sony execs will realize that they have to be at least a little creative to make money
>>71223145
>feminist flick showing male genital torture
what a shock! this movie looks like absolute garbage
>>71218449
The difference is that no one had any reason to defend Trant4stic, while there are thousands of people defending female ghostbusters for brownie points.
>>71231101
They've had numerous opportunities to learn this lesson and not once has it sunk in. Sony Pictures would need a clean wipe of the higher ups to have any chance of becoming good/profitable again.
How do they project information like this?
>150 million dollars
What the fuck is wrong with these people. It's 50 million dollar idea at best
>>71227340
Max Landis wants it to be three black guys and one white woman.
>>71218300
Mfw it cant screen in china because of thier "no ghosts policy" not even the gooks can save this turd B O M B.
C O N F I R M E D.
>>71225291
Anita was rolling in money well before GG, m8.
>>71218300
They're over-stating it. I'm calling $20 million.
>>71230215
When Shrek fell from grace Ice Age ended up filling the void, and unlike Shrek it doesn't rely too heavily on pop culture jokes meaning even more worldwide appeal. It doesn't have to be great, it just has to be 90 minutes of not-shit.
>>71224659
I like it but these guys have huge personalities, it would be too "in your face" comedy. These popped into my head, a bit more subdued. I would maybe even enjoy this. (Sticking with archtypes:)
Bill Hader/Ed Helms - (Nerd)
Sean William Scott - (Dry, Womaniser)
Chris Pratt/Paul Rudd - (Leader, the "heart")
Black Guy as Black Guy.
This movie is an example of why pirating has gotten so big
>>71232148
THIS.
Just look at shit like Jump Street, Starsky and Hutch, Dukes of Hazzard. They should have went the comedic route
Or at the very least put an ounce of thought into a new story to catch up the franchise to the current year.
>>71218822
...a what?
>>71218449
I remember articles saying it would open in the $50 Million range, you can never really trust "tracking", its really just what the studio hopes its opening weekend will look like but it almost always changes.
>>71232313
you're satan aren't you?
>>71226550
Safe to say that it won't work. The model ever since raimi Spiderman has been to pander to the nerds and Comic Con.
It's basically why they're attacking this "man child" bravado. It's going to bite them hard.
They've pissed off the nerds and people aren't falling for their manipulation marketing bullshit.
>>71220308
>$0.10 has been deposited in your account.
>>Females over the age of 25 are by far the most interested in seeing the new Ghostbusters, according to those with access to prerelease tracking
Keikaku doori? (Keikaku means plan)
>>71218530
>Are they just lying at this point?
Yes.
>>71218300
A lot of us voted out of Europe in the hope that copyright wouldn't allow that film into the country.
>>71220890
>*tips furiously*
>>71221597
Underrated
Never forget:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AQ44nPrRTM
>>71232277
Oh yeah. Also, correct me if I'm wrong I haven't seen the movies in years but Jeepers Creepers only kills boys in the movies, right?
>>71221193
Chapelle has an iffy record in movies, plus his casting would of been better 10 years ago
>>71218716
If this doesn't flop that means more genderswapsand I'm ok with that
>>71221193
>Let's recast Ghostbusters 2016
>>71219803
>>71220697
What you idiots don't seem to get, is that as long as these completely unnecessary remakes continue to make money, they will continue to shit them out. No more imagination or creativity, just fucking rehashes. The best part is that is already headed in that direction because original movie ideas don't male shit in the box office because people just don't care to watch things that aren't familiar to them. That's bad enough but when they eventually get around to that "Back To The Future" remake, you'll finally understand.
>>71233761
>Back to the Future Remake
Zemeckis is making sure that doesn't happen
>>71233787
And when he dies??
>>71218300
What's a $50 million opening? $200 million total with solid word of mouth and reviews?
$500 million worldwide if everything goes well?
>>71234078
no, pretty much now-a-days movies have that opening weekend then drop off to nothing before being swept away in a week or two for more 3D screens of some other blockbuster.
>>71231165
the media was defending the black casting, but it didn't get this out of hand.
>>71221250
the majority of woman are moms taking their kids.
>>71234111
So domestically even with a $50 million opening they're probably looking at less than $150 million?
What do MRAs, Gamergaters, White Supremacists, Anti-Semites, Islamaphobes, Trump supporters, Brexiters and people who hate Ghostbusters irrationally have in common?
>>71234189
oh yeah movies drop like 70% in viewership after the first weekend. If it got 50 million the first weekend then it wouldn't even crack 100 million by the time it's done
>>71234210
they are always proven right?
>>71234210
>What do MRAs, Gamergaters, White Supremacists, Anti-Semites, Islamaphobes, Trump supporters, Brexiters and people who hate Ghostbusters irrationally have in common?
4chan?
>>71218300
"Tracking"
What does that even mean? What are they basing those numbers on?
>>71234233
I'm trying to find some comparable movies but I'm struggling, but best case seems to be 3x opening weekend, but more likely around 2-2.5x.
Point is that even the studio are seeing this as mid tier garbage.
looks like it's stuck between a couple of animated films (Pets and Ice Age) and has Star Trek to contend with the following week.
Can't see this being in any way successful.
>>71234258
Sample size of one:
Massive white cock and ridiculous good looks.
I'm pretty sure they're just trying to trick people into thinking that it's an anticipated movie.
Basically they want people to say: "A lot of people are going to see the Ghostbusters movie, let's go watch it too."
>>71234410
kek yeah.. me too.
All they had to do was make a live action version of this. It would've been more progressive and extremely good.
>>71234564
Silly me, forgot the picture.
>>71234210
their mothers aren't whores?
