>http://www.indiewire.com/2016/06/full-movie-here-web-series-women-top-movies-there-will-be-blood-1201688720/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqEvNds5rgI
There’s a severe lack of films with female protagonists. It’s a simple and upsetting fact that needs to be changed. Recently, Disney and LucasFilm have been taking massive steps with “The Force Awakens” showcasing the talents of lead actress Daisy Ridley and “Rogue One” set to star Felicity Jones. And it seems like another group of filmmakers have joined the charge.
Toni-Marie Gallardo and Andrea Lee Christensen of YouTube channel Supertramp Co. launched a new web series called “Full Movie Here,” which takes famous movies starring men and places women in the leading roles. But that’s not all. Each entry will not only change the gender of the protagonist, but will also wipe the slate clean, changing the story, characters and genre as well — partly because the writers haven’t seen them.
Rather than taking a jab at the films they’re basing the episodes off of, “Full Movie Here” plans to, per their Indiegogo page in efforts to fund future episodes, “create a platform where we can put women at the forefront in interesting and unexpected ways.” For their first episode, the two made “There Will Be Blood,” a film about a vampire that finds out the party she’s at is BYOB — bring your own blood — and not a spread of necks. Gallardo served as the director and Christensen served as the writer on “Full Movie Here’s” comedic take on the Paul Thomas Anderson film. Check out the episode below.
For their next entries, FMH plans to put out “The Wolf of Wall Street” as “a campy horror film about a sexually frustrated werewolf” and “Finding Nemo” as a film “about the struggles of growing up in a Kardashian-like family.”
>but will also wipe the slate clean, changing the story, characters and genre as well — partly because the writers haven’t seen them.
this is stupid and pointless.
There are plenty of movies with women as the protagonist
It's just they're all romance/musical movies because those are the only genres women love
Don't these people have jobs and shit?
How can they afford to live?
>We're gonna take someones work and shit all over it.
>We're changing all the actors
>And the story and characters
>The only thing we're keeping is the title
So they're just making shitty movies that they hope will get publicity and coverage based on a stupid stunt?
>Toni-Marie Gallardo and Andrea Lee Christensen of YouTube channel Supertramp Co.
they have 50 subscribers
this is making them sound like well established producers
>>70986201
Hopefully they can't and will die.
>>70986334
I second this
>bring your own blood
mind numbing
>>70986169
this is patriarchy thinking that women only love comedies and romance. They also like suspense.
>>70986445
GET IT!
It'S LIE BRING YUOR OWN BOOZE!
Isn't this similar to what they do in Me, Earl and the Dying Girl?
It wasn't that bad.
The article makes it seem like they're gender swapping the movies but they just used the title.
>>70986030
>For their first episode, the two made “There Will Be Blood,” a film about a vampire
Thankfully there are also women out there who would call these idiots out.
>>70986522
or there will be booze....
zzzzzz level shit
>>70986287
Literally Asylum tier without the ability to watch with people while drinking etc
This is why women aren't respected.
>>70986030
>>70986030
>movie starts off with light adult jazz and looking at a candle.
>mimics title from There will be blood without the same levity
>shakey cam with shitty MIDI drums made on Garageband.
>acting and sound so cringe, can't stand to listen to it
Like the actual sound quality of it. No idea how to mix a track.
>>70986030
>doing a movie called "There will be Blood" featuring women
>not basing all the humor on periods
This is how you know they're shit writers.
>>70986030
>For their first episode, the two made “There Will Be Blood,” a film about a vampire that finds out the party she’s at is BYOB — bring your own blood — and not a spread of necks.
TL;DR
Full Movie Here is an AWFUL name for something on the internet because it just sounds like a fake movie downloading website
>>70986030
>Each entry will not only change the gender of the protagonist, but will also wipe the slate clean, changing the story, characters and genre as well — partly because the writers haven’t seen them.
What's the fucking point then? Just give them original titles then.
>take one of the best films of the last 20 years
>remake it as a shitty attempt at comedy using a dated as fuck premise
>le vampires have vampires parties xd
Yeah this will change the perception on women as artists and comedians
>>70986030
'There Will be Blood' could actually be a much better title for a story about a teenage girl coming of age. I'm not irritated that these retards are worse at coming up with ideas for stupid remakes of great movies than I am, and I hate the concept to the core.
>>70986030
>Rather than taking a jab at the films they’re basing the episodes off o
>basing the episodes
>“There Will Be Blood,” a film about a vampire that finds out the party she’s at is BYOB — bring your own blood
So in other words it has nothing to do with the original movie not even as a spoof, other than the title.
>“The Wolf of Wall Street” as “a campy horror film about a sexually frustrated werewolf” and “Finding Nemo” as a film “about the struggles of growing up in a Kardashian-like family.”
So it's like bad Youtube original movies, but you should watch it because
> severe lack of films with female protagonists
Muh misogyny.
Women want affirmative action so bad.
>create movie plots based on titles
This is almost exactly like those threads on /tv/ when the captcha had just begun and it was actual words. Except then it was actually funny
Haven't these chicks done a few movies?
>>70986030
So... they are just re using the title? Click Bait title for a stupid idea.
>>70986030
i forgot TWBB was about vampires
>>70986030
This is fucking disgusting. On so many levels.
>Vampires
>Relevant
Is it 2010 again?
Next one should be "No Country For Old Men". It's about a group of wacky zany brave women who play country music, but they refuse to play for old, evil and racist white men. NO COUNTRY FOR THEM GET IT XDDD
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/disney-acquires-rights-to-female-indiana-jones-graphic-novel-series-a7057766.html
Studio giants Disney has turned its attention to a graphic novel series led by a character described as a 'female Indiana Jones.'
The source material - named Delilah Dirk and the Turkish Lieutenant - follows the titular protagonist as she treads the globe performing high-octane actions such as battling pirates and traveling around on her flying boat.
Deadline reports that the first book in the series will be adapted into a 19th century-set live action film beginning with a prison escape in Turkey.
The film will introduce Delilah's 'mild-mannered' sidekick, Selim as well as Delilah herself who is a swashbuckling sword expert trained in 27 differing techniques; we're sure Disney will tone down the violence for a family-friendly audience.
>There’s a severe lack of films with female protagonists. It’s a simple and upsetting fact that needs to be changed.
>It’s a simple and upsetting fact that needs to be changed.
>upsetting
>>70987391
I'll bet you 5000 us dollaroos there's a period blood joke in it
hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahhah
Are you really allowed to make commentary about the modern film industry if you haven't seen There Will Be Blood?
>>70986118
This.
This is like changing Weird Science to being a movie about two girls throwing a bitching party because you didn't know it's literally about that and not strange science shit.
Also if The Thinn was all female, the movie would be either a short film or a ten hr long mini-series.
>>70986030
So those chicks haven't seen there will be blood? Goddamn what fucking plebs
>>70986030
>There’s a severe lack of films with female protagonists.
Only if you are just talking about blockbusters. There are tons in lower budget movies with women. Here are just a handful of great ones from the past couple years.
> Carol
> The Babadook
> Phoenix
> A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night
> Blue Jasmine
> The Neon Demon
> Meek's Cutoff
> American Mary
> Barbara
> It Follows
> I Am Love
> Francis Ha
> Excision
> Black Swan
> Starry Eyes
> Room
> Housebound
> Clouds of Sils Maria
>>70987414
>Gritty teen drama about a 13 girl trying to just fit in
>She only see's constant shit from the media about how you need to be thin/it's ok to be fat
>Gets into a fight near the end of the movie
>That night she gets her period
It needs work but it would still be better
>>70988417
> Blue Jasmine
Are there any other movies that show just how great Cate is?
>>70988637
Carol
They're always pulling this 1984 shit where they claim in the past there was no this and that but now, thanks to the tireless work of social justice warriors, "massive steps" are being taken, and movies/comic books/video games are at last "growing up." But remember: there's still a lot of work to be done. There always is.
>>70988576
Pushing the media influence could be interesting. Like her absent parents lead her to only see the world as corporate America has framed it. And it shouldn't be super scathing, it could be presented as admittedly more comfortable since you don't have to think too much or try hard and still have a decent, expected life.
But there could be some sudden awakening to the word being otherwise. Where it goes from there, I dunno, but I always like the Tragedy of Relapse probably because its so plausible and, by painting such a bleak yet truthful portrait of human nature, almost seems destined to happen.
Kind of like the very ending of End of Evangelion where it butters you up and then at the very last moment pulls the rug under you, prompting you to think "oh, right. that's how it would go."
>>70986030
Is this an attempt at viral?
>>70986169
what aboyt the blunt in sicario ?
>>70986030
So they're just making original short films and then attaching the name of an existing film to it?
>>70986201
They hole up in flophouses with 10 other gamejournos, indie "devs" and failed actors.
>>70986030
>Indiegogo
Go ahead. Get butthurt, raid them and make them famous like Anita Khardashian.
>>70986118
This whole this is pointless and makes me hate women more than I already do as a respectable platypus.
>>70988417
>implying blockbusters lack female protags
Lets focus on scifi/fantasy since romance/comedy is low hanging fruit with decades of female protags.
>Hunger Games Series
>Alien series
>Divergent series
>LadyHawke
>Kill Bill series
>Firefly and it's television series
>Star Trek Voyager
>Contact
>Children of Men
>Star Wars
>The Terminator series
>The Matrix series
>Pacific Rim
>>70986201
They literally get free money.
>>70986030
>There Will Be Blood (2016)
>cast is 100% white
>cast is 100% cishet
>film crew is undoubtedly white and cishet as fuck
>fails the Bechdel test
Absolutely disgusting.
>>70986030
As someone who is a feminist and has read a good amount of feminist philosophy / gender theory- this is fucking stupid and does absolutely nothing to advance the cause of feminism or undermine patriarchal power structures. How does the protagonist's lived experience as a woman inform the narrative? What statement is the film making about gender roles, objectification of the female body, or any other significant topic in feminist discourse?
>Each entry will not only change the gender of the protagonist, but will also wipe the slate clean, changing the story, characters and genre as well — partly because the writers haven’t seen them
Avoiding a film like "There Will Be Blood" is borderline unforgivable if you are interested in film. It's the best thing hollywood's made in like 20 years IMO. This is just embarassing- please don't let this type of bullshit sway your notions about feminism or turn you into a misogynist. Fuck this bullshit. It's not what feminism should be about.
>>70988971
>>70988971
They just want that easy nerd patreon money
>>70986118
>that shit cinematography
>that shit acting
>that shit soundtrack
>that truly patethic editing
Yeah, this can compare to the original and it's totally not a cash-grab.
THIS IS NOW A PTA THREAD:
Inherent Vice was great, one of his best works for sure. I've never understood the hate.
>>70991132
As a huge fan of Pynchon and PTA, IV was a huge letdown personally. The soundtrack is amazing though.
>>70991132
Didn't see Inherent Vice yet but TWBB is truly a excellent movie. It easily made its way on my (more or less subjective) Top 32.
Any other great movie about "Ambition" to recommand ?
>>70986030
>showcasing the talents of lead actress Daisy Ridley
what in the fuck are these people talking about
she's a terrible actress. get a fucking grip.
>>70991214
The Wolf Of Wall Street
>>70991236
Yes. But i meant like, aside of Scorsesse's and maybe Tarantino's flick..
>>70986169
My mom loves sci-fi and fantasy more than anything, closely followed by any sort of action. She fucking loves shit like Olympus Has Fallen and Mad Max, etc, and just flat out hates musicals.
So I'm not so sure, although she really likes romance comedies as well, she just doesn't like them as much as the other genres.
>>70988417
meeks cutoff blueballed me so hard. What a stupid ending.
>>70990998
>As someone who is a feminist and has read a good amount of feminist philosophy / gender theory
When I was growing up people actually tried to make their bait not obvious
>>70986118
Nailed it.
What purpose does it even serve to fucking name their shit after the originals?
Also I am fucking sick of shallow depth of field in ugly short films. It's like they heard it's good but don't understand why. It looks repugnant.
>>70990088
Yep.
The deserve to be ignored and then killed when everyone forgets about them.
>>70986964
my first thought.
also, uh, even the asylum has to alter the titles of their films a lot of the time. Are they trusting these media companies won't sue because then they'd cry misogyny on twitter? Cause this shit isn't fair use. It's actually just violating copyrights for money.
>>70987015
idiots exist everywhere and on every side of every issue.
>>70992228
Not bait- just prefacing my statement so as not to be taken for an MRA or bigoted /b/tard. Did you even read the rest of my post? Do you read, in general?
>When I was growing up
I'm probably older than you, big guy.
Self-respecting women should be offended by this shit
>>70990998
while I assume this is bait, I don't think these nobodies trying for a cash grab is really even a blip on the radar for serious feminists when their whole online presence is dominated by radical regressive socialists.
Even serious intersectional feminists would be more upset about that than a few childish people trying to scam people.
>>70986030
are these people just doing this to piss me off at this point?
there will be blood is a legendary piece of work you fucking cunts
>>70992965
is the joke that There Will Be Blood actually speaks very heavily to the strengths and weaknesses of masculinity as a viable source of identity but they're too stupid to realize it?
>>70992626
You're really trying, and I'm not sure if it's commendable or not.
>>70992804
>I state that I am a feminist
>Everyone assumes my post is bait
Regarding your comment about "radical regressive socialists"- historically, feminist thought has always been influenced by Marxist thought. Within Marx's materialist conception of history, class struggle can be traced to the nuclear family- with the husband as the oppressing class and the wife as the oppressed class. Engels, who co-developed Marxism with Marx, wrote "The Origin of the Family..." which is an important work of first wave feminism. I don't think "serious feminists" would be upset by a socialist bent in feminism because it has always been an important part of feminism.
Obviously the people making these videos are virtually a non-entity but stuff like this is commonplace now and cumulatively it tarnishes the reputation of feminism in the public eye. It does more harm than good, in my opinion.
>>70992998
Cool.
>>70986030
>take copyrighted title
>use said title in your own original production
sure, it's not like there are laws or anything concerning this.
Also the combination of the title and "full movie here" makes this look like an ad you see on a porn site. They sure played the "journalist" who wrote the article like a fucking fiddle though
>>70987370
>>70987297
It's a clickbait technique. So anyone who googles "there will be blood full movie" will find their shitty irrelevant movie instead.
>>70988417
>> A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night
Cool title, what's this abo-
>Residents of a worn-down Iranian city encounter a skateboarding vampire (Sheila Vand) who preys on men who disrespect women.
Aaand we're back.
>>70986030
>Each entry will not only change the gender of the protagonist, but will also wipe the slate clean, changing the story, characters and genre as well
THEN WHAT IS THE FUCKING POINT
>>70993578
earn money off useful idiots
>>70993566
>Imbd
>7/10
who was cucked enough to claim this was good
>>70988400
they wouldn't understand it even if they saw the movie
>>70993566
you just hate art
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuN4wcDGlIc
>but will also wipe the slate clean, changing the story, characters and genre as well — partly because the writers haven’t seen them.
WW3 can't start soon enough
Please God, release us from this evil
>>70992649
Yep. Fuck all these con artists who hide behind feminism as a shield to defend their shitty art and egos and to make a quick buck.
Thanks for making women look like a complete joke. I hope it was worth it, Anita/Ghostbusters/Etc.
>>70986201
they're supported by their parents/husbands
>>70993725
So they are NEETs playing on easy?
Is the 'female protagonist' thing actually the angle that the film makers are taking, or is it that they're just parody performers who happen to be female and the article is spinning it as feminism for clickbait?
>women take the title and make a movie with vampires and/or werewolves based on the title
WHO WOULD'VE THOUGHT?
And women wonder why they don't have a larger role in Hollywood, all their ideas are garbage.
>>70990998
>and has read a good amount of feminist philosophy / gender theory
>gender theory
I'm so sorry, anon.
hopefully one day every movie will have a mandatory mary sue
>>70986201
>...per their Indiegogo page in efforts to fund...
>>70993517
fools get what they deserve
>>70986030
>partly because the writers haven’t seen them.
>>70986546
That's even worse, not only because the ,,,,directors.... in question haven't seen some of the most acclaimed movies but because they're using their titles to fool people. It's pathetic.
>>70993566
It was a nice movie actually, I don't remember finding it obnoxious.
>>70994540
It was so goddamn boring and shitty, Juper Ascending was better
>>70994614
>Juper Ascending was better
Phäm, no
They're crowdfounding so this is what will really happen:
They take all of the money and horribly mismanage it until they run dry and make a video crying about how they're sorry they let women down. Then they announce they're doing another crowd funding campaign.
>>70986030
>partly because the writers haven’t seen them.
U wot m8
Even porn puts more effort into their parodies than this shit.
>>70986030
>For their next entries, FMH plans to put out “The Wolf of Wall Street” as “a campy horror film about a sexually frustrated werewolf” and “Finding Nemo” as a film “about the struggles of growing up in a Kardashian-like family.”
Then what the fuck is the fucking point of this fucking shit
That's the fucking stupidest thing I've ever heard, it defeats the point of what they're aiming to do in the first place
Fucking hell I hate this fucking generation
>>70986030
>but will also wipe the slate clean, changing the story, characters and genre as well — partly because the writers haven’t seen them.
Jesus fucking christ this is awful.
>>70987728
It's funny how you can see flops years before they're even released.
>>70993566
Funny thing it was marketed as an Iranian film when it fucking wasn't, it was just some American woman that made it.
>>70986030
> haven’t seen them
Indie filmmakers using a mainstream-chasing gimmick to get people to watch their original screenplays? I'm fine with this. Pity it has to be this way, though - there were feminist indie filmmakers for years who made their own things with no reference to multiplex dreck.
>>70988034
The majority of the modern film industry is more pleb than their audiences. Unless they are in a technical role I would guess that a lot of them haven't seen stuff like There Will Be Blood. The latest Marvel film however is another fucking story. This is part of the reason movies are the way they are now.
>>70986030
Jesus, what is wrong with these people? Why even pretend there's a connection to the other films if you're not going to make it even slightly similar? All this does is make the film suffer by comparison and imply that when women are calling the shots, you get something derivative and inferior.
Hey women, here's a crazy idea: Since you just demonstrated that you can get films made, why not make some great films that contribute to the history of cinema to demonstrate what women can accomplish? Or y'know, you could just make some insignificant garbage as a thinly veiled whinge about how women deserve more acclaim simply for being women rather than earning it.
>>70986030
>but will also wipe the slate clean, changing the story, characters and genre as well — partly because the writers haven’t seen them.
My first knee-jerk reaction to this is that it's stupid and insulting to both audiences and the people involved in the original movies. But after a moments consideration; it could also be hilarious if done right. I do love a good parody.
>or their first episode, the two made “There Will Be Blood,” a film about a vampire that finds out the party she’s at is BYOB — bring your own blood
Welp. Looks like my knee-jerk reaction was right!
>>70987728
> delilah
> dallila
> hebraic name
> selim
> muslim name
A story about a kike with her sidekick turk closeted homosexual
> yfw it can get any better than this
Kek it's literally just short unfunny womyn comedy skits. They're acting like this is revolutionary when its like a fucking MadTV sketch.
>>70986201
>It was at that moment anon started to realize that donations, no matter how small, keep "activists" free to not work and continue shit posting irl
I hate comparing feminism to the civil-rights movement ever, but Malcolm x didn't pay for his trip to Mecca with money he earned.
>let's take title's of movies we've never seen and make movies based on what we think they're about
wow that's pretty cool and creative
>the 'there will be blood" one is about a party of vampires and how one of them really wants some blood! xD
wow that's fucking stupid
>also let's use this as a platform to bitch about the patriarchy like everyone else and pretend we're pushing diversity forward through art
and this is how you can ruin a great idea by putting stupid people in charge of it
so they steal names from big movies they have never seen and just change everything about them? wow
>>70986030
So...All this is is just taking the titles of popular male dominated movies and applying them to completely different stories that happen to be all female?
A-And this is some kind of movement?
>>70996689
>fact: mainstream media mostly panders to male audiences
>let's do a send up by remaking movies with female cast
>but let's also change the plot and characters so it's something completely different, keeping only the title for clickbait
what kind of fucking logic is that?
making a female TWBB would be kinda interesting if they actually got it right (what if a ruthless, borderline sociopathic woman tried to make it into the oil business back then). but if they want to make a shitty vampire flick, then make a fucking vampire flick and drop this false pretend-agenda
>there will be blood
>in MAH TAMPON LOLOL
>female humor
compare to the refined male humor in my attached image and realize woman's place in the animal kingdom, not just below men,
but below dogs, koala bears, pigmy moths, and black people
Just on the top of my head
>alien franchise
>halloween
>colours trilogy
>gone with the wind
>g.i jane
>amelie
>double life of veronique
>thelma & louise
>kill bill
>zero dark thirty
>the cranes are flying
>breakfast at tiffanys
>all about eve
>dogville
>the others
>the silence of the lambs
>dead man walking
>boys dont cry
>erin brockovich
>black swan
>la femme nikita
>Fargo
>Mulholland drive
>Contact
>Gravity
These fucking retards need to watch more movies.
>>70986030
So they are using the movie's name to get clicks but it has nothing to do with the movie aside from the fact that they feel, despite not having seen it, that it should be recast with females.
The bar is set real low for females, isn't it?
This seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
>>70986030
D R O P P E D
>>70986030
>Each entry will not only change the gender of the protagonist, but will also wipe the slate clean, changing the story, characters and genre as well
>So... another movie entirely
>I want to remake Star Wars but set it on an island where dinosaurs run amok and kill people.
What the fuck are these dingbats on about?
Boring movie desu
>>70990532
Women's Rights were a mistake.
>>70987463
>>70986030
This is getting fucking ridiculous now. This period of history is going to be looked back on embarrassingly by both men and women.
>it's a /tv/ getting triggered episode
This season has been full of them
>>70986299
Who do you think created the thread?
>>70986030
>but will also wipe the slate clean, changing the story, characters and genre as well
So it's going to be the feminist version of those shitty straight to video made-in-the-Philippines ripoff sequels to Vietnam movies that the Italians produced in the '80s, except shittier?
I don't get what's going through these cunt's heads? Instead of setting up some kind of feminist film movement which could actually produce some interesting movies if it wasn't heavily centered on "cis", sjw, "pc", propaganda but instead on producing movies which deals with women's themes e.i. something similar to mumblecore and work of Eleonore Hendricks such as The Pleasure of Being Robbed, basically creating movies similar to James White but with women cast and a script that actually fits.
I don't see how just violently setting women into places which weren't intended for them helps anything? I really don't understand this. Why create something when you are not creative? Why just copy work of others, yes I'm talking about you crew of Ghostbusters, instead of creating something new which indisputably would have a greater merit?
This is a fucking retarded world we live in and I just can't fucking comprehend this.
>>70986201
Nu male funding
>>70992990
>is the joke that There Will Be Blood actually speaks very heavily to the strengths and weaknesses of masculinity as a viable source of identity but they're too stupid to realize it?
Same as the joke that Lawrence of Arabia is an extended critique of the idea of white saviors, but you only get that if you listen to what the non-white characters in the movie say?
Yep, I think so.
Don't give this shit the views.
>>70992426
>shallow depth of field
care to explain why it's used? genuinely curious
>>70997342
I know. I thought the point of gender equality is that women can do what men can do, and movies focusing mostly on men is ruining that idea. This sounds like something that is supposed to uphold that idea by showing gender swapped movies can be done, but apparently you have to change the entire story?
>>70986535
yeah except they somehow managed to make it shittier
>>70986030
makes me even angrier is thru the fact that based on the 2 examples given its all gonna be stupid hipster shit.
>byob
>sexually frustrated werewolf
>kardashianesque life
not one of those ideas holds a candle to the stories of the titles they are stealing
listen up shitlords it's time for women to take the stage. Here is my pitch for a great movie that only WOMEN WILL UNDERSTAND. Master and Commander, a road trip movie about a clueless sexless husband who refuses to listen to his wife's superior navigational skills. All while the wife is secretly crushin on the said husband's brother who is total bae material.
>>70991132
huge PTA fan, but lately he has turned into a meme director. The Master and Inherent Vice were awful
>>71002239
>The Master was awful
Spotted the pleb.
>>70991132
>He’s like a benign Gaspar Noé. I think he cares about cinema, he’s just a small fry. He wants to be Altman and he wants to be Alan Rudolph, and I know why: those are good examples. He’s just not there. I don’t think he’s got an original bone in his body. It’s kind of unfortunate, because I think he cares about making movies.
>>70986030
she's cute
hope they get sued
>>70986201
>Don't these people have jobs and shit?
>How can they afford to live?
Indiegogo !
Indiegogo !
Indiegogo !
>>71003213
2 grand a month.
For doing nothing.
At all.
>game was finished years ago and slated as shit. Keep donating though.
>>70995055
>original screenplays
>movies about partying vampires and a werewolf tranny
>original screenplays
