They are both good why didn't 28 Months Later happen?
>>70894348
28 weeks later was lame
Only the first half of the first one was OK. The rest was garbage.
Good movies, I'd love to see one based in americuckistan.
>>70894362
the opening was pretty spectacular and promised a good film.
It really went nowhere fast though.
>>70894362
Middle act was lame, beginning was very good and ending ok.
>>70894348
Because Godspeed You Black Emperor kill everything that they touch
>>70894348
The third one, 28 Months Later, if it ever gets made will be set in China to grab that market.
because what comes after 'weeks' smart guy. theres no good title for it to even happen
>>70894348
I could have sworn I watched a third one. What the fuck did I watch?
>>70896024
months
years
decades
centuries
>>70894348
everyone hating on 28 weeks later, let me just remind you Imogen Poots a cute.
>>70895837
kek
>>70896024
I put one in the post....
>>70894348
Both Screenplays completely fell apart. It was half baked but had some nice characters and music. I really liked the soundtrack to the first one.
I thought the first was just as forgettable as The Crazies remake or anything like that. Why am I wrong?
>>70896785
Music, characters, tone, the gay climax where "who are the bad guys here, mindless zombies or humanity itself?"
Other than making very little sense story wise it was a fun zombie movie. Setting it in England was good because here in the states we all have guns. Only when they meet up with the soildiers are there guns, but with them the soilders had power over them.
Like if there were zombies here in Phoenix I really don't think anything bad would happen. They would all dehydrate and die and we would all shoot the rest.
