is this worth seeing?
i'm beginning to notice that if critics don't like a film, it's either irredeemably bad or against the status quo (or both).
>>70685929
it's painfully average to be honest
it does have a sequence that is basically the game so i enjoyed the faithfulness of that parteven though i never played the game
Try it, there's a HD rip out.
>>70685929
It is against the status quo. To the extent that the movie HAS a message, its message is conservative.
But it's also a thoroughly mediocre, lifeless cash-grab, and it only exists because some fucking retard thought it'd be a good idea to spend millions on the movie rights to the game "Angry Birds." It's absolutely not worth seeing
>>70686006
since it was funded by the finns, i was considering paying to see it in theaters. "is it worth paying for?" is more my question.
Yes it's a good movie. Don't let political negative reviews scare you away
>>70686488
politically negative? hell, i embrace that
>>70686064
Is that you, Jim?
it's movie based on a fuckin flash game. are you retarded?
>>70685929
its rather meh.
a couple okay slapstick jokes, thats it.
>>70686828
well it IS the best video-game movie to date actually.
Not that this means much.
It's totally fine, which is much better than I thought it would be.
>>70685929
isn't it hated because the anti-migrant messages?
Literally red pill the flickography
