New international trailer:
https://youtu.be/TBNUpOlAULk
>anyone thinking this will do good in the most sexist asian nation
lol, the manniquine scene was alright though
>>70548673
The mannequin part did get a slight chuckle out of me.
>>70548606
>the black one gets maybe a half a second of screen time
BRAVO SONY
"We're Ghostbusters!"
-Surrounding crowd cheers-
Welp, just saw the ending.
>>70548606
>that pic
yup, thats what I think about when I see ghostbusters, wacky zany cartoon characters.
>>70548809
They understand the Asian market well.
Hit the thumbs down folks!
>>70548606
I feel sick. The fucking marshmallow man looks horrible.
>Is the beam not working scene supposed to be a penis joke?
>>70548885
"We're Ghostbusters!"
the crowd erupts in a bloody guffaw, trembling the chairs beneath them with eruptious a mass of flatulence, seizuring and shitting profusely
>>70549171
a metaphor for a failed handjob?
>>70549168
I'd thumb it down just to see what new way they make themselves sound stupid.
"baby men"
ironic.
>tfw no qt lesbian ghostbuster in a decent movie
>>70549180
>BigBangTheoryPosting
Retro meme.
>>70549196
No it's a metaphor for the rising impotence of men in casual sexual relationships.
t. Erectile dysfunction expeet
>>70548606
holy shit look at how quirky they are
it's gonna be so fucking bad. I can't wait for all the feminists and numales pretending to like it.
>>70549242
>t. Erectile dysfunction expeet
Dr. Babek?
femkino...
>>70549220
>What we could have had.
>>70548809
Would do Asians dislike loud mouth niggers so much? Why the hate?
I don't understand what she says to the mannequin
>>70549344
Cause the original four Ghostbusters were super attractive, right?
I can't wait for this movie to tank. The critics will hate it and specify that it's not a women/sexist thing. The feminists will have no logical rebuttal and lose any credibility that they might (didn't really) have.
The beast will eat itself.
> pic related.
It's already begun...
>>70549424
>lose any credibility
That's cute, anon. That you think that would ever happen.
>>70549168
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8
>sjw's think people are being misogynistic towards the movie
>the main reason people hate it is because 50% of the main cast aren't funny and rely on stereotypical character types rather than be original and funny like the original
>>70549388
Yes?
Are you a Dyke?
>no Tilda Swinto ay lmao ghost guest performance
D
R
O
P
P
E
D
>>70549506
This video reeks of /v/eddit
>>70548606
>wiig phoning it in hard
>dialogue is shit
Honestly doesn't look as bad as I thought after watching the first trailer. If you replaced Kristen Wig and the fat one with two no-name's it'd be way more watchable though.
>>70549376
i think she asks it a question and then says "don't reply" then it moves and she says "I SAID DONT REPLY" but i might be pulling that out my arse because I could barely make it out either.
I'm sure Japan will love watching a movie with fat, ugly western women in it.
http://www.vagabondish.com/female-foreign-japan/
>The pervading theory though, among expats and Japanese alike, was that Japanese men were in fact attracted to western women but were just too intimidated to do anything about it. Western women in Asia were like the Jennifer Anistons of the expat world. Strong, independent, assertive and outspoken, they were interesting to admire from afar, but no man would ever dream of striking up a conversation with one. Western women were so different, so foreign, they were virtually un-datable.
>Chris Hemsworth Sci-Fi Comedy Movie
>Chris Hemsworth gets top billing in trailer
>a white male
>>70549171
Not marshmallow man. It's the Logo Ghost. For some fucking reason the main Villain Rowan randomly declares "Choose a form" and the Nigress says "I think the logo is pretty cute!" and he turns into it. Not joking. Whole plot has been leaked and it's confirmed legit
>>70549639
>ugly ass bitch self inserting and juxtapositioning herself to Aniston
>strong, independent, assertive, outspoken
Yes. That's why you're single and lonely. Not because you're ugly and delusional.
This is the female equivalent of elliot rodger
>>70549809
>admire from afar
I wonder if she actually thinks people does it to her.
>>70549639
>>70549809
>>70549846
female neckbeards. I wonder if this woman has the capabilities to gun down people like rodgy rod did
>>70548606
What if the controversy was simply an elaborate trick to avoid the costs of traditional advertising? Why spend money to promote your product when you can use gender bait to stir people into paying attention. You could argue such a tactic would kill your film, but this is different because of the times and its female led.
Maybe we should just stop remaking old movies and move on to newer ideas. No one will do it because they know an established brand with remakes/sequels will always bring in some amount of cash. It's time to move on and do something else rather than hoping to cash in on the "I seen the original and I'll take my kids" crowd.
>>70549912
The term is legbeards
>>70549506
>The gorilla jokes
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>70548606
Did someone say Ghostbusters trailer reaction!?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WonpBqhL4Dc
I liked when the laser failed and she said "wah wah"
>>70548606
>Chris Hemsworth sci-fi comedy
Why is noone saying how fucking sexist and retarded a mannequin coming to life is?
Feminism truly is crushing critisizm of this fucking movie, even here on tiny white dick neckbeard basement central that is /tv/.
>>70548763
>>70548673
What did she say?
So how much money from this movie is going to help underprivileged women?
>>70548606
>0:30
>male ghostbusters make proton pack
> it works first time
>female ghostbusters make proton pack
> it fails
>>70548606
Without China it will be a fucking bomb.
Not related but Doc Strange will also suffer the lack of China. They are not allowing magic and ghosts.
GHOSTUUUUBUSTAUU~
>>70548606
>Hemsworth more funny than the women
kek
>>70550475
No clue, something like "Please don't UNGA BUNGA BIX NOOD!"
>>70549344
That's not Kylie Griffin.
>>70549388
Egon was.
>>70549506
I like it.
>>70549912
Rodger knifed an equal number
People seem to forget that
>>70548606
This movie is for all you annoying idiots who thought "Gungdam Style" was funny as shit.
>>70551315
So kids and normies?
Yeah, no shit.
GHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSTABUSTAAAAA
>>70549357
>thinking the Asians are the only one
the only part i liked in that trailer is the Asian guy saying Ghostbusters...
funnier than anything from the actual trailer
>>70549344
>tfw you own that
Feels fucking good, one of the better Kotobikuyas.
>>70549779
Does the nigger only shout her lines?
>>70551998
That is literally the only setting Leslie Jones comes with.
Watch any of her SNL appearances or God forbid, her stand-up. See if you haven't put a gun in your mouth after 5 minutes.
>>70548885
nah the script implies they do their first ghostbusting, then get noticed, but the gov doesnt want any part of it. end is pretty much after they beat the big twinkie man
>>70548606
>>70548885
Finally, after all these years, we've become Ghostbusters.
>>70549698
OLIOLIOLIOOOOO
Wow, what a novel concept!
>there will never be an article about how they only gave the black one 1.2 seconds of screen time becasuse the sjws can't hate this movie
>>70552178
what does hank hill have to do with new ghost busters?
>>70550885
>that Kylie Griffin thread on /aco/
>>70552750
that's AVGN
>>70549639
>Jennifer Anistons
could you drop a more irrelevant name? wtf
>>70552917
bullshit, its a young hank hill
>>70552750
I tell you what that boy ain't right Peggy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8
>>70548606
>Japan actively downplaying Patty.
I'm pretty sure it's not a "Lady Thaaang".
>>70548606
Literally the only good bit of that whole trailer was the Japanese voice over at the end.
>the Stay Puft man is Dan Akroyd in motion sensor
yeah okay fine
>>70552954
Are you retarded?
>>70549546
god she is out of this world
why is this movie alienating the virgin crowd?
>>70548606
DAILY REMINDER THAT THIS MOVIE WILL FEATURE A MALE AND FEMALE SLIMER
DRIVING A CAR
THE FEMALE SLIMER IS DRIVING IT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
https://www.yahoo.com/news/paul-feig-over-sexist-backlash-001511186.html
>>70553433
> "In the original they were kinda cartoony, which I like. But I want everything in this movie to be as real as a movie based on fake stuff can be." - Paul Feig
Did he succeed, anons?
>>70554021
he made it faker than a Scooby Doo movie.
>>70548606
>0:24
Bill Murray as a ghost?
>>70554021
>2016
> Fat shaming ghosts still a thing
BRAVO PAUL SO PROGRESSIVE
>>70549506
What David Lynch movie is this?
It says something when literally the only funny part of that trailer was the Korean guy saying "GHOST-AH-BUSTAHS!" at the end.
>>70549591
found the /r/ShitRedditSays feminist shillposter
why don't you get raped and murdered already? lmao
>>70554759
>triggered /v/edditer
GHOOOSTOOOOOBUSUTAAAAS!
>>70554791
>nah I'm not a feminist from /r/ShitRedditSays
>baaaawww I'm not triggered, you are
lmao my sides
>>70548673
>the most sexist Asian nation
You mean the one that doesn't murder baby girls?
Doesn't look as bad as Warcraft.
>>70554838
Now I know for sure it's a /v/edditer who made the video
>>70548606
DISHONARABRU DISPRAY
>>70549168
>American """""journalism"""""
>>70549168
check out this baby man
>>70554867
The "video" was made by Sony.
Are you this triggered by people who don't want to see your shitty ghostbusters remake /r/ShitRedditSays?
lmao
>baww muh peaches
top kek
>>70548885
Quite frankly, everyone should be able to guess the entire movie based on the trailers. There won't be any surprises.
Also Chris Hemsworth's character is a mansplainer? Is that new for this trailer or did I just block it out? Either way, absolute shit.
>>70549168
Molly, all that salt is bad for your heart.
>>70554941
ok /v/eddit
>>70554996
ok /r/ShitRedditSays
The most hilarious thing is your constantly asspained shilling is only turning this place more right wing lol
>>70549529
the main reason people hate it is because we're tired of fucking pointless remakes.
If they cast Kevin Smith and Seth Rogen people would be just as mad.
But by casting women they can now use it as a smoke screen and say people are just sexist.
Fantastic Four was a critical failure not because they cast a black guy as the human torch, but because people are fucking tired of this shit.
I knew as soon as it was announced that it would suck shit, even before I knew who was cast.
Same deal with Ghostbusters 2016, we can tell it's going to be bad.
That's why James Rolfe is telling people to just not see it if they don't want to like it, because it's become a cultural phenomenon where everyone has to live-tweet, blog and review every shitty movie.
Everyone saw Batman v Superman after it was universally panned, because people felt they had to see it.
I've already heard people say the same about Ghostbusters, that they think it will be poor but they "already know" they're going to see it.
You're supporting shitty remakes with this mentality.
>"B-But you don't know if a movie is good or not until you watch it!
This is true.
If you don't see the movie your opinion is worthless.
But that's fine.
Not everyone needs an opinion on anything.
I never saw Grown Ups 2 so I can't critique it, but I am 100% okay with that.
If people were satisfied with not having an opinion on everything, this shit wouldn't get made so often.
>>70548606
More leak confirmation. I have no reason not to believe it now.
Who the fuck did the subtitle work for this trailer? It's shocking, multiple lines don't even match up.
The "I think the word we're looking for is apocalypse" line is subtitled as "Looks like we pissed him off".
>>70555061
Thanks SpongeBob. Couldn't have said it better myself.
>>70555128
Stop being sexist, the movie and everything about it is perfect.
>>70548606
I just sat through a thirty second ad to watch ad for a movie I don't even want to see. I fucking hate myself
>>70548606
omfg that bit where the streamer gets erectile dysfunction
HOLY FUUUUUUUUUUUCK
THEY ACTUALLY DID IT THE ABSOLUTE MADMANS
>>70555216
>watching ads on youtube
I thought adblockers were common knowledge nowadays?
Also the trailer itself is an ad.
>>70555260
maybe he likes people getting paid form his views?
>>70555305
Youtubers don't deserve money.
>>70555305
I'm sure he likes the taste of sweaty taint too,because he sounds like a faggot.
>>70555305
Based on the complaint I suspected he didn't.
Also
>likes giving money to Sony
*piano solo*
Ding ding dong ding dang dong
Dingy dangy ding dong
>>70554021
Yes, having small pistols in the proton pack, which is a nuclear device created by a bunch of failed scientist and then licking these pistols in sign of victory is indeed quite realistic, At least not as cartoony as the original, of course
>>70548606
>they kept the photon licking
>>70554021
So, what he's saying is the original Ghostbusters were cartoony and silly, and this is the new real serious Ghostbusters?
I just threw up in my mouth a little. What the fuck is he saying?
>>70555626
He's trying to sell his shitty movie.
>>70548606
if they focused more on the ghosts this movie might be decent. instead they focus on female comedians who arent all that funny. and then they make the bad guy the ghostbuster symbol ghost.
>licking a gun
>limp dick joke
>slime in vagina joke
hilarious. can't wait.
>>70549168
Guys this woman is clearly mentally retarded. There's no point making fun of her.
>>70555646
Yes, and so are the trailers. Did he really direct this movie?
>>70555726
Evidently yes. I mean look at this faggot.
I have no idea why he even bothers with a beard wife anymore.
>>70555749
I mean holy shit, how the fuck did he manage to be gayer than Mark Gatiss?
>Go watch a movie
>Trailer is shown
>The crowd is silent
Even the commercials before that got more attention and reaction
>>70552856
Oh thank you for reminding me about that thread
>>70549506
>there are people who unironically find this shit funny
>>70555905
>t. ledditor
>>70548606
Asians are going to see it because they'll think the girlbusters are going to fight Buddha at the end
Clever trailer for the eastern market tbqh
>>70554711
Exactly this
>>70548606
>chris hemsworth is the first name listed in the trailer
FUCKING SEXISTS
HE'S NOT EVEN A MAIN CHARACTER
So cringeworthy. How do you cram this much cringe in trailers? Seriously?
every scene with that black chick is her screaming
>time to go shoot up the theater when this thing opens
>>70548606
>GHOSTO-BUSTAS!
Best part of the trailer.
>>70556323
I aint afraid o' no ape!
>>70556197
>they have a Chris Hemsworth mansplaining joke in the movie
>>70555681
Not even that, they dont seem to have any chemistry, from what weve seen there doesnt seem to be any back and forth, they just say punchlines and stand next to eachother, or on their own suprisingly. Theres no bantz between them that makes them feel like a team, they all feel separate from eachother.
>>70556323
The scenes with her in it are probably the only kinda funny ones in the trailer though
Except for that part when she says "the power of (something or other) compels you!". Everything leading up to that was ok
>>70556611
The power of patty.
She's patty.
>lone gunshot echoes in the distance
Why so many dislikes? It looks like incoherent childish shit, but any modern blockbuster does.
>>70549168
>They're really not going to get away with it this time
I hope the whole world sees what a hypocritical, hateful farce feminism really is.
>>70556743
because muh childhood
Hey, how come this movie has Chris Hemsworth?
Oh, cause sex icon for female audience.
Original movie did not have anything like that for guys or girls.
>muh feminism
>>70556743
The great lumbering beast of the general public has been spurred into awakening by the egregious social fuckups surrounding the marketing of this movie.
Most women, god bless them, just don't really want to be men.
>>70556743
Im still baffled how people press like or dislike at all, I bet people still read and leave comments frequently on youtube too. Form your own opinion instead of bandwagoning with everyone else.
>>70556817
Are you me?
I don't understand why people participate in that kind of social media culture so much.
>>70556817
>Form your own opinion instead of bandwagoning with everyone else.
Not how society works unfortunately, if you haven't noticed. Especially with young people: they give their attention to things that the people around them give their attention to.
>>70556743
Because the creators of this film just happened to choose a movie that has a fan base that has been waiting for a proper sequel for years and years.
So instead of coming up with something original, they use this reboot as a trojan horse for feminazi ideals.
The may as well piss on the grave of Harold Raimis.
>>70556840
It's not hard to understand.
So the chances are that, despite abstaining from the most apparent common average, you are also more influenced by the social environment around you than you'd care to admit.
>>70556817
I click like on a rare occasion if I genuinely like something and want it to be spammed to my200K subscribers
>>70556795
>Oh, cause sex icon for female audience.
Their hypocrisy is extreme and disgusting
>>70556893
Exactly my point.
>>70556921
Not to pick straws, but your point was that it's "unfair." Better to be a little more brutal in this case, imo. They're in a weak position. Can't hurt to go for the throat while we have this chance.
>>70549546
>tfw no Tilda as David Bowie's ghost
>>70553433
It's basically the go to insult for women.
Why are we still talking about a thing that no one will watch?
>>70556868
You'd think so but I'm autistic. Being socially oblivious isn't always a bad thing.
>>70557205
Just judging from the way you use words, not to mention memes, I can tell that's probably not the case; you're probably not really autistic. Maybe socially inhibited as a result of self esteem issues, but not autistic.
>>70549779
Why didn't she say something like a tiny bug then step on it. It makes no sense.
>>70556962
No, I'm not saying it's unfair, I'm saying that they are hypocrites.
The point is, if this movie isn't more geared towards women in particular, then why cast such an actor?
In other words, there didn't need to be any sexually appealing characters in the original, so why now?
Because they want to please their target audience.
the original film was for anyone to enjoy, but as I said before, this is a trojan horse for feminazi ideals.
they should have come up with their own film for their own agenda, instead of taking something that fans have been waiting forever for and then shitting all over it.
Simple as that.
>>70557242
Thanks for that, anon. I have tried pretty hard at times to emulate normality.
>Promotional material and presentation for original GB
>4 guys joining together to do a job. They all have their own little quirks but are genuinely decent well adjusted people. Humor comes from their subtle interactions with each other, non-believers and ghost they bust.
>Promotional material and presentation of new GB
>4 outrageous women. Their personalities are amped up to 11. Humor comes from ridiculous situations, yelling and pointing out the fact that they're women.
>>70557421
>>70549698
>>Chris Hemsworth gets top billing in trailer
>>a white male
We've gotta use this to trigger the SJW and make THEM protest this movie.
That way this movie loses all support and guarantees its flop
>>70555749
Why do I get the feeling Paul Feig wants me to leave Europe and make kids do loads of exams?
>>70549168
>Hit the thumbs down folks!
Hit THUMBS UP. Too many downs and they can spin it as a HATE CAMPAIGN MY MISOGYNISTS. More 50/50 rating will still be devastating.
>>70557474
I don't think it's so much a racial thing, though that would be an obviously funny leverage tool.
I think it's how they have to have Chris Hemsworth in it so a few girls in the audience can lick their fingers and rub their twats.
I'm not hating on the actor, just the reason he is there.
It proves just how fucked up the film makers are.
>>70557538
Can a parody even count as sequel?
>AW HELL NAW
Chris Hemsworth seems like the only good thing about this movie
>>70549779
>>70551943
>mfw he has a red bow-tie despite the logo not having one
>just so it evokes the Staypuft Marshmellow man more, with his red hankie
>>70557631
Agreed. His bit in the other trailer where he's showing the Ghostbusters logo was funny.
Don't cross the revenue streams!
>>70548606
I'm gonna see this because i <3 wiig
How can we use the fact that the marketers intentionally hid the gorilla from the foreign markets?
This could easily be used to accuse them of endorsing racism for profits
>>70549779
I'm assuming the red bow tie is something that Rowan will wear throughout the movie. We haven't seen his ugly ass yet as he's the personification of an aborted fetus with hair, and has no place as a Ghostbusters villain.
>>70557797
Calculate the % of facetime she got in each trailer.
Raise the question of why it was so much lower in this one.
Don't TELL why. Ask.
It's not something I would see, but I don't think it looks that bad.
>>70557888
Read the leak. That's the reason why so many people are certain it's gonna be awful, and it is absolutely confirmed at this point.
>>70557800
No, it's so he looks like Staypuft which had a red hankerchief around his neck. That's literally it.
>>70558060
I don't doubt this. The thing is, though, is I'm pretty sure we haven't seen the living Rowan just yet.
Sure, the bow-tie is a handkerchief replacement, but you can bet your ass they'll stick a similar bow tie on the actor as a half-assed explanation of its presence.
>>70549424
It has female empowerment and loads of quips. 90% easy on Rottentomatoes.
>>70548606
>GHOSTUBUSTAAZ
>>70548606
GOSTO BASTAS
>>70553433
>eat my stream, a-hole!
>eat my proton!
>Rowan, collect your virginity from the lost and found
>Busting makes me feel good
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>70558060
>implying it's that clever
It's so the logo ghost will have red on it, just like the logo itself. They couldn't exactly hang a no symbol around its neck.
>>70553433
>"At one point I had to tell Paul 'Hey, I'm a comedian. I'm not a fucking stunt person! What the fuck, yo?"
christ almighty
>>70558318
Can you guess, /tv/, which one of the sophisticated comediennes featured in the film said this?
>>70549698
I think it's funnier that he's going to be 'objectified' as fuck in the movie and nobody is gonna say a fuckin word.
Why do I have a feeling that it's gonna have a Fart Jokes in it
Not just one but more
>>70558369
supposedly there's a queef joke
>>70550883
She clearly said 'NO JOHN PROCTOR TICHIBA GOOD TICHIBA GOOD'
>>70558359
It seems like they're making him a "dumb" character for example when says they should build something to stop the ghosts and the puffy one says "that's kind of what we're doing here"
i.e. Men stupid and women smart
>>70549779
Yyyyep. Shit ass movie is a shit ass movie.
Also GHOSTSAREREALGHOSTSAREREAL!!!! Really? Fuck you. Fuck this hyperactive ADD movie.
>>70558243
How is this even okay? Seriously...what the fuck.
>>70550055
It's like you hate money or something.
Also in case you're worried they're ripping off the Stay Puft with Rowan....fear not, they're ripping off the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man in full anyway.
Except he's one of the parade floats that comes to life. Name of this toy is "Stay Puft Balloon Ghost"
Is nothing sacred? Won't Someone please think of the manbabies.
>>70558698
The love of money is the root of all evil
>>70556323
There won't be anyone in the theater though
>>70558848
Yet it's not actually evil.
>>70558863
The things people are willing to do for it clearly are. Like rebooting franchises ad infinitum. We're at a point where fucking remakes are getting remade.
>>70558886
>remakes are getting remade
I need examples of this
>>70558863
Evil is the love of money squared
what ever love of money you have, multiply it by itself to find out how evil you are
>>70558941
The Thing. The Carpenter Thing was a remake.
>>70558941
Last House on the Left, remake of the Wes Craven film of the same name, which was a remake of The Virgin Spring.
I'd cite The Thing as another example, but they had the decency to make the modern movie a prequel.
>>70559014
The MEW movie was a prequel. Look it up.
>>70559014
>>70559071
Thanks m8s, horror movies were the first thing that came to my mind as well
>>70559094
>MEW movie
Was Mewtwo Strikes Back a remake?
>>70559129
Don't get cunty.
>>70559129
MEW Two was the sequel to the MEW movie.
>>70558863
No, but making a mockery of both a beloved comedy series and the feminist movement in a single cashgrab is pretty much the definition of evil in filmmaking.
>>70549168
>We want people to watch our movie
>Insult them
holy shit are they actually autistic?
>>70559094
Officially a prequel. A remake for all intents and purposes.
>"at one point I had to tell Paul 'Hey I'm a comedian. I'm not a fucking stunt person! What the fuck, yo?"
I'm sorry...what?
Is this just lazy cunts being lazy cunts? Where's the dedication to, you know, doing your fucking job?
>>70559185
I wonder who they found to be a stunt person for the loud one
>>70559184
>Officially a prequel. A remake for all intents and purposes.
>muh headcanon
You were wrong. Stop being a retard now.
>>70559256
It is basically a remake. They threw in the prequel angle to appease the original fans.
>GHOSTU BUSTAHS!
>>70559071
that was pretty good though as a remake.
Original is much better though.
>>70559315
Point still stands. Remakes of remakes exist. This shit is getting out of hand.
I'm shocked this movie continues to look worse and worse the more that is shown.
>>70558389
The only way there won't be a queef joke is if the producers cut it in post.
All we know is it made the early cut.
>>70557474
>>70559860
Ugh.
Ugh.
Slime bubbles.
>>70548606
>WAY TO GO-BUSTERS
:sigh:
+1 dislike. come on people. it's only about 4 to 1 dislikes to likes
>>70560447
>Sign in the door literally says they are open
Come on man.
>>70553433
>v-virgin
L M A O
>>70561121
try harder pumpkin
>>70561176
>Says they're open
>In fact they're closed; is why the store is vacant
>This contradiction incites anger in the transfat, which explains her behavior
>>70561412
Or she is just retarded like all SJWs.
>>70559071
Last House remake was pretty good. The ending was a little too over the top, but the first 3/4 of the movie was good, well acted, and had great cinematography.
Reminder that Winston was completely ignored in the Ghostbusters Pachinko machine, to the point of them even cropping him out of movie footage.
https://youtu.be/-fEDUAYGoTw
>>70559781
>The full Spill crew won't be around to shit on this
Fuck.
>>70559333
Nice trips, but remakes of remakes was a thing even in the 1920s/30s. How many times can you make Dracula? Fuck, there was an english and spanish version filmed at the same time.
The problem, like you said, it's that it's getting out of hand. Hollywood's motto is to run thing into the ground now.
>>70561434
Identity politics is not understanding. If you want to beat them, you have to understand them. People who play us-them games will always be suckers for the people who do actually have understanding.
>>70559256
He's right. And you're a fag.
>>70562431
>>70559184
>After creating the Dawn of the Dead remake, producers Marc Abraham and Eric Newman began to look through the Universal Studios library to find new properties to work on.[17] Upon finding John Carpenter's 1982 film The Thing, the two convinced Universal to create a prequel instead of a remake, as they felt that remaking Carpenter's film would be like "paint(ing) a moustache on the Mona Lisa".[18] Eric Newman explained; "I'd be the first to say no one should ever try to do Jaws again and I certainly wouldn't want to see anyone remake The Exorcist... And we really felt the same way about The Thing. It's a great film. But once we realized there was a new story to tell, with the same characters and the same world, but from a very different point of view, we took it as a challenge. It's the story about the guys who are just ghosts in Carpenter's movie – they're already dead. But having Universal give us a chance to tell their story was irresistible."
Fuck off now.
>>70549196
'BUSTIN MAKES ME FEEL GOOD!"
Reminder this movie is going to make a billion dollars and get three sequels because normies don't care about what people say on message boards.
>>70562503
Studio medling is what made it more of a remake than a prequel. The original script and what we got are very different. Same with the sfx, the studio requested (forced them) to put cgi over every practical effects they made because "kids like that video game look".
>>70562571
Maybe they're wishing up?
TMNT isn't doing so hot, nor Apocalypse...
>>70548606
Funniest thing in the trailer is the chinese guy going Ghost-stew-boostas!!!
>>70562869
TMNT is decent. The last one was shit, but they really fixed a lot of the shittier aspects of that reboot with the new movie.
>>70557421
Don't forget that the four women are the best of the best at what they do.
Three top tier scientists and the world's only real expert on New York.
VS
Two quirky scientists, one conman, and a guy that just answered an ad in the paper.
>>70562970
Agreed, but it's still a shitty, poorly done movie.
I just like elements of it.
>>>70563067
>the four women are the best of the best at what they do
That bothered me the most desu
>>70553224
I used to jack it photos of her as the evil queen from Narnia on the reg. Damn.