a chance? yeah
>>70537144
we've been fed shit for 10 years now, even watching actual shit would be a cinematic experience.
ffs anon, people go and watch shit like warcraft, x-men etc. exiting the cinema and writting "it was a good movie".
all her movies are middle of the road. no exceptions. what does it mean to be "good"? money made? fan appreciation? awards for quality? it will have none of these things, but it won't be a failure. it'll get some recognition, but ultimately be forgotten.
>>70537144
Are there nude scenes in this weebshit? If she gets naked, expect good sales.
>>70537144
Yes. Totally.
Especially if you arent as autistic thinking the woman must be azn
first for kitano
yes
>>70537275
in GitS? yes she practically runs around naked. from her? prob not
>>70537144
>Is there a chance a bunch of white westerners whitewashing a classic Japanese work WON'T be utter shit?
Nope, sorry, it will be utter shit.
>>70537260
>it'll get some recognition, but ultimately be forgotten.
As with every film made today.
The days of classics are over. t's all been done.
>>70537144
At least it will make me appreciate the original even more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swmWZGgt4vk
Maybe the sequel will even look good after.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IGTiFuDjTI
>>70537144
It's already good because it made liberals cry.
was lucy goood?
was under the skin good?
why is she so smug
>Directed by the Snow White and the Huntsman guy
Just abandon ship before it crashes. Nothing to see here.
bad casting, so no
>>70537680
Lucy had a semi-interesting premise but overall it was awful.I only watched the nude scenes in Under the Skin to be honest
