What went wrong?
he couldnt save himself from himself
>>70488933
movies became more about story and character development/analysis than cinematography
>>70488933
Real objective comparison you got there, slugger.
disney jews testing how cheap they can go without plebs noticing it.
>>70489655
this
Phase 1 was bait.
Phase 2 was testing the waters to see how shitty and cheap they could get without complaints from audience.
Phase 3 is reaping the benefits and churning out mediocrity without worries.
>>70488933
What's that Kino on the before part called?
>>70489054
same trilogy
CW looks Disney Channel tier
>>70489020
Nice b8. TFA did both better than TWS and CW did.
>>70489809
Phase 1 wasn't Disney tho. It was Paramount until the Thor movie. Disney took The Avengers and Iron Man 3 from them and they only agreed in putting the Paramount logo there.
they got better and it reflects in the box office
>>70490433
Is Avatar the bestest film ever?
>>70490159
cap 1 was always the best
joe johnston delivered
>>70490470
>le moving goal posts face
>>70490433
ahh tony be in my movie
I love the MCU movies for the most part, but my biggest complaint is that they don't have interesting cinematography. Even BvS had some good shots.
Were the early films really any better? I'll have to watch them again.
>>70488933
>left row image
>freight car drawing
>moments later, Bucky falls from a freight car
BRAVO JOHNSTON
>>70490700
The early ones felt like actual movies.
Apart from that, they had more violence and weren't too quippy (except Thor 1).
