me
>>70343456
Kubrick
>>70343456
Max Landis
Who is James Cameron?
>>70343489
Terminator 1 is boring af
>>70343489
what is Avatar
>>70343456
Zack Snyder.
>>70343456
michael mann
Michael Mann
Christopher Nolan
>>70343504
t. 16 year old with add
>>70343456
Who are Joel and Ethan Coen
Matthew Vaughn
>>70343476
Eyes Wide Shut
>>70343531
>Mann
Hacker movie with Thor
>Nolan
Baneposting the movie
>>70343456
Who is Tommy Wiseau
>>70343456
Nolan and Tarantino only contrarian faggots would disagree
>>70343456
Who is Christopher Nolan
>>70343544
hail ceasar
>>70343521
Blackhat
>>70343517
Suckerpunch
>>70343531
Dark knight rises
Mel Gibson is the only correct answer
>>70343580
too bad tarantino never made a good movie either
>>70343590
>>70343559
The Dark Knight rises is bad meme, will this ever stop?
>>70343590
>Dark knight rises
Rotten Tomatoes gave it an 84. I loved it. All my friends loved it. It's not a bad movie, you fucking manchild.
>>70343456
Charles Laughton
>>70343507
A really well made movie with great action and top notch directing. Why you asking?
>>70343626
it isnt awful unless you compare it to TDK or BB
>>70343559
>Eyes Wide Shut is bad
>>70343517
>Zack
>>70343624
>>70343626
I thought all you Nolan dicklickers left here two years ago
>>70343590
>Dark knight rises
how is this bad?
Uwe Boll
>>70343456
PTA just barley
>>70343590
I haven't seen Hail Cesar but it got well reviewed and I read that it's pretty classic coen brothers.
Stop being a contrarian edge lord you moron
>>70343559
i know this is a troll, but for all the reddit/summer newfags, these three are all great movies, don't let this memester lead you astray
>>70343566
Came to post this.
Also nice dubs m8.
>>70343559
>Hacker movie with Thor
Honestly not that bad.
>>70343456
Who is Michael Bay
Disagree all you want but I don't think there's a single Michael Bay movie I wouldn't watch. They're all just light hearted entertainment with explosions and cool shit. Meanwhile there are many, many directors who have at least one movie which is super pretentious or just really really shit.
>>70343965
Oh come on. The transformers movies are just really really shit.
>>70343881
This.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VT1J65KHX8E
>>70343982
They're probably my least favourite of his movies. But they're still watchable. They're just dumb entertainment, they don't try to take themselves too seriously.
Meanwhile even someone like Chris Nolan, who I generally like, made a movie like Interstellar which is pretty good for most of it but then has a cringeworthy, sickly, schmultzy, terrible ending that I literally can't even watch without wanting to blow my own head off
>love is the fifth dimension!
Christ what a fucking hack
>>70343960
i loved it, all the negative reviews talk about it how it's pacing sucks, but i have a pretty shit attention span and normally it takes me 4 hours to finish a 2 hour movie because i'll pause to dick around every so often, but i remember being fully hooked with this the entire time.
and they all bitched about hemsworth being a smart dude, when in my life the smartest people i've ever met happen to be very attractive too
>>70343566
the steamroller and the violin
there will be no leave today
>>70343544
intolerable cruelty
the ladykillers
>>70343521
never made a good movie
>>70343517
meme
>>70343489
piranha
>>70343476
fear and desire
killer's kiss
>>70343583
Interstellar
TDKR
Insomnia
Inception
>>70343965
>>70344053
>they don't try to take themselves too seriously.
>which is super pretentious
Why is this the most offensive thing to you?
I am saying this as someone who really doesn't watch many smart movies but it seems it is the only thing you hate.
The worst a movie can do apparently.
>>70343456
Tarantino. Even though /tv/ hates his guts, I think all his movies are not bad.
>>70343965
>>70344053
holy shit you're not trolling
bad boys 2 is a good action movie i will give you that, but transformers shit the bed incredibly hard for me. i wanted to see badass robot fights, that's all i expected and i that i needed to be happy, but every fight is so closeup and choppy you can't tell what the fuck is going on. and they should have gotten someone more badass than shia lebeouf, i mean come on.
>>70344085
Basically yeah. I would rather watch a dumb action flick than some sickly, schmultzy, emotional crap any day of the week. Maybe it's because I have testicles.
Alfred Hitchcock
>>70344162
Seems like you are personally insulted if a movie seems smart.
And you are defending micheal bay as a flawless director.
Clearly bait
>>70344160
They're watchable for me.
Also he's got other great movies like The Rock, The Island, Pain and Gain, Armageddon. And obviously the original Bad Boys.
>>70344162
It's because your testicles are the size of raises, like your brain.
>>70344076
>michael mann
>never made a good movie
>what is heat
>what is collateral
>>70344141
I even enjoyed Death Proof
>>70343456
Nolan
>>70344141
Me too
>>70344162
this is painful to read, grow the fuck up dude. i'm not telling you to go out and watch crap like the notebook but if you can't enjoy a movie that deals with themes of love, spirituality, and the human condition you're just an insecure faggot.
>>70343456
>>70344076
>Interstellar
>TDKR
>Insomnia
>Inception
This is a list of Nolan's bad movies. All great RT scores and movies most everyone loves.
Stay mad fags
>>70344198
No I like smart movies, I also posted the Coen brothers, who I love, because they're smart.
I don't like pretentious emotional bullshit. If I'm watching a movie on the TV and they comes on I'll just stop watching
I'm also not saying Michael Bay is flawless, I'm not even saying anything close to that, I really don't understand how you managed to get to that straw man. I'm saying there isn't a movie of his I wouldn't watch. Which isn't the same for most directors. Eg with James Cameron I wouldn't watch Avatar again because it was shit.
>>70344204
>>70344241
My testicles are the size of grapefruit nigga
No I'm not insecure, I am secure in knowing I hate schmultzy crap
Sorry that I have different opinions to you anon, maybe when you graduate high school you'll realise that happens sometimes.
>>70344160
What I came for:
Robots fighting
Comfy nostalgia
Action
Energon Cubes
What I got:
Quips
Explosions
Stereotypes
Allspark, spectacles, Egyptian mythology meets Ancient Aliens
Chaos
>>70344273
>>Sorry that I have different opinions to you anon
Perfectly fine
>no micheal bay movie is bad because I have testicles
100% retarded.
you are a walking parody.
>>70343590
>implying dark knight rises is bad
Nice try
Why does /tv/ hate or pretend to hate Nolan and Tarantino, I don't understand it?
>>70344270
MGS 4
>>70344270
>>70344207
>what is collateral
a piece of shit
>what is heat
a tv mini-series uncomfortably squeezed in a 3-hour film, characterized by the typical horrible paciong(at times), embarassing meme (over)acting by Pacino and every single member of the female cast (except for Hershlag), and a bunch of other shit i don't wan't get into right now
Basically Heat is my number one candidate for the most overrated films of all time
>>70344270
anon, this is a thread for people who haven't made crap, not for people who only make crap
Sergio Leone is the only acceptable answer
>>70344076
Lady killers is great, where does is "bad" meme come from?
>>70343456
Uwe Boll
>>70344273
>anything emptional is pretentious
dude are you legit autistic?
>>70344369
MSG2 and everything after was crap
>>70344419
>Lady killers is great, where does is "bad" meme come from?
From the existence of the original film
>>70344322
Ah so that's why you're so rustled by my opinions, because you feel personally threatened by it
Sorry mate but emotional crap is inherently female
>>70344439
No I'm not saying ANY emotion is pretentious. Shawshank Redemption is pretty emotional I guess and that's probably my favourite movie ever. But pretentious emotion I can't stand, and a lot of movies do it these days
Sorry that my opinion and tastes rustle you anon but that's how it is, I'm not going to change it
>>70344469
Hello red.dit
>>70344486
>because you feel personally threatened by it
you are the one being threatened by anything smart.
also when did smart/pretentious turn into emotional and female?
>>70343531
>Mann
Miami Vice
>Nolan
I don't think he's an exceptional director but to his credit he hasn't actually made a bad movie.
Also never made a great one.
>>70344486
>HEHE UR JIMMIES R RUSTLED
bro, you claimed that all of michael bay's films are objectively good. just because i think you're a retard doesn't mean i'm mad. it means i think you're a retard.
Edgar Wright.
>>70344410
Coloss of Rhodos and Last Days of Pompeii were a stretch, not very good but also not very bad
>>70344536
Also never made a great one.
The Dark Knight was pretty great
>>70344602
>bro, you claimed that all of michael bay's films are objectively good
technically he only claimed they are all just objectively not bad.
Still wrong but a difference.
>>70343456
Taika Waititi
>>70343626
>>70343624
>capeshit
>good movie
And you have the gall to call him a manchild. Grow the fuck up, you daft cunt.
>>70344655
Disagree to be honest.
It's a strong superhero movie but it's carried a lot by its antagonist, has quite a few scenes that feel superfluous, isn't directed with any discernible or memorable style and its script is pretty hokey at times. It's not a classic nor a high point of the medium in any way.
Who is Paul Verhoeven ?
>>70344773
It was just an epic meme man. In my peer group at the time we literally memorized every retarded scene and quoted them to each other a la baneposting.
>>70344849
The guy who directed Showgirls.
Otherwise, he's a great director.
Fincher.
Wong Kar Wai
>>70344849
What is Showgirls?
>>70344930
>What is Showgirls?
Stripperkino
Me.
>>70344190
What is The Birds?
>>70345145
An amazing masterpiece?
>>70345145
The Birds is your example of a bad movie?
>>70344515
>>70344602
Neither of you are reading, you're literally inventing straw men
>>70344682
I said I would watch all of his movies
Am I claiming objectivity to it? Yeah maybe I guess.
>>70345244
let's recap
>the thread is asking for a director who hasn't made a bad movie
>you suggest michael bay
>i call you a retard for thinking that
>you accuse me of strawmanning
do you even know what that term means? what words did i put in your mouth? what argument did i construct and appropriate to you which i then refuted?
Wes Anderson
>>70343489
Literally who?
>>70343548
This.
>>70345654
I bet you enjoy the films of Wes Anderson
>>70343456
Who is David Fincher
Paul Thomas Anderson
>>70344930
Showgirls is great, fuck off.
>>70343456Witches of Eastwickis great.
>>70345905
Regardless of studio intervention he was still the credited director of Alien 3.
>>70346087
Beyond Turderdome is not.
Very viable candidate though. Very strong CV.
>>70343456
Who is Paul Verhoeven?
Who is John Carpenter?
Who is David Cronenberg?
>>70343548
Kickass is shit.
>>70346123
Thunderdome gets unfairly slagged. The interlude with the kids kind of fucks things, but it isn't awful either.
>>70343548
Kingsman is trash.
>>70346139
>Who is Paul Verhoeven?
Showgirls
>Who is John Carpenter?
Vampires, Ghosts of Mars, VOTD remake
>Who is David Cronenberg?
Cosmopolis
Spielberg
>>70346154
I haven't seen it in about 12 years. I didn't like it at all. I might be more fond of it now but I doubt it.
>>70343456
Who am I?
>>70346191
>crystal skull
he might be one of the most prolific directors of good movies (i.e., he's released a fuckton of good movies), but there are some stinkers in there. I also disliked Tintin.
>>70346191
1941, Flintstones, Temple of Doom
>>70346191
Hook
Crystal Skull
The Terminal
He's one of the greats, but he definitely has a few stinkers.
>>70346255
Temple of Doom is not one of them you dirty curry fucker.
>>70346278
>Temple of Doom is not one of them you dirty curry fucker.
Have always hated it. Personal preference. Crystal Skull is a huge turd but I'd probably pick it before Doom. Really don't like it.
When I was a kid I had the trilogy and despite watching Raiders non stop, Last Crusade quite a bit I must have watched Temple of Doom twice.
Saw it again as an adult and it was still shit.
Hayao Miyazaki
>>70346139
Who are three people who have never been in my kitchen?
>>70344379
>le meme
>le shit
kill yourself
>>70344925
panic room
I would argue that Scorsese hasn't made a bad movie.
The Wolf of Wallstreet was subpar, but that was a flick, and his only one at that.
>>70344925
benjamin button
>>70346191
War of worlds was horrible
>>70343456
Based Jarmusch.
>>70346278
neither is hook cuckboi
>>70346185
The Village of the damned remake was pretty good though.
>>70343559
EWS is one of his best you fucking pleb.
>>70346013
We have a winner.
>>70346370
He's my directorfu but New York, New York isn't very god and I don't like Gangs of New York at all.
>>70346447
I disagree.
>>70346185
Ghosts of Mars and Vampires are both flat-out great, and VOTD is minor but not bad. The only actual bad thing Carpenter's ever done was his second Masters of Horror episode.
>>70343476
>>70343488
>>70343489
>>70343517
>>70343521
>>70343531
>>70343544
>>70343548
>>70343566
>>70343570
>>70343580
>>70343583
>>70343881
>>70343917
>>70343965
>>70344141
>>70344190
>>70344219
>>70344247
>>70344270
>>70344420
>>70344607
>>70344706
>>70344849
>>70344925
>>70345654
>>70345905
>>70346013
>>70346087
>>70346139
>>70346191
>>70346407
All wrong. Get some taste embryos.
>>70343456
Uwe Boll
>>70346596
>Ghosts of Mars and Vampires are both flat-out great
>>70345312
You can have whatever opinion you want but I'm saying that to me, Michael Bay hasn't made a film I wouldn't watch, and yes I suppose I am claiming that objectively he hasn't made a bad film, in the sense that every one of his movies is more watchable than some of the schmultzy garbage you get from other directors
>>70343456
Terrence Malick
>>70346741
/thread
There's an argument for any single one of his movies being his best
>>70346013
This.
>>70346741
>The Tree of Life
>>70346816
Helloooooooo Reddit
>>70343456
Seth Rogen.
Sergio Leone
>>70343456
Clint Eastwood
>>70344893
>>70344930
>not liking Showgirls
What is wrong with you?
>>70346630
Cool post. You seem pretty bad ass.
this guy shown here diddling his future wife at a basketball game
>>70346741
What is Tree of Life?
>>70346859
Tree of Life was a clusterfuck of a film. It was shit apart from Lacrimosa and "muh that's where god lives".
Get some fucking standards.
>>70347368
Who is George Lucas?
>>70347352
My favorite Malick movie?
>>70344343
Because normies and retards act like they're the pinnacle of modern cinema, which is obviously not true.
>>70347293
I have Internet porn now.
There's no need to watch this movie in my room under the covers.
It has nothing of value other than jerk off material. It's just a high budget cinemax after dark tier movie.
>>70347411
The you are lost.
>>70347368
David Fincher
>>70347368
Nurse Ratchet
>>70344379
I agree with all of this. Heat is average at best, with some nice action. Collateral is unbelievably dull
>>70347378
I'm sorry you felt that way, but don't imply my standards are low because you didn't get anything out of it. I found the story of the family hit very close to home and was very interesting, and the end scene, both "Eternity" and the final look on Sean Penn's face, stirred a ton of emotions for me
>>70344655
It has some of the worst fight choreography I've ever seen in an action blockbuster (that's quite an achievement), and the writing is convoluted in classic Nolan fashion
>>70345167
The Birds is complete schlock
Charles Laughton
>>70347481
That guy admitted he was just memeing.
>>70346816
>>70347352
If you didn't like Tree of Life I'm surprised you enjoyed anything else by Malick. ToL is literally his best film btw
>>70347341
this guy shown here auditioning another young bride
>>70347548
Ok good for him. The Dark Knight Rises is still a shit film and falls apart when you think about it for more than 2 minutes
>>70343456
Robert Bresson
>>70347549
I don't remember any other Malick film featuring Brad Pitt "acting" or CGI dinosaurs that show compassion.
>>70347567
It was also the Dark Knight people were talking about. 2nd one isn't bad at all. 3rd is a meme.
Satoshi Kon
>>70347595
If your gripe with the movie is a CGI dinosaur then maybe you shouldn't be watching anything abstract or allegorical at all, if you're going to nitpick technical details like that.
>>70347643
Man. It was sub standard. I'm sorry if you're blinded by your fanboydom and your fascination about spirito-philosophical imagery with nice music, but the this shit along with the atrocious acting by Pitt took me out of the movie.
>>70347643
Also please explain the great allegorical importance and meaning of the dinosaur scene. Go on. I'll wait.
>>70347446
This. Fincher has not made a single bad movie.
>>70347740
It represents what Malick believes is the presence of grace in nature. The dominant animal shows mercy/compassion to the injured one, and lets it live. It's not of hugely allegorical importance, but it furthers the main theme of the film and develops it.
>>70347710
I'm not blinded by my fondness of the film. I agree, the CGI isn't very good. But allowing that five minute segment to ruin the entire film for you is limiting yourself massively. It doesn't warrant deeming the entire film to be bad. On Brad Pitt, I honestly had no issue with his performance. It seemed fine to me.
Peter Jackson
>>70347927
The Hobbit trilogy is a pile of garbage
>>70347927
LOTR trilogy
>>70347968
Objectively great. The Hobbit films are shit though
>>70347927
Bad Taste is shit and the entire Hobbit trilogy is trash.
>>70347368
The principal in Ferris Bueller's Day Off
Dude just wanted that damn kid to get an education.
>>70347889
>the presence of grace in nature. The dominant animal shows mercy/compassion to the injured one, and lets it live.
Which never happens. If this however was his point, why go all out and use fucking dinosaurs and not a lioness taking care of a deer cup- which actually happened? Was putting dinosaurs acting 'human' in there a choice to piss off American Evangelicals?
It was a shit decision. And yes, a radical drop of quality, even for 5 minutes can ruin a film.
>>70347397
This. Episode I is unironically my favourite SW movie. Also A New Hope is my favourite of the OT
>>70348080
>Which never happens
And then you go ahead and mention an instance in which it did happen (according to you). Way to contradict yourself.
>why go all out and use fucking dinosaurs
Because it subverts the expectation of the viewer more so than the use of any creature from our time. People generally see that period as a ruthless existence of survival of the fittest. Malick is questioning that idea in the context of what he believes. It's also in line with the entire creation sequence. We're given a glimpse into what Malick suggests is the first act of compassion, and the development of that nature vs grace dynamic that's so prominent in the film.
>Was putting dinosaurs acting 'human' in there a choice to piss off American Evangelicals?
No, Malick is a devout christian himself. What he put into this film is based on his philosophical and theological beliefs.
>And yes, a radical drop of quality, even for 5 minutes can ruin a film.
If you let such a minor detail ruin the entire film for yourself, it's pretty clear you didn't want to like it in the first place
>>70343456
Frank Henenlotter
>>70348048
>>70347968
>>70347957
So much bait
So much win
wes anderson
>>70347631
the only right answer in the thread so far.
>>70343590
I saw Hail Ceasar and it wasn't their best but it wasn't a train wreck
Duncan Jones
>>70343517
Based Zack
>>70346630
>>70346630
Seriously though. Name a jarmusch movie that is bad. They range from pretty good to fucking phenomenal.
>>70348069
He molested kids.
>>70352862
I think Only Lovers was pretty bad. I just saw Dead Man though and that more than makes up for it.
>>70346093
But Alien 3 is good
>>70343456
John Carpenter
>>70350943
>Source Code
>>70347710
As someone who grew up in Texas with brothers, Pitt was entirely believable as a father who clearly cared for his kids but wasn't quite sure how to show it
PTA and Terrence Malick.
>>70344759
what he said.
The only good capeshit are V for Vendetta and Watchmen. But they aren't really capeshit.
>>70343456
Who is Ken "fock the british and the capitalists arseholes" Loach?
>>70346240
Spielberg directed Tintin?? but that's one of the most offensive comics of all time, not to mention boring
>>70354207
Yep
>>70343456
George Lucas
>>70346278
>Hook
>bad
I see you grew up
Eli Roth
uwe boll
>>70354653
>>70344343
Because their shit is pretty basic conceptually. For me, it's more of a hatred for his fanbase than it is a hatred for his work.
>>70344607
This is the first objectively correct answer I've scrolled past
>>70343652
>>70343590
Also technically correct, but there should be a "must have made more than five films" rule or something
>>70346370
Scorsese hasn't made a bad movie. He's made sme mediocre flicks (like Kundun or New York, New York) but I've never seen a movie from him that was outright "bad."
Also TWoWS is one of his best.
>>70346741
objectively correct
Wes Anderson is the obvious answer, you plebs
>>70343456
Who is John McTiernan?
>>70344773
The Dark Knight is absolutely the high point of this current glut of comic book movies.
Nolan's Batman trilogy is worth watching, which is more than can be said for most of the other comic book movies, tv shows, and other shit that has been cranked out lately.
Martin Scorsese.
By far his worst film was Boxcar Bertha, and it's still pretty decent.
>>70348297
>
damn really makes you think
My answer is Refn and Darren Aronofsky
>>70348297
blankposting is a dying artform
@70343456
zack snyder
>>70343489
Piranha 2
Titanic
Avatar
>>70343548
Right now this is the only one I agree with in here. He hasn't made anything GOAT, but they've all been fun movies.
Adding Lord and Miller.
>>70343456
Yes, did someone call for me?
MICHAEL BAY!!!!!
KABOOM POW CGI GEARS NARCOLEPSY COMING THIS SUMMER WHOAH DUDE
